Posted by Fructedor
(here)
Thanks Ice for starting this thread and for hosting the mostly respectful discussion on the subject in true Avalonian style.
I have to say that I have no doubt that chemtrails and contrails have nothing in common. I remember my Dad explaining contrails to me when I was a nipper back in the 1950’s – high-temperature fuel exhaust meeting very cold air, creating a form of steam, just like steam from a kettle. When the temperature of the exhaust harmonizes with the ambient air, the steam disappears – this means that contrails fade away a short distance behind the plane, usually after about 30 seconds or so.
The aerosol grids that criss-cross the skies these days do not fade away, but disperse over hours, transforming what was a natural clear blue sky into a dull grey haze. The simple fact that our bue skies are being stolen angers me quite enough. There’s one video posted earlier on this thread that clearly shows the difference between a contrail and a chemtrail.
I’ve been aware of this phenomenon for many years – like many people who have posted here, I’ve seen noughts and crosses grids of seven or eight lines each way fencing the sky, and watched them turn into a misty haze. To anyone watching the sky, it’s clear that this is not a natural phenomenon.
There is abundant proof that companies like Monsanto are engaged in manipulation of the genetics of life on Earth, and that none of these manipulations are performed for the benefit of the general public. There seems to be proof that HAARP technology can readily be used to manipulate weather phenomena to the extent of steering hurricanes, creating drought and floods and triggering earthquakes – actual scientific proof that they have been used to these ends is probably lacking, but we do know that lying to the public is the basic job description of government. Cf. New York 9/11, London 7/7, Tchernobyl, and any of the secretive war-mongering and assassination activities undertaken as far back as we can remember. Tragically, the list is long.
A couple of valid questions – why would politicians condone such activities as chemtrails if they know these programmes will damage their own health and that of their families? And how would such programmes be kept secret, given the huge number of people involved? I have no ready answer, but some speculation.
First, it seems quite likely that many mid-level politicians might be working on the basis of a lie, and that they themselves don’t know the full extent or ramifications of these programmes – furthermore, I think it highly probable that members of the elite have access not only to the full gen about these programmes, but also access to all sorts of effective health products which would adequately protect them. A number of such products are available to the general public, but are usually extremely poorly-known, and often the target of quite vicious disinformation campaigns – and there are almost certainly existing health technologies and products that are hidden from us, just as so much as else is hidden from us – the list is probably greater than we imagine. Cf. Pete Peterson, Bill Deagle just off the top of my head. No doubt David Wilcock would have plenty to say about that also.
Second, and this is the question I have a little trouble with – how come there are no, or very few, whistle-blowers about programmes like chemtrails? Official or unofficial Secrets Acts? Death threats? We could also ask how come there are so many people willing to don protective gear and go and brutalize their brothers and sisters who are demonstrating to express perfectly valid citizens’ right – and even fire weapons at them? Personally, I fail to understand, and many people I know also fail to understand how they can do it – and yet there are tens of thousands of them. What about the ordinary people who put the explosives into the WTC?
So what is being sprayed? There’s plenty of information here and on other sites – personally I’ve researched very little of this, but heavy metals do seem to be a common factor. What’s it for? I suspect that it may have something to do with optimizing the wave technologies such as HAARP. There is also evidence that it has a very negative effect on human health – I have discussed this with doctors and health professionals, and I know that here in Europe, the number of pulmonary disorders has increased dramatically over the last twenty years – not to mention the advent of debilitating diseases like Alzheimers and any number of diseases directly related to the depletion of our immune system. Again, when I was a kid, I remember my Mum complaining about what was then the new government decision to put flouride in the water, ostensibly to protect childrens’ teeth. She had been a nurse, and was quite angry about the fact that flouride was dangerous. She moaned about vaccines too.
Chemtrails have increased over the last couple of decades, and anyone who pays any attention to the sky knows this. And we also know that when the government has access to any kind of obnoxious technology, they’ll use it one way or another – and it won’t be for our benefit.
So I’m convinced that chemtrails are in fact chemtrails, but just as with a number of other subjects, I’m not yet entirely sure who or what or why. It just ain’t natural.
Best wishes
Fructedor
Re: The Real Story about Trails in the Sky.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks