+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: TSA backscatter radiation safety tests were rigged

  1. Link to Post #1
    UK Avalon Member ktlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd March 2011
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    5,611
    Thanks
    10,975
    Thanked 19,015 times in 4,408 posts

    Default TSA backscatter radiation safety tests were rigged

    It can now be revealed by NaturalNews that the TSA faked its safety data on its X-ray airport scanners in order to deceive the public about the safety of such devices.

    As evidenced by recent events in Washington, we now live in an age where the federal government simply fakes whatever documents, news or evidence it wants people to believe, then releases that information as if it were fact. This is the modus operandi of the Department of Homeland Security, which must fabricate false terror alerts to keep itself in business -- and now the TSA division has taken the fabrication of false evidence to a whole new level with its naked body scanners (see below).

    Even physics professors question the TSA's obvious cover-up

    The evidence of the TSA's fakery is now obvious thanks to the revelations of a letter signed by five professors from the University of California, San Francisco and Arizona State University. You can view the full text of the letter at: http://www.propublica.org/documents...

    The letter reveals:

    • To this day, there has been no credible scientific testing of the TSA's naked body scanners. The claimed "safety" of the technology by the TSA is based on rigged tests.

    • The testing that did take place was done on a custom combination of spare parts rigged by the manufacturer of the machines (Rapidscan) and didn't even use the actual machines installed in airports. In other words, the testing was rigged.

    • The names of the researchers who conducted the radiation tests at Rapidscan have been kept secret! This means the researchers are not available for scientific questioning of any kind, and there has been no opportunity to even ask whether they are qualified to conduct such tests. (Are they even scientists?)

    source
    http://www.naturalnews.com/032425_ai...radiation.html

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ktlight For This Post:

    bluestflame (17th May 2011), Calz (17th May 2011), Lord Sidious (17th May 2011)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts