Mauro Biglino: "The Book That Will Forever Change Our Ideas About The Bible - The Gods Coming From Space"

[Foxie Loxie]

Right on, Herve!!!!

This is the article that helped me with getting my head on straight!! Recently Lionel has been questioning all this "religion" stuff(good questions, by the way) & it is interesting to see the canned answers & remarks by his followers. Hopefully, he will get some to start using Critical Thinking! (I know so well the canned answers....used to give them myself!)

This is a highly recommended article!

[what is a name?]

So if the Annunaki where the 'creators' of the upgraded 'chimp', then how did they get the Soul to inhabit this new biological 'creation'?

From what I understand the Soul is 'an eternal spark of Creation', a 'part of the Godhead', and as such only 'God' can create.

Was 'trickery' involved? Or was it the 'temptation of the flesh' of being incarnate in this 3rd density and being able to experience the pleasures of the senses? Or both?

And then the trapdoor of incarnation shut..... until now

[gord]

Posted by Billy (here)
For 70 of the Greek Bible is the sicera drink (intoxicating drink), probably a kind of cider.
In the ancient culture of the Aegean Sea, mead - fermented honey also known as the drink of the gods - was used as a psychoactive substance in religious contexts.

From The Vaults of Erowid:

There are three categories of plants that are associated with toxic honey: 1) plants whose nectar or pollen kills bees before they can transform it into honey (e.g. locoweed [Astralagus lentiginosus], Veratrum californicum, Vernonia spp.); 2) plants whose nectar is harmless to bees but when turned into honey becomes toxic/inebriating to humans (e.g. oleander [Nerium oleander], thorn apple [Datura spp.]. angel's trumpet [Brugmansia spp.], mountain laurel [Kalmia spp.], false jasmine [Gelsemium sempervirens], Euphorbia marginata, Serjania lethalis); and 3) known poisonous plants that are harmless to bees and yield edible and often exquisite honey (e.g., Rhustoxicodendron, Metopium toxiferum, Jatropha curcas, Baccharis halimifolia, Ricinus communis) (Morton 1964, 415).

Xenophon (ca. 430-355 B.C.E.) reported in his Anabis that soldiers became inebriated and poisoned by the honey that had been produced from the Pontic rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum L.) and apparently from a red-flowering oleander (Nerium oleander L.: cf. Rätsch 1995, 267 f.) (Roth et al. 1994, 615). "In modern terms, they 'got high.' . . . This condition did not last long amongst the Greeks and quickly abated" (Rüdiger 1974, 93). The toxicological literature refers to this Pontic (Turkish) honey as "mad honey" or "toxic honey of Asia Minor" (Fühner 1943, 203). This inebriating honey was well known in ancient times (Krause 1926; Plugge 1891), and it may have been involved with the Dionysian frenzies:

In the district on the Pontus, among the people of the Sanni, there is a kind of honey that is known as maenomenon ["mad maker"] because of the insanity it induces. It is thought that this is caused by the flowers of the oleanders [Rhododendron], which abound in the woods. (Pliny 21.77)

[Chris]

Posted by what is a name? (here)
So if the Annunaki where the 'creators' of the upgraded 'chimp', then how did they get the Soul to inhabit this new biological 'creation'?

From what I understand the Soul is 'an eternal spark of Creation', a 'part of the Godhead', and as such only 'God' can create.

Was 'trickery' involved? Or was it the 'temptation of the flesh' of being incarnate in this 3rd density and being able to experience the pleasures of the senses? Or both?

And then the trapdoor of incarnation shut..... until now

I believe the answer can be found in Hinduism and Buddhism. They believe in the evolution of the soul. All of us started from simple forms of life at the beginning of creation and moved on to more complex ones with each incarnation. We already existed as the Self, the spark of life from the very beginning, but our "souls" were basically that of simple single cell organisms initially. We started out as first density, almost non-living (though there is no such thing), then moved on to second density, first as single cell, then multiple cell organisms. When we were already hominids, such as Homo Erectus and others, some sort of outside "upgrade" was carried out to move us into third density and give us self-awareness.

The Movie 2001 Space Odyssey depicts this very well actually, though perhaps in a slightly naive and materialistic manner. The point is the soul was there all the time, but it evolved to higher levels of complexity and consciousness from one life to the next.

As for the original Self or "eternal spark of creation", Indeed it was part of what you would call the Godhead. There are many contrasting stories as to what happened next. Some say the One wanted to become many to experience existence, so it divided itself into discarnate souls and dual opposites, such as male and female. It was the polarity inherent in this duality that allowed creation to happen. Presumably, the creation of good and evil had to be a part of it. If there was a polarity between good and evil, a universe of evil, with its own creator must be necessarily part of this process. That is presumably what is referred to as the demiurge by gnostic thought. I don't know if we'll ever find the real truth about this, but it is fascinating to think about it.

[Flash]

Posted by Chris (here)

Posted by what is a name? (here)
So if the Annunaki where the 'creators' of the upgraded 'chimp', then how did they get the Soul to inhabit this new biological 'creation'?

From what I understand the Soul is 'an eternal spark of Creation', a 'part of the Godhead', and as such only 'God' can create.

Was 'trickery' involved? Or was it the 'temptation of the flesh' of being incarnate in this 3rd density and being able to experience the pleasures of the senses? Or both?

And then the trapdoor of incarnation shut..... until now

I believe the answer can be found in Hinduism and Buddhism. They believe in the evolution of the soul. All of us started from simple forms of life at the beginning of creation and moved on to more complex ones with each incarnation. We already existed as the Self, the spark of life from the very beginning, but our "souls" were basically that of simple single cell organisms initially. We started out as first density, almost non-living (though there is no such thing), then moved on to second density, first as single cell, then multiple cell organisms. When we were already hominids, such as Homo Erectus and others, some sort of outside "upgrade" was carried out to move us into third density and give us self-awareness.

The Movie 2001 Space Odyssey depicts this very well actually, though perhaps in a slightly naive and materialistic manner. The point is the soul was there all the time, but it evolved to higher levels of complexity and consciousness from one life to the next.

As for the original Self or "eternal spark of creation", Indeed it was part of what you would call the Godhead. There are many contrasting stories as to what happened next. Some say the One wanted to become many to experience existence, so it divided itself into discarnate souls and dual opposites, such as male and female. It was the polarity inherent in this duality that allowed creation to happen. Presumably, the creation of good and evil had to be a part of it. If there was a polarity between good and evil, a universe of evil, with its own creator must be necessarily part of this process. That is presumably what is referred to as the demiurge by gnostic thought. I don't know if we'll ever find the real truth about this, but it is fascinating to think about it.

When I was sixteen, I wrote a piece of this duality process of opposites necessary for evolution, understanding later on through physics that it was also necessary to have a differential of energy to third density creation (creation of matter).

Later on, I read and heard of the soul spark that all human have. All nature has god's energy but only a few species specialise as creators, which means they can have direct acces to God's creation skills and power. For this, a slow learning has to take place which goes through all the steps of nature. Humans are one of those creator's species. Therefore some other species being kind of "jalous".

The soul spark is what is connected to love and wisdom, the connections willfully killed from generation to generation in some groups of human, therefore the absence of love within all of their decisions and behaviors.

[Chris]

Posted by Flash (here)

Posted by Chris (here)

Posted by what is a name? (here)
So if the Annunaki where the 'creators' of the upgraded 'chimp', then how did they get the Soul to inhabit this new biological 'creation'?

From what I understand the Soul is 'an eternal spark of Creation', a 'part of the Godhead', and as such only 'God' can create.

Was 'trickery' involved? Or was it the 'temptation of the flesh' of being incarnate in this 3rd density and being able to experience the pleasures of the senses? Or both?

And then the trapdoor of incarnation shut..... until now

I believe the answer can be found in Hinduism and Buddhism. They believe in the evolution of the soul. All of us started from simple forms of life at the beginning of creation and moved on to more complex ones with each incarnation. We already existed as the Self, the spark of life from the very beginning, but our "souls" were basically that of simple single cell organisms initially. We started out as first density, almost non-living (though there is no such thing), then moved on to second density, first as single cell, then multiple cell organisms. When we were already hominids, such as Homo Erectus and others, some sort of outside "upgrade" was carried out to move us into third density and give us self-awareness.

The Movie 2001 Space Odyssey depicts this very well actually, though perhaps in a slightly naive and materialistic manner. The point is the soul was there all the time, but it evolved to higher levels of complexity and consciousness from one life to the next.

As for the original Self or "eternal spark of creation", Indeed it was part of what you would call the Godhead. There are many contrasting stories as to what happened next. Some say the One wanted to become many to experience existence, so it divided itself into discarnate souls and dual opposites, such as male and female. It was the polarity inherent in this duality that allowed creation to happen. Presumably, the creation of good and evil had to be a part of it. If there was a polarity between good and evil, a universe of evil, with its own creator must be necessarily part of this process. That is presumably what is referred to as the demiurge by gnostic thought. I don't know if we'll ever find the real truth about this, but it is fascinating to think about it.

When I was sixteen, I wrote a piece of this duality process of opposites necessary for evolution, understanding later on through physics that it was also necessary to have a differential of energy to third density creation (creation of matter).

Later on, I read and heard of the soul spark that all human have. All nature has god's energy but only a few species specialise as creators, which means they can have direct acces to God's creation skills and power. For this, a slow learning has to take place which goes through all the steps of nature. Humans are one of those creator's species. Therefore some other species being kind of "jalous".

The soul spark is what is connected to love and wisdom, the connections willfully killed from generation to generation in some groups of human, therefore the absence of love within all of their decisions and behaviors.

I have to agree with you, that was very beautifully put.

The creator thing is interesting. If we were supposedly made in the Creator's image, we must share his creative ability. I sometimes feel, that if we realised the real power we had in terms of co-creating this reality, it would turn into a paradise pretty quickly. I am enamoured by descriptions of other planets and worlds in ancient Indian stories, such as the Puranas and the Mahabharata. These other planets, which are supposedly inhabited by the gods (Devas or Shining Ones) are always described as so idyllic and harmonious. Why can't our planet be like that? Probably, because we haven't realised our co-creative ability just yet. Perhaps that will change with the current undergoing shift to fourth density.

[Foxie Loxie]

Thanks, BILLY, for starting this thread!!! Also, thanks for the diggeridoo videos!!

[Valerie Villars]

Chris and Flash, my internal being is beaming.

[Billy]

Hi everyone. I came across this 2018 Sarah Westhall interview with Mauro Biglino this morning.
As interviews with Mauro in English are rare, I am posting it here. Mauro has a translator in this interview.

Part 1

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ish0uSLkLHU

Part 2

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf7kdCvbw5Y

[Ratszinger]

Posted by Chris (here)

Posted by Flash (here)

Posted by Chris (here)

Posted by what is a name? (here)
So if the Annunaki where the 'creators' of the upgraded 'chimp', then how did they get the Soul to inhabit this new biological 'creation'?

From what I understand the Soul is 'an eternal spark of Creation', a 'part of the Godhead', and as such only 'God' can create.

Was 'trickery' involved? Or was it the 'temptation of the flesh' of being incarnate in this 3rd density and being able to experience the pleasures of the senses? Or both?

And then the trapdoor of incarnation shut..... until now

I believe the answer can be found in Hinduism and Buddhism. They believe in the evolution of the soul. All of us started from simple forms of life at the beginning of creation and moved on to more complex ones with each incarnation. We already existed as the Self, the spark of life from the very beginning, but our "souls" were basically that of simple single cell organisms initially. We started out as first density, almost non-living (though there is no such thing), then moved on to second density, first as single cell, then multiple cell organisms. When we were already hominids, such as Homo Erectus and others, some sort of outside "upgrade" was carried out to move us into third density and give us self-awareness.

The Movie 2001 Space Odyssey depicts this very well actually, though perhaps in a slightly naive and materialistic manner. The point is the soul was there all the time, but it evolved to higher levels of complexity and consciousness from one life to the next.

As for the original Self or "eternal spark of creation", Indeed it was part of what you would call the Godhead. There are many contrasting stories as to what happened next. Some say the One wanted to become many to experience existence, so it divided itself into discarnate souls and dual opposites, such as male and female. It was the polarity inherent in this duality that allowed creation to happen. Presumably, the creation of good and evil had to be a part of it. If there was a polarity between good and evil, a universe of evil, with its own creator must be necessarily part of this process. That is presumably what is referred to as the demiurge by gnostic thought. I don't know if we'll ever find the real truth about this, but it is fascinating to think about it.

When I was sixteen, I wrote a piece of this duality process of opposites necessary for evolution, understanding later on through physics that it was also necessary to have a differential of energy to third density creation (creation of matter).

Later on, I read and heard of the soul spark that all human have. All nature has god's energy but only a few species specialise as creators, which means they can have direct acces to God's creation skills and power. For this, a slow learning has to take place which goes through all the steps of nature. Humans are one of those creator's species. Therefore some other species being kind of "jalous".

The soul spark is what is connected to love and wisdom, the connections willfully killed from generation to generation in some groups of human, therefore the absence of love within all of their decisions and behaviors.

I have to agree with you, that was very beautifully put.

The creator thing is interesting. If we were supposedly made in the Creator's image, we must share his creative ability. I sometimes feel, that if we realised the real power we had in terms of co-creating this reality, it would turn into a paradise pretty quickly. I am enamoured by descriptions of other planets and worlds in ancient Indian stories, such as the Puranas and the Mahabharata. These other planets, which are supposedly inhabited by the gods (Devas or Shining Ones) are always described as so idyllic and harmonious. Why can't our planet be like that? Probably, because we haven't realised our co-creative ability just yet. Perhaps that will change with the current undergoing shift to fourth density.

If we are made in the creator's image we'd be intersex all of us. When I read Genesis Chapter one I do not see that as being at all about human beings.(us) I see chapter one totally as being all about first man, the intersex men, those male and female he created them. These are the ones in the image of God not the second man Adam taken when God noticed his plants withering. There are two hominids on the earth, one the ruling class called 'mankind' of first men intersex families. Tribes of these were already made (which I believe we stare at daily in the gender bender stars, elected and so on in the public eye living the 'high life') The second being human beings, the workers. We don't come into play at all until Chapter 2 in Genesis the way I read it.

[Star Tsar]

More from Mr Biglino

Posted by Star Tsar (here)
Ancient Astronaut Archive



Mauro Biglino : The Bible, The Aliens, The Comic

Published 4th November 2018

Signore Biglino highlights evidence of beings from other planets, clear references to alien craft & devices built from technologies not available @ the time all In the Hebrew Masoretic Bible & A comic he is developing to do exactly the same.
Spoken in Italian language with English subtitles.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bFHAQM8aPk

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFG_Kr3Mopg

[Webz Libri]

Mauro does mention Sitchen but only to say he did not use any of his translations.

Sitchin is still good here....
Mauro is laying out what he thinks is the original spoken root terms without the vowels.

Direct quote from the book...
"As we analyze the Old Testament, we will identify these concrete beings using their correct Hebrew names (for instance “Those who from heaven to Earth came” in Hebrew are “Anaqiti” instead of the more well-known published Sumerian name, “Anunnaki”)."

Same meaning....slightly different name.

.... I just got this ebook last week and its a fascinating read!

[Billy]

Hi again.
After my first sighting of a UFO in 1965 when I was 11 years old, which hovered for at least two hours in the sky above me.
There after, in my early teens reading the Bible, the Bhagavad-Gita just to see if there was any mention of flying crafts written in ancient scriptures. Which to my amazement I found there were hundreds of mentions. I read and reread, taking notes as I went.

I was alone in my thoughts amongst my friends and family members. So imagine how delighted I was when Mauro Biglino arrived on scene a few years ago, confirming everything I had researched concerning UFO's and advanced technology in ancient times.

Read the original post if you have not yet been introduced to Mauro. An Italian Hebrew translator who was hired by the Vatican to translate some old testament books "literary" leaving out the human interpretations that were added into the Torah.

[Ernie Nemeth]

Arjuna looked out over the battlefield.

It is your duty to vanquish the enemy at any cost.

Even unto the destruction of the world itself.

Arjuna was troubled.

Then what is the purpose of a life lived?

To serve.


Thanks Billy!