+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 1 5 8 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 156

Thread: For an idea on the "big" picture

  1. Link to Post #81
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Interesting corroborations to Sue Arrigo's data from John Coleman in his The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations: Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political and Economic Decline of the United States of America. (PDF-pp 2-8):

    [...]

    As previously stated, the British people did not want war, and said so, but Toynbee, Lippmann and Bernays expected to change that by applying techniques designed to manipulate public opinion through the use of polling. Herein we provide a review of the methods that were devised and executed to bring Great Britain and the United States into the First World War, plus the techniques that were put into practice between the two World Wars and beyond. As will be seen propaganda was to play a major role.

    One of the main objectives at Tavistock was to achieve the degradation of women. Tavistock recognized that Jesus Christ has brought a new place of respect in the order of civilization to womanhood, which prior to his coming had not been present.
    3
    After Christ's ministry, womanhood gained a respect and a high place in society absent from pre-Christian civilizations.

    Of course it can be argued that such an elevated status existed in the Greek and Roman empires, and that would be true to a certain extent, but not to the extent that womanhood was elevated in post-Christ society.

    Tavistock sought to change that and the process began immediately after WWI. The Eastern Orthodox Church which the Rus (Viking) princes of Moscow brought back from Constantinople, revered and respected womanhood, and their experience with the Khazarians whom they subsequently defeated and drove out of Russia, left them
    determined to protect womanhood in Russia.

    The founder of the Romanov dynasty, Michael Romanov was the scion of a noble family that had defended Russia on the basis of a Christian country. From 1613 the Romanovs sought to ennoble Russia and imbue it with a great spirit of Christianity, which meant also, protection for and the honoring of Russian womanhood.

    The Princes of Moscow under Prince Dimitri Donskoi earned the unremitting hatred of the Rothschilds for Russia because of Donskoi's defeat and expulsion of the Khazarian hordes that inhabited the lower-regions of the Volga. This barbaric warrior nation of mysterious Indo-Turk origin, had adopted the Judaic religion on passage of a decree by King Bulant after the religion was approved by the chief Khazarian soothsayer-magician-sorcerer, David el-Roi.

    It was el Roi's personal flag, now called the "Star of David" that became the official flag of the Khazarian nation when they settled in Poland after being forced out of Russia.
    4
    The flag was adopted by the Zionists as their standard and is still mistakenly called the "Star of David." Christians make the error of confusion linking it with the Old Testament King David, when in fact there is no relation between the two.

    The hatred of Russia was compounded in 1612 when the Romanov dynasty led a Russian Army against Poland taking back large parts of Poland that had formerly belonged to Russia.

    The principal architect of enmity brought to bear against Russia was the Rothschild dynasty and it was this burning hatred that Tavistock used and channeled in its plan to destroy Western civilization.

    The first opportunity created by Tavistock came in 1905 with the attack by the Japanese Navy that completely surprised the Russian Fleet. The exercise was bankrolled by Jacob Schiff, the Wall Street banker, who was related to Rothschild.

    The defeat of the Russian fleet at Port Arthur in a surprise attack marked the beginning of the pall of gloom that was about to roll in over Christian Europe. The Rockefeller Standard Oil Group directed by Tavistock and with the aid of the "300" engineered the Russo-Japanese War. The money used to finance the operation came from Jacob Schiff, but was actually provided by the Rockefeller General Education Board, whose outward purpose was to finance Negro education. All of the propaganda and advertising for the board was written and crafted by the Social scientists at Tavistock, which was then called "Wellington House."
    5
    In 1941 another Rockefeller front organization, the Institute for Pacific Relations (IPR) gave large sums to its Japanese counterpart in Tokyo. The money was then funneled to a member of the imperial family by Richard Sorge, a Russian master-spy, for the purposes of inducing Japan to attack the United States at Pearl Harbor. Again, Tavistock was the originator of all of IPR's publications.

    Although it was not yet evident, as Spengler was to mention in his monumental work, published in 1936, it marked the beginning of the end of the old order. Contrary to most establishment accounts of history, the "Russian" revolution was not a Russian revolution at all, but a foreign ideology backed primarily by the Committee of 300 and its arm, the Tavistock Institute, that was violently forced upon a startled, unprepared and dismayed Romanov family.

    It was political warfare, low grade warfare and psychological warfare in which Tavistock had become well versed.

    As Winston Churchill was to remark: "They transported Lenin in a sealed truck like a plague bacillus from Switzerland into Russia," and then once established "Lenin and Trotsky seized Russia by the hair of its head."

    Much has been written (but nearly always in passing as if it is a mere postscript to history) about the "sealed truck," "sealed car," "sealed train," that transported Lenin and his Bolshevik revolutionaries safely through the midst of war-torn Europe and deposited them in Russia, there to begin their imported Bolshevik Revolution so mistakenly termed the "Russian Revolution."
    6
    Documents the author was privileged to study at Wellington House and what was revealed in the Arnold Toynbee papers and Bruce Lockhart's private papers, led to the conclusion that without Toynbee, Bruce Lockhart of MI6 British intelligence and without the complicity of at least five European nations, ostensibly loyal and friendly with the Court at St. Petersburg, the merciless Bolshevik Revolution would have been still-born.

    As this account must of necessity be limited to Tavistock's participation in the affair, it will not be as a complete account of the skullduggery we would liked to have presented.

    According to Milner's private papers his aides through Tavistock contacted a fellow Socialist Fritz Platten. (Milner was a leading Fabian Socialist although he scorned Sydney and Beatrice Webb.) It was Platten, who planned the logistics of the trip and oversaw it until the revolutionaries arrived in Petrograd.

    This was confirmed and borne out by the Wilhelmstrasse Files the majority of which we were able to gain access to, which files were open to certain people qualified to read them. They tallied fairly closely with Bruce Lockhart's account in his private papers as well as what Lord Alfred Milner had to say about the underhand affair that betrayed Russia. It appeared that Milner had many contacts among the Bolshevik expatriates among them, Lenin. It was to Lord Milner that Lenin went, when he needed money for the Revolution. Armed with a letter of introduction from Platten, Lenin met with Lord Milner and laid down his plan for the overthrow of the Romanov's and Christian Russia.

    Milner agreed on condition that he could send his agent Bruce Lockhart of MI6 to supervise the day-to-day affairs and report back on Lenin.
    7
    Lord Rothschild and the Rockefellers demanded that they be allowed to send Sydney Reilly to Russia to supervise transfer of Russia's natural resources and the gold rubles held in the Central Bank to London. This was agreed to by Lenin, and later Trotsky.

    To seal the bargain, Lord Milner, on behalf of the Rothschilds, gave Lenin 60 millions pounds in gold sovereigns while the Rockefellers contributed around $40 million dollars.

    Countries in complicity with the "sealed train" affair were Great Britain, Germany, Finland, Switzerland and Sweden.

    While the United States was not directly involved, it must have been aware of what was going on. After all, on the orders of President Wilson, a brand new American passport was issued to Leon Trotsky, (whose real name was Lev Bronstein) so that he could travel in peace, although Trotsky was not a U.S. citizen.

    Lenin and his compatriots were provided with a private well-appointed rail carriage by the top German government functionaries and always kept locked by agreements with stations along the line. Platten was in charge and he laid down the rules for the trip, some of which are listed in the Wilhelmstrasse Files:
    The carriage was to remain locked for the entire trip.

    No one could board the carriage without Platten's permission.

    The train would have extra territorial status.

    No passports were to be asked at borders.

    Tickets would be bought at regular prices.

    No "security issues" to be raised by the military or police of any country en-route.
    8
    According to the Wilhelmstrasse Files, the trip was authorized and approved by General Ludendorff and Kaiser Wilhelm. Ludendorff went so far as to say that if Sweden refused to let the Bolsheviks pass, he would guarantee them passage into Russia through the German lines! As it turned out, the Swedish Government raised no objection and neither did the Finnish Government.

    One of the notable revolutionaries, who joined the train when it arrived at the German frontier with Switzerland, was Radek, who was to play a leading role in the bloody Bolshevik Revolution. There were some lighter moments too.

    The Wilhelmstrasse Files describe how the carriage missed its engine at Frankfurt, resulting in it being shunted to and fro for about 8 hours.

    The party had to de-train in the German Baltic town of Sasnitz where they were accorded "decent accommodation" by the German Government. The Swedish Government kindly gave them ferry transport to Malmo, from where they sailed to Stockholm, where "nice" accommodation awaited the Bolshevik party for an overnight layover and then it was on to the Finnish border.

    There, the intrepid Platten left the high-spirited party and the final journey into Russia was made by train to Petrograd.

    Thus an epic journey that began in Zurich, Switzerland, ended in Petrograd. Lenin had arrived on the scene and Russia was about to be brought low. And throughout, Bernays and Lippmann and their associates at Wellington House (Tavistock) kept up a steady flow of brainwashing propaganda that it is safe to conclude, duped much of the world.

    [...]
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  2. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (1st January 2018), Bill Ryan (2nd January 2018), Bluegreen (1st January 2018), BMJ (12th March 2018), Carmody (8th May 2018), dynamo (6th January 2018), Ewan (7th January 2018), Foxie Loxie (1st January 2018), gaiagirl (5th January 2018), Ivanhoe (8th May 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), Reinhard (13th February 2019), seko (5th January 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), william r sanford72 (6th January 2018), WTHTLight (21st February 2018)

  3. Link to Post #82
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    More wind to Coleman's sails:

    MI-5 Used Terror Groups to Assassinate Leaders

    Henry Makow
    January 4, 2018


    (Charles Haughey was Irish Prime Minister "Taoiseach" from 1979-1982 &1987-1992)

    MI-5 tried to assassinate Irish Prime Minister in 1985
    "Everyone with half-a-brain knows that Israel, the US, and Britain have used front groups like Isis and Al Nusra Front to wreak carnage in the Muslim world on behalf of Anglo-Zionist interests, but the same interests have long used western terror groups to get rid of domestic enemies and to furnish a pretext for the surveilled police state. "
    by Jude Duffy
    (henrymakow.com)

    At Christmas 2017, Irish state papers revealed that in 1985 the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) informed the Irish Prime Minister Charles Haughey, (1925-2006) that MI5 had directed them to assassinate him.

    According to the Protestant terror group - long a paramilitary wing of the British deep state - MI5 gave them comprehensive details of Haughey's movements, his mode of transport, his home, and even supplied aerial photos of the small island he owned off the south coast of Ireland. The UVF stated in the letter that they turned down MI5's request on the grounds that they didn't wish to take part in such "dirty tricks".

    One can take this letter at face value, or one can speculate as to whether it may have been the British deep state's way of issuing a thinly veiled threat - via their stooges in the UVF - of the deadly consequences for Haughey of continuing to obstruct their agenda. Either way, it illustrates how globalists happily use terrorism to enforce their will.


    GET HAUGHEY
    In the early 1980s, using the age-old deep state twin techniques of bribery and relentless psychic driving media black propaganda, the Anglo-Masons made serious efforts to remove Haughey from the leadership of the Fianna Fail party. Around this time, Ray McSharry - a loyal senior minister in his government - secretly taped a ministerial colleague, Martin O'Donoghue, informing McSharry that there was "lots of money around" for Fianna Fail TDs (members of parliament) who would agree to support an internal party coup against Haughey. When the bribery gambit backfired, the deep state merchants apparently opted for a more permanent solution to the Haughey problem.

    Indeed the would be UVF plot may have been only one of several efforts to "whack" the Fianna Fail leader. According to his son, Sean, Charles Haughey survived two serious car crashes, one plane crash landing, and the sinking of his yacht.

    Significantly this latter"accident", in which Haughey's boat mysteriously capsized on a very calm day off the south coast of Ireland, happened the year after the UVF sent their letter, and only a few weeks after Haughey fiercely condemned the then Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister), the Rothschild globalist, Garret Fitzgerald, for his attendance at the MI6 aligned Bilderberg gathering.

    Haughey eventually came on board with the neo-liberal anti-nationalist agenda of his enemies - thanks presumably to the bribes he and many other Irish politicians received from global Masonic interests (John Furze, the English born banker at the centre of huge scandal involving large bribes to Irish politicians - including Haughey - was given a full Masonic funeral when he died in 1997).

    However, it's also eminently possible that Haughey towed the Anglo-Zionist line in later years partly because he had no wish to die prematurely in an "accident" or terrorist hit-job.


    ILLUMINATI SPONSORSHIP OF TERROR GROUPS
    Everyone with half-a-brain knows that Israel, the US, and Britain have used front groups like Isis and Al Nusra Front to wreak carnage in the Muslim world on behalf of Anglo-Zionist interests, but the same interests have long used western terror groups to get rid of domestic enemies and to furnish a pretext for the surveilled police state. The activities of the Red Brigades in Italy, the Baader Meinhof in Germany and both sets of paramilitaries in Northern Ireland illustrate this technique of internal subversion (Both wings of the IRA - the Provisionals and the "Officials" - were heavily infiltrated at the very top by British spooks, as were all the Protestant Masonic loyalist terror groups in Ireland).


    (Admiral Luis Carrero Blanco assassinated in bomb blast in 1975)

    In 1973 the Freemasons assigned to the Basque separatist group ETA the task of murdering Franco's chosen successor, Admiral Luis Carrero Blanco, above, thus eliminating a crucial rallying figure of resistance to the Masonic socialist Reconquista of Spain when Franco eventually died in 1975.

    In 1986 the Swedish Prime Minister Olaf Palme was shot at point-blank range in front of his wife on a street in central Stockholm. Palme had become increasingly critical of US and Israeli policies and to this day no one has been convicted of his murder.

    Another Swedish politician, the foreign minister, Anna Lindh, was murdered in a Stockholm shopping mall in 2003, days before a crucial referendum in her country on joining the European single currency. A strong supporter of the proposal, many believe she was killed in order to generate a sympathetic backlash in favour of a yes vote.

    In 2002 the hugely popular Dutch anti-immigration politician Pim Fortuyn was shot dead nine days before a general election in which he was set to make a massive breakthrough on behalf of the anti-immigration cause.



    In 2008 the Austrian anti-immigration politician, Jorg Haider, above, died in a car crash just after his party had become a partner in government, a turn of events that provoked the "international community" into threatening Austria with all sorts of dire consequences - up to and including economic boycotts and suspension from the European Union. As with the death of Princess Diana, the Zio-media and the Austrian authorities blamed Haider's "accident" on drink driving - a claim hotly denied by Haider's wife and many of his colleagues and supporters.

    In 1981 Pope John Paul II and Ronald Reagan were shot within six weeks of each other. Even many mainstream investigative journalists posit a Mossad role in the shooting of the Pope, while Reagan's would be assassin, John Hinckley Jr, had close family ties to the U.S. Vice President and former head of the CIA, George H.W. Bush.

    In 1997, John F. Kennedy Jr., the publisher of 'George' magazine, incurred widespread establishment wrath for running an article blaming the Israeli internal secret service, Shin Bet, for the murder of Israeli Prime Minister and Nobel Peace Prize winner, Yitzhak Rabin. Kennedy Jr. had also made it clear he did not accept the official version of his father's death. In 1999 Kennedy Jr. died in a plane crash - many elements of which remain unexplained.

    In 2004 the Palestinian leader, Yasser Arafat died from suspected polonium poisoning; the Israeli deep state does not even seriously attempt to deny its involvement in his death.



    In 1994 the British Labour Party leader John Smith died suddenly after giving a speech at a posh hotel in central London. Since his election as leader in 1992, Smith had rapidly steered the party back to its working-class roots and away from the globalist cosmopolitanism of erstwhile Communist Peter Mandelson - the dominant figure in the entourage of the previous leader Neil Kinnock.

    Mandelson, a Bilderberg ultra-Zionist, complained bitterly of being marginalized by the Smith leadership, but his exile turned out to be shortlived: after Smith's death, Zionist warmonger Tony Blair took over as nominal leader and his long-time "extremely close friend" "Mandy" Mandelson once again seized the tiller.

    For some intriguing reason, Tony Blair, by his own account, always believed that John Smith would hand in his dinner pail in plenty of time for Blair and Mandy to contest the 1997 British general election as Labour Party nominal leader and controller respectively. Only a month before Smith's death, Blair told his wife, "If John dies I will be the leader, not Gordon [Brown], and somehow I think this will happen, I really do."

    How very weird. Smith was only 55 at the time. Weirder still, a mainstream satirical fillm, 'The Hunt For Tony Blair', depicted Blair murdering Smith in the hotel toilet on the night Smith gave what turned out to be his final speech. Outlandish satire or 'revelation of the method'?

    One can formulate a very simple counter-factual narrative regarding modern British political history: no death of John Smith = no Blair-Bush partnership, no Iraq War, no invasion of Afghanistan and no War on Terror.



    In 2005 the former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook died suddenly while mountain climbing in Scotland. As in so many suspicious events and false flag attacks, official and media accounts of the cause of death varied wildly in the hours after his demise. Initially, corporate media outlets said he had succumbed to external injuries he received from a fall - a story later changed to death by cardiac arrest.

    Cook was the only member of the British government to resign in protest over the Iraq War, and in the weeks and months before his death he had begun to question not just the conduct of the War On Terror, but its whole premise - going so far as to state that 'Al Qaeda' was simply another name for a list of CIA assets in the Muslim world.

    By the way, 'The Hunt For Tony Blair' blamed Blair for Cook's murder as well...Cook was 59 at the time of his death.

    On the day of the 2010 British general election, the then UKIP leader, Nigel Farage narrowly escaped death after the light plane he was traveling in crashed. Farage had aroused the anger of the British Zionist establishment, not only by opposing mass immigration and the EU, but also by standing in the election against the Speaker of the House of Commons, the arch-Zionist John Bercow.

    In 2015, Farage once again narrowly escaped death when a wheel suddenly came off his car while he was driving home to England on a French motorway. Farage was forced to dive from his car and frantically scramble over a wall in order to avoid being mowed down by oncoming lorries. Farage said that the French police told him that the wheels of his car had been sabotaged in an effort to kill him - though tellingly he later said he regretted divulging this.

    That in itself raises an intriguing question: Either the French police told Farage the episode was an assassination attempt or they didn't, and if they did say this, why would he regret publicly recounting what he had been told? Did the Rothschild deep state merchants make Farage feel the heat after he exposed the reality of mafia-style political hit squads, and force him to walk back on his original statement?

    It is worth remembering in this context that by 2015 the Anglo-Zionists had a new reason to loathe Farage: in the wake of the Neocon coup in Ukraine he had refused to join the anti-Putin hysteria of the western political and media establishment

    In 2010, the Polish President, Lech Kaczynski, died in plane crash in Russia, a crash that also killed many senior figures in the Polish military. Although Kaczynski was a fairly strong supporter of Israel, he had aroused the ire of the globalist establishment by taking a strong line against the LGBTQ agenda - going so far as to call the organizers of gay pride events "perverts" - and had also opposed feminism, abortion and the EU anti-nationalist agenda.

    Not all sudden deaths are necessarily suspicious of course - even when they happen to those the globalist establishment hate - but the reverse also applies: not all deaths from long-term illnesses are necessarily innocent. The late Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez accused the CIA of giving many Latin American leaders - including himself - cancer, an accusation that only seems far-fetched if you've never seen Hillary Clinton cackling ghoulishly over the stomach churningly brutal street murder of Muammar Ghadaffi, or if you never heard senior US politicians - including Clinton herself, Donald Trump, former Presidential candidate, John McCain, and former Speaker, Newt Gingrich - openly calling for deep state hit squads to illegally kill elected politicians and state officials in countries deemed to be enemies of the Greater Israel project.


    ---------------
    Related:
    CIA Domestic Assassination Program

    The Fox (2017 movie)
    Last edited by Hervé; 5th January 2018 at 15:20.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  4. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    3(C)+me (22nd April 2018), avid (6th January 2018), Bill Ryan (20th January 2018), Bluegreen (5th January 2018), bluestflame (5th January 2018), BMJ (22nd February 2018), Carmody (8th May 2018), dynamo (6th January 2018), Ewan (7th January 2018), Foxie Loxie (5th January 2018), gaiagirl (5th January 2018), Ivanhoe (8th May 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), Reinhard (13th February 2019), seko (5th January 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), WTHTLight (23rd January 2018)

  5. Link to Post #83
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    A List of Attempted and Successful Coup D'états by the US Government Over the Last 70 Years

    William Blum Williamblum.org
    Sat, 20 Jan 2018 15:59 UTC



    Instances of the United States overthrowing, or attempting to overthrow, a foreign government since the Second World War. (* indicates successful ouster of a government)

    • China 1949 to early 1960s
    • Albania 1949-53
    • East Germany 1950s
    • Iran 1953 *
    • Guatemala 1954 *
    • Costa Rica mid-1950s
    • Syria 1956-7
    • Egypt 1957
    • Indonesia 1957-8
    • British Guiana 1953-64 *
    • Iraq 1963 *
    • North Vietnam 1945-73
    • Cambodia 1955-70 *
    • Laos 1958 *, 1959 *, 1960 *
    • Ecuador 1960-63 *
    • Congo 1960 *
    • France 1965
    • Brazil 1962-64 *
    • Dominican Republic 1963 *
    • Cuba 1959 to present
    • Bolivia 1964 *
    • Indonesia 1965 *
    • Ghana 1966 *
    • Chile 1964-73 *
    • Greece 1967 *
    • Costa Rica 1970-71
    • Bolivia 1971 *
    • Australia 1973-75 *
    • Angola 1975, 1980s
    • Zaire 1975
    • Portugal 1974-76 *
    • Jamaica 1976-80 *
    • Seychelles 1979-81
    • Chad 1981-82 *
    • Grenada 1983 *
    • South Yemen 1982-84
    • Suriname 1982-84
    • Fiji 1987 *
    • Libya 1980s
    • Nicaragua 1981-90 *
    • Panama 1989 *
    • Bulgaria 1990 *
    • Albania 1991 *
    • Iraq 1991
    • Afghanistan 1980s *
    • Somalia 1993
    • Yugoslavia 1999-2000 *
    • Ecuador 2000 *
    • Afghanistan 2001 *
    • Venezuela 2002 *
    • Iraq 2003 *
    • Haiti 2004 *
    • Somalia 2007 to present
    • Honduras 2009
    • Libya 2011 *
    • Syria 2012
    • Ukraine 2014 *
    Q: Why will there never be a coup d'état in Washington?

    A: Because there's no American embassy there.

    William Blum is an author, historian, and U.S. foreign policy critic. He is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II and Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower, among others. Read more
    Last edited by Hervé; 20th January 2018 at 17:04.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  6. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    3(C)+me (22nd April 2018), Bill Ryan (20th January 2018), BMJ (22nd February 2018), Carmody (8th May 2018), Ewan (20th January 2018), Foxie Loxie (21st January 2018), Jayke (6th May 2018), KiwiElf (21st January 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), Reinhard (13th February 2019), Ron Mauer Sr (20th January 2018), seko (21st January 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), Valerie Villars (6th May 2018)

  7. Link to Post #84
    United States Avalon Member Foxie Loxie's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th September 2015
    Location
    Central NY
    Age
    75
    Posts
    3,079
    Thanks
    67,683
    Thanked 17,336 times in 2,953 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Too amazing to see it in print! The sad part is that the average American had NO CLUE what was going on!

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Foxie Loxie For This Post:

    BMJ (22nd February 2018), Hervé (21st January 2018), KiwiElf (23rd January 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018)

  9. Link to Post #85
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Let's not forget the British homologues across the pond:

    Historian compiles online database of declassified documents exposing 'the true history of British foreign policy since 1945'

    Rachel Lang RT
    Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:23 UTC


    © Chromorange / Global Look Press

    A historian determined to blow the lid on the UK government's shady international dealings is releasing hundreds of declassified documents on an online database. "The British public has little idea what has been done," he told RT.

    Mark Curtis has recently created his own online database, aptly named 'Declassified' - a veritable A-Z of all secret dealings between Britain and virtually every country in the world. The comprehensive list of documents, sourced mostly from the UK's National Archives, aims to provide a "snapshot only of the true history of British foreign policy since 1945" - think everything from Nazis to nuclear warfare.

    In an interview with RT, Curtis said he decided to compile the documents online as the "British public has little idea what has been done, and is being done, in their names."

    Quote
    Mark Curtis‏Verified account @markcurtis30

    #DECLASSIFIED. UK files/articles on the Falklands. US documents from @nsarchiv shows several UK concerns before the 1982 war, including about the islands being the “centre of a vast pool of oil – perhaps nine times the size of the North Sea fields”. http://goo.gl/yyj7we


    8:22 AM - 22 Jan 2018
    14 replies 102 retweets 69 likes
    "I want everyone to be able to see at least some of the documents that I have seen because they tell a much truer story of this country's real role in the world than they will hear on the BBC or read in The Telegraph," said the historian.
    "Of course, they don't tell a full story - not least because UK officials have destroyed many of the documents relating to their policies in the past, surely deliberately to cover up their crimes.
    "It should also be said that, in the set of files I've looked at and am releasing, there are many documents that are still censored. One can only imagine what is there," he added.
    The majority of the documents, while most are publicly available, are not available online.
    "The British mainstream media covers only a fraction of the reality of UK foreign policy and academic studies are largely absent or heavily sanitized,"Curtis said.
    Quote
    Mark Curtis‏Verified account @markcurtis30

    #DECLASSIFIED. UK govts made 100s of sales of nuclear materials to #Israel in the 1950s and 60s, helping it to develop nuclear weapons. http://goo.gl/gqTS6g


    5:26 AM - 22 Jan 2018
    1 reply 48 retweets 30 likes
    "They're all technically in the public domain - housed in the National Archives and available to the public - but you have to physically go there to view them since most documents are not online."
    Curtis, who is drip-feeding the documents through his site, says he will be addressing some of the most "ignored episodes" in British foreign policy - such as the UK's support for the Idi Amin coup in Uganda in 1971, the welcoming of the Pinochet military takeover in Chile, the covert operation to overthrow Sukarno in Indonesia in the late 1950s, and the covert UK war in Yemen in the 1960s.

    Through his research, he said the files expose the true British mindset when it comes to dealing with international relations in the post-war world.
    "One is that there is no interest in the human rights of the people that live in regions like the Middle East, Africa or Asia - British policy is all about geopolitics, promoting commercial interests and upholding Britain's power status," Curtis said.
    "Another theme is that the British public is largely viewed as a threat and they therefore shouldn't be allowed to know what is being done in their names, so officials regularly reveal in the files that they are acting to keep those policies hidden.

    "The danger is that the public might deflect elites from their policy course - this is unacceptable to Whitehall. This is, of course, consistent with the later burning and censoring of documents."
    Curtis, who has written multiple books on the UK's often clandestine role in international relations, said many Britons are already questioning their government, and the role of social media and alternative news sources have a big part to play in unraveling the truth to the British public.

    Quote
    Mark Curtis‏Verified account @markcurtis30

    #DECLASSIFIED. MI6 bombed 5 ships to prevent Jewish holocaust survivors reaching Palestine in 1946-8 and created a fake Arab group to provide cover for this secret operation. https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/operation-embarrass-you-bet-britain-s-secret-war-on-the-jews-1.18403 … via @jewishchron


    5:25 AM - 22 Jan 2018
    5 replies 91 retweets 59 likes
    "We should be questioning government more but we should also be challenging the mainstream sources of 'news' and 'information,' which are actually keeping people in the dark or, even worse, pulling the wool over our eyes," he said.
    "Social and alternative media is very encouraging - this is where people should be getting more and more of their information, bypassing mainstream sources."

    Related:
    Newly declassified files reveal strong British government support for Uganda dictator Idi Amin
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  10. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    3(C)+me (22nd April 2018), Bill Ryan (21st February 2018), BMJ (22nd February 2018), Carmody (8th May 2018), East Sun (22nd January 2018), Ewan (22nd January 2018), Foxie Loxie (22nd January 2018), KiwiElf (23rd January 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), Ron Mauer Sr (22nd January 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), Valerie Villars (22nd April 2018)

  11. Link to Post #86
    Avalon Member East Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2010
    Location
    Cape Cod MA USA
    Posts
    1,402
    Thanks
    2,825
    Thanked 4,024 times in 1,044 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    yes, it's time the truth came out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    Harve, Thanks
    Question Everything, twice or maybe trice..........

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to East Sun For This Post:

    BMJ (22nd February 2018), Hervé (22nd January 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018)

  13. Link to Post #87
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Missing history: US oligarchs finance Socialism

    by Jon Rappoport Feb 20, 2018

    Socialism was never a movement for “the masses”

    By Jon Rappoport

    In 1971, Gary Allen published his book, None Dare Call it Conspiracy [PDF]. It quickly became an unofficial best seller.

    Over the years, several million copies have been sold.

    Allen’s thesis was stark: super-rich American capitalists were financing socialism. This bizarre paradox was resolved when socialism was properly understood—not as “power to the people”—but as elite power over the people. In other words, as a hoax.

    These days, the socialist hoax is still unknown to most of the population:

    Cloak a global power grab as progress for all of humanity.

    Here, from chapter six of None Dare Call it Conspiracy [txt page], “The Rockefellers and the Reds,” is an explosive passage commenting on the period just after the Russian Revolution of 1917:
    “The Rockefellers assigned their public relations agent, Ivy Lee, to sell the American public the idea that the Bolsheviks were merely misunderstood idealists who were actually kind benefactors of mankind.”

    “Professor Antony Sutton of Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, notes in his highly authoritative Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development:”

    “’Quite predictably…[Ivy] Lee concludes that the communist problem is merely psychological. By this time he is talking about “Russians” (not Communists) and concludes “they are all right.” He suggests the United States should not engage in propaganda; makes a plea for peaceful coexistence; and suggests the United States would find it sound policy to recognize the USSR and advance credits [give loans].’ (Antony Sutton, Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development, 1917-1930, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, Stanford University, Calif., 1968, p.292)”

    “After the Bolshevik Revolution, Standard [Oil] of New Jersey [Rockefeller] bought 50 per cent of the Nobel’s huge Caucasus oil fields even though the property had theoretically been nationalized [by Russia]. (O’Connor, Harvey, The Empire Of Oil, Monthly Review Press, New York, 1955, p.270.)”

    “In 1927, Standard Oil of New York [Rockefeller] built a refinery in Russia, thereby helping the Bolsheviks put their economy back on its feet. Professor Sutton states: ‘This was the first United States investment in Russia since the Revolution.’ (Ibid, Vol.1, p.38)”

    “Shortly thereafter Standard Oil of New York and its subsidiary, Vacuum Oil Company [Rockefeller], concluded a deal to market Soviet oil in European countries and it was reported that a loan of $75,009,000 to the Bolsheviks was arranged. (National Republic, Sept.1927.)”

    “…Wherever Standard Oil would go, Chase National Bank was sure to follow. (The Rockefeller’s Chase Bank was later merged with the Warburg’s Manhattan Bank to form the present Chase Manhattan Bank.) In order to rescue the Bolsheviks, who were supposedly an archenemy, the Chase National Bank was instrumental in establishing the American-Russian Chamber of Commerce in 1922. President of the Chamber was Reeve Schley, a vice-president of Chase National Bank. (Ibid, Vol.11, p.288) According to Professor Sutton: ‘In 1925, negotiations between Chase and [Russian] Prombank extended beyond the finance of raw materials and mapped out a complete program for financing Soviet raw material exports to the U. S. and imports of U. S. cotton and machinery.’ (Ibid, Vol.11, p.226) Sutton also reports that ‘Chase National Bank and the Equitable Trust Company were leaders in the Soviet credit business.’ (Ibid, p.277)”

    “The Rockefeller’s Chase National Bank also was involved in selling Bolshevik bonds in the United States in 1928. Patriotic organizations denounced the Chase as an ‘international fence.’ Chase was called ‘a disgrace to America… They will go to any lengths for a few dollars profits.’ (Ibid, Vol.11, p.291) Congressman Louis McFadden, chairman of the House Banking Committee, maintained in a speech to his fellow Congressmen:”

    “’The Soviet government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank and the Guaranty Trust Company and other banks in New York City.”

    “’Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg, the general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and of the State Bank of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and you will be staggered to see how much American money has been taken from the United States’ Treasury for the benefit of Russia. Find out what business has been transacted for the State Bank of Soviet Russia by its correspondent, the Chase Bank of New York’. (Congressional Record, June 15, 1933.)”

    “But the Rockefellers apparently were not alone in financing the Communist arm of the Insiders’ conspiracy. According to Professor Sutton ‘… there is a report in the State Department files that names Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (the long established and important financial house in New York) as the financier of the [Russians’] First Five Year Plan. See U. S. State Dept. Decimal File, 811.51/3711 and 861.50 FIVE YEAR PLAN/236.’ (Sutton, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 340n.)”

    “Professor Sutton proves conclusively in his three volume history of Soviet technological development that the Soviet Union was almost literally manufactured by the U.S.A…”

    “…Sutton shows that there is hardly a segment of the Soviet economy which is not a result of the transference of Western, particularly American, technology.”

    “This cannot be wholly the result of accident. For fifty years the Federal Reserve-CFR-Rockefeller-lnsider crowd has advocated and carried out policies aimed at increasing the power of their satellite, the Soviet Union. Meanwhile, America spends $75 billion a year on defense to protect itself from the enemy the Insiders are building up.”
    NOTE: The descendants of these bankers are now doing everything they can to build up the story that Donald Trump won the presidency by colluding with Russians. To call this an irony, in view of the above information, would be a vast understatement.

    However, the motives of these men are clear: regardless of whether Trump meant to keep his promises to destroy Globalism (aka worldwide Socialism), his mere mention of Globalism as the enemy, during the presidential campaign, and his declared opposition to Globalist “free trade” treaties, was sufficient to warrant an all-out attack on him.

    The whole idea of nationalism as preferable to Globalism could act as a contagious germ spreading to the people of other countries—so Trump as the face and symbol of such sentiments had to be defamed and crushed.

    Through various front organizations, cutouts, dupes, brainwashed useful idiots, and violent hired thugs, that operation to crush Trump is well underway.

    Again—and this point must be understood—IT DOESN’T MATTER WHETHER TRUMP EVER MEANT TO KEEP HIS PROMISE TO BURY GLOBALISM. THE MERE MENTION OF GLOBALISM AS THE ENEMY WAS AND IS SUFFICIENT TO WARRANT UNCEASING ATTACKS AGAINST HIM.

    Many, many of Trump’s supporters want to see Globalism buried.

    Ultimately, these supporters are the real target of the Globalists.

    These millions of targets—human beings who want freedom, a return to Constitutional principles, and an end to both Globalism and American Empire—gave support to presidential candidates before Trump: Ross Perot and Ron Paul.

    These “targets” aren’t going away. They understand how the American Republic was betrayed. The above evidence reveals that betrayal was a set-up, designed to prop up and rescue a system (the USSR) that was dead on arrival, a complete failure.

    Elite money created Socialist Russia, sustained it, bailed it out, and propagandized it as a movement of the people.

    Socialism is a movement of, by, and for the super-rich.

    Jon Rappoport
    Last edited by Hervé; 20th February 2018 at 16:31. Reason: Better PDF link with graphs and pictures
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  14. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (21st February 2018), BMJ (22nd February 2018), Carmody (8th May 2018), Ewan (21st February 2018), Foxie Loxie (20th February 2018), gord (20th February 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), mountain_jim (21st February 2018), Reinhard (13th February 2019), Ron Mauer Sr (20th February 2018), Satori (20th February 2018), seko (23rd April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), Valerie Villars (22nd April 2018)

  15. Link to Post #88
    United States Avalon Guide: Here to help
     
    Ron Mauer Sr's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th January 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    77
    Posts
    1,927
    Thanks
    12,580
    Thanked 15,086 times in 1,863 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Reading Gary Allen's book, None Dare Call it Conspiracy [PDF] was a major wake up event for me.
    Last edited by Hervé; 21st February 2018 at 20:21. Reason: Better PDF copy linked.

  16. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Ron Mauer Sr For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (21st February 2018), BMJ (22nd February 2018), Carmody (8th May 2018), Foxie Loxie (20th February 2018), Hervé (20th February 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), mountain_jim (21st February 2018), seko (23rd April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), Valerie Villars (22nd April 2018)

  17. Link to Post #89
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Disclosure... indeed:

    "Russian Meddling?" FDR's Soviet Spies Sodomized the US

    henrymakow.com February 20, 2018


    (Maj. George Racey Jordan, Lend-Lease expediter
    and liaison with the Russians during World War II.)


    Russian "meddling" in 2016 election is a farce considering the US has been Communist-controlled since the FDR Administration when Soviet Agent Harry Hopkins was known as "Co-President and ran Foreign Policy."

    Using Lend-Lease as a smokescreen, and working out of the WH, Hopkins looted the United States and ran a massive espionage program.

    A patriot, Major George Racey Jordan, exposed this travesty in his 1952 book, From Major Jordan's Diary. As you would expect, he has been disparaged and flushed down the memory hole. No Hollywood movies for real patriots. Americans are their mind-controlled prisoners.

    How could this looting take place? The USSR was the Rothschild's private fiefdom and model for their NWO tyranny. (Now they think they can impose this tyranny with a happy face.)

    Communism concentrates all power and money in their hands. The bankers control the American corporations and politicians that subsidized the USSR at the expense of the American people.
    "This was a national looting far and above the exigencies of war supply."
    -Diana West

    Source

    by Diana West
    (henrymakow.com)

    A book called American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character (St. Martin's Press, 2013) doesn't promise uplift and renewal. I know. I wrote it.

    That said, the story of "betrayal" my new book lays out - betrayal enabled by a de facto Communist occupation of Washington by American traitors loyal to Stalin, which would solidify in the 1930s under FDR and be covered up by successive U.S. administrations and elites - is not without inspiration. I am talking about the inspiration of the truth-tellers.

    "American Betrayal" presents a rewrite of most of World War II and Cold War history, something I never imagined doing when I first began writing the book. This is simply the story that took shape from my research. And it takes shape in the book in a first-person narrative exactly as I stumbled across the revelations and put them together according to two basic mechanisms.

    One relates to revelations from secret archives in Moscow and Washington that opened, briefly and partially, after the USSR dissolved in 1991. I discovered that the treason documented in these archives, treason committed by Americans in government, some in the very highest positions of power, had not been incorporated into our general historical understanding of such defining events as World War II and the Cold War. So I did my best to incorporate them. What emerges makes our history look completely different - even our near-sacred history of World War II.

    The other stream of new information that I was able to reweave into the American story came from those I think of as the truth-tellers. These are the forgotten and/or maligned witnesses and investigators who told and sought the truth about the massive penetration and infiltration by Americans serving a hostile foreign power. (Yes, among them is Sen. Joe McCarthy.)

    Their truth-seeking example is inspiring, particularly in an age of routine, serial lying and obfuscation in Washington. If there is one thing I hope my book does, it is to reintroduce us to these great Americans. Because they contradicted the official narrative - the "court histories" as author and historian M. Stanton Evans calls it - these Americans were smeared, marginalized and lost to us, their rudderless descendants.



    We need them back in our historical and moral consciousness. To that end, I am embarking on an occasional series devoted to truth-tellers highlighted in "American Betrayal."

    I will begin with Maj. George Racey Jordan, who in 1949 and 1950 came forward to testify under oath before Congress that one big reason the Soviet Union had recently surprised the world by exploding an atomic bomb was that he, Jordan, the top "expediter" shipping thousands of tons of U.S. war supplies and aircraft through an airfield in Great Falls, Mont., to the Soviet Union under Lend-Lease during World War II, had personally overseen the shipment of uranium to Moscow.

    Really? Sure enough, as a congressional investigator would testify, two specific shipments of uranium oxide and nitrate were "completely documented to include even the number of the plane that flew the uranium ... out of Great Falls." This postwar revelation before Congress would shock and anger Gen. Leslie Groves, head of the Manhattan Project, because he had slapped an embargo on the wartime export of uranium from the U.S. Of course, the shipments in question came from Canadian stocks. How did that happen? Therein lies a tale - a tale of betrayal.

    Meanwhile, it wasn't just uranium Jordan expedited, as he testified. Heavy water, too.

    The congressional committee was able to document the shipment of heavy water, too.

    In all, Jordan "expedited" 23 atomic materials through the big airbase in Montana to Moscow during the war, along with nearly 14 million pounds of aluminum tubes, also essential to atomic experimentation.

    Findings in Soviet archives would later confirm that possession of the atomic bomb was what emboldened Stalin to trigger the Korean War in 1950. The implications of the theft of U.S. atomic secrets, then, becomes staggering.

    After Jordan went public, all manner of witnesses stepped forward to corroborate different aspects of his story. There was the pilot who flew the uranium shipment (and said he handled brown grains of uranium that spilled from a box). There was the GI who recognized in Moscow-bound blueprints the chemical structure of uranium.



    Soviet defector Victor Kravchenko celebrated author of "I Chose Freedom," would himself testify before Congress and corroborate specific allegations by Jordan attesting to Lend-Lease as a giant conduit of Soviet espionage.

    What even this skeletal synopsis of a tale that unfolds in detail in "American Betrayal" should make clear is that it wasn't just the Rosenberg atomic spy ring that enabled the Soviet theft of U.S. atomic secrets. There was a massive looting effort underway inside the U.S. government overseen by senior Washington officials.

    ----------------------


    Chief among these powers was Harry Hopkins, FDR's very top, very enigmatic, very sinister (I have concluded) adviser. Hopkins was the power behind Lend-Lease - often the power behind Roosevelt, too - and a central figure in my book.

    I knew none of this "lost" history going into my research more than four years ago. Precious few Americans, I've since learned, do. Hopkins, once famously known as Roosevelt's "co-president," is as absent from our national history lessons as Jordan, a credible eyewitness to what might well have been treason. Why do we have such blanks? Why isn't Jordan's earth-shaking testimony, most of it corroborated by documentation and supporting eyewitness accounts, ever taught? How did Hopkins, once the most powerful man in Washington next to FDR (and maybe more so) slip out of our collective memory? Who stole our history - and why?

    These are the questions I set out to unravel in American Betrayal. On this quest, I learned there was nothing like seeking out, dusting off and listening to history's truth-tellers.


    Related-
    YouTube Lecture by Diana West
    ---
    Excerpts from American Betrayal re. Lend Lease-
    "Singapore fell because 200 US fighter jets earmarked for the British enclave were diverted to Russia. As result, more than 100,000 British soldiers were interned. p. 45
    "War supplies didn't just "flow" to the Soviet Union, they flooded it, with half a million trucks and jeeps, nearly 1$ billion (1940 dollars) of ordinance and ammunition, thousands of fighter aircraft, bombers and tanks, 13 million pairs of winter boots, 1.7 million tons of petroleum products. a merchant fleet, 1000 steam locomotives, 581 naval vessels including minesweepers, landing craft, sub chasers, frigates, torpedo boats... icebreakers and a light cruiser. " p.43
    "Non-military supplies included diesel engines, entire prefab factories, and hydroelectric plants...hundreds of thousands of patents were stolen including secret military blueprints, pip-fabricating works, nearly a million miles of copper wire (sent after the war), tens of millions worth of switchboard panels, lathes and power tools for metalworking, machinery for textiles, woodworking, and typesetting, cranes, hoists, serricks, elevators, drills, not to mention $152 milion in women's dress goods, 18.4 million pounds of writing opaper and assorted cigarette cases, compacts, jewelled watches, lipstick, liquor. ...217,660,666 pounds of butter were shipped to the USSR at a time of strict rationing state-side. Planes for Russia were prioritized over US Airforce. " p. 44
    "This was a national looting far and above the exigencies of war supply." Jordan opened a few of the hundreds of black suitcases being transferred to Russia through the Great Falls MT airbase and found espionage of the highest order, including the location and blueprints of key US factories and infrastructure, patents, and plans and materiel for the atomic bomb. ( pp. 138-142)
    ----
    Related-
    FDR - Dupe or Fellow Traveller?

    FDR Turned Blind Eye to Soviet Spies

    FDR Controlled by his (((Braintrust)))

    McCarthy & the Khazar Curse
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  18. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (21st February 2018), BMJ (22nd February 2018), Ewan (21st February 2018), Foxie Loxie (21st February 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), mountain_jim (21st February 2018), Reinhard (13th February 2019), Ron Mauer Sr (21st February 2018), seko (23rd April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018)

  19. Link to Post #90
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Well, while at it, more real disclosures:

    Sen Joseph McCarthy - an American Hero

    henrymakow.com February 17, 2018



    The US is a country of co-conspirators.

    A measure of this subversion is the vilification of Joseph McCarthy, second only to Hitler. What do these two men have in common?

    Resistance to Communism, (i.e. the Masonic Jewish satanic cult.)

    History has proven him right about Communist subversion. However this cancer has spread so far that the myth of a "witchhunt" continues to be perpetuated.

    Most of those who denounce(d) him are(were) dupes or fellow travelers.
    "Virtually every one of the people accused of being a Soviet agent by Elizabeth Bentley and Whittaker Chambers -- both reviled and denounced for making false charges not only by political partisans in the 1940s but by historians ever since -- turns out to have been a Soviet spy."
    "From its inception in 1919, the CPUSA had been generously funded by the Soviet Union, with subsidies that reached $3,000,000 a year by the mid-1980s... the Party leadership had worked closely with Soviet intelligence to ferret out American secrets."
    "We have already ...possessed the minds of the goy communities...[they are] looking through the spectacles we are setting astride their noses."
    Protocols of Zion, 12

    Makow's Comment:
    Historians like Klehr cannot see the BIG PICTURE. Even McCarthy lacked this.

    Communism is a branch of Freemasonry (
    Cabalist Judaism), which is an instrument of the Rothschilds.

    Illuminati insider Chaim Rakovsky revealed in 1938, "
    the aim of Freemasonry is the triumph of Communism." All the players are Freemasons or their tools, including FDR, Truman, Churchill, and Stalin. This is why McCarthy's warnings were ignored and he was destroyed. Soviet agents like Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White defined the postwar world.

    The rot is so widespread that they now stage mass shootings on a regular basis to terrorize and disarm the American people.

    Finally, add this to your list of movies that will never be made: How Joseph McCarthy (and also Defence Sec. James Forrestal) were murdered.


    -------------------------------------------------

    Setting the Record on Sen. Joseph McCarthy Straight

    by Harvey Klehr

    (Excerpts by henrymakow.com)

    McCarthyism is [regarded as] the most frightening and detestable era in modern American history.

    For much of the 1970s, 1980s and 1990, there was a steady outpouring of books and articles arguing that the Communist Party of the United States was a small, inoffensive group of idealists committed to democracy, civil rights and labor organizing that was demonized and persecuted by an American Inquisition, headed not only by McCarthy, but also by J. Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI, and Richard Nixon, persecutor of Alger Hiss...


    (Churchill, Truman and Stalin doing their Masonic shake. Cold War was a charade. All wars are ruses to kill patriots, increase power and make money.)


    Among historians, there was widespread support for the idea that that American government had vastly overestimated the threat of Soviet espionage. The convictions of Alger Hiss and the Rosenbergs were widely regarded as miscarriages of justice. The charges by Elizabeth Bentley that dozens of government employees had given her secret data to turn over to the Russians were derided as the unsupported ravings of a deluded alcoholic. President Truman's imposition of a federal loyalty-security program was attacked as an unjustified intrusion on civil liberties...

    Beginning in the mid-1990s, this simplistic version of an American history in which national security fears were merely the pretext for an attack on civil rights and liberties began to lose ground. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, previously closed Russian archives began to open to scholars.

    I was the first American to gain access to the previously closed files of the Communist International and the CPUSA itself, located in Moscow, in the summer of 1992. Although I was originally far more interested in issues of the CP's political activities in America, I unexpectedly began to come across documents marked top secret being sent by a man named Pavel Fitin that contained the names of employees of the United States government who had been accused of being Soviet spies by Elizabeth Bentley, a defector from Soviet intelligence back in the late 1940s. It was interesting enough that these documents were labeled top secret; what was even more fascinating was that Fitin was head of the KGB's foreign intelligence branch and that his memos were dated from 1943 and 1944 -- long before Bentley went to the FBI.

    That meant they were not reports on her testimony. Because the archivists had not realized that this material was in the files or its significance, I was able to take the microfilm copies out of the country. In The Secret World of American Communism, John Haynes and I reprinted nearly one hundred Russian KGB documents establishing that Soviet intelligence had recruited American communists to spy on its behalf.

    We also showed that from its inception in 1919, the CPUSA had been generously funded by the Soviet Union, with subsidies that reached $3,000,000 a year by the mid-1980s, and that the Party leadership had worked closely with Soviet intelligence to ferret out American secrets. And we found snippets of information about a very hush-hush American project, code-named Venona, that had worked to decipher coded Soviet messages.

    After our book appeared in 1995 we were asked to testify before a commission chaired by former Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan on government secrecy. We pointed out the oddity of finding information about Venona in an open Russian archive while all information about it in America remained closed. Moynihan then pressed the director of the CIA, John Deutsch, a committee member, to consider declassifying the Venona material.

    Later that year it was released -- some 2900 messages between KGB and GRU (Soviet military intelligence) headquarters and their stations in New York, Washington, San Francisco and points outside the United States...

    VENONA REVELATIONS
    As a result of the material that has emerged from Russian archives and the release of the Venona files, we now know a great deal about the extent of Soviet espionage from the 1930s through the 1940s. There is no longer any question about the fact that Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were Soviet spies (although Ethel played a very minor role). Julius is identifiable in Venona under the code-name Liberal. By the way, the use of code names shows that the KGB had a macabre sense of humor. The code name for their bitter enemies, the Trotskyists, was Polecats, Zionists were Rats, San Francisco was Babylon and Washington DC was Carthage.



    There is no doubt that Alger Hiss, left, was a Soviet spy and continued to provide information through the Yalta Conference which he attended as an advisor to FDR. The Soviets thoroughly infiltrated the Manhattan Project and were able to build an atomic bomb several years before they otherwise would have because of such spies as Klaus Fuchs, a German-born British scientist, convicted of espionage in the late 1940s and Theodore Hall, a young American physicist who died in Britain in 1999, who had never been publicly named as a spy until the Venona material was released...

    All told, some 350 Americans turn out to have worked for Soviet intelligence during World War II -- a time when we were allies. American counter-intelligence eventually identified more than 125 of these agents -- but were never able to nail down who the other 200 plus were. Virtually every one of the people accused of being a Soviet agent by Elizabeth Bentley and Whittaker Chambers -- both reviled and denounced for making false charges not only by political partisans in the 1940s but by historians ever since -- turns out to have been a Soviet spy.

    No Federal agency was immune to Soviet penetration. There were at least 16 Soviet agents in the OSS, predecessor to the CIA, including Duncan Lee, chief counsel to General William Donovan. The Office of War Information, the Board of Economic Warfare, United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration, War Production Board, War Department, Signal Corps, Censorship office, the Justice Department were all penetrated. In the State Department Alger Hiss was not the only Soviet spy. Larry Duggan, in charge of Latin American affairs, was an agent. Lauchlin Currie, one of six presidential assistants, provided information. The most highly placed spy was Harry Dexter White, the number two man the Treasury Department and one of the architects of the post-war international financial order -- he designed the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the Bretton Woods agreement. The KGB so valued White's information -- including meetings at the founding UN conference where he revealed the American negotiating strategy -- that when he hinted at leaving government service because of financial pressures, the KGB offered to pay his daughter's college tuition...

    MCCARTHY
    There are several things about which Senator McCarthy was right -- although he was by no means the first or only person to note them. There was a very significant issue of national security presented by communist spying and subversion. No government can turn a blind eye to spying as extensive as that directed against the United States by the Soviet Union. Secondly, the American Communist Party was serving as an agent of a foreign power. ..

    Thirdly, McCarthy was partially correct that the Roosevelt and Truman administrations had been slow to respond to the issue of Soviet espionage. Whittaker Chambers had first gone to Adolph Berle with information about Alger Hiss, Harry White, Lauchlin Currie and others right after the Nazi-Soviet Pact and nothing had been done. It was not just that many liberals refused to believe that people like Hiss could not be spies.



    Even J. Edgar Hoover's FBI did not make Soviet espionage a major priority until 1943 and their early investigations, while filled with promising leads, did not go very far...

    But if McCarthy was right about some of the large issues, he was wildly wrong on virtually all of the details.

    ...The new information from Russian and American archives does not vindicate McCarthy. He remains a demagogue, whose wild charges actually made the fight against Communist subversion more difficult.

    But if McCarthy was wrong on the details -- and what is history but details -- many historians today are both wrong on the details about McCarthyism and morally obtuse about the nature of communism. Far too many American historians believe that anti-communism or the search for Soviet spies was baseless paranoia. They recoil so strongly from McCarthy that they are unable to recognize that just because an objectionable politician cynically employed anti-communism does not mean that anti-communism was objectionable. The CPUSA was a haven for spies and Soviet subversion presented a genuine security threat to the United States.

    But, for Ellen Schrecker, former editor of Academe, Journal of the American Association of University Professors, all varieties of anti-communism are species of McCarthyism. Opposition to communism, she has written," tapped into something dark and nasty ion the human soul." Blanche Wiesen Cook of CUNY lamented that "everything fine and creative in American thought has been splattered and smeared" by hostility to communism.

    ACADEMIA IS COMMUNIST
    One of the oddest phenomena in the academic world is the nostalgia so many professor display for communism. The human costs of that ideology, we now know, run upwards of 100 million dead in the former Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, Eastern Europe and North Korea. In light of archival evidence that during the Great Purges of the 1930s, the USSR was executing almost 1000 political prisoners a day...

    Most disturbing has been the willingness of many historians to blind themselves to historical evidence. As the new material has emerged from Russian archives and the declassified Venona documents, far too many historians have allowed their political and ideological biases to distort their historical judgment...

    And then there are those historians who have, sometimes reluctantly, looked this new material in the face, admitted its validity, and provided retroactive support for one of McCarthy's charges -- that one segment of American opinion supported communism and the Soviet Union against their own country. These historians have concluded that the weight of the evidence of Soviet espionage is so overwhelming that it can no longer be denied...
    ----
    Related-
    Our DeFacto Communist Society

    McCarthy Charges Now Accepted as Fact

    The New World Order is Communism

    How Communists Used McCarthy
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  20. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    BMJ (22nd February 2018), Ewan (21st February 2018), Foxie Loxie (21st February 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), mountain_jim (21st February 2018), Reinhard (13th February 2019), Ron Mauer Sr (21st February 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), Valerie Villars (24th April 2018)

  21. Link to Post #91
    United States Avalon Member Foxie Loxie's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th September 2015
    Location
    Central NY
    Age
    75
    Posts
    3,079
    Thanks
    67,683
    Thanked 17,336 times in 2,953 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Interesting part of The Big Picture we are living through right now!! FACTS never seem to matter, do they?!

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Foxie Loxie For This Post:

    BMJ (22nd February 2018), Hervé (21st February 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018)

  23. Link to Post #92
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Revisiting Col. House's version of "The Protocols":

    Protocols of Zion are Genuine: Col. House Had a Personal Copy

    henrymakow.com March 17, 2018


    (Ventriloquist Edward House, right, with his Dummy President Woodrow Wilson, left)


    Some time ago, Stan Monteith, (1929-2014) a pioneer NWO researcher, found a typewritten copy of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" in the papers of Col. E.M. House at Yale University.

    This seemed like confirmation of the widely held view that House (1858-1938) was a Rothschild agent. House was an "adviser" to Woodrow Wilson and FDR. It makes sense that he would have a copy of the Blueprint for the New World Order in his possession. He elaborated on this diabolical program in his political manifesto, "Philip Dru Administrator." (1912)

    I began a comparison of the two manuscripts here.


    Spencer Percival continues this comparison below and makes the point:
    Why would Rothschild's US consiglieri own a private typescript if The Protocols were a "forgery?"
    "This is massive, the Protocols now having a direct provenance to an unimpeachable source which effectively destroys all the so-called debunking; even the ADL will have a hard job to discredit House as an anti-Semite."
    Americans are physical collateral against the national "debt":
    House on "Social Security"
    -" Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges."
    by Spencer Percival
    (henrymakow.com)

    Colonel Edward Mandell House (July 26, 1858 - March 28, 1938) was an adviser or 'puppet master' of two US presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, overseeing passage of the Federal Reserve Act, The so called Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution to permit Congress to levy an Income Tax, America's entry into World War one, Versailles (where he also helped set up the Council on Foreign Relations, America's equivalence of the Royal Institute), recognition of the Soviet Union, gold confiscation bank holiday, formed The New Deal.

    Considered by many to be a major Rothschild agent, he exposed his agenda for humanity in a meeting with Woodrow Wilson.
    "[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property1 in a national system2 designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.

    "By such methodology, we can compel people3 to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency4.

    "Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel5, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

    "Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading6 to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.

    "They will be stripped of their rights7 and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund the government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.

    "This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call 'Social Insurance.' Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office8 of our dummy corporation9 to foment this plot against America."
    DID HOUSE TYPE THIS MS HIMSELF?
    Notwithstanding all the furor that accompanied the Marsden publication from 1919 which continued throughout the twenties and thirties, House and his executors determined to leave to posterity this version of the Protocols.

    On receipt of the copies I was most surprised at the tattered looking images of which were 99 manual typewritten pages replete with typo's and multiple corrections and other indications11 that this was being copied and that the typist wasn't a professional and therefore likely to be Edward House himself, which may suggest he didn't wish any other eyes to see the document, however without going to Yale University and comparing them to his other papers I cannot say conclusively it is equally possible that he received the MS 'as is' from another party.

    My first action was to scan, ocr12 and proofread the manuscript and when done, one of the first things to stand out was missing protocols and duplicate ones. Whilst the missing protocol and one 'duplicate protocol' could be put down to a typo the same couldn't be said for Protocol XI. for which there are two distinct 'protocols', thus the House MS has in fact 25 protocols as against 24 protocols in the Marsden MS which may or may not have esoteric significance.

    On closer examination what shows is a slightly different Protocol numbering and the splitting of a Marsden Protocol into two, thus Marsden Protocol 3 'Methods of Conquest' has moved to House Protocol 10 causing Marsden Protocols 4 and 5 to become House Protocols 3 and 4, as House Protocol 5 doesn't exist they realign at Protocol 6 and the second House Protocol 6 is in fact the first part of Marsden Protocol 7 and completed with House Protocol 7, the first of two Protocols' 11 in House relates to Marsden Protocol 10 and the second House Protocol 11 realigns with Marsden Protocol 11.

    The first thing noticed is the economy of paragraphs in the House MS. But reading the two texts, although using alternate vocabularies, both still impart the same meaning or intent, which continues throughout the Protocols.

    In Protocol 11 there is a Latin phrase, now Latin in French, English or Russian should be the same but here we have modus vivendi in the House MS and modus agendi in the Marsden MS, whilst it falls in with a consistent alternate vocabulary that imparts the same meaning or intent, for the reasons stated above you would expect it to be the same if it were a translation, additional a French term coups d'état is used in House Protocol 11 but not in Marsden Protocol 11 but in Protocol 15 and not in House Protocol 15.

    Henry Makow has compared the first eight pages of the House MS with the Marsden MS, and he concludes that the nuances of the different words are significant and whilst I do not disagree with that statement I consider the intent of the vocabulary of the text to be more significant.

    Conclusion: Protocols were "Serving Notice"
    Anyone who makes a honest study of the complete MSs cannot help but come to the conclusion that the source for the both of them is the same, whether that be a meeting or a text, with the inconsistencies noted above it points more to a meeting(s) than text, yet this does not explain the different orders in parts of the MS. That being the case the existence of the House MS proves the authenticity of the Marsden MS which most non-coincident theorists would have known anyway.

    This is massive, the Protocols now having a direct provenance to an unimpeachable source which effectively destroys all the so-called debunking, even the ADL will have a hard job to discredit House as an anti-Semite.

    As to the writer, I do not think it was an opposition copy for the simple reason it stands unique and surely the purpose of an opposition copy would be to disseminate it as widely as possible so that by now, over 100 years on, there would be several copies coming to light, also with this being about 9 years before the Marsden book came to press, it would have been a 'hot book'.

    I think that it is more likely the work of a group, possibly Chabad or given that most these people are Luciferians and Cabbalists it may have even been channeled, which brings to mind another Woodrow Wilson quote:
    "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
    Currently, my time is very limited, my main region of research being Law13 and health, As such, I have learnt that Notice (as mentioned at the start) is an integral part of law systems starting with the cosmic law and down to the common and municipal law. Cities used to post (Notice) their laws at the gate, I now believe that such 'leaks' are in some cases by design, the fact is mankind has been noticed and on the fulfillment of their plans they can legally say you were told, you did not resist, you consented. However, I shall in all probability use the comparisons above as a start to complete a comparison volume (unless you beat me to it), but for now, here is House's ms PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETING OF THE ZIONIST MEN v2 Final (3).pdf


    References:
    1 Children

    2 Although all states had birth records by 1919, the use of the standardized version was not uniformly adopted until the 1930's

    3 Persons would be more correct, as these are attached to people.

    4 Backed by the "full faith and credit" of the U.S. Government!

    5 Property

    6 Record of Live Birth - Birth Certificate

    7 The Bill of Rights does not apply to 14th Amendment U.S. Citizens.

    8 Presidency

    9 U.S.A. as opposed to the republic which is the united states of America.

    10 Which may or may not be a translation.

    11 Addition of footnotes and comments to MS.

    12 Optical Character Reader.

    13 There are many misconceptions about law, part of the same consensus reality with assumptions and presumptions allowed to be inculcated into society, if you wish a glimpse of what real law as opposed to code is, a reasonable site to visit is Private Person.

    ==============================================

    Yale University... the fiefdom of Skull & Bones whose Bonesmen Elders were behind schedule in getting WW I going...
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  24. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    BMJ (24th April 2018), Ewan (17th March 2018), Foxie Loxie (17th March 2018), gaiagirl (17th March 2018), Jayke (29th July 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), Satori (24th April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018)

  25. Link to Post #93
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    A short recap on how things got started (plucked from here <---) and how much out of hand they've gotten now:
    The New World Order is a fait accompli. They put "mission accomplished" (annuit coeptis) on the US dollar in 1929.

    [...]
    Nicholas Rockefeller admitted to Aaron Russo that his family foundation started Women's Lib to get women out of the home, expand the tax base and indoctrinate the children from a young age. In 2000, Rockefeller foretold Sept. 11 and invited Russo to become part of the coming Fascist state.

    The Rockefeller Foundation is also the major sponsor of Planned Parenthood (Formerly "The Eugenics Society") contraceptive research and Feminism. There are 87K hits for the "RF and Women's Studies" on Google.

    Previously, the Rockefellers sponsored Josef Mengele's research on how to make a human slave at Auschwitz. Feminism is also dedicated to this long-term goal. (See this video on the history of Rockefeller Social Engineering)

    There you have it, that "BIG" picture, in the most succinct nutshell possible:

    Quote Nicholas Rockefeller [...] his family foundation started Women's Lib to get women out of the home, expand the tax base and indoctrinate the children from a young age.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  26. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (22nd April 2018), BMJ (24th April 2018), Ewan (22nd April 2018), Foxie Loxie (22nd April 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), onawah (22nd April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018)

  27. Link to Post #94
    United States Avalon Member Valerie Villars's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th November 2017
    Age
    57
    Posts
    2,718
    Thanks
    27,941
    Thanked 18,129 times in 2,676 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    It's a chilling picture.

    Before I understood as much as I do now, I often thought how misguided the feminist move was, in the sense that the children are the ones who suffer. I felt that pain through the eyes of my child, too late, as I realized other people were raising my child while I was just busy trying to put food on the table.

    Or later when I lived in the nice house and I was disgusted that the mercedes (my husband's) cost over 600.00 per month while no one was tending to the dynamics of the family. I left that marriage.
    "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what we share with someone when we are uncool." From the movie "Almost Famous""l "Let yourself stand cool and composed before a million universes." Walt Whitman

  28. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Valerie Villars For This Post:

    3(C)+me (22nd April 2018), Bill Ryan (5th May 2018), BMJ (24th April 2018), Ewan (22nd April 2018), Foxie Loxie (22nd April 2018), Hervé (22nd April 2018), Michelle Marie (22nd April 2018), onawah (22nd April 2018), Satori (24th April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018)

  29. Link to Post #95
    Scotland Avalon Member Ewan's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th February 2015
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,274
    Thanks
    11,862
    Thanked 7,741 times in 1,233 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Quote Posted by Hervé (here)

    (See this video on the history of Rockefeller Social Engineering)


    404. That’s an error.

    The requested URL /videoplay was not found on this server. That’s all we know.

  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ewan For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (22nd April 2018), Hervé (22nd April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018)

  31. Link to Post #96
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    I couldn't find it anymore either... too bad.

    In any case, doing a search for " history of Rockefeller Social Engineering, video " I found those:


    The Rockefellers & Social Engineering - Dr. Russell Blaylock... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WucbVbu7exA

    Rockefeller Frankfurt School Tavistock Degeneracy - Jay Dyer / Tim Kelly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBuHPcGofHU

    SJWs From Tavistock, Project BLUEBIRD & MK Ultra - Jay Dyer (Half) VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P_vDcJuG24

    卐 German Skull & Bones Rockefeller family were behind the funding of Josef Mengele: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W88A-cVOlqA

    1969: NWO insider reveals social engineering & depopulation plan! :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xos5IBrsGlU
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  32. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (23rd April 2018), Bill Ryan (5th May 2018), BMJ (24th April 2018), Ewan (23rd April 2018), Foxie Loxie (22nd April 2018), Noelle (23rd April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), Valerie Villars (22nd April 2018)

  33. Link to Post #97
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    I moved three posts out of this thread to this new one: For an idea On The Big Picture Solutions since this thread aims at collecting corroborations to what that "BIG" picture actually consists of.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  34. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (23rd April 2018), Bill Ryan (5th May 2018), BMJ (24th April 2018), Foxie Loxie (23rd April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), Valerie Villars (23rd April 2018)

  35. Link to Post #98
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    The following article gives an idea on how the "BIG" picture gets implemented into medium and small pictures, down the line:

    Craig Murray: Complete disillusionment with the Establishment

    Craig Murray craigmurray.org.uk
    Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:58 UTC


    © Reuters

    The second half of my life has been a continual process of disillusionment with the institutions I used to respect. I suppose it started with the FCO, where I went from being Britain's youngest ambassador to being sacked for opposing the use of intelligence from torture, at the same time having an insider view of the knowing lies about Iraqi WMD being used as a pretext for invasion and resource grab.

    I still had some residual respect for the BBC, which respect disappeared during the Scottish independence referendum where BBC propaganda and disregard for the truth were truly shameless.

    My love of the universities was severely tested during my period as Rector of Dundee University, when I saw how far the corporate model had turned them from academic communities developing people and pursuing knowledge, to relentless churners out of unconsidered graduates and financially profitable research, with nearly all sense of community gone.

    My respect for charities vanished when I discovered Save the Children was paying its chief executive £370,000 and had become a haven for New Labour politicos on huge salaries, which was why it was so involved in pushing a pro-war narrative in Syria. When Justin Forsyth and Brendan Cox - both massively salaried employees who came into Save the Children from the revolving door of Gordon Brown's office - were outed over sexual predation, that seemed a natural result of "charities" being headed by rich party hacks rather than by simple people trying to do good. As for respect for parliament, well the massive troughing expenses scandal and all those protected paedophiles...

    It has become difficult to hang on to respect for any institution, and that is unsettling.

    Which brings me to last week's annual awards from Index on Censorship. The winners of the awards - from Cuba, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Honduras and Egypt - all seem worthy enough, and there is even some departure from the neo-con narrative in recognising a human rights problem in Egypt.

    But the Chairman of Index on Censorship is, incredibly, Rupert Murdoch lead hack David Aaronovitch, and he presided over the awards, in the very week in which the newspaper for which he writes produced this appalling attack on freedom of expression:



    Inside there was a further two page attack on named academics who have the temerity to ask for evidence of government claims over Syria, including distinguished Professors Tim Hayward, Paul McKeigue and Piers Robinson. The Times also attacked named journalists and bloggers and, to top it off, finished with a column alleging collusion between Scottish nationalists and the Russian state.

    That the Chairman of "Index on Censorship" is associated with this kind of attack on freedom of speech, freedom of thought and freedom of research is sadly unsurprising. The guest list of the Index ceremony had a distinct right wing tinge including A C Grayling and Sara Khan, as well as a good smattering of the BBC, which was also represented on the judging panel. The irony of the state broadcaster being part of a panel on freedom of expression is plainly lost.

    I realised something was very wrong with Index on Censorship when I contacted them over a decade ago, when Jack Straw attempted to ban the publication of my book Murder in Samarkand, after it had passed successfully through the exhaustive FCO clearance process over a time-consuming year. I tried to interest them again when my second book The Catholic Orangemen of Togo was dropped by my publisher following libel threats from mercenary commander Tim Spicer of Aegis/Executive Outcomes/Sandline. On both occasions I was told that then Chief Executive of Index, John Kampfner, did not regard these attempted book bannings as incidents of censorship. Presumably because they weren't somewhere like Cuba or Zimbabwe...

    The truly appalling Times attack on academics was part of a coordinated and government-led campaign to delegitimise anybody doubting the official narrative on Salisbury and Syria. The BBC weighed in with this horrible effort:



    The government then issued a ridiculous press release branding decent people as "Russian bots" just for opposing British policy in Syria. In a piece of McCarthyism so macabre I cannot believe this is really happening, an apparently pleasant and normal man called Ian was grilled live on Murdoch's Sky News, having been named by his own government as a Russian bot.

    The Guardian uncritically published the government's accusations in full, and astonishingly seemed proud that it had made no attempt to investigate their veracity but had merely published what the government wished them to publish:



    The Guardian
    naturally was just as reliable as the BBC in driving home the message that anybody who doubted the government's word on Syria was a flat-earth denier of the truth:



    Mr Freedland is of course a perfect representation of an interesting fact. Those who are most active in telling us that we must attack Syria, and that anybody who questions the government's pretexts is insane or evil, are precisely the same individuals who supported the war in Iraq and attacked those who doubted the existence of Iraqi WMD. Indeed these people - Jonathan Freedland, David Aaronovitch, Oliver Kamm, Alan Mendoza, Andrew Rawnsley, John Rentoul, Nick Cohen - are the leaders of the tiny, insignificant number of people who still believe that the invasion of Iraq was both justified and beneficial in its result.

    Yet these people of proven terrible judgement, they and others of their media class, are the arbiters who are allowed to dictate the terms of what is and what is not an acceptable public utterance on the situation in Syria.

    When Jeremy Corbyn became leader of the opposition, one of two things had to happen. Either the Overton window had to shift to allow for the reflection of views held by the leader of the official opposition and his myriad supporters, or the leader of the opposition had to be castigated and humiliated as an unreasonable lunatic. Corbyn's rational scepticism on British involvement in the conflict in Syria is a key moment in this process. Despite the fact Corbyn's scepticism is supported by a wide swathe of diplomatic and military opinion within the UK, it has to be portrayed as fringe, extreme and irrational.

    We thus have the extraordinary spectacle of a coordinated government and media onslaught on anybody who doubts their entirely fact free narratives. Those who were demonstrably completely wrong over Iraq are held up as infallible, and given full control of all state and corporate media platforms, where they deride those who were right over Iraq as crackpots and Russian bots.

    Meanwhile public trust in the state and corporate media hits new lows, which is the happy part of this story.

    Finally, a change of policy on this blog.

    For thirteen years now it has operated with a policy of not accepting donations, except for occasional legal funds. It has now reached a size and cost, not least because of continual attacks, that make income essential. It is also the case that due to change in personal circumstance I am no longer in a position to devote my time to it without income - the need to earn a living caused the blog to go dark for almost five months last year, and the last six weeks this journalism has stopped me doing anything else to pay the rent. So, with a certain amount of pride swallowed, here is your chance to subscribe.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  36. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (5th May 2018), BMJ (24th April 2018), Ewan (5th May 2018), Foxie Loxie (24th April 2018), mountain_jim (6th May 2018), Reinhard (13th February 2019), Satori (24th April 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), Valerie Villars (27th April 2018)

  37. Link to Post #99
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,766
    Thanks
    60,316
    Thanked 95,032 times in 15,475 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Billionaires are Behind Communism - Reece Committee

    Henry Makow May 5, 2018


    Norman Dodd (1899-1987) was a banker/bank manager, worked as a financial advisor and served as chief investigator in 1953 for U.S. Congressman B. Carroll Reece Special Committee on Tax Exempt Foundations (commonly referred to as the Reece Committee).

    Most of America's great fortunes were made by men chosen by the Rothschilds and given the money to become monopolies. Naturally, they share the Rothschild goal of worldwide Communism, which is essentially a monopoly over everything- money, power, belief & thought. Thus they must destroy all collective forces - race, religion (God), nation and family (gender).

    As this article indicates, they used tax-exempt foundations to re-engineer America in the direction of Communism. Their mandate was "to alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union." This is the origin of endless war, globalism, miscegenation, feminism, "gay rights," gun control, political correctness, multiculturalism etc. Communism is pretty much a fait accompli in the West.

    The following historical account is excerpted from Charlotte Iserbyt's book The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America, page 46-48:

    -----------------------------------------------------------

    Investigate Tax Exempt Foundations
    by Charlotte Iserbyt
    (Excerpt by henrymakow.com)


    B. Carroll Reece

    NORMAN DODD, A YALE GRADUATE, INTELLECTUAL AND NEW YORK CITY INVESTMENT BANKER, was chosen to be the research director for the Reece Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives in 1953. The Reece Committee was named for its creator, Rep. Carroll Reece of Tennessee, (above) and was formed to investigate the status of tax-exempt foundations.

    Dodd sent committee questionnaires to numerous foundations, and as a result of one such request, Joseph E. Johnson, president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, invited Dodd to send a committee staffer to Carnegie headquarters in New York City to examine the minutes of the meetings of the foundation's trustees. These minutes had long since been stored away in a warehouse. Obviously, Johnson, who was a close friend of former Carnegie Endowment's president and Soviet spy Alger Hiss, had no idea what was in them. [Word is the staffer went insane because of what she found.]

    ENDLESS WAR
    The minutes revealed that in 1910 the Carnegie Endowment's trustees asked themselves this question:
    "Is there any way known to man more effective than war, to so alter the life of an entire people?"

    (John D. Rockefeller)


    For a year the trustees sought an effective "peaceful" method to "alter the life of an entire people." Ultimately, they concluded that war was the most effective way to change people. Consequently, the trustees of the "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace" next asked themselves: "How do we involve the United States in a war?" And they answered,
    "We must control the diplomatic machinery of the United States by first gaining control of the State Department."
    Norman Dodd stated that the trustees' minutes reinforced what the Reece Committee had uncovered elsewhere about the Carnegie Endowment:
    "It had already become a powerful policy-making force inside the State Department."
    During those early years of the Carnegie Endowment, war clouds were already forming over Europe and the opportunity of enactment of their plan was drawing near. History proved that World War I did indeed have an enormous impact on the American people. For the first time in our history, large numbers of wives and mothers had to leave their homes to work in war factories, thus effectively eroding woman's historic role as the "heart" of the family.

    The sanctity of the family itself was placed in jeopardy. Life in America was so thoroughly changed that, according to Dodd's findings,
    "[T]he trustees had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom and validity of their original decision."
    They sent a confidential message to President Woodrow Wilson, insisting that the war not be ended too quickly.


    EDUCATION
    After the war, the Carnegie Endowment trustees reasoned that if they could get control of education in the United States they would be able to prevent a return to the way of life as it had been prior to the war. They recruited the Rockefeller Foundation to assist in such a monumental task. According to Dodd's Reece Committee report:
    "They divided the task into parts, giving to the Rockefeller Foundation the responsibility of altering education as it pertains to domestic subjects, but Carnegie retained the task of altering our education in foreign affairs and about international relations."

    Rowan Gaither

    During a subsequent personal meeting with Mr. Dodd, President Rowan Gaither (above) of the Ford Foundation said,
    "Mr. Dodd, we invited you to come here because we thought that perhaps, off the record, you would be kind enough to tell us why the Congress is interested in the operations of foundations such as ours?"
    Gaither answered his own rhetorical question with a startling admission:
    "Mr. Dodd, all of us here at the policy making level of the foundation have at one time or another served in the OSS [Office of Strategic Services, CIA forerunner] or the European Economic Administration, operating under directives from the White House. We operate under those same directives.... The substance under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."
    Stunned, Dodd replied,
    "Why don't you tell the American people what you just told me and you could save the taxpayers thousands of dollars set aside for this investigation?"
    Gaither responded,
    "Mr. Dodd, we wouldn't think of doing that."
    In public, of course, Gaither never admitted what he had revealed in private. However, on numerous public occasions, Norman Dodd repeated what Gaither had said, and was neither sued by Gaither nor challenged by the Ford Foundation. Dodd was subsequently warned that:
    "If you proceed with the investigation as you have outlined, you will be killed."

    Wayne Hays

    The Reece Committee never completely finished its work of investigating and receiving testimony in open hearings involving the representatives of the major tax-exempt foundations. The process was completely disrupted and finally derailed by the deliberately disruptive activity of one of its members, Congressman Wayne Hays of Ohio, (above).

    According to general counsel for the Reece Committee, Renee A. Wormser's account in Foundations: Their Power and Influence (Devin-Adair: New York, 1958, p. 341):
    "[Hays] was frank enough to tell us that he had been put on the committee by Mr. [Sam] Rayburn, the Democratic Leader in the House, as the equivalent of a watchdog. Just what he was to 'watch' was not made clear until it became apparent that Mr. Hays was making it his business to frustrate the investigation to the greatest extent possible."

    Related:

    "The Aim of Freemasonry is the Triumph of Communism"

    How University Betrays Students & Society

    Dodd interview with Ed Griffin

    Interview with Stan Monteith
    Last edited by Hervé; 23rd August 2019 at 14:01.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  38. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (5th May 2018), Bill Ryan (5th May 2018), Ewan (5th May 2018), Foxie Loxie (5th May 2018), Jayke (6th May 2018), mountain_jim (6th May 2018), Reinhard (13th February 2019), Ron Mauer Sr (5th May 2018), Sophocles (6th August 2018), Tintin (23rd August 2019), Valerie Villars (5th May 2018)

  39. Link to Post #100
    United States Avalon Member Valerie Villars's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th November 2017
    Age
    57
    Posts
    2,718
    Thanks
    27,941
    Thanked 18,129 times in 2,676 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    I have an idea on the big picture in a World Atlas book I have had since the early nineties. I began marking an X in every country in which there was a war or an invasion with a number, which I corresponded in writing on the side of the page, as to what country it was, the date and who was fighting, etc.

    The map became so littered with X's and the side page so filled with script, I finally gave up. And that was only in a decade or less's time.
    "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what we share with someone when we are uncool." From the movie "Almost Famous""l "Let yourself stand cool and composed before a million universes." Walt Whitman

  40. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Valerie Villars For This Post:

    Ewan (7th May 2018), Foxie Loxie (6th May 2018), Hervé (6th May 2018), Reinhard (13th February 2019)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 1 5 8 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts