Giant Footprint shown by Michael Tellinger in South Africa

[BestLion]

Heres something to consider. I use to mow grass at a cemetery when i was 16.. "needed a job and the town trustees gave me a mowing 2 X a month at a 3 acre cemetery" Well some stone there were date back to Born 1771 Died 1832..for example..and many were made of granite or a white i think limestone. Well near all the limestone tombstones were very weathered and I could hardly read them. The granite stones help up pretty good, but they also showed weathering..this was in Northern ohio. Now that print if it was anywhere older then 1,000 years old would be very weathered, it is just too nice..as if it was made last year. ive seen granite tombstone only maybe 90 years old that looked more weathered then that print.
Just a thought I had..

[Calz]

Would not "sculpting" be quite obvious upon close examination?

Camera pans in at Tellinger's suggestion but clearly not enough to make that sort of distinction.

Michael is fairly approachable. Perhaps someone could fire off an email and ask for a more detailed look???

[BestLion]

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
Would not "sculpting" be quite obvious upon close examination?

Camera pans in at Tellinger's suggestion but clearly not enough to make that sort of distinction.

Michael is fairly approachable. Perhaps someone could fire off an email and ask for a more detailed look???

You'd think so.. I dont know. I am not claiming it to be a hoax..it may be genuine. Are there anymore finding in that area to support giants? any other prints, bones, skulls? If so that would support the case.

[CeltMan]

Posted by BestLion (here)

Granite was never mud.

yeah I also thought that. Also the print doesn't seem to weathered. You think the rains etc after 10,000+ years it would be more rounded and harder to distinguish? Odd this print is in granite of all things..Just doesn't add up.
Giants do seem to have been real. All myths talk of them. Even religious works. And the elongated skulls found have much larger volumes in them then human skulls, and they have found 100s of these skulls.

B.lion

Not just skulls though.

If you google 'giannts skeletons' you will find actual photos of giant skeletons, often with the a man lying beside to get a comparison of height.

12 feet-18 feet

[Tarka the Duck]

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
Would not "sculpting" be quite obvious upon close examination?

Camera pans in at Tellinger's suggestion but clearly not enough to make that sort of distinction.

Michael is fairly approachable. Perhaps someone could fire off an email and ask for a more detailed look???

I've sent him an email...if I get a reply, I'll post it here.

Kathie

[Calz]

Posted by BestLion (here)

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
Would not "sculpting" be quite obvious upon close examination?

Camera pans in at Tellinger's suggestion but clearly not enough to make that sort of distinction.

Michael is fairly approachable. Perhaps someone could fire off an email and ask for a more detailed look???

You'd think so.. I dont know. I am not claiming it to be a hoax..it may be genuine. Are there anymore finding in that area to support giants? any other prints, bones, skulls? If so that would support the case.

Tellinger has all sorts of "findings" in that general area. Has a couple books, a DVD. Kerry took a trip down there. No idea about exactly how close to that "footprint" but in the general area yes.

http://www.slavespecies.com/

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNhYtTdhRuo

Michael Tellinger takes you on a tour of Adam's Calendar - now called Enki's Calendar. The Flagship among the millions of circular stone ruins of southern Africa - the original gold mining operation on planet Earth.

[BestLion]

Thanks Calz, That video I have not seen about Adams Calender. I find this archeological find very fascinating! It also seems to date back to around 76,321 BC. Thus that thing may have seen 2-4 global catastrophes. id love to know the true history of it, who built it, why etc.. i for one do like this guy Tellinger, he is very smart and i feel he =is a real genuine truth-finder.. thus this also why i think that print may be real..he is no fool and if it wasn't real he wouldn't even be interested. i do tend to feel from his vibe that he is being as honest as he can be.

[Calz]

For anyone not aware ... Kerry has done an interview with him as well ...

http://projectcamelotproductions.com...tellinger.html

I've sent him an email...if I get a reply, I'll post it here.

Kathie

Excellent ... thank you

[Tarka the Duck]

Here's the reply I received this morning from Michael:

Hello Kathie
I wish I had the answers for the 1000’s of questions I received. This is one of the great mysteries in the world. The geology is definitely granite – which makes this footprint a great puzzle.
Its location and the fact that it was discovered in 1912 in a remote area by a hunter, excludes the possibility of a hoax carving.
Something really amazing happened here a long time ago and we have to face it.

in Pure Truth

Michael of the family Tellinger
All rights reserved - without prejudice - without recourse

[Referee]

If this was discovered in 1912 wow This is close to Adams calander double wow. I wonder what else is there! I am not super gullible but this is pretty awesome. Are there any older pictures of this footprint?

What if the being could walk on a very hot surface!

[161803398]

I googled this and here's the comment:

http://s8int.com/WordPress/2010/09/0...nt-in-granite/

[Calz]

Posted by Tarka the Duck (here)
Here's the reply I received this morning from Michael:

Hello Kathie
I wish I had the answers for the 1000’s of questions I received. This is one of the great mysteries in the world. The geology is definitely granite – which makes this footprint a great puzzle.
Its location and the fact that it was discovered in 1912 in a remote area by a hunter, excludes the possibility of a hoax carving.
Something really amazing happened here a long time ago and we have to face it.

in Pure Truth

Michael of the family Tellinger
All rights reserved - without prejudice - without recourse

Thanks so much for the email and passing along.

Very helpful

[Tarka the Duck]

Posted by 161803398 (here)
I googled this and here's the comment:

http://s8int.com/WordPress/2010/09/0...nt-in-granite/

Thanks for that...the heading, A Biblical Perspective On Science, Without Apology! was, for me, a little worrying.
Also, the fact that he seems happy in the belief that science is wrong about the way in which granite was formed, because "the origin of granite is contentious". I think it's the classification of granite that is contentious, not the way in which it was formed.

[ghostrider]

that's no foot, it's a ... space station. no .. weather ballon.. no swamp gas. just kidding. seriously it's proof they were here, and mainstream media ignores it now back to our regularly scheduled PROGRAMMING. some would be quicker to believe a plane flew into a tall building , cause they saw it on cnn. something set in stone cannot be changed. the only thing that changes is perception. I believe it is a footprint of a man that was 30 ft tall. big man big ego, ehumm I'm make sure they remember for all time I WAS HERE... We leave our fingerprint, they might leave their footprint. hmmmm..

[RedeZra]

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
Michael Tellinger shows off what could One of the best pieces of evidence that there were giants on Earth a long, long time ago. Geologists have marvelled at this giant foot print in rough granite, about 4 feet long. It is located in South Africa, near the town of Mpaluzi, close to the Swaziland border. It is estimated to be between 200 million and 3 Billion years old because of our current understanding of the formation of granites in Earth's history.

there were giants in the earth in those days before the Flood and also after


the report to Moses in the time of Exodus was that the inhabitants of Canaan were of such a great stature that they felt like grasshoppers compared to them

elsewhere in the Bible in Amos 2 the Amorites are described as tall as cedars and as strong as oaks

i don't know how tall a cedar tree was over 3000 years ago but today the Cedar of Lebanon grows up to 40 m (130 ft)


granite is igneous but it takes some time to solidify and so a giant stamped his foot on it

and i don't trust the extreme old estimates of the earth

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

Hi

Its location and the fact that it was discovered in 1912 in a remote area by a hunter, excludes the possibility of a hoax carving.

Not quite true.

It has been known for certain groups to create a hoax & then to sit on it for donkeys years & then to present it to the world as a real deal complete with an old time stamp.

May I suggest that folk do their own experiment in either moist sand or mud to see exactly how a naked foot would leave an imprint.
Walking is basically a form of continuous falling over. First the kneel stamps into the ground leaving a deep impression, then the foot rolls on the outside where it then starts to level off on the ball, which in turn creates a deep impression. The forward motion then makes the toes scrunch up & dig in creating a deeper impression (full body weight) before it pushes off. Once the whole foot is lifted everything that is in front of it is kicked forward & not upward like a meteor crater.
The human foot is a very complex tool that has been baffling scientists of robotics for years.

Then there is the question of how a large human footprint could leave its mark in granite.

[GalaxyHorse]

Yes, you make a very valid point, this could have been 'fashioned' using Acid, or modern abrasive techniques.
We should not be too credulous of mere appearances-as we know appearances can be manipulated-it would be
naive to accept all 'aberrant' evidence just because it is..aberrant. Needs further study.

[RedeZra]

Posted by Bryn ap Gwilym (here)
May I suggest that folk do their own experiment in either moist sand or mud to see exactly how a naked foot would leave an imprint.

Once the whole foot is lifted everything that is in front of it is kicked forward & not upward like a meteor crater.

an imprint depends on the viscosity of a material and so stepping on moist sand or mud would not be the same as stepping on solidifying granite

and when a walker lift his feet high enough before the next step then not much is kicked forward

[Calz]

Posted by RedeZra (here)

Posted by Bryn ap Gwilym (here)
May I suggest that folk do their own experiment in either moist sand or mud to see exactly how a naked foot would leave an imprint.

Once the whole foot is lifted everything that is in front of it is kicked forward & not upward like a meteor crater.

an imprint depends on the viscosity of a material and so stepping on moist sand or mud would not be the same as stepping on solidifying granite

and when a walker lift his feet high enough before the next step then not much is kicked forward

I don't have great faith in the dating mechanisms used (carbon dating and others) but should there be any truth whatsoever to the 200 mil to billions of years speculated here then who really knows?

That said ... the "footprint" would not have been made that long ago (at least in keeping with the other material in that area perhaps in the 270k year range). Unless, of course, we are talking about "another" group of giants???

Yes even granite will certainly erode over 270k years.

So what are we to make of this?

Wandering "tricksters" with plenty of acid (or perhaps *on* acid) going back 100 years???

Hmmmm.

This is an interesting one to be sure.

[Cidersomerset]

Thanks Calz I too thought granit to hard for a imprint, but who knows looks 'cool'..


Did giants exist on earth? This interesting rock formation may suggest so. Goliath's Footprint, as the locals dubbed it, is one of South Africa's little-known secrets. Nestled in the forests near the Swaziland border of South Africa, this print is definitely not a tourist hot-spot. One may speculate that erosion caused the interesting shape of this upright rock formation, but it features exactly five "toenails," and it looks like the earth has been pushed away around the big toe. If I encountered this photo on the internet, I might have attributed it to Photoshop techniques and have had some doubts about its existence, but I have been to the spot, and felt the grooves with my own fingers. It is very real. If this mystery of nature was indeed made by a giant human, I don't think I would have wanted to encounter him! Locals in the area are all mystified by the footprint. South African folklore does contain mentions of giants, but up to date I haven't heard any stories about the origin of this giant footprint. Some say that there are similar rock formations in India and in Australia, but an internet search has not given me any results.

http://archangels-bloggy.blogspot.co...footprint.html

http://jozikids.co.za/blog/tag/giants-footprint/

*Local legend tells the story that when Shaka chased the Swazi’s out of this area there was a woman who was a giant. She was known as a goddess amongst the people. She ran towards her lover and left a footprint in the rock. The lovers skull can be seen right in front of her footprint .

This article says it was there in 2005, trying to find a earlier reference......

http://www.chrissiesmeer.co.za/giantfootprint.html