+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 3
Results 41 to 56 of 56

Thread: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

  1. Link to Post #41
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    55
    Posts
    7,236
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,275 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Quote Posted by Ishtar (here)
    Anyone and their dog can have a website. It's no guarantee of anything ... If Hitler were alive today. he'd have a website.

    OMG... I've just looked at it!! That font is terrible. Talking about Hitler ... it looks like a website of the Third Reich.
    Germans are very technically advanced.

  2. Link to Post #42
    UK Avalon Member Ishtar's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st October 2011
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    1,660
    Thanked 3,307 times in 610 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by Ishtar (here)
    Anyone and their dog can have a website. It's no guarantee of anything ... If Hitler were alive today. he'd have a website.

    OMG... I've just looked at it!! That font is terrible. Talking about Hitler ... it looks like a website of the Third Reich.
    Germans are very technically advanced.


    I'm sorry, that's it....'I'm out' as they say on Dragon's Den.

    This is a scam .... mark my words...the whole thing... it stinks of it.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ishtar For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011), Lord Sidious (30th November 2011)

  4. Link to Post #43
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    55
    Posts
    7,236
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,275 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Quote Posted by Ishtar (here)
    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by Ishtar (here)
    Anyone and their dog can have a website. It's no guarantee of anything ... If Hitler were alive today. he'd have a website.

    OMG... I've just looked at it!! That font is terrible. Talking about Hitler ... it looks like a website of the Third Reich.
    Germans are very technically advanced.


    I'm sorry, that's it....'I'm out' as they say on Dragon's Den.

    This is a scam .... mark my words...the whole thing... it stinks of it.
    I don't trust fulfordnugget.
    But those docs look genuine to me.
    That isn't to say the case is, but we will see.

  5. Link to Post #44
    UK Avalon Member Ishtar's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st October 2011
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    1,660
    Thanked 3,307 times in 610 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Actually, I trust Fulford's integrity ... I just don't trust him not to get taken in.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ishtar For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011), KosmicKat (30th November 2011)

  7. Link to Post #45
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    8,754
    Thanks
    59,307
    Thanked 77,630 times in 8,592 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    This whole thing has been going on for along time. Here's a Fullford post from the wayback machine:

    http://whats-going-on-alex.blogspot....sation-of.html

    Quote Benjamin Fulford - Answers Accusation of Murder


    "Response to recent accusations against Benjamin Fulford:..." / "Christopher Story was not killed"

    Posted By: hobie (at Rumour Mill News.com)
    Date: Friday, 17-Sep-2010 02:05:47 E-mail from Benjamin Fulford:
    =====

    Response to recent accusations against Benjamin Fulford:
    Although it is my policy to not engage in mud-slinging and focus on constructive ideas, I have been asked by many people to respond to two recent lines of attack against me.

    First of all there is the accusation that I killed Christopher Story. That is serious slander and I may decide to sue. First of all, I was asked by MI6 to please cooperate with them and not reveal the fact that Christopher Story AKA Edward Hale, was never killed. It was all part of a psy-ops. However, they are using Story's baseless accusation that I threatened him with murder as part of a campaign to discredit me so I am now revealing the truth: Christopher Story was not killed and I never threatened him.

    The other concerns the ongoing mud-slinging surrounding the OITC. The fact of the matter is that the lawsuit against the OITC and their backers at Davos and the UN has been delayed twice. First by the sudden suspicious death of Joe Bendana (the man who was going to file the lawsuit against them) and now by the fact that all the cables leading to Neil Keenan's server were cut. The lawsuit will go ahead and the courts can decide the truth as far as I am concerned.

    The Federal Reserve Board crime syndicate has found itself in a situation it cannot mathematically get out of no matter how hard they try. In their death throes, however, they are revealing their entire global network of bought and paid for servants. My message to them: accept the inevitable, help start the new financial system and then appear before a truth and reconciliation committee in exchange for forgiveness.

    Believe me, the average people and the legal system will be a lot less forgiving if you continue to try to drag the rest of humanity down with you.

    Benjamin Fulford

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011), Ishtar (30th November 2011)

  9. Link to Post #46
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    8,754
    Thanks
    59,307
    Thanked 77,630 times in 8,592 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    I used to read the financial rabbit-hole posts of Christopher Story, who seemed to side with the Queen against Obama, Bush, Rockefellers, FED.

    There have been some filed legal cases come out of all that as well, but nothing I ever saw in the mainstream media or any resolution to.

    They are all still archived here:

    http://www.worldreports.org/news

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011), Ishtar (30th November 2011)

  11. Link to Post #47
    England Avalon Member DevilPigeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2011
    Location
    Warks, UK
    Age
    49
    Posts
    689
    Thanks
    905
    Thanked 2,421 times in 560 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Quote Posted by mountain_jim (here)
    OITC may be a scam, but is has a website

    http://www.unoitc.org/

    Which by the way makes it look even more like a scam.

    (after this post of mine, I went to the above wikipedia link discussing this website, which I already had a link to for some unremembered past reason.)
    The domain was acquired in 2007, and expires in 2012. Legit organisations generally take out longer leases on their names, usually 10+ years each time. Also, the site is hosted by GoDaddy, seemingly using their "shared hosting" nameservers.

    The word "dodgy" springs to mind.
    "Stop getting Bond wrong!" (Alan Partridge)

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to DevilPigeon For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011)

  13. Link to Post #48
    UK Avalon Member Ishtar's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st October 2011
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    1,660
    Thanked 3,307 times in 610 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Quote Posted by DevilPigeon (here)
    Quote Posted by mountain_jim (here)
    OITC may be a scam, but is has a website

    http://www.unoitc.org/

    Which by the way makes it look even more like a scam.

    (after this post of mine, I went to the above wikipedia link discussing this website, which I already had a link to for some unremembered past reason.)

    The domain was acquired in 2007, and expires in 2012. Legit organisations generally take out longer leases on their names, usually 10+ years each time. Also, the site is hosted by GoDaddy, seemingly using their "shared hosting" nameservers.

    The word "dodgy" springs to mind.
    Thanks, DevilPigeon

    Are GoDaddy not a reliable outfit?

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Ishtar For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011)

  15. Link to Post #49
    Avalon Member Kimberley's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    7,329
    Thanked 12,751 times in 1,912 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by Ishtar (here)
    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by Ishtar (here)
    Anyone and their dog can have a website. It's no guarantee of anything ... If Hitler were alive today. he'd have a website.

    OMG... I've just looked at it!! That font is terrible. Talking about Hitler ... it looks like a website of the Third Reich.
    Germans are very technically advanced.


    I'm sorry, that's it....'I'm out' as they say on Dragon's Den.

    This is a scam .... mark my words...the whole thing... it stinks of it.
    I don't trust fulfordnugget.
    But those docs look genuine to me.
    That isn't to say the case is, but we will see.


    The case is NOT a scam I have the proof yesterday I called William H. Mulligan, Jr. the filing attorney of Bleakley Platt & Schmidt, LLP and he stated in an audio recording that the case was filed on November 23, 2011.

    However whether anything comes of it is obviously in question.

    Much love!

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kimberley For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011), onawah (30th November 2011)

  17. Link to Post #50
    England Avalon Member DevilPigeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2011
    Location
    Warks, UK
    Age
    49
    Posts
    689
    Thanks
    905
    Thanked 2,421 times in 560 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Quote Posted by Ishtar (here)
    Quote Posted by DevilPigeon (here)
    Quote Posted by mountain_jim (here)
    OITC may be a scam, but is has a website

    http://www.unoitc.org/

    Which by the way makes it look even more like a scam.

    (after this post of mine, I went to the above wikipedia link discussing this website, which I already had a link to for some unremembered past reason.)

    The domain was acquired in 2007, and expires in 2012. Legit organisations generally take out longer leases on their names, usually 10+ years each time. Also, the site is hosted by GoDaddy, seemingly using their "shared hosting" nameservers.

    The word "dodgy" springs to mind.
    Thanks, DevilPigeon

    Are GoDaddy not a reliable outfit?
    They've had a fair amount of bad publicity, put it that way... Google is your friend They're at the cheaper end of the shared hosting market, offering what seem like unbelievably fantastic services for the money....

    ps I'm not suggesting anything nefarious by GoDaddy, just that they're often used as a very cheap entry into shared hosting.
    Last edited by DevilPigeon; 30th November 2011 at 19:58.
    "Stop getting Bond wrong!" (Alan Partridge)

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DevilPigeon For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011), Ishtar (30th November 2011), onawah (30th November 2011)

  19. Link to Post #51
    United States Avalon Member Dennis Leahy's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th January 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Language
    English
    Age
    69
    Posts
    6,741
    Thanks
    47,010
    Thanked 48,583 times in 5,817 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    WHOIS information for unoitc.org :

    [Querying whois.publicinterestregistry.net]
    [whois.publicinterestregistry.net]
    Access to .ORG WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in
    determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the
    Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by
    Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not
    guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based
    access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes
    and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow,
    enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or
    facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations
    to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or
    (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send
    queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or
    Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
    modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves
    the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query,
    you agree to abide by this policy.

    Domain ID:D141656820-LROR
    Domain Name:UNOITC.ORG
    Created On:16-Mar-2007 08:37:42 UTC
    Last Updated On:07-Feb-2011 11:38:24 UTC
    Expiration Date:16-Mar-2012 08:37:42 UTC
    Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR)
    Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
    Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
    Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
    Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
    Registrant ID:CR42637623
    Registrant Name:UNOITC HEAD QUARTERS
    Registrant Organization:The Office Of International Treasury Control
    Registrant Street1:1133 Connecticut Avenue
    Registrant Street2:
    Registrant Street3:
    Registrant City:Washington
    Registrant State/Province:District of Columbia
    Registrant Postal Code:20036
    Registrant Country:US
    Registrant Phone:+1.2024499499
    Registrant Phone Ext.:
    Registrant FAX:+1.2024499499
    Registrant FAX Ext.:
    Registrant Email:info@unoitc.org
    Admin ID:CR42637631
    Admin Name:UNOITC HEAD QUARTERS
    Admin Organization:The Office Of International Treasury Control
    Admin Street1:1133 Connecticut Avenue
    Admin Street2:
    Admin Street3:
    Admin City:Washington
    Admin State/Province:District of Columbia
    Admin Postal Code:20036
    Admin Country:US
    Admin Phone:+1.2024499499
    Admin Phone Ext.:
    Admin FAX:+1.2024499499
    Admin FAX Ext.:
    Admin Email:info@unoitc.org
    Tech ID:CR42637627
    Tech Name:UNOITC HEAD QUARTERS
    Tech Organization:The Office Of International Treasury Control
    Tech Street1:1133 Connecticut Avenue
    Tech Street2:
    Tech Street3:
    Tech City:Washington
    Tech State/Province:District of Columbia
    Tech Postal Code:20036
    Tech Country:US
    Tech Phone:+1.2024499499
    Tech Phone Ext.:
    Tech FAX:+1.2024499499
    Tech FAX Ext.:
    Tech Email:info@unoitc.org
    Name Server:NS227.WEBSITEWELCOME.COM
    Name Server:NS228.WEBSITEWELCOME.COM
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    DNSSEC:Unsigned



    =========================

    (I was unsuccessful with a free "reverse lookup" on the phone number.)

    Here is the Google map link, which shows a number of businesses at that address, but not OITC or UNOITC:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&bi...ed=0CB0Q8gEwAA

    Dennis


  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dennis Leahy For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (30th November 2011), DevilPigeon (30th November 2011), GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011), Ishtar (30th November 2011), onawah (30th November 2011)

  21. Link to Post #52
    UK Avalon Member Ishtar's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st October 2011
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    1,660
    Thanked 3,307 times in 610 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Thanks, Kimberley. I read your post in another thread and so I knew that the case had been filed. By 'scam', I mean that I think there's more to it than meets the eye, because of the track record of the OITC (and not to mention their website! )

    David Wilcock talked about how it could be a scam in his response to it: http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/2011...suit-document/

    Quote If at any moment Neil Keenan begins saying that he expects to take possession of this trillion dollars and will distribute it to “shareholders” in a “prosperity program” he is offering, and in order to reserve your money you need to “buy in”, then I would consider that to be the kill-shot that proves this entire document is a highly elaborate scam.

    We have seen before how people create vast stories about how the Federal Reserve owes some entity money, and based on the accrued interest it would wipe out the Fed to pay it back. Then they rope in “investors” who have a minimum buy-in of 100 dollars and are told they could increase their yield by a factor of 1000 percent or more once the “prosperity funds” are “Financed.”

    Back in 1998 and thereafter I had the first of a series of contacts from people, sometimes in large numbers, telling me it was “urgent” that I get in by Friday, let’s say, or the “window” was going to close.

    Then we found out that one of the perpetrators of a scam like this went to Federal court. He defended himself and actually laughed about what he had done. He told the judge that if people were dumb enough to believe him and send him money, they deserved to lose it and just bought themselves a valuable lesson. The judge did not agree. His followers then blamed the “Dark Illuminati” for this man ending up in prison. This all happened about a decade ago now.


    ¤=[Post Update]=¤

    Quote Posted by DevilPigeon (here)
    Quote Posted by Ishtar (here)
    Quote Posted by DevilPigeon (here)
    Quote Posted by mountain_jim (here)
    OITC may be a scam, but is has a website

    http://www.unoitc.org/

    Which by the way makes it look even more like a scam.

    (after this post of mine, I went to the above wikipedia link discussing this website, which I already had a link to for some unremembered past reason.)

    The domain was acquired in 2007, and expires in 2012. Legit organisations generally take out longer leases on their names, usually 10+ years each time. Also, the site is hosted by GoDaddy, seemingly using their "shared hosting" nameservers.

    The word "dodgy" springs to mind.
    Thanks, DevilPigeon

    Are GoDaddy not a reliable outfit?
    They've had a fair amount of bad publicity, put it that way... Google is your friend They're at the cheaper end of the shared hosting market, offering what seem like unbelievably fantastic services for the money....

    ps I'm not suggesting anything nefarious by GoDaddy, just that they're often used as a very cheap entry into shared hosting.
    Thank you, DP!

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ishtar For This Post:

    DevilPigeon (30th November 2011), GlassSteagallfan (30th November 2011), Kimberley (30th November 2011)

  23. Link to Post #53
    Avalon Member Kimberley's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    7,329
    Thanked 12,751 times in 1,912 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    FYI The case showed up on pacer.gov today

    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...gi?read=223093

    Much love

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kimberley For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (1st December 2011), Dennis Leahy (1st December 2011), GlassSteagallfan (1st December 2011)

  25. Link to Post #54
    United States Avalon Member Ba-ba-Ra's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th June 2010
    Location
    N. California foothills
    Age
    84
    Posts
    1,735
    Thanks
    25,407
    Thanked 13,315 times in 1,567 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Quote Posted by Kimberley (here)
    FYI The case showed up on pacer.gov today

    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...gi?read=223093

    Much love
    Again, I repeat: That doesn't mean it's not a frivolous lawsuit. Be cautious, just observe. Conversely, whether frivolous or not, it might help to get those who are still in deep sleep, if not to wake, to at least stir a bit.
    Blessed are the cracked, for they are the ones who let in the light!

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ba-ba-Ra For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (1st December 2011), Ishtar (1st December 2011), KosmicKat (1st December 2011)

  27. Link to Post #55
    Avalon Member Kimberley's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    7,329
    Thanked 12,751 times in 1,912 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    I am trying to keep 4 threads on this topic up to speed so posting this again on this thread...

    Hello The case is real and showed up on pacer yesterday...I download what is filed on pacer.gov

    David has not posted the interview with Ben Fullford yet... coming soon he says


    and read this: (by the way I am the "female radio show host" that David is talking about)

    David Wilcock adds a comment to Ben’s recent post . . . thanks DrinkDeep
    Posted on November 30, 2011
    update from Ben’s (by David W):

    Another significant development. I called the main attorney on this case and he knew who I was. He said he would ‘perhaps’ talk to me later. I then wrote him an email on their website and told him if this was a fraud perpetrated against him, I would help him quickly put it to an end.

    Right after I sent this out, I got an email from a female radio show host who had called him and gotten a call back, which she recorded and presented to me as an MP3. In this call, a man with the same voice I had just heard identified himself as William Mulligan, of Bleakley Platt and Schmidt, and confirmed that 11civ8500 had been filed by him and his firm as a civil complaint.

    Amazing! I am hoping to get an interview with Mulligan, but this story has now become vastly more substantiated. I will tag my brief discussion with the radio host onto the end of the MP3 that will be released.

    - David
    Comment by dwilcock on November 30, 2011 @ 4:41 am



    Daivd Wilcock speaks again – thanks to DrinkDeep
    Posted on December 1, 2011


    Dear Cafe Members,

    I would like to formally apologize to Ben Fulford and to Neil Keenan for how I talked about this case in my initial post.

    It is certainly OK to be skeptical and to conduct your own investigation. However, at that point I so believed I was right that I didn’t even stop to consider that this might actually be a real case.

    Now that I’ve interviewed Fulford, spoken to the prosecuting attorney and to Keenan, I realize I came across too harshly in the original letter.

    Specifically I said that if the cited parties were to murder Keenan, they could potentially make the problem go away.

    Obviously this is a real danger, and I never would have written it up that way if, at the time, I’d believed it was true. Now that I have confirmed the validity of the filing, I wish to apologize for how nonchalantly I spoke about such a sensitive subject.

    The interview transcript is complete and the posting should occur within the next 2 days. It was a lot of work! Whew.

    - David
    Comment by dwilcock on December 1, 2011 @ 10:03 am


    Much Love to us ALL!!

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kimberley For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (1st December 2011), mountain_jim (1st December 2011)

  29. Link to Post #56
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    8,754
    Thanks
    59,307
    Thanked 77,630 times in 8,592 posts

    Default Re: Link to "B. Fulfords" gangster lawsuit

    Hoping for mod-merge of the threads on this subject.

  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    GlassSteagallfan (1st December 2011), Ishtar (1st December 2011)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts