Stonehenge and Coral Castle building solved

[Unified Serenity]

This is why I keep researching. I have watched countless documentaries about how places like Stone Henge were built. These massive stones moved great distances and then standing them up, same thing with the great blocks in Egypt. Did it take help from Aliens or Gods?

Nope, man is perfectly capable of moving immense weight by himself. Watch this video and see 1 man move a 17 ton block with nothing but counter weight and some wood.

We are fully capable of doing great things without some supernatural explanations or ancient technology. This really caused me to do a face palm as in DUH! How stupid could we be not to see this? It's so simple. Watch him move these blocks and even a 300 ft Pole barn! Wonder how Coral Castle was built? Here ya go!

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsoYkGb7p28

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Here's some more Cool explanations.

K. I. S. S. Keep It Simple Sweetheart

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBRks6deEr8

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qj2H_qkCEWY

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8P_hV4FpKk

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBQITsMQtjc

[BestLion]

Well here is the problem>
1. The stones he is moving are no more then 3 tons.Id like him to move a 300 tons stone of granite up 200 ft and set it perfectly in the kings chamber.
2. Lets talk of the extreme accuracy of the builders who built these great megaliths.They had precision accuracy.
So I would like him to move,place, cut a stone "of granite and dyarite' of 50 tons and then I may buy into his theory some more.
Also other mysteries like how they made the coffin in the kings chamber..how they lined up to the stars..and the queens chamber to Sirius..many many question.
but that was interesting how he did move the 1-3 tons stone.. kudos to him for the attempt.
Also I think that Atlantians built these monument of old.Atlanteans are generally considered to have had great occult and/or technological powers, and inhabited the lost continent of Atlantis, which was destroyed due to their abuse of psychic powers.

[Unified Serenity]

That one long block I believe was 17 tons. It's amazing, I show it right in front of you and you are not the least bit acknowledging that 1 man moving a 3 ton block with nothing more than wood and counter weight is very plausible. These videos do not deal with the accuracy, just the fact it can be placed. Are you saying this would not work at Stone Henge?

[Cartomancer]

This man is amazing. I have read several articles about what he is doing. The only thing that bothers me about this technique is the fact that he has to have a solid concrete slab underneath the whole rig to make it work. This would not be possible in many situations but may have been used at the site of construction itself. Also what he points out about the pivot stones could be used in many different situations where a stable base would not be available. He is on to something.

I think Coral Castle is still strange. Many people saw the site during the time he was building it even though he wouldn't let anyone watch him work. There are even lots of photos and none of them show any kind of rig like this. Another possible problem with ancient sites would be the size of the stones at places like Baalbek. Either way this is fun to check out and contemplate.

[BestLion]

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)
That one long block I believe was 17 tons. It's amazing, I show it right in front of you and you are not the least bit acknowledging that 1 man moving a 3 ton block with nothing more than wood and counter weight is very plausible. These videos do not deal with the accuracy, just the fact it can be placed. Are you saying this would not work at Stone Henge?

I thought it was 7 tons..Yeah I do think it is pretty amazing how he is moving these stone all by himself. Stonehenge I believe were 25 ton-30 ton stones..so if he could move 17 ton stones himself..then this method he is using could be possible for Stonehenge. But other megalithic I would question this method like Puma Punku for example..I think they didnt use his method on that..but a lost technology.

[Unified Serenity]

I hear you Bestlion, those are some really big rocks, but look at what this guy is doing all by himself. Imagine having hundreds of people available around the clock to work together. I just think this gives lots of room to pause. My next problem of course is dealing with cutting the rocks in Egypt wit bronze tools, that is not going to work, or the face of Pharoah so perfectly symetric on each side. But, let's remember these videos and maybe the explanations really are much more simple and today we just make things harder.

I am always reminded of America spending millions to create a pen that writes in zero gravity while the Soviets just grabbed a pencil! DUH.... problem solved simply.

[BestLion]

I think Coral Castle is still strange. Many people saw the site during the time he was building it even though he wouldn't let anyone watch him work. There are even lots of photos and none of them show any kind of rig like this. Another possible problem with ancient sites would be the size of the stones at places like Baalbek. Either way this is fun to check out and contemplate.

Yes Coral Caste he didnt have a machine as this..but seemed to have a type of tractor machine..I think he there used a type of vibration-sound manipulation to place those stone.
Baalbek 1 of those stones is 1,000 tons! Just gigantic..and also a question i would have with his method which is being overlooked>
How did they transport these 50-1,000 ton stones from rock quarries sometimes 100s of miles away? Id like to see his next project on transporting a 17 ton stone say 10 miles.

[ulli]

Reminds me of the last twenty of my 40 + house moves. Although I didn't have to unload the truck nor container, the rest of it I did all by myself.
Only once did I hurt my back....used the wrong muscles when pushing a sofa, and also forgot the surface had a tile sticking out, where I expected smooth.
It's all just a matter of common sense, not even rocket science maths.

[Cartomancer]

I like what this guy is doing because it also points out how we underestimate what people are capable of in ancient times. I'm sure these techniques were used to some extent. Sometimes factors like these help to give a practical explanation concerning topics that others assign paranormal or otherworldly origins to. Given that there are still many unexplainable factors to ancient construction techniques.

[Cartomancer]

Posted by BestLion (here)

I think Coral Castle is still strange. Many people saw the site during the time he was building it even though he wouldn't let anyone watch him work. There are even lots of photos and none of them show any kind of rig like this. Another possible problem with ancient sites would be the size of the stones at places like Baalbek. Either way this is fun to check out and contemplate.

Yes Coral Caste he didnt have a machine as this..but seemed to have a type of tractor machine..I think he there used a type of vibration-sound manipulation to place those stone.
Baalbek 1 of those stones is 1,000 tons! Just gigantic..and also a question i would have with his method which is being overlooked>
How did they transport these 50-1,000 ton stones from rock quarries sometimes 100s of miles away? Id like to see his next project on transporting a 17 ton stone say 10 miles.

Great point. In order to move stones of that magnitude more effort would go into the building of the rig than the monument itself. Kind of like the theory of a ramp being used to build the pyramids. It would have taken more effort to build and demolish the ramp itself.

I recently read an article about how the large stones at Stonehenge may have been moved on sleds over snow. I'll see if I can find that and post it.

[13th Warrior]

A possible simple solution; although an impractical method for such large construction projects.

[BestLion]

Posted by Cartomancer (here)
I like what this guy is doing because it also points out how we underestimate what people are capable of in ancient times. I'm sure these techniques were used to some extent. Sometimes factors like these help to give a practical explanation concerning topics that others assign paranormal or otherworldly origins to. Given that there are still many unexplainable factors to ancient construction techniques.

YES, and I tend to think certain monuments were build in the past 6,000 years , and other in the past 87,000 years.I do think Stonehenge is the date they say and was built by Celtic druids ..likely using a method as he is doing..But Stonehenge is a bit 'crude' in many ways if compare to other sites that i feel are much older like Giza, Puma Punku, Thus I think the modern megalithic monuments used a method as such..but most of the modern ones (BC 6,000-500 AD) have smaller stone weights, and are more crude looking. ..but the older ones 'that tend to have larger stones' used a different method.And were much finer looking.

[Cartomancer]

Posted by BestLion (here)

Posted by Cartomancer (here)
I like what this guy is doing because it also points out how we underestimate what people are capable of in ancient times. I'm sure these techniques were used to some extent. Sometimes factors like these help to give a practical explanation concerning topics that others assign paranormal or otherworldly origins to. Given that there are still many unexplainable factors to ancient construction techniques.

YES, and I tend to think certain monuments were build in the past 6,000 years , and other in the past 87,000 years.I do think Stonehenge is the date they say and was built by Celtic druids ..likely using a method as he is doing..But Stonehenge is a bit 'crude' in many ways if compare to other sites that i feel are much older like Giza, Puma Punku, Thus I think the modern megalithic monuments used a method as such..but most of the modern ones (BC 6,000-500 AD) have smaller stone weights, and are more crude looking. ..but the older ones 'that tend to have larger stones' used a different method.And were much finer looking.

True Stonehenge looks to be more crudely constructed than many other ancient sites. I have always been impressed by how the top of Stonehenge seems to be completely level. I wonder if this factor had something to do with a practical use of the structure or simply for aesthetic reasons? My thoughts were that they were making a level artificial horizon from which to measure celestial events.

[christian]

Stonehenge is placed on a ley line and set up to correspond with astrological movements, it's not far out to suspect, that they had some kind of knowledge, that has been forgotten since then. The ability to move objects through mind or sound surely exists, even simple intentional creation out of 'nothing'. It's pretty bold to claim the riddle of how Stonehenge was created is now solved.

It's nice to see how one can move a lot through being smart, though.

[Unified Serenity]

I think it's a pretty good title to the thread, and I also think the simplest explanation is probably the truth.

Edit:

Or better yet, I could just say I channelled the information from the chief builder and he sent me to youtube and showed me the videos. You choose.

[iceni tribe]

hasn't this all been discussed a year ago.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...uilding-Solved

[13th Warrior]

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)
I think it's a pretty good title to the thread, and I also think the simplest explanation is probably the truth.

Edit:

Or better yet, I could just say I channelled the information from the chief builder and he sent me to youtube and showed me the videos. You choose.

That's great! Case closed for you; now on to the next thing!
Mean while the rest of us will continue to ponder these ancient sites and you must ignore any further evidence that would support an alternate theory...

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

I believe this guy is closer to the truth than folk would care to believe. The human mind is a great tool / problem solver. And just because folk of today don't know how certain things were done then doesn't mean that Mr ET is behind all. People should give more credit to the intelligence of our ancestors.

Stonehenge was built over *4500+ thousand years. The Blue stones from Dyfed are at least a thousand years older than the bigger ones.
Folk can't really judge the difference between the "crudely constructed" state of Stonehenge with the likes of the pyramids, because of years of vandalism & due to the elements. What you see now is not what the stones would have looked like when dressed 4500+ years ago.

[Unified Serenity]

Posted by 13th Warrior (here)

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)
I think it's a pretty good title to the thread, and I also think the simplest explanation is probably the truth.

Edit:

Or better yet, I could just say I channelled the information from the chief builder and he sent me to youtube and showed me the videos. You choose.

That's great! Case closed for you; now on to the next thing!
Mean while the rest of us will continue to ponder these ancient sites and you must ignore any further evidence that would support an alternate theory...

Yep, case closed for me. LOL

Show me something tangible to show it happened a different way, otherwise I am happy with this explaning moving some rather large objects. Of course a star trek tractor beam would be nifty! I just haven't seen one yet, have you?

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by iceni tribe (here)
hasn't this all been discussed a year ago.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...uilding-Solved

Thanks for sharing that! I post things currently in the news and two days later another member posts the exact same video. I don't get bothered by it. Sorry if my post bothered you bringing it up under a different thread. If the mods want to delete it or combine I don't really care at this point. Seems you do though.

[conk]

And then there is the video (can't find it at work, no youtube access) that explains the mathmatics of Coral Castle. Antigravity, simply explained. And the kicker is that the numbers and alignments can be found in Masonic temples and buildings. is that the Masonic secret, antigravity? The video has been posted here before. Wish I had the link. Very, very interesting.

Yes, it is astounding how this man moves these giant stones!