Bill, wasn't it Steven Spielberg himself who once commented that if the Roswell footage was fake, he'd hire the guy who did it, as it's amazingly well done, especially considering how long ago that was!
Bill, wasn't it Steven Spielberg himself who once commented that if the Roswell footage was fake, he'd hire the guy who did it, as it's amazingly well done, especially considering how long ago that was!
Cartomancer (9th July 2012), Omni (10th July 2012)
Great Thread!
I am aware of all the critics to the alien authopsy film. I have analized them carefully, as well as the movie production discrediting Ray Santilly.
My conclusion might be controversial, so, take it as my opinion only:
In my opinion the alien authopsy is real, as well as the other video published by Bill here. I have been working on the Roswell ship design recontruction for 20 years now. I started where William Louis McDonald had finished. I have found that the injures in the right leg of the pilot, are perfectly consistent with his position in the craft and with the angle of the crash. The alien has also injures in his arms and wrists, which are consistent with the Control panel breaks that can be seen in the first video in this previous thread: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...Roswell-Crash-
Most investigators think that the control panels were in front of the pilots, (as shown in the plastic kit below) but I found that they were part of the seats, and when they were broken the pilot had his hands on the hand prints, and the injures were produced eactly where the control panel was broken.
In the next image you can see the broken pannel.
The same can be seen in all the videos, and nobody has pointed this up to now. This is one of the many reasons I have to consider that material genuine.
Here in this image you can see the position of the pilot who was injured and appeared in both films.
The idea of the control pannels connected to the seats is not an assumption, but based in witnesses descriptions of the interior of the ship.
The camera is located at the exact point where the ship crashed against the rocks. You make your own calculations on how the injures and broken pannel are consistent or not.
The other information that all we know discrediting the film, and Santilli could very well be a counterintelligence work. Consider that the powers that want to hide these things, have unlimited budget to do it, as well as the necesary impunity to force anybody´s claim, to say what they need you to say. I have studied the fake alien in the hollywood movie discrediting Santilli and I can say that it is really bad made. But I cannot say the same about the Original film. I wonder how a poor guy (Santilli) did a better work investing his personal budget, where a hollywod tank production couldn´t?
As for the photograph named in the title of this thread, it is not the first time I see it, and my assumption for now is that it is not real, mainly because the ship looks too flat. I am working on the exterior reconstruction of the ship, following witneses descriptions, and modern photograps of flying UFOs that fits those descriptions.
Here you have a video of that type of ship:
Ernesto
NOTE ON THE INTERIOR IMAGE. The position of the 7 seats in the ship, are the same as in the Testors plastic kit, but later I found that the ocupants were not of the same kind. At the time the image was produced I thought they were all of the same kind. Apparently (I have to confirm this) there were 3 kind of beings. 4 of them where as the guys in the authopsy. The other two guys looking at each other in the image were of a diferent kind, and the commander (not shown in the image) who seated in the back was of a unique kind.
The amount of fingers were a sign of their rank: 6 fingers = lower rank (4 guys) 4 fingers = mid rank, (two guys) and 3 fingers = Higer rank which was the Commander of the ship)
The size of eyes were also a rank sign, the bigger the eyes the higher rank of the beings.
Last edited by ernesto; 9th July 2012 at 20:41.
Cartomancer (9th July 2012), danceblackcatdance (9th July 2012), eileenrose (10th July 2012), Flowerpunkchip (20th May 2016), mab777 (9th July 2012), mountain_jim (9th July 2012), noxon medem (3rd October 2017), WhiteFeather (9th July 2012)
video not working I have no idea it came up as music and not video like an audio.
Cartomancer (9th July 2012), noxon medem (9th July 2012)
The pointed diferences could be due to the fact that the guy was dresed in his tight suit, which was broken in some points, but in the aothopsy he was nude.Posted by tron (here)
the differences:
- slightly different leg shape lines, the retrieval body seemed slightly smaller in proportion.
Cartomancer (9th July 2012), noxon medem (9th July 2012)
Dear Bill, I strongly respect your opinions. I really thank you for your great work, mainly because you are sharing it with all of us selflessly. I loved all your interviews, which made me open my mind, and still they are working! I would like to ask you to consider the possibility that the Alien Interview might be authentic. I have my own opinion, and have studied it since it was published, and found many hints that confirms my opinions (at least for me), on the other hand I haven´t found any sign in the book that could support the idea that it was fake.Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Hi, Folks:
This is a hoax - I'm afraid.
Here's the review on the book I posted to Amazon a little while back. (Please cross-post this to the PC forum with my best wishes to all - thanks )
Sincerely Yours
Ernesto
Cartomancer (9th July 2012), eileenrose (10th July 2012), WhiteFeather (9th July 2012)