Real Truth Lights the way in the Darkest of hours
The world knew then that it wasn't a boeing.I just wonder why the american peopleare so easily satisfied with the original investigation.No answers only more questions were raised.If that happened in my country the parliament would get burnt down.(i think,hope).Are the people not interested or have they no internet access....
What source could take aerial view pictures so close to the pentagon while it is a no-fly zone (especially on the moment supreme) ?
I am not disputing that it was most likely a missile attack but every time you see pictures or a video 'sense' the situation at that time
and you will push yourself to ask critical questions.
I think it is even more likely that the projectile that hit the pentagon was not powered by propellant. If it was a cruise missile then people all over Washington on the missiles approach path would have heard the sound of the missiles jet exhaust. I bet it was an explosive zero gravity advanced weapons platform of some sort.
So many camera's may be they overlooked one ,whilst taking the videomaterial from the other surrounding buildings.
I am not familiar with the exact situation.Only what's on the vids.
If this video is real, it's one of the most damning against the Bush government there is. Of course, as with the Twin Towers videos we see a bright light appear at the exact spot where the projectile hit before it reached its' target.
Could this video have been leaked to distract the public from the real problems of today - the crash of the US economy? As for why the aeroplane was in the air to see the occurrence, isn't that one of the jobs of the military to check that everything ran smoothly? Find out the source of who was in the air when the images were taken (eye witnesses said that there was a low flying aeroplane in the air at the time of the explosion).
The aeroplane which took the images was on a regular flight path at the time? If not, why?
Was it a commercial airline? If it was, was it taken by a passenger? Who?
What was in the air in the direction from where the missile was coming from?
If it was a ground missile, what was set up from that region from where the missile was coming from that would support said missile?
The AA 'missile' could be a red herring. Who are the workers transporting the AA 'missile'? Is it actually a missile? Is it a model plane for an exibition, for example?
So many questions and so many mis-directs coming from this government....
Very interesting video!
I think the entire idea of a Boeing jet hitting the Pentagon is a little "crazier" than the whole missile theory. There's certainly a wealth of information, literally everywhere on the internet, to support this idea, along with a million other "ideas."
There are definitely a few questions that remain after watching that video clip, such as: what kind of plane had the clearance to fly almost directly above the Pentagon on the morning of September Eleventh, and who filmed the video - were they simply a lucky passenger in the right place at the right time, or might this whole video be another misdirect