Another 9/11 Pentagon Missile Video? Could This Be It?

[Enlightenment101]

http://www.disclose.tv/forum/another...it-t21020.html

[TThinking]

The world knew then that it wasn't a boeing.I just wonder why the american peopleare so easily satisfied with the original investigation.No answers only more questions were raised.If that happened in my country the parliament would get burnt down.(i think,hope).Are the people not interested or have they no internet access....

[Operator]

What source could take aerial view pictures so close to the pentagon while it is a no-fly zone (especially on the moment supreme) ?

I am not disputing that it was most likely a missile attack but every time you see pictures or a video 'sense' the situation at that time
and you will push yourself to ask critical questions.

[tone3jaguar]

I think it is even more likely that the projectile that hit the pentagon was not powered by propellant. If it was a cruise missile then people all over Washington on the missiles approach path would have heard the sound of the missiles jet exhaust. I bet it was an explosive zero gravity advanced weapons platform of some sort.

[TThinking]

So many camera's may be they overlooked one ,whilst taking the videomaterial from the other surrounding buildings.
I am not familiar with the exact situation.Only what's on the vids.

[steve_a]

Hi Enlightnment101,

If this video is real, it's one of the most damning against the Bush government there is. Of course, as with the Twin Towers videos we see a bright light appear at the exact spot where the projectile hit before it reached its' target.

Could this video have been leaked to distract the public from the real problems of today - the crash of the US economy? As for why the aeroplane was in the air to see the occurrence, isn't that one of the jobs of the military to check that everything ran smoothly? Find out the source of who was in the air when the images were taken (eye witnesses said that there was a low flying aeroplane in the air at the time of the explosion).

Question:

The aeroplane which took the images was on a regular flight path at the time? If not, why?
Was it a commercial airline? If it was, was it taken by a passenger? Who?
What was in the air in the direction from where the missile was coming from?
If it was a ground missile, what was set up from that region from where the missile was coming from that would support said missile?
The AA 'missile' could be a red herring. Who are the workers transporting the AA 'missile'? Is it actually a missile? Is it a model plane for an exibition, for example?

So many questions and so many mis-directs coming from this government....

Best regards,

Steve

[Dale]

Very interesting video!

I think the entire idea of a Boeing jet hitting the Pentagon is a little "crazier" than the whole missile theory. There's certainly a wealth of information, literally everywhere on the internet, to support this idea, along with a million other "ideas."

There are definitely a few questions that remain after watching that video clip, such as: what kind of plane had the clearance to fly almost directly above the Pentagon on the morning of September Eleventh, and who filmed the video - were they simply a lucky passenger in the right place at the right time, or might this whole video be another misdirect

[Fredkc]

Ok, a missile/fighter hit the Pentagon.
Next silly question: Wheres the plane? wheres the people?

One thing I am curious about, that I can't find an answer for:
Why is UAL175 still in the air almost an hour after it hit Tower 1?

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdXGSefI6pM

The answer would settle everything. No scientific studies needed.
Seems you can't even get the question asked.

Fred

[TThinking]

Witnesses saw a small plane i believe,maybe that could launched it or it was the missile.
Dont think it was nuclear or anti gravity.Just a missile without a warhead.
Good afford that they made it look like a commercial one but unfortunately big fail as is the rest of 911.
If there ever was a conspiracy,this is the one.

[John Parslow]

Hello all

My comment is: Come on 'The power's that be', you are really letting the side down with this one! Only someone of the meanest intelligence (perhaps an ape) would really believe that this was a Boeing packed with passengers. Where are the bodies; where is the wreckage (did it magically disappear) where was the massive fire-ball as the fuel tanks explode? If anyone has ever seen the aftermath of any plane crash they would know this whole thing is a sham from start to finish. Why don't the American ask the proper questions or is it just a case of mass apathy?

Very much enjoyed the thread though. Love and peace to all. JP

[Dale]

One thing I am curious about, that I can't find an answer for:
Why is UAL175 still in the air almost an hour after it hit Tower 1?

Yup. I absolutely agree. No one's talking about that one. I gave a small presentation a few years ago on the 9/11 attacks, and I found some pretty strange facts about these planes. Flight 93, the jet that was reported to have crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, was also reported by an Ohio news-source to have safely landed at an Ohio airport just twenty minutes prior to it's alleged "crash." The report alleged the plane landed at the airport due to a bomb threat, and that all of the passengers made it out unharmed. I've been trying to find a saved copy of that report online, but it looks like it made a fast exit to stage left

The "official story" on the 9/11 planes sure puts the magic bullet theory to shame. Maybe we'll straighten this magic plane theory out one day.

[Bomack]

Posted by The_Cipher_Replied (here)
Flight 93, the jet that was reported to have crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, was also reported by an Ohio news-source to have safely landed at an Ohio airport just twenty minutes prior to it's alleged "crash." The report alleged the plane landed at the airport due to a bomb threat, and that all of the passengers made it out unharmed. I've been trying to find a saved copy of that report online, but it looks like it made a fast exit to stage left

Does this help Cipher?

From Sifting Through Loose Change http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/.../flight93.html

00:58:45
So if Flight 93 didn't go down in Shanksville, then where?
You ready for this? Cleveland. At 11:43 on September 11th, WCPO, a local TV station in Cincinnati, Ohio, reported that two planes landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport due to a bomb threat. United Airlines identified one of the planes as Flight 93.

Are you confused? Well, it gets better. Check it out.
At approximately 10 AM, Cleveland Hopkins Airport was evacuated, amidst rumors that a hijacked plane was going to land. That was flight 1989. Passengers had to leave, but couldn't drive. They had to walk or hitchhike. Buses weren't allowed to leave. People were sent home. According to Associated Press and local Ohio papers, one plane landed at approximately 10:45. But Delta Airlines confirmed that their plane, Delta 1989, landed in Cleveland at 10:10. Therefore, Flight 93 landed at Cleveland at approximately 10:45.

So the entire basis of the 'Cleveland theory' is a TV news story that ran at 11:43 AM on 9/11/01, amidst the confusion of the attack. AP picked up and posted the story before it had been corrected.

Anyone who watches news coverage from 9/11/01 will see that reporting errors abound. The report that Delta Flight 1989 was hijacked is just one example, and led to the questioning of the passengers at the Cleveland airport. Here is an account by a passenger on Flight 1989.
00:59:54
Authorities searched Delta 1989 for over two hours, and passengers were questioned individually.
"Our plane was directed to an isolated area of the airport, and we waited for over two hours in quarantine before FBI agents and bomb sniffing dogs came out to the plane."
-Anonymous, September 13th, 2001,
http://256.com/gray/thoughts/2001/20010912/
The Plain Dealer reported that the plane was evacuated at 12:30. But the Akron Beacon reports that a plane was evacuated at 11:15. Which would make that Flight 93.

If you have trouble following the logic of this argument, you're not alone.
01:00:09
Mayor White reported that the plane had 200 passengers. But a passenger from Delta 1989 describes 60 or so passengers. So at 11:15, 200 or so passengers were released from Flight 93. The passenger from Delta 1989 states that she was taken into FAA headquarters. But other reports say that passengers were brought into the NASA Glenn Research Center located near the west end of the airport, which had already been evacuated. So, to sum up. Delta 1989 landed at 10:10, was evacuated at 12:30, almost two and a half hours later, and 69 passengers were taken to FAA Headquarters. Flight 93 landed at 10:45 and evacuated within a half hour, 200 or so passengers quickly taken to an empty NASA Research Center. Why did it take 140 minutes to evacuate 69 passengers, when 200 were evacuated in a half hour? We can assume that the passengers from Delta 1989 are safe somewhere.

More theorizing based on erroneous reports.
01:01:12
The question remains, what happened to the 200 or so passengers from Flight 93? It's interesting to note that the combined total of all the passengers from all four flights is 198. Or 243. Depending on who you ask.

Who did the Loose Change producers ask?
So rather than accepting the evidence that Flight 93 was downed in Shanksville -- witnesses to the crash, physical evidence of the crash, cell phone calls from the passengers, and identification of human remains -- Loose Change speculates that 200 people were somehow herded onto Flight 93 (perhaps from Flights 11, 175, 77) and then mysteriously disappeared into a NASA research facility. Could it get any more ridiculous?
01:01:27
We may never know what really happened to Flight 93.

Bob

[Dale]

From Sifting Through Loose Change http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/.../flight93.html

Yes, that's the report I was looking for. Thanks! Flight 93, along with WTC Building 7, hold two of the most important clues to the entire 9/11 saga, and also the two most confusing. It's a real pain to find "official" documents on the collapse of Building 7, and on the other hand, everyone is absolutely sure they know what happened to Flight 93. Just listen to some of the interviews from people living around Shanksville, Pennsylvania on 9/11. There's the missile theory, the FBI theory, the explosion theory, and that pesky "white jet" theory.

Anyways, I'll stop before I get too off topic, here

[saint_chris]

I found the same pic of the missle with out the plane colours on, but it got taken down so trying to find it at the mo


http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/s...-3588H-002.jpg

[SPIRIT WOLF]

Posted by Enlightenment101 (here)
http://www.disclose.tv/forum/another...it-t21020.html

Hate to put the damper on things but thats CGI, check the angle of view, as if being filmed from a helicopter at less than 200ft

[Spiral of Light]

Posted by TThinking (here)
The world knew then that it wasn't a boeing.I just wonder why the american peopleare so easily satisfied with the original investigation.No answers only more questions were raised.If that happened in my country the parliament would get burnt down.(i think,hope).Are the people not interested or have they no internet access....

I wonder the same, myself. We have been dumbed down by lies from mainstream media and in the school systems, but there is so much alternative information available for those who search for it.

Perhaps the fluoridated water in our municipal water supplies has taken a toll on us collectively. The general population either just doesn't get it... or just doesn't give a damn.

[woodshreder]

I have recently been trying to reach out to a very close friend who is a flight attendant for United I have provided some very convincing evidence to show that the story that has been made up for us to believe is no way and could no way be true.
I have been met with some very stiff resitance because this person lost a couple of close friends on that day, one being the pilot of the Shanksville crash. Its a very emotional subject and almost impossible to even talk about that day
They still have to fly and I think its something they try and put out of their mind so that its tolerable to still perform their job with a level of professionalism knowing that they too could become a victim
Ive tried several different angles to maybe seed another point of view and give them hope that their friends could still be among the living, held up at another location in our solar system or ? until the truth finally becomes known
I truly feel sorry for those who cant grasp the fact that we have been duped by the powers that be. Its just not right, Any suggestions?

[SPIRIT WOLF]

You will never convince the majority of people whom have bought the official line, they will not listen to the most convincing of evidence, maybe because its too way out for their mindset to accept the government might have been complicit. I have met with hostile reactions many times some years ago on my website. One or two even stated they would gladly travel long distances to 'shut one unpatriotic f***** up'. Its a no win, thats why it will never ever be rectified.

[Operator]

Posted by SPIRIT WOLF (here)
You will never convince the majority of people whom have bought the official line, they will not listen to the most convincing of evidence, maybe because its too way out for their mindset to accept the government might have been complicit.

What you pay attention to is what you become aware of ... They absolutely won't pay any attention to it ! If they are aware of it they have to deal with it ... and they simply don't want to.

Posted by SPIRIT WOLF (here)
Its a no win, thats why it will never ever be rectified.

Right, John Harris also said ... you won't find justice ... but it will be rectified somehow, in a creative new way.
We should not give up on it ...

[SPIRIT WOLF]

Agreed, its up to those with wide open eyes and minds to continue trying to educate those whom still cannot see