Jim Stone Freelance

[Calz]

Ever get the feeling of walking through quicksand ... you try to reach for the illusion tv set and turn it off ... but it is just out of reach.

This one doesn't specify the USS Enterprise (well of course not since it is *allegedly* from Iranian military sources). Yeah right.

Anyway ... right on que ... Iranian "Rear Admiral" suggests they will be sinking a US carrier. Hmmmmm. Who is writing this script???

Those pesky Iranian subs which cannot be detected [what about the Israeli subs???].


Bring it on??? Really??? What's the Iranian translation for that again???





______________________


Iran to U.S.: Bring it on

Raises threat to Persian Gulf carriers, even as 1st ship returns to region


WASHINGTON – High-ranking Iranian military officials are rattling sabers again, this time by issuing a warning that Iranian submarines “can ambush and destroy enemy vessels especially U.S. aircraft carriers” should they return to the Persian Gulf – even as the first has returned, according to a report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

Rear Adm. Farhad Amiri, of the Iranian army’s self-sufficiency jihad, claimed that the United States is especially focused on Iran’s “astonishing subsurface capabilities.”

Iran is known to have a number of diesel-run submarines, some purchased from Russia years ago, but the nation also has developed an indigenous submarine production.

The submarines not only can fire missiles off of their decks when surfaced but they are assessed by various reliable sources to have the Russian export version of the Shkval, a high-speed supercavitating rocket-propelled torpedo designed to be a rapid-reaction defense against other submarines and surface vessels.

It also can be used as a counter-measure to an incoming torpedo. Because the Shkval can travel at speeds of 250 miles per hour, the U.S. Navy has no known defense against it.

The Russians also have developed a “super” Shkval, which can be guided. It cannot be ruled out that the Russians may have provided the super Shkval to the Iranians.

Amiri not only pointed to the Iranian navy’s arms and equipment but also to “tactical issues,” apparently referring to the capability that the Iranian submarines can sit quietly on the Persian Gulf’s seafloor.

“It would be the worst threat to the enemy,” Amiri said. “That is one of the U.S. concerns since Iranian submarines are noiseless and can easily evade detection as they are equipped with the sonar-evading technology and can fire missiles and torpedoes simultaneously.

When the submarine sits on the seabed it can easily target and hit an aircraft carrier traversing in the nearby regions.” According to reliable sources, sonar on U.S. warships to detect the submarines may not pick up the Iranian submarines, especially the smaller submarines in Iran’s inventory, since U.S. equipment is so powerful and designed to work in deep waters.

Meanwhile, U.S. report said the USS Abraham Lincoln was dispatched back into the Persian Gulf today.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/iran-to-u-s-bring-it-on/

[jackovesk]

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
Ever get the feeling of walking through quicksand ... you try to reach for the illusion tv set and turn it off ... but it is just out of reach.

This one doesn't specify the USS Enterprise (well of course not since it is *allegedly* from Iranian military sources). Yeah right.

Anyway ... right on que ... Iranian "Rear Admiral" suggests they will be sinking a US carrier. Hmmmmm. Who is writing this script???


Bring it on??? Really??? What's the Iranian translation for that again???


Attachment 13052Attachment 13053

I know Calz,

...and the 'Frustration' continues

I have decided to let go of the MSM Fearmongering Machine - We know its all full half/truths/innuendo/propaganda & Deception...

Its all a 'Guessing Game' which you can never win...

I will make my albiet small contribution with Intention & Focus on a Positive Endgame for 2012 with 'Humanity' being (Victorious)

T1 is Nigh & The End is Near - Long Live the New Rookie Rulers (US)..!

[DreamsInDigital]

Posted by gittarpikk (here)
Oh... am do NOT forget the Israeli submarine that went missing a couple weeks ago... Has anybody got any new info on that one?

If it is still missing... you now have the gun that fires the shot...and it will probably be the one that launches from an area that an Iran sub is cruising...from behind it ...in stealth

If nothing has been heard about this one.... maybe someone ought to get this same info to Alex and Kerry

The ET's are claiming direct responsibility for this. According to John Kettler.

[SomaSmith]

Awesome find Calz! Just another piece of the puzzle.

Ever get the feeling of walking through quicksand ... you try to reach for the illusion tv set and turn it off ... but it is just out of reach.

This one doesn't specify the USS Enterprise (well of course not since it is *allegedly* from Iranian military sources). Yeah right.

Anyway ... right on que ... Iranian "Rear Admiral" suggests they will be sinking a US carrier. Hmmmmm. Who is writing this script???

Those pesky Iranian subs which cannot be detected [what about the Israeli subs???].


Bring it on??? Really??? What's the Iranian translation for that again???

Hi Jackovesk,

Don't sell yourself short..
That is no small contribution! We know "they" are going to do their worst... But our awareness and intentions, in my opinion, can change the game!

I will make my albiet small contribution with Intention & Focus on a Positive Endgame for 2012 with 'Humanity' being (Victorious)

T1 is Nigh & The End is Near - Long Live the New Rookie Rulers (US)..!

[Mightyram]

I have just shared a video of this possibility on facebook with over 200 people because surely the more this information is out there then the less the likelyhood of it actually being carried out.
The quicker the human race climbs the acendency ladder the better....

[Calz]

Yes!!! This is more like it! This is now on AJ. Perhaps we helped get it there.

Thanks to all for your help.

Kerry???

(note - I think there is a vid here as well but I cannot see it behind a firewall - take the link)

_____________________


Persian Gulf Option One: A False Flag

Patrick Henningsen
Infowars.com
January 25, 2012



The USS Liberty incident took place in 1967

“Remember the Maine!”, was the cry back in 1898 from William Randolph Heart’s New York Journal – a forerunner the modern Murdoch press. Then, some 274 men lost their lives as a result of the explosion which sunk the USS Maine in Havana Harbor. Hearst even told a story of how the enemy had planted a torpedo beneath the Maine and detonated it from shore. The only problem was – it never happened. Nonetheless, the event used as the popular pretext for the United State’s entry into the Spanish-American War, and ultimately, the acquisition of Cuba itself by the US. This was now the modern blueprint for using propaganda in conjunction with, what is accepted by many historians, a type of false-flag event.

Some 70 years later, on June 8, 1967, during the Six-Day War, a similar event took place off the coast of Egypt. It could well have been, “Remember the Liberty!”, following an event which saw 34 US men killed and 170 wounded when the USS Liberty was attacked by both the Israeli Air Force and Israeli Navy torpedo boats. History now reveals that Israel’s slaughter of the USS Liberty crew was designed as a false flag event, but luckily Russia intervened at the last minute before Israel could sink the decorated American ship. Had it worked, it could have been used to drag the US and her allies into a new regional, or even a third world war - with who knows what consequences.


If a conflict is to ignite in the Persian Gulf in 2012, it is highly likely that the US or Israel will use the false flag option. Two reasons support this. Firstly, Iran lacks a motive to want to engage in a suicidal first strike against the axis powers – a move which would no doubt cost them thousands of innocent lives and billions in infrastructure. Frankly, it’s safe to say that it’s not at all in the Iranian national interest to start such a conflict. History does show however, that the US and Israel can – and will, employ the technique of the false flag attack, where they would engineer an incident and then blame it on the Iranians. By all accounts, this is also how the US was able to fake their way into the costly and bloody Vietnam War, via the infamous Gulf of Tonkin Incident.

Recent weeks have seen a massive build-up of naval assets in the Persian Gulf by both the US and the British. The irony of surface naval power in the 21st century is that it is only good for one thing, and that is the ‘projection of force’. In fact, Naval Power ceased to be a major factor geopolitical power-play since the dawn of the 20th century, when it was usurped by Air Power.

As Great Britain learned in the Falklands War back in 1982, even a single French Exocet missile can sink a battleship, or aircraft carrier. Iran has more than this capability, so for all practical purposes, any American ships in the region are nothing more than bait – large, slow sitting targets. Which begs the obvious question: why would the US be sending its soon-to-be decommissioned, rusty chess piece – the 50 year old nuclear-powered USS Enterprise carrier into the line of fire in the Persian Gulf? A very large and expendable, floating museum, and one which, interestingly enough with its six on board nuclear reactors… would probably cost a fortune to dispose of.

If other sides are drawn in to a conflict, most experts agree that it has the danger of escalating into a WWIII situation, and both sides would surely be losers in such a scenario, not to mention the global economy.

However, we have the ideal set of conditions for a New Cold War to emerge in the early 21st Century – one where the Western Axis powers of the US, Europe, Israel and GCC countries sit on one side, and with Iran, Syria, Pakistan, China, and perhaps Russia sitting on the opposite side. This New Cold War will be more about the projection of power and securing sub-regional dominance in terms of economics – natural gas, mineral and trade relationships, as well as petroleum – than it will about the political ideologies that seemed to dominate the previous 20th Century Cold War.

On the surface, this latest spat between the US and Iran looks like a step closer to war, but on closer examination however, the present conditions are not at all ideal for a preemptive strike against Iran by the US, or Israel. Why? In a time when fuel consumption is down worldwide, and oil supplies are high, oil prices are defying economics and maintaining strength above $100 per barrel. It’s also worth noting that defense contracts – particularly in the GCC countries – are way up, meaning there is still much money to be made from this current crisis – on both sides, including Iran.

Still though, we must keep our eyes open for that false flag from the west.



http://www.infowars.com/persian-gulf...-a-false-flag/

[TWINCANS]

Now what about Jim Stone...

[Carmen]

Yeah! What can we do to help him? Get him interviewed by Kerry??

[Calz]

Posted by Carmen (here)
Yeah! What can we do to help him? Get him interviewed by Kerry??

astrid suggested Kerry had been made aware and was looking into it ... all I know.

[crosby]

Calz, thank you so much for posting that article by Patrick H., that was very insightful AND it shows that the word is getting out there as quickly as possible. It plainly and succinctly sets the plan and asks the right questions, which, in the final analysis gives Jim Stone a strong backing.
warmest, corson

[Calz]

Off topic here???

Perhaps not.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=m6ZX9aIfNUE

[Calz]

Posted by ViralSpiral (here)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ufdw21ltc-8

This one made it to David Icke's site ... word it getting out.

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/6...ise-false-flag

[ljwheat]

Where the ship is at is 7 hrs ahead of us here in the states, so 7:30 pm evening there and nothing happened so fare, except we helped get the word out in time? Ether way I feel good about the effort all of us has spent on throwing the public eye at this situation. Thanks everyone, XXXX Namaste John

[Calz]

Posted by ljwheat (here)
Where the ship is at is 7 hrs ahead of us here in the states, so 7:30 pm evening there and nothing happened so fare, except we helped get the word out in time? Ether way I feel good about the effort all of us has spent on throwing the public eye at this situation. Thanks everyone, XXXX Namaste John

Yep

As others have remarked previously the date is in question ...

By no means assume it is a victory. Keep your eye firmly on the prize.

That said yes ... fantastic job here peeps for all the efforts to make this go viral.

As Twincans suggests ... let us not forget the messenger ...

Kerry???

[sister]

This is from an article on VeteransToday, IRAN: US/Israeli False Flag Attack May Be Underway

(posted on Jan. 14, 2012):

"There are major indications that the vessel of choice is to be the USS Vincennes. The fourth USS Vincennes (CG-49) is a US Navy Ticonderoga class Aegis guided missile cruiser.

On July 3, 1988, the ship shot down Iran Air Flight 655 over the Persian Gulf, killing all 290 civilian passengers on board, including 38 non-Iranians and 66 children.

This would be an ideal vessel for the staged provocation as it could be easily sold to the world as having been Iranian retribution for the 1988 downing of Flight 655.

That way the evident lack of motive for Iran to provoke the US and Israeli military titans will be replaced by a perceived “motive.” No one will stop to ask themselves why Iran would thereby invite its own national annihilation."

Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01...y-be-underway/

[Calz]

Looks like Kerry finally got this on her blog. I cannot see (or post) the video right now so not sure if it is the same as the one on AJ's site.

USS Enterprise - False Flag setup in Progress?

click here to view this important video warning

http://projectcamelotproductions.com/blog-hp.html

[Calz]

In the meanwhile ... stormclouds continue to build ...

________________________________


Massive U.S. Military Buildup Reported Around Iran; Up to 100,000 Troops Ready By March

Mac Slavo
SHTFPlan
January 31, 2012

While President Obama’s supporters hailed his withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq as the end of the war in the middle east, behind the scenes the Pentagon has been quietly massing troops and armaments on two islands located just south of the Strait of Hormuz, and within easy striking distance of Iran.

In addition to some 50,000 U.S. troops currently in the region waiting for orders (apparently they won’t be home by this past Christmas as was originally promised), Nobel Peace Prize winner President Barack Obama is deploying an additional 50,000 soldiers to be ready for ‘any contingency’ by March:

President Barack Obama is reported exclusively by DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s military and Washington sources to have secretly ordered US air, naval and marine forces to build up heavy concentrations on two strategic islands –Socotra, which is part of a Yemeni archipelago in the Indian Ocean, and the Omani island of Masirah at the southern exit of the Strait of Hormuz.

Since 2010, the US has been quietly building giant air force and naval bases on Socotra with facilities for submarines, intelligence command centers and take-off pads for flying stealth drones, as part of a linked chain of strategic US military facilities in the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf.

The Socotra facilities are so secret that they are never mentioned in any catalogue listing US military facilities in this part of the world, which include Jebel Ali and Al Dahfra in the United Arab Emirates; Arifjan in Kuwait; and Al Udeid in Qatar – all within short flying distances from Iran.

Additional US forces are also being poured into Camp Justice on the barren, 70-kilometer long Omani island of Masirah, just south of the Hormuz entry point to the Gulf of Oman from the Arabian Sea.

…

Western military sources familiar with the American buildup on the two strategic islands tell DEBKA-Net-Weekly that, although they cannot cite precise figures, they are witnessing the heaviest American concentration of might in the region since the US invaded Iraq in 2003.

Then, 100,000 American troops were massed in Kuwait ahead of the invasion. Today, those sources estimate from the current pace of arrivals on the two island bases, that 50,000 US troops will have accumulated on Socotra and Masirah by mid-February. They will top up the 50,000 military already present in the Persian Gulf region, so that in less than a month, Washington will have some 100,000 military personnel on the spot and available for any contingency.

US air transports are described as making almost daily landings on Socotra and Masirah. They fly in from the US naval base of Diego Garcia, one of America’s biggest military facilities, just over 3,000 kilometers away. The US military presence in the region will further expand in the first week of March when three US aircraft carriers and their strike groups plus a French carrier arrive in the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea: They are theUSS Abraham Lincoln, USS Carl Vinson, USS Enterprise and the Charles de Gaulle nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.

A fourth US carrier will be standing by in the Pacific Ocean, a few days’ sailing time from the water off Iran’s coast.

Source: Debka

Still holding out hope that we won’t go to war with Iran?

There’s already reason enough for the powers-to-be to invade Iran based on the accusations that they are in the process of manufacturing nuclear weapons. Whether true or not makes no difference, as we saw with weapons of mass destruction that have yet to be found in Iraq.

Similarly, like Saddam Hussein before them, Iran’s leadership is attempting to trade their oil without going through the proper channels – in essence attempting to bypass the United States and Europe by striking deals with China, India, and Russia that will not require the exchange of oil for US dollars, but rather, Yuan, Rupees and Gold.

It may very well be that nuclear weapons, like WMD in Iraq, are simply the pretext, rather than the real reason, that will be used to crush those who oppose the financiers, politicians and influencers behind the new world order paradigm.

Make no mistake: this is serious business. They will kill as many as is needed (on our side and theirs) in order to push the agenda forward.

This is what happens when you mess with the men behind the curtains:

*Warning Graphic Video*

(need to take link for video)


http://www.infowars.com/massive-u-s-...eady-by-march/

[SomaSmith]

Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
Looks like Kerry finally got this on her blog. I cannot see (or post) the video right now so not sure if it is the same as the one on AJ's site.

USS Enterprise - False Flag setup in Progress?

click here to view this important video warning

http://projectcamelotproductions.com/blog-hp.html

That video is AWESOME! Well produced and gets the message across quickly. to Pokertron and a big hug to Kerry for putting it on her blog.

Between A.J. Kerry and thousands of us un the ground I feel that we are potentially changing our experience here!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fijtd2BXhgA

[DreamsInDigital]

I passed on the info about the new Ship Target to peoples that can stop it. Hopefully they get it in time.

[ViralSpiral]

US admiral plays down reports of floating Gulf base
Wednesday, 01 February 2012 11:23

WASHINGTON, Feb 1, 2012 (AFP) - A top US admiral has denied media reports that an aging warship will be serving as a floating base for special forces in the Gulf, saying the vessel would instead be used to help clear mines.
The USS Ponce, a 1970s-era amphibious transport ship, is undergoing an overhaul to support naval forces in the Middle East, said Admiral John Harvey, US Fleet Forces command chief, told reporters Tuesday.
But its primary mission is not to serve as a “mothership” for elite commandos, as reported by the Washington Post and other news outlets.
“I think they put two and two together and got 22,” Harvey said when asked about the reports.
“It is not going over there as a special operating forces 'Deathstar ...Galactica' coming through the Gulf,” Harvey said, referring to a sci-fi television series.
The upgrades to the USS Ponce grew out of a standing request from US Central Command, which oversees American forces in the Middle East, to help with efforts against potential mines in the Gulf, Harvey said.
Iran has threatened to shut down the strategic Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for US and European sanctions. In the 1980s, Tehran relied on mines to disrupt shipping in the area during its war with Iraq.
The Ponce can carry MH-53 helicopters and support patrol craft, the admiral said. Such aircraft and vessels are often used by special forces.
Confusion about the Ponce's mission may have been the result of a call for private bids to carry out the improvements to the ship, he said.
The procurement documents included references to upgrades that would make some spaces accessible to special operations forces.
Harvey said the revamped Ponce should be ready to sail to the Gulf by June.
The Navy hopes to develop a new line of ships in the coming years that would serve as floating bases, and the altered Ponce could serve as a “bridge” to the new vessels, Harvey said.


Source