Here and Now...What's Happening?

[astrid]

From another thread, but Gregg says it so well that its worth posting here.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XnSgIFnF3I

[dan33]

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)
A bit of realistic Karmic humour for the day:

I was at the local reuse/junk store a while back.

I found a bag of pens that look like they were made by the lowest bidder.

I bought them, as the name on them was appealing in that twisted humour tongue-in-cheek kinda way.

They are cheap pens for...: "The Center for Civil-Military Relations".


I've got over 50 of them, over 50 of these pens.


None of them work.

To add, you can make them work, sometimes. By pushing them really really hard, to the point of failure, then they work. sort of. going around in circles with them.

then when finally working at going around in circles, you stop and try and be productive with them, they fail. Fractured output at best.

And the output..the ink..it stinks funny.

Isn't that just......perfect?

(Just played with some of the pens a bit more.)

But.... wait! It gets better!

The funny smell of the ink.

It smells like......ALMONDS.

Why is that significant?

The smell of cyanide, used for suicide OR execution...cyanide smells like.....almonds. (and a little bit toward coconut, the ink smells like that)


This is downright freaky.

CITIZEN KUBRICK by John Ronson.

"Ah yes," says Jan. "Stanley loved typefaces." Jan pauses. "I tell you what else he loved."

"What?" I ask.

"Stationery," says Jan.

I glance over at the boxes full of letters from people who felt about Kubrick the way Kubrick felt about stationery, and then back to Jan. "His great hobby was stationery," he says. "One time a package arrived with 100 bottles of brown ink. I said to Stanley, 'What are you going to do with all that ink?' He said, 'I was told they were going to discontinue the line, so I bought all the remaining bottles in existence.' Stanley had a tremendous amount of ink." Jan pauses. "He loved stationery, pads, everything like that."

[Carmody]

So, you are saying that if one had bought real parchment paper and envelopes (sealed with wax and a signet type 'seal'), used real ink and real ink pens..and wrote Stanley a letter with real stylish 'proper' handwriting..that Stanley would read every single bit of it with extreme relish. No matter the content.

[dan33]

Posted by Carmody (here)
So, you are saying that if one had bought real parchment paper and envelopes (sealed with wax and a signet type 'seal'), used real ink and real ink pens..and wrote Stanley a letter with real stylish 'proper' handwriting..that Stanley would read every single bit of it with extreme relish. No matter the content.

I don't know, Carmody. ... but, may be.

[ulli]

Posted by Carmody (here)
So, you are saying that if one had bought real parchment paper and envelopes (sealed with wax and a signet type 'seal'), used real ink and real ink pens..and wrote Stanley a letter with real stylish 'proper' handwriting..that Stanley would read every single bit of it with extreme relish. No matter the content.

I can believe that.
Well, up to a point. Maybe as far as page 2, top paragraph.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hey, lookie lookie--- what has made it to the Yahoo front page!!
If it isn't our Yucatan pyramid with the light beam coming out of it.
http://news.yahoo.com/mayan-light-be...145401585.html

[Carmody]

Posted by astrid (here)
Agree with Carmody on Donnie Darko i have to
now rearrange my top ten .

Excellent in every way.
Going to be re watching this one for sure.

a 'ain't that the truth!' statement..from the reviews of Donnie Darko, at 'rotten tomatoes':

"The drowsy surrealism and elaborate inconclusiveness of Donnie Darko will simultaneously guarantee it a rabid cult and put it way off limits to the don't-get-its."

[ulli]

Posted by dan33 (here)

Your avatar, Dan...can you drink it?
Can you smell it?
Or what about, can you drive it?

[Carmody]

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)
So, you are saying that if one had bought real parchment paper and envelopes (sealed with wax and a signet type 'seal'), used real ink and real ink pens..and wrote Stanley a letter with real stylish 'proper' handwriting..that Stanley would read every single bit of it with extreme relish. No matter the content.

I can believe that.
Well, up to a point. Maybe as far as page 2, top paragraph.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hey, lookie lookie--- what has made it to the Yahoo front page!!
If it isn't our Yucatan pyramid with the light beam coming out of it.
http://news.yahoo.com/mayan-light-be...145401585.html

From the link:

It's more likely that the "light beam" corresponds to a set of columns of pixels in the camera sensor that are electronically connected to each other, but not to other columns in the sensor, and that this set of connected pixels became oversaturated in the manner described above.

~~~~~~~~~~

This can be easily tested. The image will have pixels. If there is any twist in the image, where it does not align PERFECTLY with the pixels of the sensor, which is a near impossible task, this alignment of 'perfection', then his 'cover story' fails. Big time. basically, the camera would have to be held perfectly vertical with zero issue, less than 1/10thof a degree or so off from perfectly vertical... and also be in perfect alignment with the pyramid, at the same time.

My explanation is in threads on the photo, on the forum, and is quite detailed and covers all the expected science behind pyramids, and the issues of modern digital cameras. without a single glitch or hiccup.

[dan33]

Posted by ulli (here)

[/COLOR]Hey, lookie lookie--- what has made it to the Yahoo front page!!
If it isn't our Yucatan pyramid with the light beam coming out of it.
http://news.yahoo.com/mayan-light-be...145401585.html

The video reminds me the book "REGINA" by Vicente Velasco Piña. Awesome True Story.

http://2012rising.com/article/the-aw...-of-teotiwakan

http://reginamexico.blogspot.com/

[dan33]

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by dan33 (here)

Your avatar, Dan...can you drink it?
Can you smell it?
Or what about, can you drive it?

McQueen was my hero when i was a kid. Every Christmas my parents gave me a poster of him.

William Claxton, a friend of him made an excellent book. Shows a "different" McQueen, with his family, friends, cars.... clown, ... HIM.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSIm6beF6MI

[dan33]

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by astrid (here)
Agree with Carmody on Donnie Darko i have to
now rearrange my top ten .

Excellent in every way.
Going to be re watching this one for sure.

a 'ain't that the truth!' statement..from the reviews of Donnie Darko, at 'rotten tomatoes':

"The drowsy surrealism and elaborate inconclusiveness of Donnie Darko will simultaneously guarantee it a rabid cult and put it way off limits to the don't-get-its."

Love DONNIE DARKO. Was included in the top 100 best movies

[ulli]

Yeah, Dan, I know what you mean.
I even married a guy once because he looked like him.
Well, a mix between McQueen and Ryan O'Neal.

Is there any way one can raise a kid nowadays that is not influenced by Hollywood?
I watched your Fellini clip earlier, the one from 8 1/2...
Too brilliant for words...
those Italian film makers really had eyes. Fellini was the best.

[astrid]

i also watched this over night.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVLvMg62RPA

[dan33]

Posted by ulli (here)
Yeah, Dan, I know what you mean.
I even married a guy once because he looked like him.
Well, a mix between McQueen and Ryan O'Neal.

Is there any way one can raise a kid nowadays that is not influenced by Hollywood?
I watched your Fellini clip earlier, the one from 8 1/2...
Too brilliant for words...
those Italian film makers really had eyes. Fellini was the best.

...or influenced by videogames. Even now i saw a great picture or movie of Mcqueen and I almost feel goose bumps.
Fellini talked to Castaneda. He was thinking to make a film about "Don Juan".
Someone said that Fellini wanted to make a movie with the only purpose to make love with Florinda Donner (the girlfriend of Castaneda) ha...

[dan33]

Posted by astrid (here)
i also watched this over night.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVLvMg62RPA

The American version of Millenium. I haven't seen it yet. Thanks.

[ulli]

This looks good. Too sleepy to watch it all now, but want to see it when I wake up in the morning.
Studies on telepathy.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMIiJXfGIew

[Carmody]

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)
So, you are saying that if one had bought real parchment paper and envelopes (sealed with wax and a signet type 'seal'), used real ink and real ink pens..and wrote Stanley a letter with real stylish 'proper' handwriting..that Stanley would read every single bit of it with extreme relish. No matter the content.

I can believe that.
Well, up to a point. Maybe as far as page 2, top paragraph.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hey, lookie lookie--- what has made it to the Yahoo front page!!
If it isn't our Yucatan pyramid with the light beam coming out of it.
http://news.yahoo.com/mayan-light-be...145401585.html

From the link:

It's more likely that the "light beam" corresponds to a set of columns of pixels in the camera sensor that are electronically connected to each other, but not to other columns in the sensor, and that this set of connected pixels became oversaturated in the manner described above.

~~~~~~~~~~

This can be easily tested. The image will have pixels. If there is any twist in the image, where it does not align PERFECTLY with the pixels of the sensor, which is a near impossible task, this alignment of 'perfection', then his 'cover story' fails. Big time. basically, the camera would have to be held perfectly vertical with zero issue, less than 1/10thof a degree or so off from perfectly vertical... and also be in perfect alignment with the pyramid, at the same time.

My explanation is in threads on the photo, on the forum, and is quite detailed and covers all the expected science behind pyramids, and the issues of modern digital cameras. without a single glitch or hiccup.

The review on yahoo, I have to report, says that the pixels with the pink tinge do align perfectly, within the pixel map of the image. which is a potential negative - toward fraud.


Due to all the other potentials I have covered, in my analysis, the idea that the pixels being 100% in alignment (according to them-NASA, where's my perfect copy of this image and where did they get theirs?) is not a deal breaker, but it is strong evidence of fraud.

For the problem is.... that all my conclusions fit the evidence and the associated potentials surrounding all aspects of the image and what is in the image.

So where is my original copy of the image taken.... so I can look-see this pixel issue myself?

Oh yes. I went back and looked at the image again.

Problem.

The light streak is coming out of darker areas.

When the cameras go 'pink' in pixel rows... they do it at the leading edge of a severe brightness issue area.

There is no such area anywhere near the pyramid. it is only very bright (comparatively) off to the left of the pyramid, where no pink toning is occurring.

Which casts a minimal doubt (but doubt nonetheless) on the NASA conclusion and announcement, as they deemed it fit to include that in their debunking. For some reason.

Even though they admitted that there was no light near the area of dispute, in the recorded image. And the lightning flash in the back ground would have been pink,and it is right next to the pyramid (but way in the back).... and it has no pink tonality issues.

Edit:

NASA's complaint, ie, evidence of fraud was that the shaft was perfectly vertical. I found a shot and looked at it. The side slope of the pyramid was also pixel perfect, thus, exactly 45 degrees. Meaning the image capture itself is inherently ...perfectly level, with regard to the pixel mapping showing evidence of pixel mapping perfection. thus, in such a shot it is possible that the shaft of light, if real, would be perfectly vertical and perfectly expressed as being perfectly vertical, with highly defined edging or boundaries.

somehow NASA managed to fail to say that, even though I noted that pyramid left side slope pixel perfection....within minutes.

Once I checked that NASA was correct and not fibbing...I started looking for references that the mapping ie, the leveling of the image might be perfect enough..and indeed..it is.

Yes. just found the evidence. The slope of the steps of Kukulcan pyramid... is exactly...45 degrees. And the image captured that, exactly. Thus a shaft of light in the same image...would also be perfectly vertical.

[Cottage Rose]

Another 70's rocker died today - RIP Ronnie

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1319923.html

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZYsUEOXMm0

[Calz]

Golden Resonance

By Khris Krepcik Published: March 3, 2012
Posted in: The Etheric, The Public Writings



In Disney’s Prince of Persia - the Sands of Time, they have visual special effects that show a very good representation of what a golden resonance looks like. That’s one of the cool things about using movies as references, because they have big budgets and can create high quality graphics. They aren’t always 100% accurate representations of things, but energy and the multidimensional worlds are composed of flowing fractal lights — and this film does a great job of showing what some of it looks like.

Obviously the film is just a fantasy film, but it’s the digital graphics of the golden resonance that make it well worth watching — and it also shows the character dematerializing and going into a non-solid state, of which we know is possible and real, because we’ve seen and experienced it many times. So, although the story’s fantasy, there are some accurate multidimensional things within it. If you’ve never seen energy or some of the worlds we write about, watching this film can help you align to the feeling of it.

To learn to see energy, you have to be open to the possibility of it as a reality. It’s not so much about believing, as much as it is about not believing and just being open, because the rigidity of the mind and what it believes are the very things that block it from perceiving something more. Once the rigidity of the mind is out of the way and not locking on to the solidity of things, it allows you to begin to perceive the non-solid nature of reality. Healing, inner power, and perception all come down to developing a quality consciousness — a quality energy. Consciousness and etheric energy are one and the same thing.

A golden resonance is the resonance of a celestial force — a mystical healing energy of celestial warmth. Aligning to it is simply a matter of neutralizing the coldness and inner negativity of the rigid intellect and developing a sense of true inner virtues and warmth. If you would like to know what unconditional love looks like — it’s a golden resonance. It’s simply a golden vibrational resonance of celestial warmth.

As a person develops the quality of their consciousness, what do you think they are really doing? Is it about forming more concepts and rigid intellectual opinions within the mind? Is it about developing close-mindedness, coldness, and rigidity? No. It’s about releasing the rigid opinions within the mind, reaching openness, and developing a vibrational resonance of warmth — a golden resonance.


http://www.thehoodedsage.com/2012/03/golden-resonance/

[giovonni]

Greetings ...
i wanted to post this here and see if our friend ~ Ulli
will share her special insights into what she knows and feels in regards to this info ...

The Shift Escalates: The Astrology of March 2012
http://zen-haven.dk/the-astrology-of...-for-everyone/

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peGdslO5xlk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=peGdslO5xlk