+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Carbon 12 -> Carbon 7 ???

  1. Link to Post #1
    England Avalon Member Taurean's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th July 2010
    Location
    West Yorkshire, UK
    Age
    59
    Posts
    817
    Thanks
    992
    Thanked 2,471 times in 606 posts

    Default Carbon 12 -> Carbon 7 ???

    Wow, this sounds good !

    http://youtu.be/yyJm44kGU8o
    “The nail that sticks up will be hammered down.” – Japanese Proverb

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Taurean For This Post:

    crosby (2nd July 2011), dan i el (2nd July 2011), Ria (3rd July 2011), sandy (3rd July 2011), Watching from Cyprus (4th July 2011)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member dan i el's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th January 2011
    Location
    Leipzig, DE
    Posts
    381
    Thanks
    984
    Thanked 701 times in 247 posts

    Default Re: Carbon 12 -> Carbon 7 ???

    interesting, thanks

  4. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    8th February 2011
    Posts
    2,394
    Thanks
    19,468
    Thanked 8,785 times in 2,103 posts

    Default Re: Carbon 12 -> Carbon 7 ???

    now i understand why the ptw want to destroy the majority of the population. thanks Taurean, this was very eye opening indeed.
    regards, corson

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to crosby For This Post:

    Ria (3rd July 2011)

  6. Link to Post #4
    United States Administrator Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    16,310
    Thanks
    10,061
    Thanked 50,593 times in 9,970 posts

    Default Re: Carbon 12 -> Carbon 7 ???

    This sounds like nonsensical playing with numbers and pseudo science to me, another bogus attempt to provide the appearance of a scientific basis for some deeply flawed (and in my view likely deliberately deceptive) theories of ascension.

    The smallest known isotope of Carbon is Carbon-8, which has a half-life of two trillionths of one nanosecond, also known as two zeptoseconds. If I got my math right, this is approximately the amount of time it takes light to travel one percent of the distance across a single hydrogen atom ... really, really quick.

    Carbon-7 (one less neutron than Carbon-8) would not last even that long, if it existed at all. It does not form the basis for anything, past yet another nonsensical Youtube video.
    -- Formerly known as "ThePythonicCow", aka "Cow", "PCow", "TPC", "PC", "Mooster", ...

  7. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Paul For This Post:

    Anchor (4th July 2011), dan i el (4th July 2011), Mad Hatter (4th July 2011), modwiz (4th July 2011), Ria (3rd July 2011), Taurean (3rd July 2011)

  8. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member Dawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th June 2011
    Location
    Pismo Beach, California
    Age
    63
    Posts
    2,023
    Thanks
    10,310
    Thanked 7,487 times in 1,092 posts

    Default Re: Carbon 12 -> Carbon 7 ???

    If this is real information then this is wonderful news. One thing I have always kept in mind is something gifted to me by an interesting person I was close friends with for a few years. She was a lac (licensed Acupunctureist). In her studies she and others in her field began to attempt to close the gaps left by the Chinese revolution, where much of the Chinese medical knowledge was lost. This group combined mudras (hand positions said to allow access to different body aspects) with acupuncture. They isolated a mudra which seemed to access the future and could treat the body for imbalances which were set to show up in the future. Anyway... they all found that ALL the bodies they tested after 2012 were highly radioactive. This was scary to these acupuncturists because they were not sure if they were witnessing the effects of a nuclear war or something else. I have always felt that what they were seeing was NOT negative, yet what was it? Effects of the sun would be one answer, yet how were the bodies still alive when so irradiated? This could be why... and how. Time will tell.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Dawn For This Post:

    Carmen (4th July 2011)

  10. Link to Post #6
    Australia Avalon Member Anchor's Avatar
    Join Date
    10th February 2010
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,916
    Thanks
    8,774
    Thanked 20,046 times in 3,051 posts

    Default Re: Carbon 12 -> Carbon 7 ???

    I always secretly knew that my halo was down to neutrino deficiency, it is great to have this confirmed by such a well researched and scientifically valid source. I especially liked the synthetic sounding voice of the presenter.....
    Every majestic oak tree was once a nut who stood his ground.

  11. Link to Post #7
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    24th March 2011
    Age
    67
    Posts
    3,940
    Thanks
    7,129
    Thanked 23,101 times in 3,610 posts

    Default Re: Carbon 12 -> Carbon 7 ???

    I always did like the number seven!

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts