Reposted question from other thread:
I really don't get how people belive Judy when she has done zero experiments to test her theory.
That is what science is.
Otherwise you just believe what she says on faith alone. How is what she says with zero practical proof or experiments to back her up better than what anyone else is saying in the 9/11 movement? (many of which DO have practical experiments to back them up)?
It just seems like people have read her ideas and decided they are true without bothering to look at the counter arguments.
Its like their mind is made up and then at that point they completely shut down to any further discussion of her ideas.
Also, why on earth people keep asking me to prove she is wrong is beyond me. Its up to her to prove she is right. And she has not.
Not a single experiment.
Her heart is in the right place but she has not shown any good evidence to support her space beams ideas.