+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 3 4 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 78

Thread: For an idea on the "big" picture

  1. Link to Post #41
    Scotland Avalon Member Ewan's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th February 2015
    Age
    55
    Posts
    1,105
    Thanks
    9,719
    Thanked 6,268 times in 1,063 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Quote Posted by Hervé (here)
    CONCLUSION
    The "Mardi Gras Secrets" suggest that, given the depth of corruption, the US political system cannot be taken seriously as a democracy. There is a pattern of Illuminati-Rothschild control throughout US history. People who deny this are living in a fantasy.
    People who deny that are probably living in ignorance (rather than denial), if there is awareness then ascribe it to cognitive dissonance.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ewan For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (23rd March 2017), LadyM (5th August 2017), The Freedom Train (17th April 2017)

  3. Link to Post #42
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Quote Posted by Ewan (here)
    Quote Posted by Hervé (here)
    CONCLUSION
    The "Mardi Gras Secrets" suggest that, given the depth of corruption, the US political system cannot be taken seriously as a democracy. There is a pattern of Illuminati-Rothschild control throughout US history. People who deny this are living in a fantasy.
    People who deny that are probably living in ignorance (rather than denial), if there is awareness then ascribe it to cognitive dissonance.
    If there is ignorance, then, indeed, there is nothing to deny... and the statement doesn't apply and is a strawman argument.

    For those who entertain a cognitive dissonance, then, which universe do they pretend to live in? Reality?... or a world made up of unsupported beliefs? Accordingly, the statement is accurately correct
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), LadyM (5th August 2017), The Freedom Train (17th April 2017)

  5. Link to Post #43
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    David Rockefeller's dark legacy in Brazil

    Brasil Wire
    Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:05 UTC


    David Rockefeller

    On March 20, David Rockefeller died at the age of 101. As the obituaries for one of the world's richest men gush over his philanthropy, it needs to be pointed out that he was a major player in several Latin American coups, supported extremely corrupt military dictatorships, post-dictatorship neoliberal policies that greatly exacerbated income stratification and poverty and that his dark legacy will continue to influence the region long after his death.

    The Rockefellers' arrival in Brazil
    The Rockefeller Foundation first arrived in Brazil during World War I and was embedded within the so-called "public health movement" amongst Brazilian elites. At that time, Brazilian eugenics was synonymous with public health and emphasized "hygienization", expressed in the maxim "to sanitize is to eugenize". With Rockefeller assistance, the creation of the Eugenic Society of São Paulo in 1918 represented the institutionalization of eugenics in Brazil. Amongst elites, eugenics was associated with evolution, progress and civilization, even treated by some as a 'new religion'. In "War against the weak" Edwin Black explains that the purpose of the Rockefeller Foundation was to finance programs aimed at "the extermination of those considered degenerate". In Brazil this meant the poor, the ignorant, those of mixed race and African descent.

    In her thesis on David's older brother Nelson Rockefeller, historian Elisabeth Cobbs argues that U.S. Foreign policy in Brazil was not only realised by official relations between governments and diplomats, but also by the private sector, including philanthropic organisations. Nelson had been a regular visitor to Brazil since the 1930s, and in 1941 was named by President Roosevelt as coordinator of the Office of Interamerican Affairs (CIAA), which ran intelligence and propaganda operations against the Axis Powers in Latin America.

    Following the end of the War, Nelson headed the American International Association for Economic and Social Development in Brazil of AIA. The AIA was a "Capitalist Missionary" philanthropic NGO known in Brazil for its programmes for modernisation of agriculture to North American models and standards (including the introduction of pesticides, herbicides and hybrid seeds), sanitation, and literacy. AIA would eventually birth two more agencies, IBEC (International Basic Economy Company) and the IRI Research Institute. As coordinator of the CIAA, Nelson acquired invaluable information about Latin America's untapped natural resources, especially mineral reserves, information that he would go on to use following the war. IBEC became a key component in the post-World War Two opening of the Amazon rainforest to commercial exploitation, "a process that eventually led to military dictatorships, genocide of native peoples, loss of biological diversity and unprecedented misery for the majority of Brazilians".


    President Getúlio Vargas

    The Cold War increased pressures on Brazil regarding Oil exploration concessions. President Getúlio Vargas was said to have tried to address this by forming a consortium, with the participation of Standard Oil, Shell and the Brazilian State. Shell is reported to have accepted the idea, but Standard Oil and Chase Bank opposed. Standard Oil would instead coerce using threats to Brazil's Coffee exports - the Rockefeller group controlled the American Coffee Corporation, which bought most of Brazil's coffee, processed it and distributed to the United States.

    In the 1950s David Rockefeller & Chase became more active in Brazil, creating Interamerican Finance & Investments, only to sell their shares in 1956 as the political climate turned against Internationalisation. In 1961 he tried to set up a Chase affiliate bank in Brazil, buying 51% of Banco Lar for $3m dollars, but Chase were discouraged due to the political instability in the country. (In 1980 he was cleared by the Central Bank to buy the remaining shares, and this entity finally became Brazil's Chase).

    During this period, along with his brother Nelson, David developed a very close friendship with partner and boss of Unibanco (later merged with Itau) Walther Moreira Salles, whose family made a second fortune from the ultra-rare mineral Niobium. Together, the Rockefellers and Moreira Salles would purchase a massive Farm, "Bodoquena", in the state of Mato Grosso.

    In the early 1960s on the instruction of President Kennedy, David Rockefeller founded the Business Group for Latin America, which was intended to help counter the spread of leftist governments in the region following the Cuban revolution. Under his leadership, it subsequently transformed into the Council of the Americas and finally AS/COA, which currently publishes Americas Quarterly, a relatively discreet but influential nucleus of anglophone "Free Trade" policy discourse on Latin America.

    The Business Group for Latin America included on its board senior executives such as C. Jay Parkinson, CEO of Anaconda Copper - which had a strong presence in Chile, and Harold Geneen, head of the International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (ITT), also heavily involved in the country, and Donald M. Kendall, CEO of PepsiCo. All of these firms supported the intervention of Nixon and Kissinger against elected President Salvador Allende, in 1973.

    In 1970, covert CIA schemes against Allende included a $500,000 contingency plan to influence the congressional vote against his candidacy. His opponent Alessandri was to be given around half a million dollars, to be raised by ITT and other companies within the Business Group. According to Pulitzer Prize winning journalist According to Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Rockefeller's Business Group for Latin America, which was transformed in 1970 into the Council of the Americas, had a close relationship with the CIA and Enno Hobbing, who had participated in the overthrow of Arbenz in Guatemala. Hobbing, a CIA official who had initially been assigned as liaison to the Business Group, eventually left the CIA and became the principal operations officer for the Council of the Americas.

    Countless academics have written about economic sabotage, often in cooperation with US business elites such as the Rockefeller family, as a component of US-backed coups in Latin America. From the ITT orchestrated Chilean copper boycott of 1972 to the Reagan administration's economic destabilization of Nicaragua, to US efforts to sabotage the Venezuelan economy, progressive populism is to this day frequently met with US aggression, including media propaganda.

    David Rockefeller and the Brazilian Military Dictatorship
    Jan K. Black's "United States Penetration of Brazil" contains numerous passages related to the activities of Rockefeller Group, the Business Group of Latin America and its precursors in the 1962 Election, the Coup of 1964 and period that followed, in connivance with local conservative elites. She documents how, at a Military conference on Latin America at West Point in the fall of 1964, David Rockefeller said that it had been decided quite early that Goulart was not acceptable to the U.S. banking community, and that he would "have to go." As in 2016, in 1964 the foreign emphasis was not on marxist ideology, but on combating economic and resource nationalism.

    "The assertion of national control over basic natural resources, as well as a more general assertion of control over the productive capacity of the economy, had been seen by the Goulart government as a prerequisIte to the redistribution of income. The advocacy of economic nationalism had also been seen as one of the most promising means of mobilizing mass support for the government. U.S. businesses, with the support of the U.S. Government, had generally been able to fend off the constraints of nationalistic but weak governments. If the mobilization of the masses had not appeared to be a threat or a possibility, It seems likely that the combined pressures of the multinational corporations and those elements of the Brazilian business community whose fortunes were linked to them would have been sufficient to intimidate the Brazilian government into backing down on its nationalistic designs. But regardless of the actual potential in 1964 for the mobilization of the masses, Goulart apparently believed that it was possible: and his enemies, foreign and domestic, apparently feared that he was right."

    In 1975, former CIA agent Philip Agee confirmed many of the findings and suspicions of a Brazilian congressional commission into Foreign interference in Brazil's 1962 Election. The investigation revealed that of the (CIA) Rio Station's main political-action operations, the Brazilian Institute for Democratic Action (IBAD) and a related organisation called Democratic Action (ADEP):
    "...spent during the 1962 electoral campaign at least the equivalent of some 12 million dollars financing anticommunist candidates, and possibly as much as 20 million....The parliamentary investigating commission was controlled somewhat-five of its nine members were themselves recipients of IBAD and ADEP funds-but only the refusal of the First National City Bank, the Bank of Boston, and the Royal Bank of Canada to reveal the foreign source of funds deposited for IBAD and ADEP kept the lid from blowing off. Beneficiaries of IBAD were prominent among the conspirators in the coup of 1 April and some, particularly military beneficiaries, were among who gained power as a consequence of it....Robinson Rojas listed Standard Oil of New Jersey, U.S. Steel, Texas Oil, Gulf Oil, Hanna Corporation, Bethlehem Steel, General Motors, and Willys Overland among the depositors in the accounts of IBAD-ADEP-Promotion". Economist & Environmentalist Jean Marc von der Weid maintained that "more than one hundred foreign enterprises and some national ones were involved in financing the institute, and that the Rockefeller Group-IBEC was one of the major benefactors."
    The CIA's "point man" in the 1964 Coup was Joseph Caldwell King, also known by his CIA code name of Oliver G. Galbond. He was former vice president of Business Group member Johnson & Johnson, in charge of Brazil & Argentina, and from there he moved to his close friend Nelson Rockefeller's Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs (OCIAA). After officially leaving the CIA in 1967, King became CEO of 'Amazon Natural Drug Company', a CIA front which was collecting organic material from the rainforest for Rockefeller Foundation-funded research by US Agencies.

    Brazil's hegemonic media network, Rede Globo, was actually created with the assistance and funding of Rockefeller-associated Time-Life Publishing in the United States. It became a powerful instrument of societal control during the dictatorship following its launch in 1964.

    Gerard Colby & Charlotte Dennett's 'Thy will be done: The Conquest of the Amazon' was an investigation into the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL), also known as the Wycliffe Bible Translators - a Rockefeller & USAID funded Evangelical organisation which had been translating the Bible into hundreds of indigenous languages in Central and South America. Wycliffe was founded by ultraconservative William Cameron Townsend who worked in tandem with Rockefeller and which the authors accuse of destroying indigenous peoples' cultural values to abet penetration by U.S. businesses, employing a "virulent brand of Christian fundamentalism that used linguistics to undermine the social cohesion of indigenous communities and accelerate their assimilation into Western culture". It sent scores of missionaries and establishing churches to counter the "threat" of Left-Wing "Liberation Theology" to United States Security, identified by older brother Nelson in his 1969 'Rockefeller Report' for President Nixon. These missionaries also acted as scouts, covertly surveying the Amazon for resources. Financial support for Evangelical faith in Brazil evidently extends to the present, with the massive and politically influential Pentecostal "Universal Church of the Kingdom of God" whose head Bishop, Edir Macedo told his followers in 2011 that the Rockefellers had been generous contributors.

    David and Nelson Rockefeller along with Zbigniew Brzezinski were also involved in the drafting of Henry Kissinger's "National Security Study Memorandum 200" in 1974, which President Ford, to whom Nelson was serving as Vice, made official United States policy. The once secret NSSM-200, which was first seen by researchers in the 1990s, is a chilling document which advocates forced population control in 13 "Less Developed Countries", one of which was Brazil, countries chosen for the strategic importance of their natural resources. The study states that "the world is increasingly dependent on mineral supplies from developing countries, and if rapid population frustrates their prospects for economic development and social progress, the resulting instability may undermine the conditions for expanded output and sustained flows of such resources."

    It goes on to conclude that "Whether through government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbance, the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized. Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth", and "Young people, who are in much higher proportions in many LDCs, are likely to be more volatile, unstable, prone to extremes, alienation and violence than an older population. These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the 'establishment,' 'imperialists,' multinational corporations, or other-often foreign-influences blamed for their troubles".

    Such mandatory population control programmes would be implemented by Non Governmental Organisations such as the Rockefeller's own Eugenicist Population Council. In 1968, Frederick Osborn, the organisation's first president, said "Eugenic goals are most likely to be achieved under another name than eugenics."

    The implications of the NSSM-200 document for Brazilians cannot be understated. It can be interpreted that de-facto opposition to population growth, rises to living standards & life expectancy, availability of quality public education and healthcare, and independent development in Brazil, has been effectively codified into United States foreign policy since 1975.

    Post-Dictatorship
    Two decades after a Military Dictatorship took power with his support, in 1987 following transition to Civilian Rule, David Rockefeller remarked “In all my visits to Brazil, I have never before come across such desperate poverty”.

    In June 1992 he was back in Brasilia. “The progress is encouraging and the road is open to an accord” he said, after a 45-minute meeting with corruption-hit President Fernando Collor de Mello at the Planalto Palace in the capital. Though by this point Rockefeller was only a consultant at Chase Manhattan, he was still involved in the Council of the Americas. The New York Times wrote that Brazil was seeking to convert its world record $108bn debt into 30-year bonds that would be backed by the United States Treasury. Born into an Oligarchic family, Collor had come to power in 1989 via the first direct election since the 1964 Coup, as Rede Globo’s anointed candidate. One of his leftist rivals Leonel Brizola, had been identified as the potential target for a U.S.-supported Coup d’etat should he have won. By the end of 1992, Collor, who had overseen a programme of rapid privatisation and economic liberalisation, resigned, facing imminent impeachment, with inflation standing at over 1000%. In dealing directly with Collor, Rockefeller ensured that debt-deals were set in stone before any change in Presidency.

    During preparations for the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Rockefeller Foundation created LEAD (Leadership in the Environment and Development). According to their website they have since then “been recruiting talented individuals from key sectors and professions all over the world to be part of a growing network now standing at over 2400 leaders, who are committed to changing the world. […] Since 1992, more than 500 professionals have been trained in Brazil, Canada, China, Former Soviet Union, Europe, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan and South Africa.” The Brazilian branch of LEAD (ABDL) was one of the first, founded in mid-1991. Al Binger, LEAD’s international director, said with surprising frankness: “We hope that in ten years many of the fellows will be acting as ministers of environment and development, university rectors and CEOs.”. One of the Brazilian Politicians most closely associated with LEAD/ABDL would be future Presidential Candidate & environmental campaigner, Marina Silva. Silva was Catholic Liberation Theologist, and social movement leader for almost two decades, converting to Evangelical faith in the mid 1990s. Although widely hailed as an environmentalist leader in the anglophone media, her public support of “green capitalism” is not only rejected by the Brazilian environmentalist movement, it’s rejection was chosen as the theme to the Cupula dos Povos, the international alternative forum to Rio+20, held simultaneously with it in Rio de Janeiro in 2012.

    “A bridge to the future”
    AS/COA (Americas Society / Council of the Americas) magazine Americas Quarterly and its circle of promoted commentariat have been a major player in reshaping the master narrative of Brazil as a failing state, that Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment was legitimate, and in particular the depiction of Lava Jato judge Sergio Moro as objective “anti-corruption crusader”. There is a also a common rhetorical dismissal of U.S. interference in modern Latin America as being a relic of the cold war.

    Shortly after the illegitimate impeachment of predecessor Dilma Rousseff, on September 22 2016, documented U.S. informant, new President Michel Temer, who was visiting the United States to meet Vice President Joe Biden and address the UN, also spoke at a specially-organised meeting at the New York headquarters of AS/COA . At the meeting for Investors, Business and Banking elites, Temer candidly revealed an “open secret” – that the true purpose of Rousseff’s removal was that she would not agree to implement a hardline Austerity & Privatisation programme contained within a policy document called “Bridge to the Future“.

    The document was odd in that it appeared to have been translated from English, with social media users remarking on its unusual wording. Economist Marcio Pochmann noted similarities between “Bridge to the Future” and the “Government Economic Action Plan” (PAEG) which followed the Coup of 1964. One such similarity, he says, is the strong international influence.

    “PAEG was written in English, there was great American intervention in the country, so much so that the US supported the dictatorship and even sent a ship in case of civil war. The coup of 2016 also has undeniable US interests in relation to a series of developmental moves the country had made since 2003, as it sought greater autonomy in Brazilian foreign policy. The South-South relationship and the strengthening of the BRICs (Trade Bloc formed by Brazil, Russia, India and China)is different from what the US considers to be the best for Latin America.”

    Former Dictatorship-era Public Security Official Michel Temer was also asked by one attendee what plans he had to deal with social unrest amongst the population in response to such extreme austerity measures. This too echoes 1964, in “Who Rules the World“, Chomsky noted that the Kennedy administration’s policy was to transform Latin America’s Militaries into glorified police forces, designed to deal with their own populations “should they raise their heads”, not external threats.

    Despite the shocking nature of Temer’s comments, they were for the most part ignored by close-knit Brazil-based corporate journalists, but to those who have been following the US-led rollback against democratically elected center-left and left leaders in Latin America, it was no coincidence that Temer admitted this at a meeting sponsored & organised by AS/COA.

    AS/COA is effectively a Latin America equivalent of the Atlantic Council and its slogan is “Uniting opinion leaders to exchange ideas and create solutions to the challenges of the Americas today” and its online biographies state: “Americas Society (AS) Is the premier forum dedicated to education, debate, and dialogue in the Americas. Its mission is to foster an understanding of the contemporary political, social, and economic issues confronting Latin America, the Caribbean, and Canada, and to increase public awareness and appreciation of the diverse cultural heritage of the Americas and the importance of the inter-American relationship.”, “Council of the Americas (COA) Is the premier international business organisation whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the Western Hemisphere. The Council’s membership consists of leading international companies representing a broad spectrum of sectors, including banking and finance, consulting services, consumer products, energy and mining, manufacturing, media, technology, and transportation.”

    The organisation is said to be based on the “fundamental belief that free markets and private enterprise offer the most effective means to achieve regional economic growth and prosperity.” Membership has grown to over 200 blue chip companies that represent the majority of U.S. private investment in Latin America. The Council hosts presidents, cabinet ministers, central bankers, government officials, and leading experts in economics, politics, business, and finance, which gives it unique access to information from the region. The Council of the Americas argues that “free markets and private enterprise offer the most effective means to achieve regional economic growth”. It has been a supporter of free trade agreements and has been instrumental in the conception of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA)….and the yet to be implemented Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), the long-held ambition of David Rockefeller himself. Meanwhile, sister organisation The Americas Society’s focus is in contrast “to increase public awareness and appreciation of the diverse cultural heritage of the Americas and the importance of the inter-American relationship”

    Elite COA corporate members include: Bloomberg, Blackrock, Bank of America, Barings, Barrick Gold Corporation, Boeing, Bombardier, Banco Bradesco, Banco do Brasil, Banco Santander, Cisco, Citigroup, Coca Cola, ExxonMobility, Ford, General Electric, General Motors, Google, Itaú Unibanco, IBM, Johnson & Johnson, JP Morgan Chase, Lockheed Martin, McDonalds, Moody’s, Morgan Stanley, Microsoft, News Corp / Fox, Pearson, Pfizer, Philip Morris, Raytheon, Shell, Television Association Of Programmers Latin America, Time Warner/Turner, Toyota, Viacom, Wal-Mart. One of the successor companies to Standard Oil, Chevron Corporation is listed as “Patron Corporate Member” of Council of the Americas, and has a strong vested interest in who governs Brazil. David Rockefeller remained Honorary Secretary of COA until the day he died, while current Secretary is William R. Rhodes, formerly of Citibank/Citigroup.

    Alongside other D.C. Think Tanks such as the older Brookings, and Rockefeller/Ford funded Council on Foreign Relations, AS/COA is not unusual in its stated function but is a particularly interesting case – an interface between State & Corporate power, Intelligence communities, Multinational & Latin American Banks, Washington-aligned Neoliberal Politicians, educational institutions such as FGV, local & international NGOs, Authors, Journalists, and everyday English-language media from the region, such as Reuters and CNN.

    David Rockefeller once said, “American capitalism has brought more benefits to more people than any other system in any part of the world at any time in history. ” He may have passed away, but his imperialist business interests and his think tank, backed by some of the World’s most nefarious corporations in terms of human and environmental rights, will no doubt continue to meddle and weaken democracy in Latin America for years to come.
    Last edited by Hervé; 23rd March 2017 at 16:23.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  6. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), BMJ (25th March 2017), Debra (17th April 2017), Dennis Leahy (17th April 2017), Ewan (28th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (23rd March 2017), gaiagirl (20th July 2017), LadyM (5th August 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), sdv (3rd September 2017), seko (27th March 2017), The Freedom Train (17th April 2017)

  7. Link to Post #44
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Here is another piece of that global "Big Picture" and a re-post from there:
    Quote Posted by Hervé (here)
    ...
    From Sue Arrigo's Case 28 DCI Robert Gates, Torture, and Ashes of Children

    The GAO Has the Evidence on Who Ordered the Burning Alive of the Children
    When I gave a talk at the CIA in 2004, I showed 7 documents to prove each point I made and the whole talk lasted a grueling 5 hours. More people kept showing up until it was standing room only; though perhaps some came just to see how long it would be before I was pulled off the stage into a basement torture chamber again.

    For each slide I speak about, the document, photo, or evidence is sitting in the Government Accounting Office (GAO's) files since the Dept of Justice was corrupted beyond use. Since I was tortured and stripped of all of my possessions when I was outed from the CIA by Cheney in 2004, clearly I do not have any of these documents in my personal possession. But I still remember the talks I gave at the CIA and the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) in 2004, recalling parts of them here to tell you what evidence the GAO has in its possession, if Congress will but request it from them.

    In the rest of this article I am going to address the question of who was responsible for MKULTRA and its related CIA programs. Who turned the children into ashes and what did they do with them? Remember that this reminiscence by recounting a slideshow details the evidence sitting at the GAO.

    The Coverup of the Rockefeller Satanic Rituals
    There has been a conspiracy to keep the public, and even intelligence people in the dark. On this slide you see a letter from Nelson Rockefeller thanking the owner of the New York Times for his discretion in not covering a lurid crime. Note the date which is two weeks after this Upstate New York police report was made. The victim was a young boy who was sodomized and then killed.

    Here is the last notes in the police report made by the detective. He says he is making progress in the case and the evidence is strong and growing. Then the next day he writes suddenly that the case is “unfounded” and is being closed.

    Here is the KGB’s report on that murder. Note that it lists the people that the Rockefeller thank you letter goes to--about 20 media owners. It also shows the earlier letter Nelson Rockefeller wrote them asking them to kill this story. All except one of them did. Here is the letter from a KBG officer to Nelson Rockefeller asking for hush money in exchange for the evidence in the KGB’s files.

    Here is a copy of the financial transaction from Rockefeller’s hush money account to the KGB officer for about $86,000 in 1970’s money. What exactly was Rockefeller worried about that he paid out the money? Here is the flak-assessment of likely blowback by the CIA if the money was not paid. Note that this flak report was sent to Nelson at his Upstate New York Estate, where it was found in the Rockefeller Archives with this envelop attached to it. The date it was received is one day before the money was ordered transferred. Here is the journal entry of Nelson on that day saying, “Our side business has caused me $86,000 in extra expenses today. I have asked the DCI to tighten up our security procedures so that there is less risk of exposure. The last thing we want is the headlines “Boy’s rape and murder linked to the Rockefeller’s Estate”. Fortunately, the body was off my property by the time the car was stopped. Had I not gotten the warning of the raid on the ritual from my men inside Police enforcement, this could have been quite serious... Billions of dollars hang in the balance. I have scheduled a Policemen’s Ball here next month so as to ensure cooperation...New hidden cameras will be installed.”

    Here is the KGB’s list of who was invited to the “Policeman’s Ball”. It looks like a “Who’s who” of Police, FBI and media VIPs. Here are some of the photos from that event from the Rockefeller Archive’s blackmail files on the left side of the following slides with the KGB’s photos of the same event. That gives you an idea of the accuracy of the KGB files; the KGB actually was better at taking blackmail photos. Here is the letter from that same KBG officer laying out the evidence he has. He claims that he has the evidence on all of the Rockefeller’s global sex slave trafficking. That is a little hard to believe, but he sent with the letter an organizational chart listing the addresses of the branch offices of Rockefeller’s sex slave trade by country. Here is the CIA’s own organizational chart of the sex slave trade that they are engaged in with the profits going to the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and Skull and Bones members.

    If you read my Case 22C Hot Sodas Courtesy of those who Brought You Auschwitz? you will see that the Rockefellers and Bonesman Prescott Bush were major players funding Hitler, building Auschwitz, using the slave labor, and paying the SS guards.

    Those families have been major players in the New World Orders plans to enslave the world using torture, mind control, and rape as their modus operandi for over a century. There were some minor discrepancies between the KGB and CIA charts on Rockefeller’s sex slave trade, but overall the charts agree. Here is the transaction from the Rockefeller’s hush money account which paid the Russian to destroy the KGB’s files. Note the sum of about $150,000.

    Next is a handwritten note of the DDO shortly thereafter in which he is preparing to advise the DCI on how that particular Russian KGB officer can be assassinated. Due to a delay in the Russian banks clearing the transaction and delivering the money to the Russian in cash, the CIA accidentally killed him before he destroyed the KGB’s files on Rockefeller’s sex slave trade which are quite extensive.


    The CIA’s and KGB’s Sex Slave Trade Make Profits for the Same NWO Bosses
    Here is a breakdown of the recipients of the profits on the sex slave trade run by the CIA and that run by the KGB. Note that due to the Rothschilds and Rockefellers funding of the Bolshevik Revolution, that they are the major recipients of the KGB’s sex slave running operations. In fact, the Rothschilds and Rockefellers were major forces behind the scenes setting up both the KGB and OSS/CIA intelligence agencies to run their illegal drug, trafficking in humans, weapons, and war-profiteering businesses. Throughout the Cold War and before, they were giving orders to the OSS/CIA and the KBG and getting those orders followed with a high degree of reliability. Here is a late 1930’s letter from a Rockefeller to Stalin ordering him to purge KGB people and depts. which have displeased Rothschild. Here is the letter back from Stalin saying that he has done as requested. In fact, the KGB followed the Rothschild and Rockefeller orders better than US intelligence which was less efficient.

    The Rothschilds and Rockefellers used MI6 and the CIA to check up on whether the KGB was doing what they wanted and vice versa. Here is a 1990’s CIA report on the KGB sex slave trade which was found in the Rockefeller Archives. Note the handwritten note in David Rockefeller’s handwriting which says that some of the profits are being diverted to people which are not part of his operations and that this problem must be eliminated.

    Here is a CIA report from 2 months later in that same Rockefeller file, detailing what steps have been taken to “stem the losses”. One of the recommendations is to start a war in Chechnya to cover up the deaths in eliminating the competition to the Rockefeller and Rothschild sex slave trade. The next month the Russians launched a seminal invasion of Chechnya.

    Here, also from the same Rockefeller file is a private think tank report on the effect of the Russian invasion into Chechnya in terms of whether it has succeeded in covering up the early Chechen deaths as related to “the global” sex slave trade. It concludes that it was a successful cover-up. Note at the bottom of the report David Rockefeller has written “All copies of this report are to be destroyed.” However, in Rockefeller Archive jargon that means all copies outside of the Rockefeller and Rothschild Archives.

    Here is a letter from David Rockefeller to the Rothschilds saying in abbreviated form what steps he has taken to secure that the Chechens do not interfere with their profits anymore. Inserted in the letter was an accounting sheet giving the profits from the sex slaves made “from the Russians quelling the Chechen uprising”.

    An ordinary person following the news has no way to know the real causes of the events they are told about. They swallow the official propaganda lies of which every side they are sitting on. That means that the war-profiteers can endlessly threaten them with external enemies and force them into wars. In those wars, the costs are borne by the taxpayers and the profits all go into the same private hands.

    Here is how the profits flowed in the 1980’s Russian war in Afghanistan. Note that we are looking at the global profits from that war. Both the Russian and the US govt. forced their taxpayers to buy billions of dollars worth of armaments to use in Afghanistan without ever asking them if that was how they wanted their money spent.

    Here is how the profits are flowing in the 2000’s US war in Afghanistan. There is very little difference, most of the profits are going into the pockets of the Rothschilds and their downline, like the Rockefellers, and Skull and Bones members.

    Both wars started when the Afghanis attempted to shut down the Rockefellers and Rothschilds using their country to grow opium for their illegal drug trade. In May 2000, the Taliban outlawed the growing of opium poppies. The CIA verified that 95% of the poppy fields were gone, see The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade by Alfred McCoy.

    The Taliban went from being supported by the US to being public enemy number 1 over that issue. One of the first things the US did when it invaded Afghanistan was to let the drug war lords out of the Taliban’s prisons and put them back in business as their downline.

    Nelson Rockefeller Ordered JFK Assassinated
    In this first slide in this next section, you see the first premise that we are going to prove through examining these documents---'All those not making decisions at the level of David Rockefeller, or above, in the New World Order are expendable slaves from the point of view of the elite in it.'

    Here in the second slide you see a planning document in the John F. Kennedy Assassination. Note that it is a CIA document discussing how to manage the cover-up of the assassination and is dated about 5 weeks before the assassination. The signature at the bottom is John McCone's, the director of CIA that JFK appointed under pressure from Nelson Rockefeller, after firing DCI Allen Dulles for the Bay of Pigs fiasco.

    This document comes from the blackmail files of the Rockefeller Achives. Nelson Rockefeller requested the cover-up White Paper from McCone and had the power to compel McCone to sign it. Clearly, it was against McCone's interests to prove he was part of the conspiracy to kill JFK.

    ... etc... [...]
    ==================================================

    So... Putin... ex KGB... means that, to the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, he might KNOW a bit too much...

    ****************************

    Last edited by Hervé; 27th March 2017 at 22:01. Reason: Fixed broken link.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  8. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), BMJ (27th March 2017), Carmody (29th August 2017), Debra (17th April 2017), Dennis Leahy (17th April 2017), Ewan (28th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (27th March 2017), gaiagirl (20th July 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), sdv (3rd September 2017), seko (27th March 2017), The Freedom Train (17th April 2017)

  9. Link to Post #45
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Speaking of which:

    Lavrov: No force on earth can compete with NATO and US’ drug trafficking business in Afghanistan

    By Jonas E. Alexis on March 27, 2017

    Quote “In country after country, from Mexico and Honduras to Panama and Peru, the CIA helped set up or consolidate intelligence agencies that became forces of repression, and whose intelligence connections to other countries greased the way for illicit drug shipments.”
    …by Jonas E. Alexis

    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has done it again. He has recently grabbed the New World Order establishment by the horn and cut them to pieces with a chainsaw when he said that the establishment has done covert and illegal operations in places like Afghanistan.

    Lavrov did not mince words:
    The US operation against the Taliban and al-Qaeda was supported by all countries. It’s another matter that after receiving the international approval, the United States and its NATO allies, which took over in Afghanistan, started acting rather inconsistently, to put it mildly.
    “During their operation in Afghanistan, the terrorist threat has not been rooted out, while the drug threat has increased many times over. The drug industry prospered. There is factual evidence that some of the NATO contingents in Afghanistan turned a blind eye to the illegal drug trafficking, even if they were not directly involved in these criminal schemes.
    “Afghanistan is a separate case, although the current developments there, which are a result of the NATO operation’s failure, despite the carte blanche the bloc received from the international community, can be considered an unintended cause of managed chaos. In Iraq, Syria and Libya, this chaos was created intentionally.”
    Lavrov is right in line with the scholarly world.

    Peter Dale Scott of the University of California writes:
    “In country after country, from Mexico and Honduras to Panama and Peru, the CIA helped set up or consolidate intelligence agencies that became forces of repression, and whose intelligence connections to other countries greased the way for illicit drug shipments.”[1]
    Noted historian Alfred W. McCoy of the University of Wisconsin has reported the same thing.[2] McCoy began to work on this issue while he was a Ph.D. candidate in Southeast Asian history at Yale back in 1972. He accused American officials “of condoning and even cooperating with corrupt elements in Southeast Asia’s illegal drug trade out of political and military considerations.”

    McCoy’s
    “major charges was that South Vietnam’s President Nguyễn Văn Thiệu, Vice President Nguyễn Cao Kỳ, and Prime Minister Trần Thiện Khiêm led a narcotics ring with ties to the Corsican mafia, the Trafficante crime family in Florida, and other high level military officials in South Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand. Those implicated by McCoy included Laotian Generals Ouane Rattikone and Vang Pao and South Vietnamese Generals Đăng Văn Quang and Ngô Dzu.”
    McCoy produced enough evidence which indicated that the CIA used “tribal mercenaries” in places like Laos in order to maintain their criminal and drug trafficking business.

    In short, Lavrov was essentially deconstructing the CIA when he said that they have been spreading corruption throughout the world for decades. Whenever they take a break from spreading opium, they start perpetuating wars and creating false flags in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and now in Syria.

    The CIA is certainly not happy about what Lavrov has said. This is one reason why they hate Russia and all that it represents.


    [1] Peter Dale Scott and Jonathan Marshall, Cocaine Politics: Drugs, Armies, and the CIA in Central America (Berkley: The University of California Press, 1998), vii-viii. See also American War Machine: Deep Politics, the CIA Global Drug Connection, and the Road to Afghanistan (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010 and 2014); Peter Dale Scott, Drugs, Oil, and War: The United States in Afghanistan, Colombia, and Indochina (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003).

    [2] Alfred W. McCoy, The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade (Chicago: Lawrence Hill Books, 2003).

    Related:
    Lavrov: New World Order Domination Is at Its Twilight
    Last edited by Hervé; 28th March 2017 at 15:56.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  10. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Baby Steps (28th March 2017), Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), Debra (17th April 2017), Dennis Leahy (17th April 2017), Ewan (28th March 2017), gaiagirl (20th July 2017), norman (28th March 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), sdv (3rd September 2017), seko (16th July 2017), The Freedom Train (17th April 2017)

  11. Link to Post #46
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Yeah... the BIG, planet wide picture:

    David Rockefeller's gruesome legacy

    F. William Engdahl New Eastern Outlook
    Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:59 UTC



    The death of David Rockefeller, the de facto Patriarch of the American establishment, at age 101, is being greeted by establishment media with praise for his alleged philanthropy. I would like to contribute to a more honest picture of the person.

    The Rockefeller American Century
    In 1939, along with his four brothers - Nelson, John D. III, Laurance and Winthrop - David Rockefeller and their Rockefeller Foundation financed the top secret War & Peace Studies at the New York Council on Foreign Relations, the most influential private US foreign policy think-tank which also was controlled by the Rockefellers. A collection of American academics gathered even before outbreak of World War II to plan a postwar world empire, what Time-Life insider Henry Luce later called The American Century. They made a blueprint for taking over a global empire from the bankrupt British, but carefully decided to call it not an empire. Rather they called it "spreading democracy, freedom, the American way of free enterprise."

    Their project looked at the geopolitical map of the world and planned how the USA would replace the British Empire as de facto the dominant empire. The creation of the United Nations was a key part. The Rockefeller brothers donated the land in Manhattan for the UN Headquarters (and in the process made billions in the increased prices of the adjoining real estate that they also owned). This is the Rockefeller "philanthropy" method. Every grant donated is calculated to increase family wealth and power.

    After the War David Rockefeller dominated US foreign policy and the countless wars in Africa, Latin America, Asia. The Rockefeller faction created the Cold War against the Soviet Union, and NATO in order to keep a reviving Western Europe under American vassal status. How they did so I documented in detail in my book, The Gods of Money. Here I consider several examples of David Rockefeller's crimes against humanity.

    Rockefeller Biology Research: 'Control the people...'
    If philanthropy should be motivated by love of our fellow man, the grants of the Rockefeller Foundation are not. Take medical research. During the period until 1939 and the War, the Rockefeller Foundation financed biological research at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin. It was Nazi eugenics—how to breed a superior race and how to kill off or sterilize those they deemed "inferior." Rockefeller financed Nazi eugenics. Rockefeller's Standard Oil also violated US law to secretly supply the Nazi Air Force with scarce fuel during the War. After the War the Rockefeller brothers arranged for leading Nazi scientists involved in ghastly human experiments to be brought to the USA and Canada under sanitized identities to continue their eugenics research. Many worked in the CIA top secret MK-Ultra project.

    In the 1950's the Rockefeller brothers founded the Population Council to advance eugenics, disguised as population research into birth control. The Rockefeller brothers were responsible in the 1970's for a US Government Top Secret project directed by Rockefeller National Security Adviser Kissinger, NSSM-200 titled, "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests." It argued high population growth in developing nations with strategic raw materials like oil or minerals were a US "national security threat" as more population demands national economic growth, using those resources internally (sic!).NSSM-200 made developing world population reduction programs a precondition of US aid. In the 1970s David Rockefeller's Rockefeller Foundation also financed together with WHO development of a special tetanus vaccine that limited population by making a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy, literally going after the human reproductive process itself.

    The Rockefeller Foundation created the entire field of genetic manipulation through its ownership of Monsanto Corporation and financing of university biology research to create the "gene cannon" and other techniques to artificially alter gene expression of a given plant. The aim of GMO, since Rockefeller sponsored the disastrous Philippine Golden Rice project, has been to use GMO to control the human and animal food chain. Today more than 90% of all soybeans grown in USA are GMO and more than 80% of all corn and cotton. Yet it is not labelled.

    'Control the oil...'
    The Rockefeller fortune is based on oil around companies such as ExxonMobil, Chevron and others. Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller's political adviser since 1954, was involved in every major Rockefeller project. Kissinger secretly manipulated Middle East diplomacy in 1973 to trigger an Arab OPEC oil embargo.

    The Oil Shock of 1973-74 was orchestrated by a secretive organization David Rockefeller created in the 1950s known as Bilderberg Group. In May 1973 David Rockefeller and the heads of the major US and UK oil majors met in Saltsjoebaden, Sweden at the annual Bilderberg Meeting to plan the oil shock. It would be blamed on "greedy Arab oil sheikhs." It saved the falling US dollar, and made Wall Street banks, including David Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan, into the world's largest banks. This author has the "confidential" protocol of that meeting where the price increase strategy is described six months before the Arab-Israeli war. Please see my book, A Century of War, for documentation. In the 1970's Kissinger summed up David Rockefeller's world strategy: "If you control the oil, you control entire nations; if you control food, you control the people; if you control money, you control the entire world."

    'Control the money...'
    David Rockefeller was chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, the family bank. He was responsible for getting Chase Vice President, Paul Volcker, to become President Carter's Federal Reserve chairman to make the Volcker interest rate shock that again, like the oil shock, saved the falling US dollar and Wall Street bank profits, including Chase Manhattan, at the expense of the world economy.

    Volcker's October 1979 interest rate 'shock therapy', backed by Rockefeller, created the 1980's "Third World Debt Crisis." Rockefeller and Wall Street used that debt crisis to force state privatizations and drastic national currency devaluations in countries such as Argentina, Brazil, Mexico. Rockefeller and friends such as George Soros then grabbed the crown jewels of Argentina, Brazil, Mexico at dirt cheap prices.

    The model was much like the British banks used in the Ottoman Empire after 1881 when they de facto took control of the finances of the Sultan by controlling all tax revenues through the Ottoman Public Debt Administration (OPDA). Rockefeller interests used the 1980s debt crisis to loot much of the indebted Latin America and African countries, using the IMF as their policeman. David Rockefeller was personal friends to some of the more savage military dictators in Latin America including General Jorge Videla in Argentine or Pinochet in Chile, both of whom owed their jobs to CIA coups arranged by then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger on behalf of Rockefeller family interests in Latin America.

    Through organizations such as his Trilateral Commission, Rockefeller was the foremost architect of the destruction of national economies and advancing so-called Globalization, a policy that mainly benefits the largest banks of Wall Street and City of London and select global corporations—the same who are invited members of his Trilateral Commission. Rockefeller created the Trilateral Commission in 1974 and gave his close friend Zbigniew Brzezinski the job of choosing its members in North America, Japan and Europe.

    If we speak of an unseen, powerful network some call the Deep State, we might say David Rockefeller saw himself as Patriarch of that Deep State. His true acts deserve to be honestly seen for what they were—misanthropic and not philanthropic.


    Related:
    Puppet Master: The Unauthorized Biography of David Rockefeller
    The Corbett Report | The Unauthorized Biography of David Rockefeller | Mar. 28, 2017
    Last edited by Hervé; 29th March 2017 at 12:27.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  12. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), Debra (17th April 2017), Dennis Leahy (17th April 2017), Ewan (28th March 2017), Foxie Loxie (28th March 2017), gaiagirl (20th July 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), sdv (3rd September 2017), seko (16th July 2017), The Freedom Train (17th April 2017)

  13. Link to Post #47
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    This article to underline that Russia is well aware of what Rockefeller's/Bushs'/Clintons'/Obama's "CIA" has been doing world wide:

    Lavrov suggests NATO collusion in creating the opioid crisis

    Isaac Davis Waking Times
    Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00 UTC



    As more of the blame for the world's exacerbating opiate overdose crisis is now being rightly put on the pharmaceutical industry, the dark side of this epidemic in the fact that the production of opium containing poppies has exploded since the military occupation of Afghanistan beginning in 2001.

    According to Russian diplomat Sergey Lavrov, there are signs of collusion between NATO and drug producers and traffickers working to flood the world with opium. Remarking on how the mission to rid Afghanistan of terrorists quickly became distorted after the invasion, ultimately creating a never-ending supply of drugs to the West.
    "During their operation in Afghanistan, the terrorist threat has not been rooted out, while the drug threat has increased many times over. The drug industry prospered. There is factual evidence that some of the NATO contingents in Afghanistan turned a blind eye to the illegal drug trafficking, even if they were not directly involved in these criminal schemes." ~Sergey Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister
    So, what exactly is the evidence? In a 2014 report, the UN notes that poppy production had reached an all time global high, with shocking increases in heroin users worldwide.
    "The amount of land used for cultivating opium poppies around the world is at an all-time high, says a UN report. Afghanistan is largely behind the increase, with its crop growing by 36 percent over a year, producing 80 percent of the world's opium.
    A World Drug Report released by the UN's Vienna-based Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) has charted the global use of drugs. Although it says that global drug use is "stable," it notes that the cultivation of opium has grown drastically." [Source]
    As noted by TDC:
    "When the Untied Nations produces a report that reads like a corporate stock prospectus you know something is fishy. The UN report was very detailed about the number of new addicts, the flow of drugs out of Afghanistan and the final destination." [Source]
    In short, if a NATO country is overseeing the security and military occupation of Afghanistan, and suddenly poppy production explodes, then at the very least NATO is permissive of the cultivation and exportation of the world's deadliest and most addictive street drug.

    Furthermore, as noted by Lavrov, there is a strategy of managed chaos in play at present in the Middle East and northern Africa, disrupting and ruining the lives of millions of people, for the benefit of America and those in positions to temporarily profit from unfettered access to the natural resources of targeted nations.
    "The concept of managed chaos appeared long ago as a method of strengthening US influence. Its basic premise is that managed chaos projects should be launched away from the United States in regions that are crucial for global economic and financial development." ~Sergey Lavrov
    Lavrov's comments on the opium crisis and managed chaos are included in the following video.

    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  14. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), Debra (17th April 2017), Dennis Leahy (17th April 2017), Ewan (3rd April 2017), Foxie Loxie (17th April 2017), gaiagirl (20th July 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), sdv (3rd September 2017), seko (4th April 2017), Shannon (3rd April 2017), Sophocles (5th April 2017), The Freedom Train (17th April 2017)

  15. Link to Post #48
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Proof that "World Government" is Banker Tyranny

    from June 9, 2009
    by Henry Makow Ph.D May 15, 2017


    (Rothschild agent Col. E.N. House with puppet Woodrow Wilson)


    We revisit the "Col. E.M. House Report", (1919), a chilling 10-page document which proved the League of Nations was a facade for "British" (i.e. Masonic Jewish) imperialism. "The League is in substance the Empire with America admitted on the same basis as our other colonies."

    The report oozes contempt for Americans and reveals the "system of thought control" the bankers employed almost 100 years ago. These goals and methods have not changed. If ever we needed proof that democracy is a charade, this is it.

    -----------------------------------------------------

    from June 9, 2009
    by Henry Makow Ph.D

    In 1919, the Rothschild-dominated Bank of England planned to trick the United States into becoming a "British" colony again by joining the League of Nations. The League of the Nations, like the "British Empire", was the bankers' fiefdom, and this strategem would merely formalize a colonial status which already existed.

    The bankers took over the U.S. during the Teddy Roosevelt Administration (1901-1909) when Rothschild front J.P. Morgan alone controlled 25% of American business.

    The "Col. E.M. House Report", is a chilling 10-page "progress report" dated June 10, 1919 which proves the League of Nations was an aborted attempt at world government and a facade for banker tyranny. The Report reveals the reality and the tactics behind the United Nations and globalization.

    House writes:
    "We have wrapped this plan in the peace treaty so that the world must accept from us the League or a continuance of the war. The League is in substance the Empire with America admitted on the same basis as our other colonies."
    The report oozes contempt for Americans and reveals the deceitful methods international finance employed almost 100 years ago to bring about world government. These goals and methods have not changed. If ever we needed proof of an elite conspiracy to subvert and enslave us, this is it.

    PUPPET MASTER



    The author is Col. Edward Mandell House (1858-1938), the Rothschild agent who secretly directed U.S. affairs during the Woodrow Wilson administration. Col. House was known as Wilson's friend and "alter ego." (He had not served in the military and the term "Colonel" was merely honorary.) The report is addressed to British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, whose career was made as a lawyer for the World Zionist Organization.

    Rep. Jacob Thorkelson (1876-1945) introduced The House Report to Congress in Oct. 1939 and published it in the Congressional Record (Oct. 13 1939, pp.598-604). Attempts to delete it were thwarted. The complete text is available on line.

    The report details Col. House's progress in preparing "for the peaceful return of the American colonies to the dominion of the Crown."

    "Crown" refers to the owners of the Bank of England. Their identities are an official secret. According to E.C. Knuth, the "international financial oligarchy uses the allegoric 'Crown' as its symbol of power and has its headquarter in the ancient city of London...the giant Bank of England, a privately owned institution... is not subject to regulation by the British parliament and is in effect a sovereign world power." (The Empire of the City, p. 59)

    Col. House continues:
    The "peaceful return of the American colonies" can only be brought about with "the consent of the dominant group of the controlling clans."
    Col. House relates how these classes are being taught to accept "British" leadership. He details how the universities and press are staffed by "British-born" or Canadians.
    "Through the Red Cross, the Scout movement, the YMCA, the church, and other humane, religious, and quasi religious organizations, we have created an atmosphere of international effort which strengthens the idea of unity of the English speaking world."

    The Overseas Clubs, service clubs, and war charities "enable us to pervade all sections and classes of the country."

    We "hold all American newspapers as isolated from the non-American world as if they had been in another planet instead of another hemisphere. The realization of this by the Associated Press and the other universal news gatherers, except Hearst, was most helpful in bringing only our point of view to the papers they served."
    He boasts that the United States "while still maintaining an outward show of independence" is identical with other colonies in its relationship to the Crown. "Has not President Wilson cancelled the big Navy program and dutifully conceded to us the command of the seas?"

    He boasts that "the Anglo American alliance" has become "the unchallenged financiers of the world."

    He congratulates "our fiscal agents Messrs Pierpont Morgan & Company" for "putting this country into the war." They exert "widespread influence on newspaper policy" through advertising and lent $200,000,000 to Japan to build a fleet to compete with America (making the U.S still more dependent on England.)

    Col. House boasts that the "Crown" used money lent by the U.S. government for war purposes to buy up oil fields in California, Mexico and Latin America.
    "The war has made us custodians of the greater part of the world's raw materials... [We] now largely control the oil fields of the world and thereby the world's transportation and industry."
    THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS RUSE
    The pressing issue now is to "transfer its dangerous sovereignty from this colony to the custody of the Crown. We must, in short, now bring America within the Empire."

    The first step was Wilson's plan for the League of Nations "which we prepared for him."
    "The plain people of this country are inveterate and incurable hero worshippers," Col. House explains. They easily can be manipulated by a man with a slogan that expresses their "undefined aspirations."

    Afterwards, they will trust the sloganeer no matter what he does. Wilson has gained this trust and this accounts for "his exceptional usefulness to us."

    "Any abrupt change might startle the ignorant American masses and rouse them to action against it. And us. Our best policy therefore would be to appoint President Wilson the first president of the League... he will be able to satisfy [Americans] that far from surrendering their independence to the League, they are actually extending their sovereignty by it..."
    Foreshadowing The Patriot Act, Col. House says Woodrow Wilson "alone can father an anti-Bolshevik act which judicially interpreted will enable appropriate punitive measures to be applied to any American who may be unwise enough to assert that America must once again declare her independence."

    Col. House goes into great detail about how Wilson must be messaged and manipulated. Many people think someone else wrote this Report but only Edward Mandell House knew Wilson this well.

    For example he says Wilson "is easily slighted and remarkably vindictive." The new British ambassador should be a "Wilson worshipper" and "a gentleman-in-waiting to the President." He lists the gifts Wilson already has been given.

    "OUR ENTIRE SYSTEM OF THOUGHT CONTROL" IS AT WORK
    Col. House suggests staging the first session of the League of Nations in Washington.
    "This will convince these simple people that they are the League and its power resides in them."
    He recommends a
    "series of spectacles by which the mob may be diverted from any attempt to think too much of matters beyond their province."

    "While awaiting these diversions for the vulgar, we are incessantly instructing them in the wonders of the league. Its praises are thundered by our press, decreed by our college presidents, and professed by our professors. Our authors, writers and lecturers are analysing its selected virtues... we have enlisted 8000 propagandists for the League. We have organized international and national synods, committees, conferences, convocations, conventions, councils...to herald the birth of the League as the dawn of universal peace."

    "Agriculturalists, bankers, brokers, accountants, chemists, and all other functional groups capable of exerting organized professional, business, financial or social pressure are meeting to endorse the League in the name of peace, progress and prosperity...Our film concerns are preparing an epoch-making picture..."

    "In short, our entire system of thought control is working ceaselessly, tirelessly, ruthlessly, to ensure the adoption of the League. And it will be adopted, for business wants peace, the righteous cannot resist a covenant, and the politicians, after shadow boxing for patronage purposes, will yield valiantly lest the fate of the wanton and wilful pursue them."
    CONCLUSION
    Thanks to the valiant opposition of Republican Senators, the United States rejected the Peace Treaty and with it the League of Nations Nov. 19, 1919. The plot was temporarily foiled.

    But the secretive bankers' covert campaign to impose world tyranny has not abated. They financed Hitler and engineered World War Two. The League of Nations was resurrected as the United Nations in 1945 and the "Cold War" initiated. Many believe we are in the early stages of "World War Three."

    All segments of society continue to be propagandized with the virtues of the UN. National institutions are subverted. The press and education continue to be controlled. Politicians are figureheads.

    Some of the tactics have changed. The American empire has replaced the British Empire as their instrument of world hegemony. But Americans should not think they are serving their own interests. They are building a 'new world order' and its master is "the Crown." In Col. House's words, Americans will be colonists who have to "petition at the foot of the throne."

    The references to control of oilfields suggest that oil is first and foremost an instrument of world domination. The final stage of world tyranny involves gaining complete control of Middle Eastern oil. This portends an invasion of Iran.

    The threat can no longer be characterized as strictly "Jewish." Through Freemasonry, the Rothschilds have received a degree of collaboration from the world's financial, cultural and political elites as to render this point moot.

    Lemming-like, Western elites have embraced a death-wish for civilization.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  16. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), Bluegreen (23rd September 2017), Debra (17th April 2017), Dennis Leahy (17th April 2017), DNA (5th August 2017), Ewan (17th April 2017), Foxie Loxie (17th April 2017), gaiagirl (20th July 2017), mountain_jim (17th April 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), sanma (17th April 2017), seko (16th July 2017), The Freedom Train (17th April 2017)

  17. Link to Post #49
    United States Avalon Member Dennis Leahy's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th January 2011
    Location
    Duluth, Minnesota
    Age
    63
    Posts
    5,547
    Thanks
    28,210
    Thanked 36,100 times in 4,625 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Hervé, a click on the "thanks" button is not enough. Thank you for taking the time to research and to consolidate documented evidence of who David Rockefeller (and his father) really were and what they really represented - and the legacy of death and destruction they left. Big picture indeed.


  18. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Dennis Leahy For This Post:

    Baby Steps (19th April 2017), Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), Bluegreen (23rd September 2017), Debra (17th April 2017), DNA (5th August 2017), Ewan (28th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (17th April 2017), Hervé (17th April 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), sanma (17th April 2017), sdv (3rd September 2017), seko (16th July 2017), Shannon (17th April 2017), The Freedom Train (17th April 2017)

  19. Link to Post #50
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Victor Rothschild was a "Soviet" Agent

    By Henry Makow Ph.D. April 19, 2017
    (slightly revised from July 19, 2013)


    (Victor Rothschild, 1910-1980, the famous "Fifth Man" of the Cambridge Five Spy Ring)


    Reprise of key article:
    Here is proof that the Rothschild-controlled central banking cartel is behind Communism and world government tyranny.

    Quote "Which is more plausible? One of the richest men in the world, Victor Rothschild espoused Communist ideals so that his own fabulous wealth and position could be taken away? Or that Communism was in fact a deception designed to take away our wealth and freedom in the name of "equality" and "brotherhood"? "
    In 1942, Sir Mark Oliphant, a leading British physicist was shocked when a messenger delivered a part from his new radar technology with a warning from MI-5 Security Inspector Victor Rothschild to "tighten up your security."

    A few days earlier Rothschild had visited Oliphant's Birmingham University lab, quizzed him on his research, and pocketed the three-inch diameter magnetron.

    But talk about chutzpah!

    Baron Rothschild was himself a Soviet agent! Before returning the magnetron, he had transmitted detailed drawings to Moscow, a fact later confirmed by his KGB handlers.

    Oliphant related this story in 1994 to Roland Perry, the Australian author of The Fifth Man (1994, Sedgwick and Jackson, 475 pp).

    Between 1935 and 1963, the Soviet Union knew all of Britain's military and scientific secrets thanks to "The Cambridge Five" a spy ring that operated in M1-5, MI-6 and the Foreign Office. Western intelligence agencies were rendered ineffective and Allied secrets, including the design of the atomic bomb, were stolen.


    (Only a society bent of suicide would portray these dupes and traitors in a positive light.)


    The traitors were Kim Philby, Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess and Anthony Blunt. But there is a natural reluctance to admit that "the Fifth Man" was Nathaniel Meyer Victor Rothschild (1910-1990), the Third Baron Rothschild, the British head of the world's richest banking dynasty , which controls the Bank of England.

    In 1993, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, six retired KGB Colonels in Moscow confirmed Rothschild's identity to Roland Perry. Col. Yuri Modin, the spy ring's handler, went on the record.

    Perry writes:
    "According to ...Modin, Rothschild was the key to most of the Cambridge ring's penetration of British intelligence. 'He had the contacts,' Modin noted. 'He was able to introduce Burgess, Blunt and others to important figures in Intelligence such as Stewart Menzies, Dick White and Robert Vansittart in the Foreign Office...who controlled Mi-6." (p.89)
    You can understand the reluctance. The Rothschilds are undoubtedly the largest shareholders in the world's central banking system. Victor Rothschild's career as Soviet agent confirms that these London-based bankers plan to translate their monopoly on credit into a monopoly on everything using government as their instrument, ultimately a "world government" dictatorship akin to Communism.

    It adds credence to the claim theRothschilds were behind the Bolshevik Revolution, and used the Cold War and more recently the 9-11 hoax and bogus "War on Terror" to advance their world hegemony.

    Which is more plausible? One of the richest men in the world, Victor Rothschild espoused Communist ideals so that his own fabulous wealth and position could be taken away?

    Or that Communism in fact was a deception designed to take away our wealth and freedom in the name of "equality" and "brotherhood"?


    (Evil and Rich)


    MAN OF ACTION
    According to "The Fifth Man", Victor Rothschild had an IQ of 184. He was a gifted jazz pianist with an intuitive understanding of many scientific disciplines. He saw banking as a dreary affair and preferred the exciting example of his great grandfather Lionel Rothschild (1808-1879) who Benjamin Disraeli immortalized as "Sidonia" in the novel Coningsby (1844).
    "No minister of state had such communication with secret agents and political spies as Sidonia. He held relations with all the clever outcasts of the world. The catalog of his acquaintances in the shape of Greeks, Armenians, Moors, secret Jews, Tartars, Gypsies, wandering Poles and Carbonari, would throw a curious light on those subterranean agencies of which the world in general knows so little, but which exercise so great an influence on public events. The secret history of the world was his pastime. His great pleasure was to contrast the hidden motive, with the public pretext, of transactions."
    (Coningsby pp. 218-219)
    Rothschild studied Zoology at Cambridge where Anthony Blunt recruited him for the KGB about 1936. (Blunt later said it was Rothschild who recruited him.) Rothschild later joined MI-5 and was in charge of counter sabotage. He instructed the military on how to recognize and defuse bombs. Rothschild was a personal friend of Winston Churchill.

    Perry writes:
    "The two socialized often during the war years. Rothschild used his wealth and position to invite the prime minister to private parties. His entree to the wartime leader, plus access to all the key intelligence information, every major weapons development and his command of counter-sabotage operations in Britain, made Rothschild a secretly powerful figure during the war years...The result was that Stalin knew as much as Churchill about vital information, often before the British High Command was informed." (xxviii-xxix)
    Rothschild helped neutralize enemies of the Soviet Union who came to the British for support. For example, he was involved in the cover-up of the assassination of Polish war leader and British ally Wladyslaw Sikorski, whose plane was blown up in July 1944. Sikorski had become burdensome to Stalin after he discovered the KGB had massacred 16,000 Polish officers in the Katyn Woods and elsewhere in 1940.

    In 1944, Blunt, Burgess and Philby all stayed with Victor at the Rothschild mansion in Paris. Rothschild was briefly in charge of Allied intelligence in Paris and interrogated many prisoners.

    After the war Rothschild spent time in the US overseeing attempts to learn the atom bomb secrets. Due in part to the Cambridge Five, Perry says "the Russians knew about every major intelligence operation run against them in the years 1945 to 1963." (xxxi)

    CONCLUSION
    Victor Rothschild held many jobs that served to disguise his true role which I suspect was that of a member of the Illuminati Grand Council. (The Illuminati represent the highest rank of Freemasonry.) He was not a lowly agent. He probably gave orders to people like Winston Churchill, FDR and Stalin.

    For example, he ensured that the USSR supported the establishment of the State of Israel.
    "He knew the proper back-channels to reach decision-makers in Moscow," a KGB Colonel told Perry;
    "Let us just say, he got things done. You only did that if you reached the top. He was very persuasive." (176)
    T Stokes wrote:
    " In the Russian Intel archives Lord and Lady Rothschild are codenamed; "David and Rosa." Rothschild and Churchill were inseparable during W.W.II. The bankers bought Churchill's services in W.W.II for a recorded £50,000 to lobby for total war with Germany, and in W.W.1 Churchill had a bank account in the name of 'Colonel Arden,' to accept these secret donations."
    The fact that Rothschild was protected until his death suggests this is a ruling class conspiracy. According to Greg Hallett, Anthony Blunt, a fellow spy, was an illegitimate son of George V, half-brother and look-alike to Edward VIII, the Duke of Windsor. Until his exposure in 1964, Blunt was Knighted and Curator of the Queen's art collection. He received immunity from prosecution in exchange for his confession.

    Many believe this conspiracy is "Jewish." Yes but "generational Satanist" would be more accurate. These Sabbatean Jews intermarry with Gentiles. The current Lord Jacob Rothschild, the Fourth Baron Rothschild is Victor's son by his first wife Barbara Hutchinson, pictured above, a non-Jew who converted. In Jewish law, Jacob Rothschild is not a Jew. He married Serena Dunn. By the way, Meyer Amschel, Victor's only son by his second marriage, also to a non-Jew, 'committed suicide' in 1996.

    While Victor Rothschild pretended to "socialist ideals," this was just a ruse to entrap misguided idealists. The banker was a conscious traitor. Treason is the template for contemporary politics. The central banking cartel is erecting its "world governance" dictatorship and anyone who wants to succeed must be loyal to the sick new paradigm and a traitor to the genuine old.

    While distracting us with sex and sports, our political and cultural "leaders" attack our national, religious, racial and family foundations using war, homosexuality, pornography, feminism, migration and "diversity."

    Clearly, we need new leaders who will stand up to the owners of the world monetary system. The destiny of humanity is at stake.

    ------

    =================================================

    Meet MI6 - Mossad - CIA - KGB bosses:


    Jacob Rothschild with David Rockefeller

    Last edited by Hervé; 19th April 2017 at 17:00.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  20. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), Carmody (29th August 2017), Dennis Leahy (19th April 2017), DNA (5th August 2017), Ewan (28th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (21st April 2017), gaiagirl (20th July 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), sdv (3rd September 2017), seko (16th July 2017), Shannon (24th April 2017), sheme (21st April 2017)

  21. Link to Post #51
    Great Britain Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    23rd January 2013
    Age
    67
    Posts
    2,006
    Thanks
    7,723
    Thanked 7,391 times in 1,757 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Sure this simplified historic outline of the progress of the Khazarian mob is very interesting and connected many dots for me, a concise outline of the rise and hopefully the fall of the psycopaths of the world.

    https://geopolitics.co/2015/03/11/hi...azarian-mafia/

  22. Link to Post #52
    United States Avalon Member Foxie Loxie's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th September 2015
    Location
    Central NY
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,498
    Thanks
    36,463
    Thanked 7,798 times in 1,407 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Looks like the little cartoon sums it up pretty well! "We are ruled by an elite group of psychopaths who own the banks that control the governments & media. They fund both sides of war for profit & they manufacture the consent of the public through the propaganda of the media."

  23. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Foxie Loxie For This Post:

    Baby Steps (21st April 2017), Blacklight43 (24th July 2017), Bluegreen (23rd September 2017), DNA (5th August 2017), Hervé (21st April 2017), sheme (2nd May 2017)

  24. Link to Post #53
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    The Illuminati Nazi Empire after WW2

    Henry Makow, May 12, 2017

    Paul Manning, a distinguished msm journalist, was persecuted for revealing in 1981 that World War Two was a charade.

    With the cooperation of the Allies, Martin Bormann ensured Germany's postwar economic rebirth by transferring Nazi wealth abroad .

    Both he and Hitler probably survived.

    This is more evidence that, at the top, the Nazis and the Allies were controlled by the same people, the Illuminati (Sabbatean-Frankist) Jewish bankers.

    The purpose of war in general is to kill the non-Masonic Jewish and goy patriots, degrade & demoralize humanity, and consolidate debt and power in bankers' hands.

    Why are people reluctant to believe humanity is in the grip of Satanists?

    Modern history was and is hell-on-earth for many millions. This wasn't done by choir boys.

    The Sabbatean-Frankist Nazi Empire after WW2 is the title of a must-see video by Dave Emory.

    I found this [following] review in the comments. Dave deserves credit for single-handedly keeping this critical story alive. Naturally they want to suppress it.

    The Unvarnished Truth
    A review of Paul Manning's Martin Bormann: Nazi In Exile" 1981(from Sept , 2015)

    By John C. Sanders

    Anticipating the defeat of the Third Reich, Reichsleiter Martin Bormann set up 750 corporations in neutral countries, primed as vehicles to receive the liquid wealth of Germany in addition to patents and other proprietary industrial information.

    An organizational genius and the real power behind Hitler, Bormann, known as the "Brown Eminence", successfully fled Europe for South America and administered a "Reich in Exile" in the years following the war.

    With remnants of the SS as an enforcement arm, former Gestapo chief General Heinrich Mueller as security director, the 750 corporations as a base of economic power and the willing silence and cooperation of the Western Allies, Bormann guided his organization to a position of consummate power.

    One banker quoted by Manning termed the Bormann Organization, the "world's most important accumulation of money power under one control in history".

    Controlling Germany's major corporations, the Federal Republic itself and much of Latin America, the Bormann Organization also maintained a formidable circle of influence in the United States.

    Paul Manning has written the definitive text on the Bormann Organization. Manning worked with CBS radio during World War II in London as a member of the elite Edward R. Murrow/Walter Cronkite team and then became a speechwriter for Nelson Rockefeller.


    DISCOVERY
    Several decades after WWII, Manning stumbled across the U.S. military CSDIC (Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centers) interviews of members of German industrial and banking magnates in the US National Archives. Aghast at the findings, Manning set out to write a book about the secret machinations of Nazi money laundering.



    Unknown to Manning, the manuscript was a stake in the heart of former CIA director Allen Dulles (above) who represented many German interests on both sides of the Atlantic during the 1930's and 40's through his law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell with offices in New York and Berlin.

    Upon the German surrender, Dulles was instrumental in quietly recruiting Hitler's chief intelligence officer General Reinhard Gehlen and many of his key operatives. They were brought to Fort Hunt, Virginia and folded into the American O.S.S. which was converted into the C.I.A. with enactment under Truman of NSC-68 in 1948. Gehlen remained covertly in full U.S. employ until returning to head the German BND in the fifties.

    Concerned over public exposure of Manning's investigation, Dulles volunteered to "help" the unsuspecting Manning with his manuscript, and sent him on a carefully orchestrated wild goose chase, searching for Martin Bormann in South America. Without knowing that he had been deliberately sidetracked, Manning wrote a forward to his book personally thanking Allen Dulles for his assurance that "I was on the right track" and "should keep going." In actuality, Dulles' assistance was aimed at sending Manning and his manuscript into obscurity to avoid disclosure of the transfer and protection of Nazi money.


    PUBLICATION HISTORY
    Through its connections with major American corporations, the Bormann group successfully pressured publisher after publisher to decline Manning's manuscript. Of particular significance in the suppression of Manning's book was the Thyssen family.(patriarch Fritz Thyssen was Hitler's earliest and most prominent backer among German industrialists) His grandson, Count Zichy-Thyssen, who controlled Thyssen Steel from his base in Argentina, let it be known it would be very much appreciated if American publishers "stayed away" from the Manning text.

    Manning finally found a home for the book at the maverick publishing house Lyle Stuart. In retaliation, the head of the publishing house had his legs broken the week the book was released and reviews of the book were blocked in major newspaper markets and mainstream publications. In 1993, after another decade of intense research, Manning's son Jerry, was senselessly and inexplicably murdered.

    Based on information garnered from his contacts in the intelligence community, Manning concluded the killing was in retaliation for his continued work and intent to publish a follow-up book, "In Search of Martin Bormann". The death of his son devastated Manning and stymied completion of the 2nd book. He died shortly after in 1995.

    In December 1998, California-based researcher and broadcaster Dave Emory conducted a live, on-air radio interview ... with Manning's surviving son, Peter, concerning the Bormann flight capital organization and his father's work in bringing its activities to light. Peter movingly recounted the difficulties his family experienced as a result of his father's work on the book.

    In addition to surveillance and harassment, the family experienced economic and mental hardship as a result of deliberate efforts by elements hostile to its message. For obvious reasons, copies of this book were assiduously removed from market and have, for some time, been unobtainable.

    This landmark work nonetheless remains the unvarnished truth regarding Germany's post-war economic rebirth and lays the groundwork for understanding its current bid for dominance in manufacturing, banking and most importantly, publishing.

    "Martin Bormann: Nazi in Exile" is without peer in detail, accuracy and courage in probing the most important and successfully concealed story of the twentieth century. Mandatory reading. (Pdf)

    ---------

    Related:
    Nazi Germany Morphed into Federal Republic
    Nazi Money Financed Germany's Rebirth
    Jews Active in Nazi Financial Empire
    Nazi Owned Corporations Control France's Economy
    Did Illuminati Jews Help Plan Holocaust?
    Bormann Ran Hitler for the Illuminati
    Proof Bormann Was illuminati Agent
    Hitler & Bormann Were Traitors
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  25. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Carmody (29th August 2017), DNA (5th August 2017), Ewan (28th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (12th May 2017), gaiagirl (20th July 2017), mountain_jim (13th May 2017), Paul (13th May 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), seko (16th July 2017)

  26. Link to Post #54
    United States Avalon Member Foxie Loxie's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th September 2015
    Location
    Central NY
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,498
    Thanks
    36,463
    Thanked 7,798 times in 1,407 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    WOW! Thanks, Herve! Right on!!

  27. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Foxie Loxie For This Post:

    DNA (5th August 2017), Hervé (12th May 2017), Paul (13th May 2017)

  28. Link to Post #55
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    If the EU goes down, all life ceases to exist

    By Jon Rappoport Jul 16, 2017

    I’ll get to the European Union in a minute, but first a bit of background.

    System building—how do you do it? In particular, how do you build a perverse structure?

    There are three sequential steps:
    One: Secretly create the system.

    Two: Once it’s up and running and established, act as if you’re a mere participant in the system.

    Three: Claim that the system is absolutely necessary, and without it, things would collapse.
    When those three steps have been accomplished, you can add other flourishes. For example, sometimes you can get away with saying the system was never created at all; it arose organically because there was a need for it. That’s a good one.

    THE EU IS SUCH A SYSTEM.

    The propaganda: “It wasn’t planned from the top. It came about as a response to the need for peace among nations, the need for a common market and a uniform currency, the need for an end to brutal nationalism, etc.”

    Actually, the EU was created as an extension of World War 2 by other means. Hitler’s dream of a united Europe was accomplished, with a reborn Germany as the economic powerhouse. But other key players were involved: the Vatican, the City Of London, Swiss banks, etc. And after 1973, the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission. Globalists all.

    The EU’s current support of the migrant flood into Europe is a case of: this is how we erase borders, destroy the traditions of separate cultures, take down separate nations once and for all, and make Europe into a single entity.

    Brexit was “a disturbance in The Force,” but it is being used to advantage by the EU. In actual game theory (not the ludicrous version taught in universities), you must have threats to the system, in the wake of which the system survives. This “proves” the structure is sound and necessary, and continues to meet the needs of the people.

    The EU is painted as a kind of heroic soldier who has endured many battles. This picture sells.

    As time passes, expect more and more news stories featuring the propaganda theme, “The EU is on the comeback, stronger than ever.”

    The truth is, the EU could vanish tomorrow, and the individual nations of Europe would find ways to connect, cooperate, and do business.

    In fact, one or two adventurous countries could change the face of Europe (which tells you why the EU tries so hard to pass so many binding regulations that apply to all its members). Here is an example:

    Suppose one European country decided to cancel all the odious EU regulations restricting the sale and use of nutritional supplements? Suppose the whole area of nutrition was turned over to the free choice of every citizen?

    You can bet your bottom franc or pound that this nation would suddenly undergo an economic renaissance. Nutritional companies by the hundreds would set up shop. Citizens from all over Europe would move there. Jobs would multiply. In turn, this country would become a haven for all sorts of natural health practitioners and their clients.

    Watching this happen, other European countries would follow suit. Suddenly, health freedom would become an economic tiger.

    Big Pharma, one of the driving forces behind the EU, would be exposed as a pernicious monopoly. Never a bad thing.

    Who knows how many other areas of the economy (aka free market) would suddenly reappear, free of repressive regulations?

    What about GMO crops? From what I can discover, 50 GMO crops are permitted in Europe. A nation can submit a request to the EU to ban a GMO crop, and the EU makes the final decision. Suppose—if the EU vanished—one country stood up on its hind legs and declared:
    “We are banning ALL GMOs. If you live here, all your food will be non-GMO. That is our commitment.”
    Do you think that might result in many people moving to that country?

    Do you think the mega-agri GMO corporations favor the EU? Of course they do, because they believe that, in the long run, they can exert sufficient influence to have their way—whereas on a continent of separate and autonomous nations, the risk factor would be higher.

    All ruthless mega-corporations embrace the EU. That is their preferred system: predators cooperating with other predators. Eventually, you look at the EU and the worst corporations in Europe, and you can’t tell the difference. They’re blood brothers.

    Breaking up and dissolving the EU would smell very much like freedom, if enough citizens could remember the scent.

    The EU is betting it can sustain control; its program of opening borders and letting in what amounts to a massive crime wave will somehow be given a pass by Europe’s traditional population. The EU is betting it has reduced the people of the continent to such a degree of passivity that any insult is accepted.

    “The people don’t want freedom, they want the system.”

    That’s a risky gamble.

    The EU is showing its teeth for all to see. It’s essentially assaulting the population and daring it to rise up in rebellion.

    Which is another aspect of real game theory: launch a series of insults and challenges and tests to those under your rule and see if you can grind them down further and further.

    Europe was the cradle of individual liberty. Not China, not India, not Argentina, not Japan, not Bolivia, not Egypt. Europe. That’s why the Globalist EU has Europe in its sights and wants to flatten it.

    The biggest systems of control are often built after the biggest wars. Those who engineer and finance those wars, on both sides, understand this. They draw up those systems, in the ashes of the prior conflict. It was always their intention. Just as key members of the Rockefeller Council on Foreign Relations were tasked with designing the Union Nations before World War 2 was finished, key Globalist players were already laying out the roadmap to the European Union at the same time.

    You could say World War 2 was instigated and fought for the very purpose of bringing in these huge systems of post-war control.

    War creates the perceived need for the systems.

    Make no mistake about it, the ultimate plan is to erase all separate nations and turn them into distant memories.

    Freedom would be the other distant memory.


    Jon Rappoport
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  29. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (24th July 2017), DNA (5th August 2017), Ewan (27th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (21st July 2017), gaiagirl (20th July 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), seko (16th July 2017)

  30. Link to Post #56
    United States Avalon Member gaiagirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th June 2011
    Age
    48
    Posts
    64
    Thanks
    6,023
    Thanked 324 times in 56 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    A despot in disguise: one man’s mission to rip up democracy by George Monbiot

    July 19, 2017

    It’s the missing chapter: a key to understanding the politics of the past half century. To read Nancy MacLean’s new book, Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America, is to see what was previously invisible.

    The history professor’s work on the subject began by accident. In 2013 she stumbled across a deserted clapboard house on the campus of George Mason University in Virginia. It was stuffed with the unsorted archives of a man who had died that year whose name is probably unfamiliar to you: James McGill Buchanan. She says the first thing she picked up was a stack of confidential letters concerning millions of dollars transferred to the university by the billionaire Charles Koch.

    Her discoveries in that house of horrors reveal how Buchanan, in collaboration with business tycoons and the institutes they founded, developed a hidden programme for suppressing democracy on behalf of the very rich. The programme is now reshaping politics, and not just in the US.

    Buchanan was strongly influenced by both the neoliberalism of Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises, and the property supremacism of John C Calhoun, who argued in the first half of the 19th century that freedom consists of the absolute right to use your property (including your slaves) however you may wish; any institution that impinges on this right is an agent of oppression, exploiting men of property on behalf of the undeserving masses.

    James Buchanan brought these influences together to create what he called public choice theory. He argued that a society could not be considered free unless every citizen has the right to veto its decisions. What he meant by this was that no one should be taxed against their will. But the rich were being exploited by people who use their votes to demand money that others have earned, through involuntary taxes to support public spending and welfare. Allowing workers to form trade unions and imposing graduated income taxes were forms of “differential or discriminatory legislation” against the owners of capital.

    Any clash between “freedom” (allowing the rich to do as they wish) and democracy should be resolved in favor of freedom. In his book The Limits of Liberty, he noted that “despotism may be the only organizational alternative to the political structure that we observe.” Despotism in defense of freedom.

    His prescription was a “constitutional revolution”: creating irrevocable restraints to limit democratic choice. Sponsored throughout his working life by wealthy foundations, billionaires and corporations, he developed a theoretical account of what this constitutional revolution would look like, and a strategy for implementing it.

    He explained how attempts to desegregate schooling in the American south could be frustrated by setting up a network of state-sponsored private schools. It was he who first proposed privatizing universities, and imposing full tuition fees on students: his original purpose was to crush student activism. He urged privatization of social security and many other functions of the state. He sought to break the links between people and government, and demolish trust in public institutions. He aimed, in short, to save capitalism from democracy.

    In 1980, he was able to put the programme into action. He was invited to Chile, where he helped the Pinochet dictatorship write a new constitution, which, partly through the clever devices Buchanan proposed, has proved impossible to reverse entirely. Amid the torture and killings, he advised the government to extend programmes of privatization, austerity, monetary restraint, deregulation and the destruction of trade unions: a package that helped trigger economic collapse in 1982.

    None of this troubled the Swedish Academy, which through his devotee at Stockholm University Assar Lindbeck in 1986 awarded James Buchanan the Nobel memorial prize for economics. It is one of several decisions that have turned this prize toxic.

    But his power really began to be felt when Koch, currently the seventh richest man in the US, decided that Buchanan held the key to the transformation he sought. Koch saw even such ideologues as Milton Friedman and Alan Greenspan as “sellouts”, as they sought to improve the efficiency of government rather than destroy it altogether. But Buchanan took it all the way.

    MacLean says that Charles Koch poured millions into Buchanan’s work at George Mason University, whose law and economics departments look as much like corporate-funded think-tanks as they do academic faculties. He employed the economist to select the revolutionary “cadre” that would implement his programme (Murray Rothbard, at the Cato Institute that Koch founded, had urged the billionaire to study Lenin’s techniques and apply them to the libertarian cause). Between them, they began to develop a programme for changing the rules.

    The papers Nancy MacLean discovered show that Buchanan saw stealth as crucial. He told his collaborators that “conspiratorial secrecy is at all times essential”. Instead of revealing their ultimate destination, they would proceed by incremental steps. For example, in seeking to destroy the social security system, they would claim to be saving it, arguing that it would fail without a series of radical “reforms”. (The same argument is used by those attacking the NHS). Gradually they would build a “counter-intelligentsia”, allied to a “vast network of political power” that would become the new establishment.

    Through the network of think-tanks that Koch and other billionaires have sponsored, through their transformation of the Republican party, and the hundreds of millions they have poured into state congressional and judicial races, through the mass colonization of Trump’s administration by members of this network and lethally effective campaigns against everything from public health to action on climate change, it would be fair to say that Buchanan’s vision is maturing in the US.

    But not just there. Reading this book felt like a demisting of the window through which I see British politics. The bonfire of regulations highlighted by the Grenfell Tower disaster, the destruction of state architecture through austerity, the budgeting rules, the dismantling of public services, tuition fees and the control of schools: all these measures follow Buchanan’s programme to the letter. I wonder how many people are aware that David Cameron’s free schools project stands in a tradition designed to hamper racial desegregation in the American south.

    In one respect, Buchanan was right: there is an inherent conflict between what he called “economic freedom” and political liberty. Complete freedom for billionaires means poverty, insecurity, pollution and collapsing public services for everyone else. Because we will not vote for this, it can be delivered only through deception and authoritarian control. The choice we face is between unfettered capitalism and democracy. You cannot have both.

    Buchanan’s programme is a prescription for totalitarian capitalism. And his disciples have only begun to implement it. But at least, thanks to MacLean’s discoveries, we can now apprehend the agenda. One of the first rules of politics is, know your enemy. We’re getting there.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ian-capitalism
    Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth. -Albert Einstein

  31. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to gaiagirl For This Post:

    avid (24th July 2017), DNA (5th August 2017), Ewan (27th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (21st July 2017), Hervé (20th July 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), StandingWave (20th July 2017)

  32. Link to Post #57
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Wake up to the Rockefeller movie of political reality

    By Jon Rappoport Jul 24, 2017

    The key document here is the 2010 Rockefeller Foundation brainstorming exercise, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”.

    It imagines various disasters and possible responses to them.

    The report presents a friendly and concerned front, but reading between the lines, you can see Globalism at work, shoring up a new and improved international order—as if that solution is the only viable future for humanity.

    Here is a choice bit of scenario-building and forecasting from the report:
    “In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit…national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”
    Ah yes, the favorite phony stepchild of the Globalists: a pandemic. Forget the fact that every dire prediction of worldwide destruction from a dreaded virus, during the past 15 years, has fallen flat. SARS, Swine Flu, West Nile, Bird Flu, etc. Duds.

    Here’s another preposterous Rockefeller future, from the viewpoint of 2010:
    “Undeniably, the planet’s climate was becoming increasingly unstable.”

    “Sea levels were rising fast, even as countries continued to build-out coastal mega-cities.”

    “In 2014, the Hudson River overflowed into New York City during a storm surge, turning the World Trade Center site into a three-foot-deep lake. The image of motorboats navigating through lower Manhattan jarred the world’s most powerful nations into realizing that climate change was not just a developing-world problem.”
    The last Time I looked, New York City was not underwater. Submarine taxis weren’t taking people to work.

    Now read further, to get a flavor of the Rockefeller solution to the “climate disaster.” Notice that an international order, and NOT separate nations, is required:
    “In such an interconnected world, where the behaviors of one country, company, or individual had potentially high-impact effects on all others, piecemeal attempts by one nation here, one small collective of environmental organizations there, would not be enough to stave off a climate disaster – or, for that matter, to effectively address a host of other planetary-scale problems.”
    “But highly coordinated worldwide strategies for addressing such urgent issues just might. What was needed was systems thinking – and systems acting – on a global scale.”
    “International coordination started slowly, then accelerated faster than anyone had imagined.”
    “In 2015, a critical mass of middle income and developed countries with strong economic growth publicly committed to leveraging their resources against global-scale problems, beginning with climate change. Together, their governments hashed out plans for monitoring and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the short term and improving the absorptive capacity of the natural environment over the long term.”
    “In 2017, an international agreement was reached on carbon sequestration (by then, most multinational corporations had a chief carbon officer) and intellectual and financial resources were pooled to build out carbon capture processes that would best support the global ecosystem. A functioning global cap and trade system was also established.”
    “Worldwide, the pressure to reduce waste and increase efficiency in planet-friendly ways was enormous.”
    Now here is the big one, with technocracy as the master:
    “New globally coordinated systems for monitoring energy use capacity – including smart grids and bottom-up pattern recognition technologies – were rolled out. These efforts produced real results: by 2022, new projections showed a significant slowing in the rise of atmospheric carbon levels.”
    “Inspired by the success of this experiment in collective global action, large-scale coordinated initiatives intensified. Centralized global oversight and governance structures sprang up, not just for energy use but also for disease and technology standards. Such systems and structures required far greater levels of transparency, which in turn required more tech-enabled data collection, processing, and feedback.”
    “Enormous, benign “sousveillance” systems allowed citizens to access data – all publicly available – in real time and react. Nation-states lost some of their power and importance as global architecture strengthened and regional governance structures emerged. International oversight entities like the UN took on new levels of authority, as did regional systems like the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), and the Asian Development Bank (ADB).”
    Are you following this? The monitoring of energy use, for example. This is nothing less than moment to moment tracking of energy production and consumption, planet-wide.

    It’s the ultimate top-down force. What flows from this position is the ALLOCATION of energy to every nation—and, up the road, TO EVERY HUMAN.

    “Mr. Jones, your energy-use card shows you’ve reached your limit for this month. Ten days left until February 1. All your energy-producing devices and assets will shut down now. Have a nice day.”

    You don’t think that could ever happen? There is no way to assign energy-use limits to nations without directly impacting use by individuals.

    I also hope you noticed the reference to emerging “regional governance structures.” The takeover of separate nations by the UN, the EU, and other unelected bodies.

    This is the preferred and mandated Rockefeller solution.

    And now a word about the hated and loved Donald Trump. Whatever you think of him, he raised the issue of Globalism, front and center. He shot down the Rockefeller TPP treaty. He didn’t sign the Paris Climate pact. He emphasized nationalism, as opposed to internationalism. He mocked climate-change “science.”

    For the moment, let’s assume the very worst. Trump didn’t mean anything he said. He was a liar, is a liar, and will be a liar. He was actually put in office by the Globalists, who wanted a ludicrous enemy to play off of. He wasn’t and isn’t an enemy of Globalism. He’s a complete fraud. By relentlessly attacking Trump, the Globalists will defeat their “last opponent,” and in the next election they will sweep into power as never before, believing they can then complete their plan for worldwide domination. Let’s assume all this.

    Nevertheless, millions and millions of people have become alerted to this thing called Globalism as a destructive force with a covert agenda of planetary control.

    Observers can go full-bore gloom and doom, claiming it doesn’t matter. They can bitch and moan about how nothing has changed. They can confirm their own personal prophecy of failure along all fronts.

    Or they can try to wake up more people to what Globalism is really all about.

    All along I’ve said I’m far more interested in the people who supported Trump, for their own reasons, than I’m interested in Trump. And I’m not particularly interested in those supporters’ reasons, either—except when FREEDOM is involved.

    The freedom to take destiny into their own hands.

    That idea is not dead. It will never be dead.

    Time is long.

    THE INDIVIDUAL is at the very bottom of the Globalist plan. He is considered to be a fly in the ointment who needs to be eradicated, in favor of The Group.

    He is considered to be an extinct evolutionary appendage.

    That is why the Globalist superstructure must be defeated.

    Psychologically, spiritually, mentally, emotionally, creatively, a separate nation is better than an oligarchical global government.

    An individual is better than a nation.

    A free individual is better than a sleeping individual.

    A self-empowered individual—free, responsible, rational, intensely creative—is possible and necessary.

    This is where it all starts.

    This is where it has to start.

    It doesn’t start with a global glob of fantasizing utopians, who are unaware they’re acting on behalf of an Earth Empire.


    Jon Rappoport

    ==========================================

    ... and it all starts with "Education":

    Miseducation by Design - A compilation with Joseph Farrell [ Rotten to the Common Core ]

    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  33. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    avid (24th July 2017), Blacklight43 (24th July 2017), DNA (5th August 2017), Ewan (28th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (24th July 2017), seko (6th August 2017)

  34. Link to Post #58
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Venezuela regime change project unabashedly revealed

    David William Pear Global Research
    Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:48 UTC


    © Ariana Cubillos / The Associated Press

    When the U.S.A. wanted a regime change it used to be done in secret by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), especially when that country had a democratically elected government such as Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), Nicaragua (1980's), Haiti (2006), Honduras (2009), Ukraine (2014) and Syria, where the bloody project is still raging, the body count mounting, and millions of refuges are homeless.

    In the last few decades the U.S. has grown bolder in its regime change projects. What used to be done secretly is now unabashedly done in plain sight.

    The 2017 Venezuela regime change project has gone public.

    Most of the U.S. public cannot see the forest for the trees of propaganda that has the public confused about what is behind the chaos in Venezuela today. Mostly what is behind it is U.S. funding millions of dollars to the political parties of the oligarchs. Without that money the opposition political parties would be more divided than they already are and weaker. The mainstream media spreads the propaganda that President Nicolas Maduro is a dictator, and that
    • Maduro is repressive and killing his own people of peaceful demonstrators.
    • the Venezuelan Supreme Court judges are his cronies and exceeded their constitutional powers.
    • the Constituent Referendum called by Maduro was illegal.
    • the elections have been a fraud.
    • the opposition are patriots who are demanding democracy.
    • Maduro has singlehandedly destroyed Venezuela's economy.
    • the press and television media is censored by Maduro.
    • the reason President Barack Obama imposed sanctions on Venezuela is because it is a national security threat to the U.S.
    • President Trump has imposed additional sanction because he is upset about democracy, freedom and the rule of law in Venezuela.
    None of the above is true.

    Yet the main stream media keeps repeating it: New York Times, Washington Post, Guardian, Fox News, CNBC, and CNN. Members of Congress keep repeating these lies, a word I rarely use. Not since the mainstream media was a co-conspirator for the Bush-Cheney administration's illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 has the mainstream media fallen so low and been so guilty of collusion to spread false propaganda supporting illegal U.S. foreign policy aggression.

    Anyone who still has illusions that the U.S. mainstream media is free and independent should be dispelled of that belief by what it is misinforming us about Venezuela today.

    The co-opting of the mainstream media is not new. Here is a New York Times editorial the day after Hugo Chavez was kidnapped by a military coup government that was installed in 2002:
    Uprising In Venezuela: The Government; Venezuela's Chief Forced To Resign; Civilian Installed

    By Juan Forero April 13, 2002
    A transitional government headed by a leading businessman replaced President Hugo Chavez today, hours after military officers forced him to resign. It was a sudden end to the turbulent three-year reign of a mercurial strongman elected on promises to distance his country from the United States while uprooting Venezuela's old social order-

    Pedro Carmona Estanga, the head of Venezuela's most important business association, was installed as interim president at a ceremony at 6 p.m. He promised that the new government would adhere to "a pluralistic vision, democratic, civil and ensuring the implementation of the law, the state of law."

    Elections will be held within a year, officials said.

    The Bush administration laid the blame for Mr. Chavez's overthrow firmly with the ousted leader. Officials portrayed the ouster as a victory for democracy-

    Pedro Francisco Carmona Estangaplace
    © Wikimedia Commons

    The next day the New York Times was forced by circumstances to reverse itself, kind of a non-retraction retraction. Notice that the "prominent businessman", Pedro Carmona Estanga is not quite so "prominent" after he "dismantled the National Assembly, fired the ministers of the Supreme Court, repealed the constitution, arrested high-level members of the Chavez government and sent others into hiding. He sounds more like the kind of right-wing fascist that the U.S. prefers to be in charge. And exactly who was it that "installed" him as the interim president, the New York Times does not say. It sure made Bush happy thought. Neither the Times nor the U.S. react the way democracy lovers would be expected to after a military coup d'état. How is that a victory for democracy?
    Popular Uprising Allows Chavez to Reclaim Venezuelan Presidency

    By Ginger Thompson And Juan Forero April 14, 2002
    CARACAS, Venezuela, April 14 - Two days after one huge political movement forced President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela out of power, a countervailing uprising that swept like wildfire through the slums surrounding the capital carried the populist leader back to the presidency today.

    Once in power, the short-lived interim government, led by a prominent businessman, Pedro Carmona Estanga, dismantled the National Assembly, fired the ministers of the Supreme Court, arrested high-level members of the Chavez government and sent others into hiding.

    The new government announced that Mr. Chavez had resigned from power. But word began to spread mostly through international television news reports that Mr. Chavez had not resigned. His followers in slums and poor towns across the country began to worry for his safety. They took to the streets to demand that Mr. Chavez be freed. And they won.
    [The Bush administration showed no remorse in its attempt to violently overthrow Chavez, a coup which cost the lives of dozens of people.]

    The New York Times went on:
    The Bush administration, which showed little regret with Mr. Chavez's apparent ouster on Friday, said it supported the O.A.S. [endorsing Chavez's return to power] resolution. But it called on Mr. Chavez to change his policies.

    "I hope that Hugo Chavez takes the message that his people sent him, that his own policies are not working for the Venezuelan people, that he's dealt with them in a high-handed fashion", President Bush's national security adviser, said today on the NBC news program Meet the Press.
    The Bush Administration, the New York Times and the mainstream media showed no remorse or shame - the U.S. government continued to watch and undermine the Chavista movement, Venezuela's Bolivarian Socialism, in any way that it can. The U.S. continues to be involved and fund a long-term regime change project. The Empire never gives up.

    The U.S. has been perfecting its regime change techniques, camouflaging them as "democracy promotion", which is funding subversion through the Agency for International Development (AID), the United States Information Service (USIS), and the Congressional funded National Endowment for Democracy (NED), International Republican Institute (IRI) and co-opted non-governmental organizations (NGO). Covertly the CIA and US military continue to this day to undermining democracy in Venezuela.

    Regime change is being perfected by sophisticated public relations techniques using marketing strategies, constant repetition, image control, word selection, negative campaigns, mass media, false propaganda and mind shock. The public justification for ousting a democratically elected head of state, such as today's Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro, is cynically said to be democracy promotion and human rights. The real U.S. foreign policy motivation is to recruit a compliant head of state; but that is not what one will hear from the mainstream media propaganda machine cabal, as the New York Times demonstrated after the U.S. backed military coup in 2002.

    Since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, the U.S. has been on a mission of global hegemony, known as the Wolfowitz Doctrine:
    "To prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power".

    Brzezinski and fellow former National Security Advisers meet with President Obama in the Situation Room. September 1, 2010.
    © CSIS: Center for Strategic & International Studies / FlickrPhotos

    And the Grand Chessboard master Zbigniew Brzezinski:
    "The most immediate task is to make certain that no state or combination of states gains the capacity to expel the United States from - [anywhere in the world] - or even to diminish significantly its decisive arbitrating role."
    The U.S. is imposing world hegemony by military might, political arm twisting and economic domination.

    The military might of the U.S. is unquestionable with its trillion dollar annual budget, 1000 foreign outposts in every region of the world, interlocking military alliances such as NATO, and its apparatus of covert special para-military forces and cyber surveillance.

    Economic hegemony requires controlling world organizations such as the United Nations, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, mega-international corporations and maintaining world financial transactions in the U.S. dollar. The raw economic power of the U.S. is regurgitated by the false theory of neoliberal economics, which has deservedly been labeled Voodoo Economics for good reasons.

    Nothing and nobody takes preference ahead of U.S. military and economic world hegemony. To maintain it requires a cadre of academia, mass media, bureaucrats, politicians, and a servant class that is willing to sell their soul for prestige and remuneration. One of the most important functions of this cadre is to manufacture the consent of the majority of the population of the U.S. and its allies. The U.S. will not hesitate to kill millions of people to maintain every link in the chain of hegemony. As the Grand Chess Master Zbigniew Brzezinski himself said:
    "It is now harder to control, but easier to kill, a million people."
    Brzezinski's words were not the idle musing of an intellectual, political scientist or philosopher. He was dead serious. The number of people who have been killed directly and indirectly for U.S. hegemony since 1991 is in the millions. Those millions could not be controlled so they were killed or they became collateral damage, for the benefit of the U.S. Empire. The number of people the U.S. has killed for the sake of democracy and human rights is zero.

    The U.S. public has become controllable by a security state apparatus of spies, militarized police, incarceration on an industrial scale, rigged elections, policies to dumb down the population, keep them literally fat and lazy, constantly preoccupy them with meaningless sensationalism, create a consumer culture, entertain them with mindless saturations of sex and violence, and keep them obedient with propaganda from a network of willing corporate mass media.

    Gaining the implied consent of the public for an astronomical military budget, foreign wars, military campaigns, and regime change projects has been perfected to a degree that makes George Orwell's book Nineteen Eighty-Four look like a child's primer. Despite the trillions of dollars spent on empire, the public has been convinced that the U.S. cannot afford investments in human resources such as healthcare, education, affordable housing, antipoverty programs, mass transportation and needed infrastructure maintenance and improvement.

    Nor will the U.S. sit idle while another country invests in its human capital. The U.S. has been on a campaign to overthrow the government of Venezuela since the 1998 election of Hugo Chavez. Chavez broke with the neoliberal neocolonial mold of being compliant to the U.S. Among Venezuela's natural resources is the world's largest proven oil reserve. That is a resource that the U.S. wants to dominate.

    Chavez committed the unforgivable crime, in the eyes of the hegemonic U.S., by rejecting neoliberal economics, using Venezuela's oil wealth for the benefit of the Venezuelan people, nationalizing the oil operations in its country, adopting a socialist economic model, entering into a friendship with Cuba, and setting an example for South America that openly defied U.S. domination. Hugo Chavez, his Bolivarian Socialism and his successor Nicolas Maduro are unacceptable to the U.S., and it has been attempting to eradicate them.

    In 2002 the George W. Bush administration was caught red handed in a plot with the wealthy and upper middle class of Venezuela to overthrow Chavez in a coup d'état. Chavez was briefly kidnapped, held at a U.S. military facility, and the U.S. immediately recognized the legitimacy of the coup government.

    To the U.S. surprise, and Bush's befuddlement, the people of Venezuela turned out in mass demanding Chavez's return as their democratically elected president. The coup government and the U.S. were left with no choice but to comply. But that did not stop the U.S. from continuing to demonize Chavez and attempting to overthrow his democratic socialist government.

    After Chavez's death in 2013 his democratically elected Vice President Nicolas Maduro assumed the office of president, according to constitutional law. New elections were held and Maduro again was democratically elected president. The U.S. refused to recognize the legitimacy of the election and together with the wealthy upper class of Venezuela immediately cried election fraud.

    The U.S. continued to villainize Maduro, labeling him a dictator and a human rights abuser. The U.S. did not letup on its regime change project. The U.S. has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on so-called "democracy promotion" by USAID, USIS, NED, IRI, NGO's and numerous front organizations in Venezuela to overthrow Maduro and Bolivarian Socialism, either in elections, street violence or by a military coup. To the increasing frustration and anger of the U.S. they have so far failed.

    We are now witnessing today a U.S. intensive phase of the regime change project in Venezuela. It is a coup in the making in plain sight. It is following the textbook example used in Ukraine, Honduras and elsewhere over the decades. The people of Venezuela like their democracy the way it is. But no one in the US would know it from the mainstream media propaganda.

    President Donald Trump, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin and Congress are supporting the wealthy coup plotters in Venezuela. Many of the coup plotters are the same ones that backed the kidnapping and attempted coup against Hugo Chavez in 2002.

    The U.S. is financing the opposition, leading international diplomatic pressure against Venezuela's democratically elected President Nicolas Maduro, imposing sanctions, and encouraging the Venezuelan military to overthrow the government. The U.S. rhetoric and Fake News propaganda is full of outright lies, there is no nice way to say it. There is no polite word for lies. The regime change artists and coup plotters know exactly what the truth is. Here are just a few examples of the outrageous statements:
    "As President Trump has made clear, the United States will not ignore the Maduro regime's ongoing efforts to undermine democracy, freedom, and the rule of law", said Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin.
    [The truth: Venezuela is a democracy, with the best voting system in the world as certified by the Carter Foundation and the Organization of American States (OAS). Maduro is lawfully following the Constitution of Venezuela and he is not a dictator.]

    Here is what CIA director Mike Pompeo had to say,
    "At any time you have a country as large and with the economic capacity of a country like Venezuela, America has a deep interest in making sure that it is stable, as democratic as possible. And so, we're working hard to do that."
    [Truth: Venezuela is more democratic and has a better human rights record than the compliant governments of Mexico, Columbia and Brazil that are joining the U.S. in criticizing Maduro for allegedly being a dictator. Pompeo let it slip that the CIA's interests in Venezuela is its "economic capacity". He must mean oil.]

    The Fake News is a co-conspirator to the U.S. regime change project. They pound away that Maduro is a "dictator", that Sunday's referendum for a Constituent Assembly, which had one of the largest voter turnouts in the history of Venezuela, was fraudulent. That Maduro's security forces are the ones responsible for the deaths and violence which is untrue; the opposition has caused most of the deaths. The Fake News keeps repeating the numbers killed without revealing who is doing the killing, leaving it as if Maduro is largely responsible. It is another lie by omission.

    Those deadly mysterious snipers, which we saw in Ukraine, have shown up again. The agent provocateurs have mostly killed innocent bystanders and their own opposition demonstrators, as in Ukraine. It is cold blooded murder for oil.

    The U.S. is not concerned about democracy and human rights. If it were it would be waging a campaign and imposing sanctions against Saudi Arabia, which is on a head-chopping spree since the beginning of the year. The U.S. would be concerned with the obscene number of journalists that have been murdered in Mexico, that Honduras overthrew a democratic government with a military dictatorship (and U.S. help), that Columbia has some of the most dirty politics in South America, where 60% of Columbian voters do not even turn out, that Brazil is mired in scandal and corruption and a recession and that less than 5% of the population gives President Michel Temer a favorable rating.

    The American people have to internalize that the U.S. does not care about democracy, human rights, justice, political prisoners, torture, journalists or millions of people killed and maimed in U.S. wars of aggression, instigation of chaos and perpetration of regime changes. Of twenty South American countries, Venezuela comes in 7th in the United Nations Index of Human Development. The Fake News propaganda will not mention that fact.

    In the 2012 elections of Hugo Chavez as president, the international humanitarian and election observer President Jimmy Carter certified the results and called Venezuela's voting system "the best in the world". The opposition and the U.S., which before the elections promised to honor Carter's certification, were crying fraud no sooner than the results were announced. Only the U.S. because of its supposed exceptionalism gets to decide who wins elections, who is democratically elected president and who is a dictator.

    Venezuela does not need "democracy promotion" (i.e. subversion) from USAID, USIS, NED, IRI and any of the phony NGOs. Venezuela could teach the rest of South America and the U.S. about democracy and human rights. There is only interest in Venezuela "economic capacity", as CIA director Mike Pompeo admitted, meaning mostly oil. And Venezuela has the largest oil reserves Worldwide (See graph below):


    © Source Energy BC

    The U.S. wants Venezuela to embrace neoliberalism so that international mega-corporations can exploit its oil, which is the largest proven reserve in the world.

    Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, the former CEO of Exxon, wants to see his former employer get in on the profits, instead of profits being invested in Venezuela's people.

    When is the public ever going to get it that the U.S. does not care about democracy, human rights, the deaths of innocent civilians and those widowed, orphaned and made homeless by U.S. stoked wars? They want the oil.

    David William Pear is a progressive columnist writing on economic, political and social issues. His articles have been published by OpEdNews, The Greanville Post, The Real News Network, Truth Out, Consortium News, Russia Insider, Pravda, and many other publications.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  35. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Baby Steps (5th August 2017), DNA (5th August 2017), Ewan (27th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (5th August 2017), Iloveyou (27th August 2017), LadyM (5th August 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), seko (6th August 2017)

  36. Link to Post #59
    France Moderator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    13,369
    Thanks
    43,863
    Thanked 67,236 times in 12,121 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Thanks to uzn for unearthing this video which picks up where Sue Arrigo left off:

    New: CIA Agent Whistleblower Risks All To Expose The Shadow Government

    Published on Aug 23, 2017
    http://GeoengineeringWatch.org

    TO READ OR POST COMMENTS ON THIS VIDEO, PLEASE GO DIRECTLY TO THE ARTICLE http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ne...

    Our hope and goal is for this video to be shared far and wide, DO NOT RE-UPLOAD this copyrighted video without prior written permission and conditions from GeoengineeringWatch.org

    Kevin Shipp was a decorated CIA officer who refused to look the other way in regard to government criminality and cover-up. At a very important public awareness event, held by GeoengineerWatch.org in Northern California, on July 28th, 2017, Mr. Shipp presented a shocking and compelling presentation on numerous, horrific and ongoing government crimes. The total persecution of anyone who dares to tell the truth about rampant government tyranny is also fully exposed. The paradigm we have all known has been built on deception and the dark agendas of the global power structure. The courage Kevin Shipp has shown by doing his best to expose government criminality and tyranny serves as a stellar example to us all.

    We desperately need other individuals in government agencies and the US military to follow Kevin's lead. All of us are essential in the battle to help wake the masses to the truth so that the whistleblowers have the support they need to come forward. If we have any chance of stopping the completely out of control criminal cabal that currently runs our country and much of the world, we must all make our voices heard, we must all join the fight for the greater good.

    Dane Wigington


    ==============================================


    Towards the end of the presentation, Kevin Shipp explains why so very few whistleblowers ever come out... chilling!
    Last edited by Hervé; 27th August 2017 at 17:45.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  37. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Ewan (28th August 2017), Foxie Loxie (27th August 2017), Jayke (27th August 2017), Reinhard (28th August 2017), uzn (29th August 2017)

  38. Link to Post #60
    Scotland Avalon Member Ewan's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th February 2015
    Age
    55
    Posts
    1,105
    Thanks
    9,719
    Thanked 6,268 times in 1,063 posts

    Default Re: For an idea on the "big" picture

    Wow, a 3 month self-imposed sabbatical and did I miss some great posts. Great work Hervé, (and other contributors). The saddening part for me is so few 'thanks' to what is surely one of the greatest wake-up threads in recent years.

  39. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ewan For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (27th August 2017), Hervé (27th August 2017), Jayke (27th August 2017), Rachel (29th August 2017)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts