American Terrorist Anwar-al-awlaki...Killed today in another drone attack.

[Cidersomerset]

The US killed....Anawar al-Awlaki in another Drone attack on Yeman.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BTMqRrpVgk

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPADaha_ZK4

He is an American born 'Al Qaeda terrorist'

This is the 4th Al Qaeda leader including bin Laden Killed this year, The mainstream has been highlighting this recently more than usual. I get the impression from what we know of the elites thru the CIA they are stepping up their plan to liquidate 'CIA Qaeda' and their links with them,to make way for a new agenda. War with Iran/China/Russia that will make lots of money for the military ind complex , because although 'Terrorism' is good to keep on the back burner to scare the public.You do not need a massive military machine to combat it, and they can roll it back out at anytime.

No It looks like its time to get rid of the 'old threat' and bring in new one , it could also be they are preparing for a possible false flag Alien invasion ? I don't this is the case , as it would be over complicated and unnecessary. Much more likely a terrestial event, a major money spinning conflict, or utilising weather wars technology thru Haarp ? It just feels like the CIA have got very proficient all of a sudden at killing off their assets.....Something is brewing!!!!!

[Providence]

I just see these 'assassinations' as the US government sponsored terrorist acts. This just insights more and more people to plan attacks against the US, and maybe that's what the government really wants. And so many americans are just eating it up, like taking revenge for 911. If they only knew! Such ignorance!

[NancyV]

The CIA has always been proficient at taking out "assets", terrorists, etc. We just didn't hear about it as often as we do now. They sometimes kill off even their own American agents for one reason or another. As far as al-Awlaki being killed... I like that, since he was a very bad man, but that doesn't mean I like the CIA.

I'm pleased when the bad guys kill each other off although there are always more to take their place. Trying to figure out "right and wrong" in these covert wars and ops is futile, especially when both sides have what seem like "evil" or destructive agendas and are either insane or on a mission from god. (I guess that's insane too!)

It's just one of many games here on earth.
If you don't like a particular game there are many others to play!

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by NancyV (here)
The CIA has always been proficient at taking out "assets", terrorists, etc. We just didn't hear about it as often as we do now. They sometimes kill off even their own American agents for one reason or another. As far as al-Awlaki being killed... I like that, since he was a very bad man, but that doesn't mean I like the CIA.

I'm pleased when the bad guys kill each other off although there are always more to take their place. Trying to figure out "right and wrong" in these covert wars and ops is futile, especially when both sides have what seem like "evil" or destructive agendas and are either insane or on a mission from god. (I guess that's insane too!)

It's just one of many games here on earth.
If you don't like a particular game there are many others to play!

What if there are no ''bad'' and ''good'' people?

[humanalien]

How do you know if Anwar is a bad guy? Do you have
inside information that tells you he is bad?

You only know he is bad because MSM is telling you
he is bad and you have to know by now that they
lie all the time.

[dreamer]

he must have ben very rude at the dinner he had at the pentagon, MANNERS MANNERS!!!!

[Darla Ken Jensen Pearce]

No one is quite as bad as the CIA and certainly not their pimps. They loom large in the background of most world events. Mucking up the works royally.

TPTW are planning an alien invasion scenario but it will be lost in the shuffle of other events we've been told by our channels. For one thing, new interim governments are coming, as well as, a new financial system. These along with disclosure (finally) loom larger so their efforts will not make any difference. They will, in fact, all fail. As all their other dark deeds will be doing soon. Since all their words, deeds, plans, and actions are known and being watched constantly by higher powers, it can never fully materialize as they have planned. Technology wise, TPTW may be a hundred years ahead of We, the people, but they are literally and figuratively kindergarteners when up against Celestial beings of the higher realms and that's just how it is...

I have great hope and belief in the future without the evil/good equation as duality leaves us. Thank goodness and mercy!

[NancyV]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by NancyV (here)
The CIA has always been proficient at taking out "assets", terrorists, etc. We just didn't hear about it as often as we do now. They sometimes kill off even their own American agents for one reason or another. As far as al-Awlaki being killed... I like that, since he was a very bad man, but that doesn't mean I like the CIA.

I'm pleased when the bad guys kill each other off although there are always more to take their place. Trying to figure out "right and wrong" in these covert wars and ops is futile, especially when both sides have what seem like "evil" or destructive agendas and are either insane or on a mission from god. (I guess that's insane too!)

It's just one of many games here on earth.
If you don't like a particular game there are many others to play!

What if there are no ''bad'' and ''good'' people?

Of course on one level there are no bad or good people. It's all in your perspective. As far as al-Awlaki being "bad" he has had a lot of information on the Internet and his own words have shown that he wishes to kill people and has participated in many plots to kill people. The ones he seems to want to kill don't even have to be considered "bad", like maybe the CIA or US government. Apparently he wanted to kill just about any American. Is that bad? Not necessarily but it "seems" bad to our society and we automatically want to do something to protect ourselves against being killed or having our citizens killed.

Anyone who thinks terrorists don't exist at all is wrong. They do exist. Our government and most governments act against terrorists, they can also act AS terrorists and they can spread false information about terrorists and terrorism in order to have a bogeyman that everyone can focus their hate and fear upon. But just because the CIA often act as "bad" guys doesn't mean Al Qaeda and other radical Muslims are good guys. They could all be considered to be playing the same game, and in that game they're all "bad" guys. (only from a certain perspective)

I don't personally like the guys who play the "lets kill the infidels" game, so I call them "bad guys". I also don't like the CIA much since they've tried to kill my husband a couple of times in his career as a counter terrorist, so I call them "bad guys" too. But from a non game playing perspective everything is as it's supposed to be and all the actors are perfect in their chosen roles.

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by NancyV (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by NancyV (here)
The CIA has always been proficient at taking out "assets", terrorists, etc. We just didn't hear about it as often as we do now. They sometimes kill off even their own American agents for one reason or another. As far as al-Awlaki being killed... I like that, since he was a very bad man, but that doesn't mean I like the CIA.

I'm pleased when the bad guys kill each other off although there are always more to take their place. Trying to figure out "right and wrong" in these covert wars and ops is futile, especially when both sides have what seem like "evil" or destructive agendas and are either insane or on a mission from god. (I guess that's insane too!)

It's just one of many games here on earth.
If you don't like a particular game there are many others to play!

What if there are no ''bad'' and ''good'' people?

Of course on one level there are no bad or good people. It's all in your perspective. As far as al-Awlaki being "bad" he has had a lot of information on the Internet and his own words have shown that he wishes to kill people and has participated in many plots to kill people. The ones he seems to want to kill don't even have to be considered "bad", like maybe the CIA or US government. Apparently he wanted to kill just about any American. Is that bad? Not necessarily but it "seems" bad to our society and we automatically want to do something to protect ourselves against being killed or having our citizens killed.

Anyone who thinks terrorists don't exist at all is wrong. They do exist. Our government and most governments act against terrorists, they can also act AS terrorists and they can spread false information about terrorists and terrorism in order to have a bogeyman that everyone can focus their hate and fear upon. But just because the CIA often act as "bad" guys doesn't mean Al Qaeda and other radical Muslims are good guys. They could all be considered to be playing the same game, and in that game they're all "bad" guys. (only from a certain perspective)

I don't personally like the guys who play the "lets kill the infidels" game, so I call them "bad guys". I also don't like the CIA much since they've tried to kill my husband a couple of times in his career as a counter terrorist, so I call them "bad guys" too. But from a non game playing perspective everything is as it's supposed to be and all the actors are perfect in their chosen roles.

Your last sentence could be one of the most important on this whole forum. I am glad that you see it.
And terrorists do exist, but they may not be who we think they are.

[Davidallany]

What if there are no ''bad'' and ''good'' people?

It's the ultimate good cop, bad cop, my Lord.

[GlassSteagallfan]

LaRouche: Awlaki Killing Is the Most Impeachable Crime of Obama

October 2, 2011 • 9:35AM

Department of Justice's secret memo "authorizing" the hit on Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen, should immediately remind one of the infamous torture memos written by G.W. Bush Administration officials soon after the 9/11 attacks to "authorize" torture of individuals detained by the U.S. military. According to the Washington Post, the document was composed "following a review of the legal issues raised by striking a U.S. citizen and involved senior lawyers from across the administration," and there was no dissent. "What constitutes due process in this case is a due process in war," one of the anonymous officials told the Post,— that even though the U.S. is not at war in Yemen! In other words, Awlaki was deemed a "terrorist" and therefore the President had the right to order his assassination, all matters of law notwithstanding. The memo should recall President Richard Nixon's dictum that "if the President does it, then it's legal."

This is of even greater enormity than anything Dick Cheney was accused of during the previous administration, as lawless as that was. While Cheney claimed the right to torture in the name of national security, Obama claims the right to murder in the name of national security. The death of Samir Khan, another American said to be the editor of Al-Qaeda's Inspire publication, underscores the point. He was killed simply because he was accompanying Awlaki at the time. Neither of them was even ever indicted for any crimes, much less subjected to due process, one of the purposes of which is to determine the truth of the charges against the subjects. Lyndon LaRouche said Saturday that these killings are Obama's most impeachable crime. A number of top administration officials are also known to be extremely upset about them.

Source:http://www.larouchepac.com/node/19681