+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 29 FirstFirst 1 4 14 29 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 565

Thread: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

  1. Link to Post #61
    Mauritius Avalon Member kersley's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    Mauritius
    Posts
    726
    Thanks
    1,341
    Thanked 1,859 times in 533 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Quote Posted by Bollinger (here)
    My advice therefore is to pay no heed to anyone who claims to be able to predict such things and so I can say with probabilistic certainty that none of the other doomsday events he predicts will happen.
    What do you mean by my advice? And should this prediction come true, will you also be giving out more advice?. What Mitchell is saying, is that he has inside information of them using HARRP. His last prediction was too accurate We would be fools to ignore this guy.
    If you have family and friends in that part of the world, send them the warning.. what have you got to loose?
    Last edited by kersley; 3rd January 2012 at 10:32.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to kersley For This Post:

    corson (4th January 2012), jubjubmoreley (3rd January 2012), Lisab (3rd January 2012), misericordia (3rd January 2012), Referee (14th January 2012), SKAWF (10th August 2012), Woody (3rd January 2012)

  3. Link to Post #62
    Avalon Member Bollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Age
    39
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    1,014
    Thanked 1,470 times in 283 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Quote Posted by kersley (here)
    Quote Posted by Bollinger (here)
    My advice therefore is to pay no heed to anyone who claims to be able to predict such things and so I can say with probabilistic certainty that none of the other doomsday events he predicts will happen.
    What do you mean by my advice? And should this prediction come true, will you also be giving out more advice?. What Mitchell is saying, is that he has inside information of them using HARRP. His last prediction was too accurate We would be fools to ignore this guy.
    If you have family and friends in that part of the world, send them the warning.. what have you got to loose?
    Lot's of people say they have insider information about one thing or another. Do we believe them all? Hypothetically speaking, if we are saying that the tsunami will be caused by man-made technology, it makes it even less likely to happen because presumably those responsible would simply change the target or the time or refrain altogether if they thought the word had got out. So, if anything, that argument goes against you.

    I appreciate there are many human emotions at play here and one of them is the feeling of guilt for not warning people knowing something “might” happen. But how likely is it? If that probability is infinitesimal, (with which you obviously do not agree), it is not worth the anxiety, expense and inconvenience that is certain to ensue should they act on the warning.
    Last edited by Bollinger; 3rd January 2012 at 11:04.
    Hope springs eternal in the human breast; Man never Is, but always To be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin'd from home, Rests and expatiates in a life to come.
    Alexander Pope

  4. Link to Post #63
    England Provisional Member
    Join Date
    17th June 2011
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    550
    Thanked 39 times in 8 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Hello Bollinger,

    I thank you for your words of caution and I undestand that you would like people to see the 'odds' of prediction are extremely small. I feel though that people are mostly equipt to be rational when it comes to discernment. I fear that your comments are going to draw people away from the original purpose of the thread, just as I am having to do here to begin an arguement that is not as fleshy as it could be because the thread will be littered with crossed arguements and not ones that may be deemed more fit for purpose.

    The question is how can this fellow Mitchell Coombs be as exact as he has been with his facebook comments and his rugby scores if he does not have some kind of valid source?

    I don't ever intend to upset or offend,

    Jubjub.

  5. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jubjubmoreley For This Post:

    corson (4th January 2012), kersley (3rd January 2012), Mare (3rd January 2012), misericordia (3rd January 2012), Woody (3rd January 2012)

  6. Link to Post #64
    Avalon Member Bollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Age
    39
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    1,014
    Thanked 1,470 times in 283 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Quote Posted by jubjubmoreley (here)
    Hello Bollinger,

    I thank you for your words of caution and I undestand that you would like people to see the 'odds' of prediction are extremely small. I feel though that people are mostly equipt to be rational when it comes to discernment. I fear that your comments are going to draw people away from the original purpose of the thread, just as I am having to do here to begin an arguement that is not as fleshy as it could be because the thread will be littered with crossed arguements and not ones that may be deemed more fit for purpose.

    The question is how can this fellow Mitchell Coombs be as exact as he has been with his facebook comments and his rugby scores if he does not have some kind of valid source?

    I don't ever intend to upset or offend,

    Jubjub.
    Hi Jubjub,

    No offence taken here. We are all anxious for the truth and nothing but the truth. But that anxiety more often than not draws all kinds of people to make all kinds of predictions, for whatever reason. That is a fact. Attention seeking is a way of life for some people, especially teenagers, and they will use absolutely any means at their disposal to get it.

    Anyway, the question you pose is a valid one and has already been answered in my previous post. If someone wins the lottery, do we go and ask them: how did you know which numbers would come up? No of course not.

    Either the youngster in question got lucky or managed to hack into the Facebook database to change the date and time of the post. The second one is more likely because I know that these social network sites are hacked all the time but the owners keep it quiet for obvious reasons and that is if they even notice or if someone complains.

    Instead of doing predictions on Facebook and then joining the chorus on HAARP to add credulity to his predictions, let him send anonymous hardcopy letters to alternative websites with the time and date of a major event. That is what I would consider as real evidence of foreknowledge.
    Hope springs eternal in the human breast; Man never Is, but always To be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin'd from home, Rests and expatiates in a life to come.
    Alexander Pope

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Bollinger For This Post:

    jubjubmoreley (4th January 2012)

  8. Link to Post #65
    Avalon Member misericordia's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    1,426
    Thanked 786 times in 119 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Wow.. Bollinger with all due respect have you actually read this thread or his comments? I make it very clear that I am cautious of this guy and the information he provides and nobody has said anything about believing every word of what he sais.. as far as I can see most responses to this thread are that of caution mixed with interest and I suppose an agreed feeling that the info he shares should be monitored closely.

    Furthermore he hasn´t predicted anything.. what he has done is provided warnings with what he claims is insider information.

    With regard to the Rugby Scores I saw his update as soon as it was up and followed the comments as regularly as I could in real time.. so for your clarification NO his page was not ´hacked´ and the date/time was not changed.

    ´let him send anonymous hardcopy letters to alternative websites with the time and date of a major event. That is what I would consider as real evidence of foreknowledge.´

    He has said that he cannot provide the date of the tsunami because HAARP can change their decision at any moment, it is only when the ´´button´´ is pressed that an 104 hour point of no return is enacted and that is when he can make an accurate update. In other words he most likely has access to a date right now however he wouldn´t want to divulge it incase they change the date after he makes a date public as he would not want his credibility tarnished. However he has provided the time for the tsunami.. but I guess you would have noticed this if you had read the thread.
    Last edited by misericordia; 3rd January 2012 at 14:31.

  9. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to misericordia For This Post:

    bluestflame (7th August 2012), corson (4th January 2012), jubjubmoreley (4th January 2012), kersley (3rd January 2012), Woody (3rd January 2012)

  10. Link to Post #66
    Avalon Member Bollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Age
    39
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    1,014
    Thanked 1,470 times in 283 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Quote Posted by misericordia (here)
    Wow.. Bollinger with all due respect have you actually read this thread or his comments? I make it very clear that I am cautious of this guy and the information he provides and nobody has said anything about believing every word of what he sais.. as far as I can see most responses to this thread are that of caution mixed with interest and I suppose an agreed feeling that the info he shares should be monitored closely.

    Furthermore he hasn´t predicted anything.. what he has done is provided warnings with what he claims is insider information.

    With regard to the Rugby Scores I saw his update as soon as it was up and followed the comments as regularly as I could in real time.. so for your clarification NO his page was not ´hacked´ and the date/time was not changed.

    ´let him send anonymous hardcopy letters to alternative websites with the time and date of a major event. That is what I would consider as real evidence of foreknowledge.´

    He has said that he cannot provide the date of the tsunami because HAARP can change their decision at any moment, it is only when the ´´button´´ is pressed that an 104 hour point of no return is enacted and that is when he can make an accurate update. In other words he most likely has access to a date right now however he wouldn´t want to divulge it incase they change the date after he makes a date public as he would not want his credibility tarnished. However he has provided the time for the tsunami.. but I guess you would have noticed this if you had read the thread.
    Firstly, in case you haven’t been reading your own thread properly, people are already talking about warning other people who live in the areas they think the tsunami will strike. That to me doesn’t sound like caution but more like panic.

    Secondly, you say you saw the rugby scores go up in real time. What on earth has that got to do with predicting HAARP activity? Do the HAARP people also control and fix rugby matches? Has that question occurred to you? Logic alone should tell you that the two pieces of information cannot have come from the same place especially as in other Facebook posts he says his information comes from the illuminati cards. This bit of it is complete bunkham.

    Thirdly, I believe he predicted a tsunami in California back on 25th April 2011 (it was on the above top secret forum) which never materialised and a lot of people on that site rubbished most of the predictions anyway. Why was that?

    Fourthly, the 104 hour thing sounds very movie-like (I've never heard of it in connection with HAARP and a lot of people who know a great deal more about HAARP than I do haven't talked about it either) so it's likely to be pure fiction.

    Fifthly, here is a video on YouTube that actually shows you how to backdate a post on Facebook. I haven’t tried it because I don’t have many dealings with Facebook but perhaps you can try it and let me know if there is any truth in it.



    Always look at the facts and the evidence, not the ramifications.
    Hope springs eternal in the human breast; Man never Is, but always To be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin'd from home, Rests and expatiates in a life to come.
    Alexander Pope

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bollinger For This Post:

    alamojo (3rd January 2012), jubjubmoreley (4th January 2012)

  12. Link to Post #67
    United States Avalon Member SEAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th January 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    374
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 1,810 times in 307 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    FYI... He's a gun instructor in New South Wales, with a license to sell armaments, with a couple payment accounts, including Paypal. So I don't think he is too worried about being ID'd.
    Ex Military... could be an Oathy, or an insidy.. and his Anon buddy fought in Afgahn.. so whatever his motive, I wouldn't want to be the first one punching through his front door at 2 am.

  13. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SEAM For This Post:

    CeltMan (3rd January 2012), corson (4th January 2012), jubjubmoreley (4th January 2012), misericordia (3rd January 2012), Woody (3rd January 2012)

  14. Link to Post #68
    Avalon Member misericordia's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    1,426
    Thanked 786 times in 119 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Firstly there is nothing wrong with giving people a heads up just the same way Bill did here on Avalon back in September to a Cali tsunami, also look at my reply to that particular post.

    ´Either the youngster in question got lucky or managed to hack into the Facebook database to change the date and time of the post. The second one is more likely because I know that these social network sites are hacked all the time but the owners keep it quiet for obvious reasons and that is if they even notice or if someone complains.´´´

    I was replying to your comment because in that particular context I had been able to see for myself that he could not have hacked or backdated his own times in those particular instances.

    Never has he said that the HAARP people control the Rugby League Matches. Err.. are you at all familiar with the notion of hacking? A hacking group can hack into a variety of different organizations with each bearing no relation to one another. Logic too can tell you that..

    Once again if you had read this thread you would have seen I have already alluded to the whole illuminati thing.

    Here in post #37 is a reply I gave to a poster.
    ´´58andfixed... Before I comment on the point made by the ATS poster I must emphasize that Mitchell has backtracked a great deal with regard to how much importance he initially placed on the card game which has left me and others confused. That is why as I have already stated in this thread there remains too many unanswered questions around this whole thing and for that reason one must exercise a vigilant eye.´´

    So if people on Above Top Secret rubbish claims than we must all rubbish them too.. right?

    Well with regard to April 25th I don´t recall him ever having been that specific but I do remember him mentioning that a Cali tsunami would be soon after the Japanese tsunami in around April/May and further to that and as I have mentioned previously in this thread I recall him giving a warning in May(ish) that the Cali tsunami had been postponed to late Sept (coinciding with Bills warning) however a month or two (I believe )prior to Sept he said it would be postponed again.

    Could you possibly give a reference for these people that know a lot about HAARP and haven´t spoken about the 104 timer. I do not know much at all about HAARP and I am just as perplexed as the next person about it so I would be interested to know more.

    I am abroad at the moment and the computer I am using does not allow me to view youtube vides unfortunately.

    Once again Bollinger it is tiring to have to say this again but I will nonetheless. I began this thread with the objective of critically discussing this guy with others as I believe the information he provides is important. I did not start this thread saying ´this guy is 100% accurate and everything he says is true´. I have made it clear to everyone to preserve a sense of vigilance with this info.

    I´ll repaste a comment I made in #37 just to try and make my point clearer.

    ´´However I must stress that the goal I had in making this thread was to discuss whether the information provided by this individual Mitchell Coombes is authentic or not, it was not created to assert that he speaks the truth. Thus, I must emphasize that I make these points not in his outright defense but because in my opinion it is quite evident that the ATS poster has not been very dutiful in substantiating his criticism with stronger points.´´
    Last edited by misericordia; 3rd January 2012 at 16:35.

  15. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to misericordia For This Post:

    bluestflame (7th August 2012), corson (3rd January 2012), jubjubmoreley (4th January 2012), kersley (3rd January 2012), Lisab (4th January 2012), Sharleen (4th January 2012), SKAWF (10th August 2012), Woody (3rd January 2012)

  16. Link to Post #69
    Avalon Member Bollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Age
    39
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    1,014
    Thanked 1,470 times in 283 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    I have made my position clear and put enough reasons in black and white. Any further scrutiny of what I said and what you said will border on tedium so instead of raising you I’d like to call so please show your hand by giving a score to the following.

    On a scale of 0 to 10, please state the level of credibility you attach to the veracity of what this youngster is claiming.

    The score I give it is 0. What score do you give it?

    Post Edit:

    The above question goes for everyone (observer or participant) and not just misericordia. Please state the degree of belief you put into this after 4 pages of discussion.
    Last edited by Bollinger; 3rd January 2012 at 17:04.
    Hope springs eternal in the human breast; Man never Is, but always To be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin'd from home, Rests and expatiates in a life to come.
    Alexander Pope

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bollinger For This Post:

    jubjubmoreley (4th January 2012), kersley (3rd January 2012), Kronuise (3rd January 2012)

  18. Link to Post #70
    UK Avalon Member Kronuise's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Age
    41
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 276 times in 41 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Good Idea , I would give it a 5, With Facebook timeline feature you can add a status up date which can be place at any time on the timeline however the comments that follow will show the correct date so maybe this can be proved or discounted.
    Sitting up in a spaceship looking down at the earth you wonder what they all stuggling for what's it all really worth?

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Kronuise For This Post:

    Bollinger (3rd January 2012)

  20. Link to Post #71
    UK Avalon Member Kronuise's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Age
    41
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 276 times in 41 posts

    Thumbs down Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Update, I cannot find the posting on his Fb page relating to the jpg of the comments, but there is one dated

    Mitchell Coombes
    March 1, 2011
    Mother Nature- Goodbye Japan, Goodbye California

    But the first comment is dated 20th Dec 2011? I think something is a miss here!

    Edit, After looking in more detail at his posts it appears the first date of his comments are 4th Dec

    Mitchell Coombes : This video was back in February before teh JAAPN TSUNAMI
    December 4, 2011 at 5:42am

    changed my score from 5 to 0, pity...
    Last edited by Kronuise; 4th January 2012 at 08:23.
    Sitting up in a spaceship looking down at the earth you wonder what they all stuggling for what's it all really worth?

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Kronuise For This Post:

    Bollinger (3rd January 2012)

  22. Link to Post #72
    Avalon Member Bollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Age
    39
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    1,014
    Thanked 1,470 times in 283 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Quote Posted by Kronuise (here)
    Good Idea , I would give it a 5, With Facebook timeline feature you can add a status up date which can be place at any time on the timeline however the comments that follow will show the correct date so maybe this can be proved or discounted.
    Thank you for that. In that case if you look at post 3 on page 1, the second picture of the Facebook post does indeed have some comments after it and there you will see that the status date and time from Mitchell Coombes is 6th March 8.39 whereas all the comments that follow it start on 11th March. Are we to believe that nobody commented on the remarkable prediction that we only have "104 hours to go" till a full 4 days later when someone asks him what's next and where on 11th March at 5.29am?

    That looks very suspicious to me. How about you?
    Last edited by Bollinger; 3rd January 2012 at 17:24.
    Hope springs eternal in the human breast; Man never Is, but always To be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin'd from home, Rests and expatiates in a life to come.
    Alexander Pope

  23. Link to Post #73
    UK Avalon Member Kronuise's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Age
    41
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 276 times in 41 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    The screen dumps bear no resemblance to items within his fb page, they simply do not exist. But the screen dumps exist in his gallery, come on guys how hard is it to fake an image.
    Sitting up in a spaceship looking down at the earth you wonder what they all stuggling for what's it all really worth?

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kronuise For This Post:

    alamojo (4th January 2012), Bollinger (3rd January 2012)

  25. Link to Post #74
    Mauritius Avalon Member kersley's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    Mauritius
    Posts
    726
    Thanks
    1,341
    Thanked 1,859 times in 533 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Quote Posted by Kronuise (here)
    The screen dumps bear no resemblance to items within his fb page, they simply do not exist. But the screen dumps exist in his gallery, come on guys how hard is it to fake an image.
    Hold your horses.. He has just accepted my friends request on facebook.. I will look into this.. But of course I would have to have his permission..

  26. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to kersley For This Post:

    alamojo (4th January 2012), corson (4th January 2012), Lisab (4th January 2012), misericordia (4th January 2012)

  27. Link to Post #75
    United States FLAY the FASCIST corson's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th February 2011
    Posts
    2,203
    Thanks
    17,751
    Thanked 8,030 times in 1,936 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    kersley, please let us know what you find.

    and i would just like to say for the record, that my friends in california know very well that there is something stirring. they are not in a panic and i have not gone off the deep-end telling them to leave. as a matter of fact, they are already aware of mitchell's facebook information.

    miseridcordia stated from the first post that this is information that should be discerned. i sent a pm to misericordia to apologize for anything that my post may have done to bring about the above posts from bollinger.

    we are not children here, we know what steps we need to take in breaking down information. i don't think that taking over another persons' thread in this manner is appropriate. if you have questions, or concerns, pm the op. it only takes a minute and can save all from witnessing a heated argument or hurt feelings. be considerate.
    regards and apologies to my friend misericordia.
    corson
    beauty, at it's best.......

  28. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to corson For This Post:

    bluestflame (7th August 2012), jubjubmoreley (5th January 2012), kersley (4th January 2012), Lisab (4th January 2012), misericordia (5th January 2012), seko (5th January 2012)

  29. Link to Post #76
    Avalon Member Bollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Age
    39
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    1,014
    Thanked 1,470 times in 283 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Quote Posted by corson (here)
    kersley, please let us know what you find.

    and i would just like to say for the record, that my friends in california know very well that there is something stirring. they are not in a panic and i have not gone off the deep-end telling them to leave. as a matter of fact, they are already aware of mitchell's facebook information.

    miseridcordia stated from the first post that this is information that should be discerned. i sent a pm to misericordia to apologize for anything that my post may have done to bring about the above posts from bollinger.

    we are not children here, we know what steps we need to take in breaking down information. i don't think that taking over another persons' thread in this manner is appropriate. if you have questions, or concerns, pm the op. it only takes a minute and can save all from witnessing a heated argument or hurt feelings. be considerate.
    regards and apologies to my friend misericordia.
    corson
    Well, at least have the courtesy to answer the question I posed earlier instead of accusing me of taking over this thread. The bottom line and the number one priority is getting to the truth, nothing more, OK.

    What a lot of people do not realise is that there are many outside of this membership who visit and read these pages. It's not just about you and your family. If someone is adamant a 100-foot tsunami is very soon to strike a densely populated area such as California saying the waters will reach some 75 miles inland and witness a whole herd of members on this forum post and thank each other for the information without actually investigating its source and veracity, that in my book, is irresponsible.

    The least you can do is give your verdict as I have requested in my earlier post instead of just ignoring it and getting angry over nothing very much.

    I'll repeat it here again. What level of credibility does everyone put on it from 0 to 10?
    Hope springs eternal in the human breast; Man never Is, but always To be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin'd from home, Rests and expatiates in a life to come.
    Alexander Pope

  30. The Following User Says Thank You to Bollinger For This Post:

    Kronuise (5th January 2012)

  31. Link to Post #77
    United States Deactivated
    Join Date
    25th August 2011
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,128
    Thanks
    4,191
    Thanked 4,018 times in 934 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Bollinger.........the jury is still out.

    If Coombs is really one for one on cataclysmic earth changes that would be worth considering.

    Seems more likely that this is BS though-to me.

    Since I have to rate on 1 to 10 right now at gunpoint---lol---I will give him a score of 3.5.
    score margin of error +/- 3.5
    Last edited by gooty64; 5th January 2012 at 17:23.

  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gooty64 For This Post:

    Bollinger (5th January 2012), Referee (14th January 2012)

  33. Link to Post #78
    Avalon Member EYES WIDE OPEN's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th March 2010
    Posts
    781
    Thanks
    307
    Thanked 1,821 times in 427 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    UPDATE - Does this mean the 104 countdown has now started?! Its not clear... http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...type=1&theater

  34. Link to Post #79
    Avalon Member EYES WIDE OPEN's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th March 2010
    Posts
    781
    Thanks
    307
    Thanked 1,821 times in 427 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    edit: Mitchell Coombes
    No Countdown has begun as of yet. I will say this again, for the 2,575th time since March 11. California is NEXT. I will post a STATUS similar to my Japan warning and it will be a 4-DAY-COUNTDOWN. I will say it again. HAARP do NOT RUN BY a CALENDAR of EVENTS they run by 104 HOUR TIMERS. To those whinging that I don't just come out with THE DATES like some sort of calendar it's because they do not OPERATE like THAT. If 104 hour countdown is not GOOD ENOUGH for you then THAT is all I can do.

  35. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EYES WIDE OPEN For This Post:

    corson (6th January 2012), sygh (16th January 2012)

  36. Link to Post #80
    United States Deactivated
    Join Date
    25th August 2011
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,128
    Thanks
    4,191
    Thanked 4,018 times in 934 posts

    Default Re: Mitchell Coombes: Does he really have access to insider info?

    Eyes wide open, great find. How did you locate this facebook page. The only thing I could find on coombes on facebook was r.i.p. mitchell coombes. The Australian psychicnamed Mitchell coombes is not the guy who predicted the Japan earthquake.

    Looks like the real Mitchell Coombes is on the run sort of...

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts