AMAZING FOOTAGE UFO JAN 7, 2012 spectacular sight - Mount Bisbino, Italy.

[The One]

Date of sighting: January 7, 2012
Location of sighting: Mount Bisbino, Italy


It appears that these four orbs may actually be one craft from the way they travel together, but some would argue that they are in formation and will break apart when they explore on their own. That is sometimes the case with orbs. There are two sets of 4 orbs, one disappears in front of the camera and the other moves around a bit before disappearing. You can even see the first one that disappeared as its cloak reveals itself slightly latter in the video

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp_RH7-B9EQ

[RMorgan]

Hey my friend,

Wow! This one looks pretty genuine in my opinion! Thanks!

Cheers,

Raf.

[BestLion]

Have you found any other video footage by other people on this? Or is this the only one? It looks like something abnormal- not typical of flight craft the earth has. I'd like to see a few more videos or clear photos on this. Surely there has to be some on the net.
EDIT:
Upon my 3rd viewing of this it appear the video may have been filmed behind a window..and the lights could be reflection from that window. I'm just so amazed at the poor videos people have now..Its 2012..PEOPLE BUY A DECENT CAMERA!!! Seems most these 'lights in the skys' are done with such cameras like they bought the camera at a yard sale in the 1980s.

[Black Panther]

"UFO Sightings Skyrocket Into 2012"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...title=Lanterns

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMTV0K6pQn4

[RMorgan]

Posted by Black Panther (here)
"UFO Sightings Skyrocket Into 2012"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...title=Lanterns

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMTV0K6pQn4

Hey mate,

In my opinion, this is just a piece of plastic wrap flying around.

Cheers,

Raf.

[The One]

Posted by BestLion (here)
Have you found any other video footage by other people on this? Or is this the only one? It looks like something abnormal- not typical of flight craft the earth has. I'd like to see a few more videos or clear photos on this. Surely there has to be some on the net.
EDIT:
Upon my 3rd viewing of this it appear the video may have been filmed behind a window..and the lights could be reflection from that window. I'm just so amazed at the poor videos people have now..Its 2012..PEOPLE BUY A DECENT CAMERA!!! Seems most these 'lights in the skys' are done with such cameras like they bought the camera at a yard sale in the 1980s.

Hey i love your input and investgation work what are your thoughts on one of the best ufo clips see below for details

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BEM-ObMXJY

Turkey UFO Analysis

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvObCG-cMRw

cheers

[Black Panther]

Posted by RMorgan (here)

Posted by Black Panther (here)
"UFO Sightings Skyrocket Into 2012"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...title=Lanterns

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMTV0K6pQn4

Hey mate,

In my opinion, this is just a piece of plastic wrap flying around.

Cheers,

Raf.

The YT video was just one example of the videos on the the website.
I thought it's interesting there is a huge increase in UFO sightings
in the beginning of 2012. I'm not an UFO expert. Just wanted to share
the article, mate.

[BestLion]

Hey i love your input and investgation work what are your thoughts on one of the best ufo clips see below for details

Bad film footage 1st off this is like what was this done with the Billy Meier 1975 camera. the footage looks as if a UFO, very poor... the video is very bad quality.. since 1995 I dismiss ANY UFO done in a poor resolution camera as a FAKE. Easy to manipulate. in low resolution this is the oldest trick in the book by fakers Billy Meier is a prime example
I believed the Billy Meier case for years....and upon my investigation of that being a 100000% HOAX. I can see very clear a hoax now days. If poor 1972 resolution style I dont even have to view it much..instant write off..unless 1,000 of the same video is produced..Unlike Meier only 1 source...William the Fake Meier.
Video-Bad resolution. Heck in 2001 I had a 3.1 megapixel that could do better video then this! Bad resolution should mean instant hoax..easy to fake. I go no further with this..I claim it as a fake.Billy Meier should if all else teach us that bad resolution means instant hoax..
Year is 2012 now with 22 megapixels online..most cell phone have 3-5 mega.this thing look like it was take with a 1973 camera...nuff said bad resolute=hoax..I dont even need to investigate further

[DreamsInDigital]

Being a college certified and freelancing Video Expert Witness for the Courts. I would deem this one to be absolutely genuine, that's my expert opinion. Specially the way the last set of lights just "take off" and cloak. The way they go in and out of focus with the background. It's obvious the first origional post is not CGI or Window Reflections.

@ Best Lion
It is unfair I think to disregard every low quality video as fake, specially with the consideration that most that are likely to see the UFO's and video tape them don't have the money to afford high quality or broadcast quality video cameras with huge zooms on them that range anywhere from $3,000 plus. It's amazing how many videos I see on Youtube, where people are screaming it is a fake or CGI and obviously don't even have a clue what entails the necessity for using CGI and to get it to blend in that much? Even, I can look at a Film with 100-200 million dollar budget where they've got the best CGI equipment out there, and I can still tell when they use CGI. Bad Resolution does not mean Instant Hoax, what it means is a low level camera. IMO I think the Low Level Video Camera footages are more valuable because they are less likely to be hoaxed. But, then there are those that swear blind some of the best quality footage with the clearest of crafts or probes are fakes. I'm sorry, but you know..you guys just can't have it both ways. And it's this exact precise attitude towards ET's, Off Worlders, Aliens, etc. That makes them even more reluctant and the governments as well to lead to open disclosure. The Mind Set has to change.

[RMorgan]

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
Being a college certified and freelancing Video Expert Witness for the Courts. I would deem this one to be absolutely genuine, that's my expert opinion. Specially the way the last set of lights just "take off" and cloak. The way they go in and out of focus with the background. It's obvious the first origional post is not CGI or Window Reflections.

@ Best Lion
It is unfair I think to disregard every low quality video as fake, specially with the consideration that most that are likely to see the UFO's and video tape them don't have the money to afford high quality or broadcast quality video cameras with huge zooms on them that range anywhere from $3,000 plus. It's amazing how many videos I see on Youtube, where people are screaming it is a fake or CGI and obviously don't even have a clue what entails the necessity for using CGI and to get it to blend in that much? Even, I can look at a Film with 100-200 million dollar budget where they've got the best CGI equipment out there, and I can still tell when they use CGI. Bad Resolution does not mean Instant Hoax, what it means is a low level camera. IMO I think the Low Level Video Camera footages are more valuable because they are less likely to be hoaxed. But, then there are those that swear blind some of the best quality footage with the clearest of crafts or probes are fakes. I'm sorry, but you know..you guys just can't have it both ways. And it's this exact precise attitude towards ET's, Off Worlders, Aliens, etc. That makes them even more reluctant and the governments as well to lead to open disclosure. The Mind Set has to change.

I agree 1000%.

Low resolution isn´t an indicator of hoax. This video was filmed in Turkey, by, if I´m not mistaken, a security officer, with his cell phone. I don´t know about you, but my cell phone camera is crap, so his cell phone could be a simple model as well. The resolution gets even worse when you have to zoom, simply because zooming a low-res video has to be done digitally, which will increase pixelation.

DreamsInDigital, you´ve made an interesting point. If such video is hoaxed by an amateur, well, he should be in Hollywood, because Hollywood´s millionaire CGI industry can do very crappy things indeed.

And, if I remember correctly, I´ve seena video analyzes about this video in Turkey, made by a professional, and he says this video is genuine.

About the first video, the glass window theory is impossible because, if you see the focus changes, it´s clear that it is behind the line of the trees.

Cheers,

Raf.