# Thread: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

1. ## F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

F.M Chalkalis blog
http://chalkalis.blogspot.com/

Mathematical proof by a scientist.

Related forum
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-donation.html

I came up to this new device by accident. My intuition tells me Chalkalis Energy Multiplier really works.

All the gravity wheels are closed loop system but this one is a open system like the pulse motor. From the Leonard Da Vinchi, Bessel, to other inventors, those depends on the weight unbalance of rotating wheel.

He overcome the friction of the pendulum by using an external motor, which is brilliant approach.

2. ## The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Hughe For This Post:

Art (18th March 2012), Bhusunda (30th June 2011), Daren (30th June 2011), John Parslow (17th March 2012), Mad Hatter (5th April 2012), Marikins (30th June 2011), PathWalker (11th April 2012), pharoah21 (29th June 2011), pie'n'eal (29th June 2011), ROMANWKT (17th March 2012), Seikou-Kishi (18th March 2012), seko (17th March 2012), Steven (30th June 2011), Trail (10th July 2011)

3. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

I feel something big is happening.

A simple device that uses the gravitation potential energy and the law of inertia.

Two-Stage Mechanical Oscillator - A Mechanical Amplifier
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/indexEng.htm

Read carefully the word 'Multiplier' and 'Amplifier'. These two inventors find out how to amplify a small input and produces extra output energy using the fundamental laws of physics nothing special. If I'm wrong, please let me know: Gravity and the Inertia of moving object!

4. ## The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hughe For This Post:

Mad Hatter (5th April 2012), Marikins (30th June 2011), PathWalker (11th April 2012)

5. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

Another one!!! Thanks. And wow, how simple, brilliant. Just watching it working is enough to understand the mechanism. Give me the will to try building one. From the theoretical explanation given, it has a COP of 5, which is awesome. I wonder if he had coupled it with a load? Spread the word!

Namate, Steven

6. ## The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Steven For This Post:

Mad Hatter (5th April 2012), Marikins (30th June 2011)

7. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

To check more models, click the link.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Gravity_Motors

9. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

To know the real physics behind it, study Kanarev Philipp's two books there:
http://kubsau.ru/science/en/public.php?kanarev&kind=1
Energy Impulse Secrets
Introduction to mechanodynamics

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...uncements.html
CONFERENCE IS LIMITED TO 150 PEOPLE.
AFTER 2 WEEKS, ALREADY 1/3 SOLD OUT.
ONLY 100 SEATS LEFT SO REGISTER NOW!

Revealed: Advanced Technologies Released to Public
Bedini-Lindemann 2012 Science & Technology Conference
...
To finish off the day, Peter Lindemann, another long time legend in the alternative science field, will show how advanced discoveries in Classical Mechanics make it possible to harness Gravitational Accelerations and Centrifugal Forces that can lead to the creation of a true "Mechanical Engine", unlocking the method and mystery of the "Self-turning Wheel".
Self-turning wheel is flawed. It must have at least two wheels. I wonder Peter Lindemann would bring out Kanreve Phillpps's theory. I got tired of the funny game among FE researchers. Grow up people!

11. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

Looks to me like he's just tried to re-invent the flywheel. A flywheel multiplies rotational torque. We been using them for centuries.

love and peace
sirdipswitch

12. ## The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sirdipswitch For This Post:

Hughe (18th March 2012), Mad Hatter (5th April 2012)

13. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

Posted by sirdipswitch (here)
Looks to me like he's just tried to re-invent the flywheel. A flywheel multiplies rotational torque. We been using them for centuries.

love and peace
sirdipswitch
The theory makes it possible to create a harmonic open loop system that produces any size of power out. It's independent of gravity. Precise time control is the key. The machine will run on Earth or zero gravity setting. ^^

15. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

Hey Hughe

Have you thought of asking Wade to give this his expert eye? If anybody will be able to determine its merits, it has to be him.

19. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

Thanks for posting this Hughe. re the first video I however do wonder what he life of the mechanical bearings would be under those sorts of stresses...

20. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

not sure what is achieved in the OP vid.....he s got a pedulum going full circle, propelled by the 2 motorised rubber wheels that give it just enough thrust to go round again.
It doesnt really matter how heavy the pendulum is, this would work with 5 tons as well as 5 kilos....question is can any overunity energy be extracted here..... I cant see where...

21. ## The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to meat suit For This Post:

Hughe (11th April 2012), Mad Hatter (7th April 2012)

22. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

@meat suit

Kanarev's five laws of motion have: 1st Acceleration, 2nd uniform, 3rd deceleration, 4th interaction between two objects, 5th independence of action. He introduced the inertia force. Newton's 3rd law is still valid as 4th law of Kanarev. Newton's 1st and 2nd laws are replaced by other four laws of Kanarev.

Newtons laws of motion:
1st: The velocity of a body remains constant unless the body is acted upon by an external force.
2nd: The acceleration a of a body is parallel and directly proportional to the net force F and inversely proportional to the mass m, i.e., F = ma.
3rd: The mutual forces of action and reaction between two bodies are equal, opposite and collinear.

Anyway his new theory makes it possible to create a dynamic system that regulates total energy using few mechanical parts - two revolving wheels and timing device.

I give one example for thought experiment how the theory works, refined version of inertia in physical universe.
Suppose there is a 1,000kg of round ball hanging on a straight rod off the ground. It's freely moving like a pendulum.
The length of the rod is 2 meter (close to 6 ft 10).

Can I move the ball 2 meters height over the ground? I can do that with one hand theoretically with precise pushes at each period.
Each push (pulse) increases the total kinetic energy of the ball caused by ball's weight and gravity. Keeping pushing the ball whenever the ball pause in the right side, the ball moves faster and higher. Eventually the ball will start rotate up and down along the axis where the rod attached.

Adding force at the peak of ball's movement will increase the kinetic energy, providing friction at the peak will reduce the kinetic energy.
This is observed phenomenon everyday on the swinging seat for a kid.

This is radical change of perspective at a fundamental level. Which one is right? One has to build prototypes and test Kanarev's theory. I've seen four working prototypes so far.

23. ## Re: F.M Chalkalis Energy Multiplier

Posted by Hughe (here)
@meat suit

Kanarev's five laws of motion have: 1st Acceleration, 2nd uniform, 3rd deceleration, 4th interaction between two objects, 5th independence of action. He introduced the inertia force. Newton's 3rd law is still valid as 4th law of Kanarev. Newton's 1st and 2nd laws are replaced by other four laws of Kanarev.

Newtons laws of motion:
1st: The velocity of a body remains constant unless the body is acted upon by an external force.
2nd: The acceleration a of a body is parallel and directly proportional to the net force F and inversely proportional to the mass m, i.e., F = ma.
3rd: The mutual forces of action and reaction between two bodies are equal, opposite and collinear.

Anyway his new theory makes it possible to create a dynamic system that regulates total energy using few mechanical parts - two revolving wheels and timing device.

I give one example for thought experiment how the theory works, refined version of inertia in physical universe.
Suppose there is a 1,000kg of round ball hanging on a straight rod off the ground. It's freely moving like a pendulum.
The length of the rod is 2 meter (close to 6 ft 10).

Can I move the ball 2 meters height over the ground? I can do that with one hand theoretically with precise pushes at each period.
Each push (pulse) increases the total kinetic energy of the ball caused by ball's weight and gravity. Keeping pushing the ball whenever the ball pause in the right side, the ball moves faster and higher. Eventually the ball will start rotate up and down along the axis where the rod attached.

Adding force at the peak of ball's movement will increase the kinetic energy, providing friction at the peak will reduce the kinetic energy.
This is observed phenomenon everyday on the swinging seat for a kid.

This is radical change of perspective at a fundamental level. Which one is right? One has to build prototypes and test Kanarev's theory. I've seen four working prototypes so far.
so, is anyone extracting surplus energy?

cheers

meat

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts