+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

  1. Link to Post #1
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    .
    Posts
    7,100
    Thanks
    10,946
    Thanked 98,022 times in 5,600 posts

    Default New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Hi, All:

    (Project Avalon blog, 16 June):

    Many of you will already have heard Richard Hoagland on Coast to Coast AM two days ago, vividly describing the risk of a collapse of part of the seabed of the Gulf of Mexico, with a resultant catastrophic tsunami. Click here for a continuous 20 minute MP3.

    I've just now completed a 40 minute audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle in which he identifies precisely the same risk, informed by his own separate sources. Bill Deagle WAS UNAWARE OF RICHARD HOAGLAND'S SUMMARY WHEN HE SPOKE TO ME.

    Please click here for this important interview. It may be of interest to many that 'Dr Bill' seriously recommends the nuclear solution described in this recent Russian newspaper article.
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 17th June 2010 at 01:15.

  2. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 8 times in 3 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    good information, thanks bill, especially since there are bound to be others like me who were inclined to categorically dismiss anything nuclear. will go listen now.

  3. Link to Post #3
    Germany Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    15th March 2010
    Location
    3rd Rock from The Sun
    Posts
    357
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Quote 'Dr Bill' seriously recommends the nuclear solution described in this recent Russian newspaper article.


    Problem With this is its to unpredictable and they have no guarantee it will work and in fact it could make it worse and then what , the People in charge have been dragging their knuckles on this for to long any one who believes they have been on top of this is just to stupid to understand the magnitude of it or enjoy dining with the other sheep . You don`t want to compound the problem and then make it so that one can`t come in to fix the problem because of radiation And yes Russia has done this before but are the American Idiots in charge going to let Russia come in and solve this NO it doesn`t matter that they have the experience the brainless twits at pennsylvania Ave believe they can screw it up on thier own with out any ones help

  4. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member Rocky_Shorz's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th March 2010
    Posts
    7,708
    Thanks
    9,579
    Thanked 23,586 times in 5,601 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Russia did not use a nuke on a well with 70K PSI behind it...



    more underground nuclear blasts

    Last edited by Rocky_Shorz; 17th June 2010 at 02:09.
    Coincidence or Destiny, it's all in the art of knowing.... III IIII charts ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  5. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member Rocky_Shorz's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th March 2010
    Posts
    7,708
    Thanks
    9,579
    Thanked 23,586 times in 5,601 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    I just did a quick study on all 5 nukes Russia used to stop oil spills and only one is close to the same situation set off 2 Kilometers under the surface... Kharkov region in 1972 even though the set off the mini nuke down deep it had a mushroom cloud on the surface and didn't stop the oil flow...

    imagine blowing a hole 1/10 of a mile across over this well, igniting the natural gas and then having the sea water pour down on the magma...

    it isn't worth the gamble...
    Coincidence or Destiny, it's all in the art of knowing.... III IIII charts ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  6. Link to Post #6
    Avalon Member HORIZONS's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Age
    54
    Posts
    1,301
    Thanks
    1,435
    Thanked 2,065 times in 591 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Very good interview - everyone should listen and consider what is being shared.
    Many thanks to you Bill for all your efforts.
    ~ If nothing changes then nothing changes ~

  7. Link to Post #7
    Germany Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    15th March 2010
    Location
    3rd Rock from The Sun
    Posts
    357
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Quote Posted by HORIZONS (here)
    Very good interview - everyone should listen and consider what is being shared.
    Many thanks to you Bill for all your efforts.
    nope i`ll pass

  8. Link to Post #8
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Location
    Where ever I am supposed to be.
    Posts
    425
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 72 times in 32 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Bill, I love you man. However, why do you find Dr. Deagle to still be credible? Last time he was talking about how planet x was going to cause all of the problems. Now he does not mention that at all and it is going to be caused by graviton waves on the galactic plane. Not to mention the call he made to you and Kerry a couple of years ago when he said that nuclear war was eminent. He believes that he is a prophet that was sent from god to tell us all the truth, and yet everything he tells us turns out to be made up B.S. I am tired of hearing him evangelize. He needs to give it a rest.

    ¤=[Post Update]=¤

    Quote Posted by Rocky_Shorz (here)
    I just did a quick study on all 5 nukes Russia used to stop oil spills and only one is close to the same situation set off 2 Kilometers under the surface... Kharkov region in 1972 even though the set off the mini nuke down deep it had a mushroom cloud on the surface and didn't stop the oil flow...

    imagine blowing a hole 1/10 of a mile across over this well, igniting the natural gas and then having the sea water pour down on the magma...

    it isn't worth the gamble...
    Natural gas will not ignite unless you mix it with the proper air to fuel ratio of oxygen. The only oxygen down there is in the water and that does not count.

  9. Link to Post #9
    Germany Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    15th March 2010
    Location
    3rd Rock from The Sun
    Posts
    357
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Natural Gas is stored in lime stone up here and it doesn`t blow it apart so how could it there the fact it is a gas means it will find the path of least resistance ahead of any liquid so if anything it will make its way to the surface faster then the oil

  10. Link to Post #10
    Avalon Member unplugged's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th May 2010
    Location
    Burlington, NC
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 85 times in 30 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Don't we have a sufficient number of toxins to contend with in the Gulf right now -- benzene @ 3000+ PPB (acceptable levels = 5 PPB), Methylene Oxide @ 3400 PPB (acceptable levels = 5-10 PPB), Hydrogen sulfide @ 3000 PPB (acceptable levels = 61 PPB), without adding nuclear waste to the mix?

  11. Link to Post #11
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Location
    Where ever I am supposed to be.
    Posts
    425
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 72 times in 32 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Quote Posted by unplugged (here)
    Don't we have a sufficient number of toxins to contend with in the Gulf right now -- benzene @ 3000+ PPB (acceptable levels = 5 PPB), Methylene Oxide @ 3400 PPB (acceptable levels = 5-10 PPB), Hydrogen sulfide @ 3000 PPB (acceptable levels = 61 PPB), without adding nuclear waste to the mix?
    If you set off very small nuclear weapons under 1000+ feed of limestone, all you get is a bunch of heat to melt the rock shut. The radiation would stay underground.

  12. Link to Post #12
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    .
    Posts
    7,100
    Thanks
    10,946
    Thanked 98,022 times in 5,600 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Quote Posted by tone3jaguar (here)
    If you set off very small nuclear weapons under 1000+ feed of limestone, all you get is a bunch of heat to melt the rock shut. The radiation would stay underground.
    That's totally correct - unless the rock strata fractures, and it all goes wrong. (I don't have a position on the nuke option. by the way - I'm just trying to educate and inform as even-handedly as possible.)

  13. Link to Post #13
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    900ft above sea level
    Age
    58
    Posts
    2,000
    Thanks
    2,202
    Thanked 5,696 times in 1,413 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Surely!? If you melt the rock with a nuke, if the upwards pressure is extreemly high, won't the 'melt' only release more energy creating a bigger escape route for that energy?
    “one should indeed be silent, but not about anything” - Otto Neurath

    "The problem with stuff that is meant to be idiot proof is that it immediately stimulates the development of new and improved idiots" - bluetroll

  14. Link to Post #14
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    .
    Posts
    7,100
    Thanks
    10,946
    Thanked 98,022 times in 5,600 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Quote Posted by norman (here)
    Surely!? If you melt the rock with a nuke, if the upwards pressure is extreemly high, won't the 'melt' only release more energy creating a bigger escape route for that energy?
    If the rock is solid, and therefore the energy has nowhere to go, the energy is contained and focused and ends up melting the rock (which then re-solidifies). Everything is 'welded' shut and solid.

    If the rock is not solid (or solid enough), the energy will end up MOVING the rocks - maybe upwards and along fault/fracture lines, and more fissures are created. When the Russians did this, this is what happened one time out of five.

  15. Link to Post #15
    Mauritius Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Age
    30
    Posts
    113
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked 51 times in 23 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Hard time for the undersea life , so sad

  16. Link to Post #16
    Avalon Member MorningSong's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Lombardy, Italy
    Posts
    2,336
    Thanks
    7,056
    Thanked 7,993 times in 1,743 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Thanks Bill for this very, very, very interesting interview!
    "Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle." Unknown

    "Vision without action is merely a dream.
    Action without vision just passes the time.
    Vision with action can change the world." Joel Arthur Barker

  17. Link to Post #17
    Avalon Member HORIZONS's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Age
    54
    Posts
    1,301
    Thanks
    1,435
    Thanked 2,065 times in 591 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    This is not just the opinion of Dr Bill:
    Simmons Says Nuclear Device Only Option to Stop Oil Flow
    http://video.godlikeproductions.com/..._Stop_Oil_Flow
    ~ If nothing changes then nothing changes ~

  18. Link to Post #18
    United States Avalon Member Rocky_Shorz's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th March 2010
    Posts
    7,708
    Thanks
    9,579
    Thanked 23,586 times in 5,601 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    well everyone needs to be watching very closely, the relief well is cutting through at 5 times the rate it was...

    This is a 5 mile pile of sediment they are drilling through, it is almost complete... less than 200 feet to go...

    This isn't sand and stone on the surface....

    when you watch the video on the Russian nuke blast, you see the burst come up to the surface...

    so what if it doesn't go upwards, it seems softer as they get closer to the well...

    setting off the nuke might open from the nuke downward just bringing the well closer and opening more leaks for it to pour through...

    we are talking upwards of 70,000 PSI of pressure that is 35 TONS per square inch?

    That is the type of pressure that turns coal into diamonds...

    Now word is coming out that Thorium and Uranium are leaking from this well...

    We would be building Thorium reactors around the world right now instead of Nukes if we didn't need enriched uranium for building bombs...

    so what if like I said blowing a nuke blew downward into the well filled with Thorium and Uranium?

    We have 2.5M gallons of oil leaking 4B cubic feet natural gas and 2B of methane leaking right now each day... along with volcanic gases and Thorium and Uranium...

    at the present rate of leak, it will take over 30 years before it runs dry...

    they drilled 5 miles down into a underwater mountain, what happens if setting off the nuke blows out the side of the mountain...

    68 Trillion Gallons of Oil/Natural Gas/Methane released instantly...


    I'm not an expert, but anyone that is pushing to set off a nuke to stop this oil flow is a gambler willing to take a shot at instantly destroying this planet...

    as terrible as it sounds, if they are only able to capture 95% of what is leaking...

    It won't be pretty, but at least we'll survive and have time to try and come up with a better solution
    Coincidence or Destiny, it's all in the art of knowing.... III IIII charts ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  19. Link to Post #19
    United States Avalon Member Rocky_Shorz's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th March 2010
    Posts
    7,708
    Thanks
    9,579
    Thanked 23,586 times in 5,601 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    Coincidence or Destiny, it's all in the art of knowing.... III IIII charts ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  20. Link to Post #20
    Avalon Member lindabaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th April 2010
    Posts
    170
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 208 times in 46 posts

    Default Re: New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe

    I keep getting a "404 Not Found" message on the Deagle links, both on this forum and on the Project Avalon Blog page.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Important audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle, April 2010
    By Bill Ryan in forum Bill Ryan's Threads
    Replies: 216
    Last Post: 20th October 2012, 21:04
  2. Questions and Answers about the Gulf Oil Catastrophe
    By Bill Ryan in forum Gulf Oil Disaster UPDATES
    Replies: 244
    Last Post: 4th February 2011, 19:08
  3. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 23rd July 2010, 12:40
  4. Bill Ryan from Project Avalon on the Gulf Oil Catastrophe - and more
    By AlphaZebra in forum Project Avalon YouTube Videos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19th July 2010, 16:00
  5. Jane Burgermeister versus Dr Bill Deagle and others
    By Swami in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 6th May 2010, 07:31

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts