+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: US Attorney General Defends Legality of Bin Laden Raid

  1. Link to Post #1
    UK Avalon Member ktlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd March 2011
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    5,611
    Thanks
    10,987
    Thanked 19,017 times in 4,408 posts

    Default US Attorney General Defends Legality of Bin Laden Raid

    Amidst growing questions over the legality of the killing of Osama bin Laden, US Attorney General Eric Holder defended the commando raid that resulted in the death of the former al-Qaeda terror chief.

    Get summaries of the top business news from a global perspective Sample

    “What happened to bin Laden was not an assassination,” Holder told BBC.

    I think the action that we took against him can be seen as an act of national self-defense. You have to remember it is lawful to target an enemy commander.”

    The Special Forces acted "in an appropriate way," he declared.

    "If the possibility had existed, if there was the possibility of a feasible surrender, that would have occurred," Holder said.
    "But their protection, that is the protection of the force that went into that compound, was I think uppermost in our minds."

    Holder added: “This [bin Laden] is a man who swore he would never be taken alive. There were some indications that perhaps he wore a suicide vest, there’s indications that perhaps there were weapons in the room.”

    Holder also stated that the commando operation adhered to international laws on the targeting of enemy commanders.

    "I actually think that the dotting of the I's and the crossing of the T's is what separates the United States, the United Kingdom, our allies, from those who we are fighting," he said.

    "We do respect the rule of law, there are appropriate ways in which we conduct ourselves and expect our people to conduct themselves, and I think those Navy Seals conducted themselves in a way that's consistent with American, [and] British values."

    Meanwhile, criticism of the US raid continues, particularly in Pakistan.
    On Thursday, several hundred supporters of opposition politician, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, demonstrated in Abbottabad itself.

    They chanted such slogans as "Go, America Go", "Down with Obama" and "Down with Zardari", in reference to the US President and his Pakistani counterpart.

    Sharif, who is the head of the Pakistan Muslim League-N party, has demanded a full inquiry into the raid on bin Laden’s compound.

    Two of bin Laden’s sons have also denounced the raid, questioning why their father was not taken alive. They told the New York Times in a statement: “[why was he] not arrested and tried in a court of law so that the truth is revealed to the people of the world?”

    source
    http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/1446...h-pakistan.htm

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ktlight For This Post:

    Lord Sidious (13th May 2011)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    44
    Posts
    7,252
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,276 posts

    Default Re: US Attorney General Defends Legality of Bin Laden Raid

    Those who have no morality should never try to justify.
    For those words they used may one day be on their own indictment.

  4. Link to Post #3
    UK Avalon Member ktlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd March 2011
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    5,611
    Thanks
    10,987
    Thanked 19,017 times in 4,408 posts

    Default Re: US Attorney General Defends Legality of Bin Laden Raid

    What I am finding strange is that the daughter came out and substantiated that OBL was disposed of recently, and it now appears so do the sons?

  5. Link to Post #4
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    44
    Posts
    7,252
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,276 posts

    Default Re: US Attorney General Defends Legality of Bin Laden Raid

    Quote Posted by ktlight (here)
    What I am finding strange is that the daughter came out and substantiated that OBL was disposed of recently, and it now appears so do the sons?
    How would they know?

  6. Link to Post #5
    UK Avalon Member ktlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd March 2011
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    5,611
    Thanks
    10,987
    Thanked 19,017 times in 4,408 posts

    Default Re: US Attorney General Defends Legality of Bin Laden Raid

    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by ktlight (here)
    What I am finding strange is that the daughter came out and substantiated that OBL was disposed of recently, and it now appears so do the sons?
    How would they know?
    The daughter was there when it happened, it was said - unless I went temporarily blind.

  7. Link to Post #6
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    44
    Posts
    7,252
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,276 posts

    Default Re: US Attorney General Defends Legality of Bin Laden Raid

    Quote Posted by ktlight (here)
    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by ktlight (here)
    What I am finding strange is that the daughter came out and substantiated that OBL was disposed of recently, and it now appears so do the sons?
    How would they know?
    The daughter was there when it happened, it was said - unless I went temporarily blind.
    I couldn't see it in that article.

  8. Link to Post #7
    UK Avalon Member ktlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd March 2011
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    5,611
    Thanks
    10,987
    Thanked 19,017 times in 4,408 posts

    Default Re: US Attorney General Defends Legality of Bin Laden Raid

    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by ktlight (here)
    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by ktlight (here)
    What I am finding strange is that the daughter came out and substantiated that OBL was disposed of recently, and it now appears so do the sons?
    How would they know?
    The daughter was there when it happened, it was said - unless I went temporarily blind.
    I couldn't see it in that article.
    It's in this
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...SNT-armed.html

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to ktlight For This Post:

    Lord Sidious (13th May 2011)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts