+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 54

Thread: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member music's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th October 2011
    Location
    The Universal Heart
    Posts
    1,277
    Thanks
    2,656
    Thanked 6,650 times in 1,143 posts

    Default Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    If you wiki search Nassim Haramein, you get to this page about his deletion from wikipedia. The main reason seems to be that his work isn't cited by mainstream scientists. Since most scientists are funded to be, and remain, mainstream (ie do not rock the boat), this is probably not surprising.

    Interesting in light of the effect his work could have on the development of free energy.

  2. The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to music For This Post:

    1derer (27th November 2011), aranuk (28th November 2011), Art (30th November 2011), binemaya (8th October 2012), bodhii71 (28th November 2011), Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), enfoldedblue (27th November 2011), Gardener (28th November 2011), greybeard (27th November 2011), Jeia Ra Manuk (29th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Lisab (27th November 2011), Luis Filipe (31st March 2013), mab777 (28th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), Realeyes (29th November 2011), Robert J. Niewiadomski (28th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), toothpick (28th November 2011), Watching from Cyprus (27th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Morocco Deactivated
    Join Date
    18th January 2011
    Location
    With friends
    Age
    61
    Posts
    5,660
    Thanks
    45,848
    Thanked 45,233 times in 5,445 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Posted by music (here)
    If you wiki search Nassim Haramein, you get to this page about his deletion from wikipedia. The main reason seems to be that his work isn't cited by mainstream scientists. Since most scientists are funded to be, and remain, mainstream (ie do not rock the boat), this is probably not surprising.

    Interesting in light of the effect his work could have on the development of free energy.
    Wikipedia is starting to be heavy handed in its deletion policies. They are becoming mind police because of them being a sort of ubiquitous information source.

    Here is a recent egregious deletion: http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/hot-...nim-entry.html

  4. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to modwiz For This Post:

    1derer (27th November 2011), Aryslan (28th November 2011), Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), heyokah (27th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Kiki (29th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), toothpick (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  5. Link to Post #3
    UK Avalon Member 1derer's Avatar
    Join Date
    21st November 2011
    Location
    Sol Terra III
    Posts
    155
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 531 times in 126 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Posted by music (here)
    If you wiki search Nassim Haramein, you get to this page about his deletion from wikipedia. The main reason seems to be that his work isn't cited by mainstream scientists. Since most scientists are funded to be, and remain, mainstream (ie do not rock the boat), this is probably not surprising.

    Interesting in light of the effect his work could have on the development of free energy.
    Nikolas Tesla was never cited in any scientific community either, and he also embarked on the free energy route to help mankind.

    It seems that Free Energy is a real threat to established forms ofr energy and anyone who tries to discuss or promote it becomes ostracised.


    Quote Nassim Haramein’s award winning scientific paper, “The Schwarzschild Proton,” has passed the peer review process and has been published at the American Institute of Physics (AIP) Conference Proceedings.
    http://theresonanceproject.org/research/scientific
    Last edited by 1derer; 27th November 2011 at 19:10.

  6. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to 1derer For This Post:

    Art (30th November 2011), Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), Davidallany (27th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Laurel (29th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Ecuador Avalon Greeter: Here to help
     
    Davidallany's Avatar
    Join Date
    21st February 2011
    Location
    Not sure anymore if location really exist..
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,929
    Thanks
    7,302
    Thanked 5,872 times in 1,539 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Wikipedia is part of the system, a good funds raiser too.

  8. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Davidallany For This Post:

    Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), Rahkyt (27th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member 000's Avatar
    Join Date
    10th July 2010
    Posts
    404
    Thanks
    1,199
    Thanked 1,795 times in 314 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    "If this theory were truly significant, it would be discussed in mainstream peer-reviewed publications and not in a bare smattering of self-published and non-mainstream sources." just one of the many fun quotes from why he was deleted.

    Ahhh mainstream scientists... providing me with much giggling since forever. They are so scared

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 000 For This Post:

    Cjay (29th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    1st June 2010
    Location
    Hayle, Cornwall, England
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,113
    Thanks
    4,167
    Thanked 2,929 times in 657 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Nikolas Tesla was never cited in any scientific community either, and he also embarked on the free energy route to help mankind.

    It seems that Free Energy is a real threat to established forms ofr energy and anyone who tries to discuss or promote it becomes ostracised.
    ... Or Deleted! ... JP

  12. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to John Parslow For This Post:

    1derer (27th November 2011), Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), Mad Hatter (28th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Morocco Deactivated
    Join Date
    18th January 2011
    Location
    With friends
    Age
    61
    Posts
    5,660
    Thanks
    45,848
    Thanked 45,233 times in 5,445 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Posted by Davidallany (here)
    Wikipedia is part of the system, a good funds raiser too.
    Let the 'usual suspects' fund it. I know how to make use of it for basic and some technical info. I also know the mindfield that pervades there.

    ¤=[Post Update]=¤

    Quote Posted by 000 (here)
    "If this theory were truly significant, it would be discussed in mainstream peer-reviewed publications and not in a bare smattering of self-published and non-mainstream sources." just one of the many fun quotes from why he was deleted.

    Ahhh mainstream scientists... providing me with much giggling since forever. They are so scared
    They are scared because they are owned. That funding money comes from somewhere and science is now a tool for 'proving' things to the sheeple.

  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to modwiz For This Post:

    000 (27th November 2011), Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  15. Link to Post #8
    Sweden Avalon Member jorr lundstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    here
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,966
    Thanks
    6,456
    Thanked 9,091 times in 1,724 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Well, is wikipedia for real?? Who cares about wikipedia? Isnt that on the level of Disney?
    We are free, have always been. LOL

    There is no sharing.

    Im responible for wot I say, not wot you understand

  16. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to jorr lundstrom For This Post:

    Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), DouglasDanger (29th November 2011), John Parslow (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), mab777 (28th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  17. Link to Post #9
    Sweden Avalon Member jorr lundstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    here
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,966
    Thanks
    6,456
    Thanked 9,091 times in 1,724 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    We are free, have always been. LOL

    There is no sharing.

    Im responible for wot I say, not wot you understand

  18. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jorr lundstrom For This Post:

    Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), Gardener (28th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), Nate (29th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    46
    Posts
    7,238
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,276 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Posted by jorr lundstrom (here)
    Well, is wikipedia for real?? Who cares about wikipedia? Isnt that on the level of Disney?
    I don't think it is that good.
    Disney are openly not allowing people to mess with their stuff.
    On wikinuggetry, anyone can mess with it.
    I had a friend edit an article on the City of London Corporation and it was reverted inside ten seconds.
    No joke.
    We were talking on skype as he did it and couldn't believe it was so fast.

  20. Link to Post #11
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Location
    Eureka Springs, Arkansas
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,175
    Thanks
    11,195
    Thanked 21,773 times in 4,163 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    This is obviously more a judgement about Wikipedia than about Nassim.

  21. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), Gardener (28th November 2011), John Parslow (27th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  22. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Member cloud9's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Posts
    997
    Thanks
    331
    Thanked 2,584 times in 635 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    What it means is that he is really onto something!

    What is the best way to censor a person? Make them disappear from a very well known and very used web site that millions consult every day and trust? Uhmmm...

  23. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to cloud9 For This Post:

    Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), Gardener (28th November 2011), jjjones (28th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), jp11 (27th November 2011), Kamikaze (28th November 2011), Loony (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), onawah (27th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  24. Link to Post #13
    Avalon Member Seikou-Kishi's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd November 2010
    Location
    Middanġeard
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks
    2,811
    Thanked 5,305 times in 1,294 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Lol, I really love this about wikipedia. They don't allow any information that hasn't been rubber-stamped by consensus. In other words, wikipedia is like a Roman Catholic dicastery making pronunciations on dogma — no dissenting opinion allowed.

    All things are subject to intepretation, and whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
    — Friedrich Nietzsche

  25. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Seikou-Kishi For This Post:

    Art (30th November 2011), Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), Gardener (28th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Kamikaze (28th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), meeradas (28th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  26. Link to Post #14
    United States Avalon Member STATIC's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th November 2011
    Location
    by the big lake
    Age
    28
    Posts
    336
    Thanks
    789
    Thanked 1,092 times in 280 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Weird, I was just searching how many youtube hits Nassim has got and all the results are sites debunking his work.
    I find it funny that science has gotten to be this way. It's aOk to have 11 dimensions, but the possibility of free and limitless energy.... Unthinkable.
    What a bunch of hypocrites!

  27. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to STATIC For This Post:

    Art (30th November 2011), bodhii71 (28th November 2011), Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), jjjones (28th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Loony (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), meeradas (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  28. Link to Post #15
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    46
    Posts
    7,238
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,276 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Posted by Seikou-Kishi (here)
    Lol, I really love this about wikipedia. They don't allow any information that hasn't been rubber-stamped by consensus. In other words, wikipedia is like a Roman Catholic dicastery making pronunciations on dogma — no dissenting opinion allowed.
    When I read this one, it made me think of a bunch of church authorities getting together to decide how many angels could fit on the head of a pin.
    Don't laugh, they really did meet and discuss this.

  29. Link to Post #16
    United States Avalon Member STATIC's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th November 2011
    Location
    by the big lake
    Age
    28
    Posts
    336
    Thanks
    789
    Thanked 1,092 times in 280 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by Seikou-Kishi (here)
    Lol, I really love this about wikipedia. They don't allow any information that hasn't been rubber-stamped by consensus. In other words, wikipedia is like a Roman Catholic dicastery making pronunciations on dogma — no dissenting opinion allowed.
    When I read this one, it made me think of a bunch of church authorities getting together to decide how many angels could fit on the head of a pin.
    Don't laugh, they really did meet and discuss this.
    funny :-) seriously...?

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to STATIC For This Post:

    Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011)

  31. Link to Post #17
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    46
    Posts
    7,238
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,276 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Posted by STATIC (here)
    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by Seikou-Kishi (here)
    Lol, I really love this about wikipedia. They don't allow any information that hasn't been rubber-stamped by consensus. In other words, wikipedia is like a Roman Catholic dicastery making pronunciations on dogma — no dissenting opinion allowed.
    When I read this one, it made me think of a bunch of church authorities getting together to decide how many angels could fit on the head of a pin.
    Don't laugh, they really did meet and discuss this.
    funny :-) seriously...?
    http://www.heart-disease-bypass-surg...rticles/68.htm
    Seriously.

  32. Link to Post #18
    Avalon Member Seikou-Kishi's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd November 2010
    Location
    Middanġeard
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks
    2,811
    Thanked 5,305 times in 1,294 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by Seikou-Kishi (here)
    Lol, I really love this about wikipedia. They don't allow any information that hasn't been rubber-stamped by consensus. In other words, wikipedia is like a Roman Catholic dicastery making pronunciations on dogma — no dissenting opinion allowed.
    When I read this one, it made me think of a bunch of church authorities getting together to decide how many angels could fit on the head of a pin.
    Don't laugh, they really did meet and discuss this.
    Actually my grandmother used to tell us that when we were children. She'd always say "religion is the arena in which mediocre men shine" and warn us not to contract the "contagious stupidity" lol... old people have such a way with words :D

    All things are subject to intepretation, and whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
    — Friedrich Nietzsche

  33. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Seikou-Kishi For This Post:

    Carmody (27th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), jorr lundstrom (27th November 2011), Laurel (29th November 2011), Lord Sidious (28th November 2011), mariposafe (28th November 2011), Midnight Rambler (29th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011), WhiteFeather (27th November 2011), winnasboy (28th November 2011)

  34. Link to Post #19
    United States Avalon Greeter: Here to help
     
    WhiteFeather's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th July 2011
    Location
    Grounded To Gaia
    Posts
    5,346
    Thanks
    29,845
    Thanked 31,440 times in 4,949 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Whackypedia is thy new label, all let it be known henceforth!
    "Although I Live On This World, I Choose Not To Live In It"
    <:~W.F.~:>

    "The answer to every question can be found in nature, if one knows how to look and listen”
    Gwilda Wiyaka

    "Everything on the Earth has a purpose, Every disease a herb to cure it, and every person a mission. This is the Indian theory of existence".
    Mourning Dove Salish


  35. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to WhiteFeather For This Post:

    Cjay (29th November 2011), Darla Ken Pearce (29th November 2011), Hughe (28th November 2011), jjjones (28th November 2011), Lord Sidious (28th November 2011), Mad Hatter (28th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), Seikou-Kishi (27th November 2011), seko (28th November 2011)

  36. Link to Post #20
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    46
    Posts
    7,238
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,276 posts

    Default Re: Nassim Haramein deemed "not a person of note" by wikipedia

    Quote Posted by Seikou-Kishi (here)
    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by Seikou-Kishi (here)
    Lol, I really love this about wikipedia. They don't allow any information that hasn't been rubber-stamped by consensus. In other words, wikipedia is like a Roman Catholic dicastery making pronunciations on dogma — no dissenting opinion allowed.
    When I read this one, it made me think of a bunch of church authorities getting together to decide how many angels could fit on the head of a pin.
    Don't laugh, they really did meet and discuss this.
    Actually my grandmother used to tell us that when we were children. She'd always say "religion is the arena in which mediocre men shine" and warn us not to contract the "contagious stupidity" lol... old people have such a way with words :D
    Sounds like you were lucky in that the family you joined had their heads on straight.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts