~The Bob Dean Thread~

[WhiteFeather]

I'm dedicating this thread to Bob Dean. A Whistle-Blower and a humble man with great knowledge, He's simply spoon-feeding us awesome Disclosure Info, with an overwhelming bounty of food. I'm starting with this Video, Bob Dean On Nibiru. One Of My Favorites. A Must Watch. Thanks Bob.

~*And Much Thanks To Bill and Kerry For This One*~

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=AbgHyrmgRZM

[etheric underground]

Excellent white feather, bob dean is a true hero and a couragous warrior.
I pay tribute to his partner marcia schafer also....She helped me cleanse
my past life karma ... and for that I give the utmost grattitude and thanks to her.

[Calz]

Everyone loves Bob Dean.

I don't recall a single negative post by *anyone* regarding Bob.

Same cannot be said for most of the other interviewees.

[shadowstalker]

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
Everyone loves Bob Dean.

I don't recall a single negative post by *anyone* regarding Bob.

Same cannot be said for most of the other interviewees.

There have been but few and far between.
But i admire that ex atlantian

[markoid]

Like almost everyone else I like Bob Dean very much.
I can think of one thing, (and probably ONLY one thing) that doesn't sit right with me regarding Bob's take on.. everything, is this seeming blanket statement that all ETs are 'good' (ie here for our benefit) and are like our benevolent 'cousins'. Hendrik from Red Ice Radio asks the, to me, very pertinent question in his latest interview with Bob... if they are here for our benefit, why have they given some of their very advanced technology to shadow governments and black ops perpetrators, who have then used or withheld same on the population at large, to the extreme detriment of the human populace. I would like to hear anyone's thoughts on this.

[onawah]

Auracaria did have an issue with Bob Dean regarding some incorrect info he gave secondhand from Z. Sitchin.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...559#post313559
Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN
Post #45 Auracaria wrote:

"There is definitely a problem of some kind with Bob Dean’s take on Nibiru. He refers to his ‘good friend’ Sitchin, and then states: Santorini (1600 BC) plus 3600 years equals now.

Here’s what Sitchin writes, (in The End of Days, page 298):

‘Such an occurrence (a moon of Nibiru striking Uranus) would have affected the orbit of Nibiru, slowing it down to about 3450 Earth-years rather than 3600, and resulting in a post-Diluvial reappearance schedule of circa 7450, circa 4000, and circa 550 B.C.E. If that is what had happened, it would suggest the “early” arrival of Nibiru in 556 B.CE. – and suggest that its next arrival will lbe circa A.D. 2900.’

So according to the number one Nibiru specialist himself, we have nothing to worry about for another nine centuries... "

I think Bob's advanced years, his drinking and cigar smoking may contribute to making him a bit hazy when it comes to numbers, but doubtless his mistake was unintentional.
I am a fan, and look forward to hearing what he has to say at the Awake and Aware Conference.
He probably doesn't have a lot of reservations anymore about what he can and cannot say.

[Calz]

Perhaps I unintentionally pointed this thread in the wrong direction by suggesting no one had anything negative to say.

I think a great deal of "we the alternative news crowd" had been convinced of Sitchin's work ... if Bob was his close friend then who can "blame" him. Bob is still here in human form and subject to all that comes with it.

How about we set aside Sitchin and honor and respect Bob for what he has done with his life.

He has really put it on the line to bring out the truth (as he understands it at whatever portion of his life).

Humble thanks and gratitude to Bob.

BOB DEAN

[SpookyMulder]

That man is a blessing.

One can never get enough when listening to him, and I am sure being in his presence also bring some special energy.
I hope to still be able to listen to him in the years to come.

In love and light

[bennycog]

clapping my hands.. he needs much more than a thread the cuddly bear needs to be placed on every street corner..

[araucaria]

Posted by onawah (here)
Auracaria did have an issue with Bob Dean regarding some incorrect info he gave secondhand from Z. Sitchin.
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...559#post313559
Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN
Post #45 Auracaria wrote:

"There is definitely a problem of some kind with Bob Dean’s take on Nibiru. He refers to his ‘good friend’ Sitchin, and then states: Santorini (1600 BC) plus 3600 years equals now.

Here’s what Sitchin writes, (in The End of Days, page 298):

‘Such an occurrence (a moon of Nibiru striking Uranus) would have affected the orbit of Nibiru, slowing it down to about 3450 Earth-years rather than 3600, and resulting in a post-Diluvial reappearance schedule of circa 7450, circa 4000, and circa 550 B.C.E. If that is what had happened, it would suggest the “early” arrival of Nibiru in 556 B.CE. – and suggest that its next arrival will lbe circa A.D. 2900.’

So according to the number one Nibiru specialist himself, we have nothing to worry about for another nine centuries... "

I think Bob's advanced years, his drinking and cigar smoking may contribute to making him a bit hazy when it comes to numbers, but doubtless his mistake was unintentional.
I am a fan, and look forward to hearing what he has to say at the Awake and Aware Conference.
He probably doesn't have a lot of reservations anymore about what he can and cannot say.

Let me be clear on one thing: my above remark was in no way intended to be negative about Bob Dean, for whom I have great respect. I also contributed a post to his birthday thread.
I still don't understand his take on Sitchin, that's all

[onawah]

No incrimination intended, Auracaria, directed at you or Bob Dean. I was just being factual.

[araucaria]

Posted by onawah (here)
No incrimination intended, Auracaria, directed at you or Bob Dean. I was just being factual.

Me too onawah, no problem.

[onawah]

I'm not sure that he actually said all ETs are good.
However, I do think he believes that we are in no real present danger from ETs.
He did say that there are some ETs who don't like us.
As to the Greys who gave the governments advanced technology, etc. it may be that Dean doesn't dwell on that because, as many have been saying, they are pretty much history now.
I think Dean likes to focus on the positive, which is probably a good thing.
I think what we really need to understand is that we are pretty much our own worst enemies.
Continuing to project our own worst traits on the ETs isn't going to help us very much.

Posted by markoid (here)
Like almost everyone else I like Bob Dean very much.
I can think of one thing, (and probably ONLY one thing) that doesn't sit right with me regarding Bob's take on.. everything, is this seeming blanket statement that all ETs are 'good' (ie here for our benefit) and are like our benevolent 'cousins'. Hendrik from Red Ice Radio asks the, to me, very pertinent question in his latest interview with Bob... if they are here for our benefit, why have they given some of their very advanced technology to shadow governments and black ops perpetrators, who have then used or withheld same on the population at large, to the extreme detriment of the human populace. I would like to hear anyone's thoughts on this.

[DNA]

I understand folks call Bob Dean a whistle blower, but, and I ask this in all earnestness, what information has he ever disclosed?

He is very dramatic, he is amazingly charismatic, and it seems that it is his charisma that seems to lend an air of trust worthyness to his stories.

But, his stories tend to be things that are fairly well established. He recites Zacharia Sitchin, talks about the petrified Noah's Ark as if no one has ever heard about it and rehashes the now defunct Aviary without bringing up anything new and incitefull.

I have watched hours and hours of Bob Dean interveiws, and I have yet to learn anything I didn't already know.

Contrasted with guy's like Wendelle Stevens, John Lear, Sgt Clifford Stone, Jim Sparks and Cathy O'Brien who are all imparting real information that can really further one's search, I just don't get what Bob Dean has to offer.

[araucaria]

Posted by DNA (here)
I understand folks call Bob Dean a whistle blower, but, and I ask this in all earnestness, what information has he ever disclosed?

.

Well, he did describe how WW3 was narrowly averted in the early sixties when the Russians and the Americans in Paris both nearly reacted to a fleet of UFOs, and he described the contents of the subsequent report. That in itself is quite a substantial piece of testimony I'd have thought...

[onawah]

Did you not see the amazing photographs he showed of the enormous ships around the rings of Saturn and elsewhere?
What he offers is not so much factual information, but an account of how his experiences were transformative to him personally and how our future is going to be transformed by contact with ETs. I'd say he is more of a philosopher than a whistleblower, but what he offers helps to humanize the whole experience.

Posted by DNA (here)
I understand folks call Bob Dean a whistle blower, but, and I ask this in all earnestness, what information has he ever disclosed?

He is very dramatic, he is amazingly charismatic, and it seems that it is his charisma that seems to lend an air of trust worthyness to his stories.

But, his stories tend to be things that are fairly well established. He recites Zacharia Sitchin, talks about the petrified Noah's Ark as if no one has ever heard about it and rehashes the now defunct Aviary without bringing up anything new and incitefull.

I have watched hours and hours of Bob Dean interveiws, and I have yet to learn anything I didn't already know.

Contrasted with guy's like Wendelle Stevens, John Lear, Sgt Clifford Stone, Jim Sparks and Cathy O'Brien who are all imparting real information that can really further one's search, I just don't get what Bob Dean has to offer.

[DNA]

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by DNA (here)
I understand folks call Bob Dean a whistle blower, but, and I ask this in all earnestness, what information has he ever disclosed?

.

Well, he did describe how WW3 was narrowly averted in the early sixties when the Russians and the Americans in Paris both nearly reacted to a fleet of UFOs, and he described the contents of the subsequent report. That in itself is quite a substantial piece of testimony I'd have thought...

That does sound interesting, but it also sounds well, a tad bit like a piece of over dramatized information, which is what Dean is kind of good at, (dramatizing). TPTB have known about UFO's since the 40's atleast, and if one were to include the Aurora Texas incident and use the material that Charles Forte has written(then it wold be far longer), it would seem that although the folks who think they are in control may have over reacted, I'm sure the black project folks knew not to over react.

That's the kind of stuff I hear from Dean when he gets all serious and uses his conspiratorial hushed voice when he is talking.
Stuff that is project blue book level material. Not really any black ops type stuff.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by onawah (here)
Did you not see the amazing photographs he showed of the enormous ships around the rings of Saturn and elsewhere?
What he offers is not so much factual information, but an account of how his experiences were transformative to him personally and how our future is going to be transformed by contact with ETs. I'd say he is more of a philosopher than a whistleblower, but what he offers helps to humanize the whole experience.

Well I can agree about the more of a philosopher than a whistle blower part. And no I had never seen the pics of ships by Saturn. I've never seen any UFO pics associated with Dean.
Do you have any links?

[jcocks]

Posted by onawah (here)
Continuing to project our own worst traits on the ETs isn't going to help us very much.

Hear hear!

[araucaria]

Posted by DNA (here)
That does sound interesting, but it also sounds well, a tad bit like a piece of over dramatized information, which is what Dean is kind of good at, (dramatizing). TPTB have known about UFO's since the 40's atleast, and if one were to include the Aurora Texas incident and use the material that Charles Forte has written(then it wold be far longer), it would seem that although the folks who think they are in control may have over reacted, I'm sure the black project folks knew not to over react.

That's the kind of stuff I hear from Dean when he gets all serious and uses his conspiratorial hushed voice when he is talking.
Stuff that is project blue book level material. Not really any black ops type stuff.

OK, you give Dean low marks for style and low marks for content, he was only a young staff sergeant and doesn't pretend to know stuff he couldn't have known. What he does know you know already. No big deal. Why not just leave it and move on?

[markoid]

Posted by onawah (here)
I think Dean likes to focus on the positive, which is probably a good thing.
I think what we really need to understand is that we are pretty much our own worst enemies.
Continuing to project our own worst traits on the ETs isn't going to help us very much.

Yep... well said.