Stonehenge and Coral Castle building solved

[Referee]

Nice post US however Some of the stones are much much biger up 150 tons also It dosen't explain the carving of Granite and other very hrd rocks with sergical percision.

Best Regards,

[BestLion]

Cheops broke into into the famous "cheops" pyramid and during the excavation removed the "Arc of the Covenant". Not realising what it was his men removed it and "shorted" it. It is a superconductor of immense power. It was then that the granite ceiling "cracked" and reported as being heard during that period. Furthermore the main gallery contained an array of some kind which was also removed. That occurred 2500yrsBC

This is a theory. i have spent 100s of hours in the study of past civilizations, from Hittites , Celtics, Sumerians, Jews, you name it. In the year 2,500 BC the only civilization that had a knowledgeable type system was the Celts..And the Celts were also said to have went and brought culture to Egypt "this is a theory" and it is much explored by Michael Tsarion extensively.

Furthermore, ANYBODY who considers the pyramids were built 5000BC are retards:-)

Well all we can do is research for ourselves, and each man can build his own conclusions. I for one do not find enough compelling evidence to support the 2,400 BC date of construction of Giza. It is inclusive.Likely as you said Khufu more less just reentered this monument about the time of 2,400 BC.

All around the world civilisations experienced major collapses around the period of 2500yrs BC

This can be an entire thread of itself. Modern view is this was about the time when civilization sparked and started. I have spent much time on study of a possible collapse of civilization in this time-frame. But the problem with this is around 2,500 BC we didn't have many civilizations..about 9 known then. "At 500 BC we had 24 known civilizations"

The ancient cities in Mexico were also evacuated around the same time as in Cambodia, everywhere was effected by this

Very possible. Michael Tsarion sort of takes this theory also. This was about the time of the 1st Celtic collapse also.

Then Moses and his gang nicked the Arc of the Covenant f

I'm more of the opinion that it was a sort of communication device that could contact this demigod Elohim.

Nice post US however Some of the stones are much much biger up 150 tons also It dosen't explain the carving of Granite and other very hrd rocks with sergical percision.

Yes..that is a mystery. Puma Punku have stone made of diorite, that is so hard can only be cut with diamond.Diorite is an extremely hard rock, making it difficult to carve and work with. Its hardness, however, also allows it to be worked finely and take a high polish, and to provide a durable finished work.Not only were these stones really hard to cut, but they are also extremely heavy. One of these stone ruins weighs in at about 800 tons! These are big stones, and they are really heavy. The nearest quarry is at least 10 miles away from the site of the ruins of Puma Punku. How in the world did these people move these blocks that weighed many tons, and how were they able to form a structure with them?

[Unified Serenity]

None of the stones at Stonehenge look like they are surgically precise unless its those on top, and then it's still doesn't look that precise, but ok.

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)
None of the stones at Stonehenge look like they are surgically precise unless its those on top, and then it's still doesn't look that precise, but ok.

Hi.
My comment on the first page #18 may explain this.

Stonehenge was built over *4500+ thousand years. The Blue stones from Dyfed are at least a thousand years older than the bigger ones.
Folk can't really judge the difference between the "crudely constructed" state of Stonehenge with the likes of the pyramids, because of years of vandalism & due to the elements. What you see now is not what the stones would have looked like when dressed 4500+ years ago.

[Unified Serenity]

Funny, the one's in Egypt still look nice n flat.

[freebird111777]

Back in the day the people did not have any entertainment like TVs to occupy their minds (which is why they were smarter)....so yeah it is very plausible that with help from fellow man, they could build such elaborate structures.

[13th Warrior]

Posted by freebird111777 (here)
Back in the day the people did not have any entertainment like TVs to occupy their minds (which is why they were smarter)....so yeah it is very plausible that with help from fellow man, they could build such elaborate structures.

On this same line of thinking...

If these peoples were as primitive as history would have us believe and this thought is what carries forward the idea that these structures were built on basic lever, fulcrum and ramp principles? A truly primitive society spends a great deal of time just in subsisting; they wouldn't have the luxury or the resources to carry on such tasks.

A blacksmith certainly would have the ability to make steel girders and rivets to hold them together but, you don't see any ancient skyscrapers now do you?

A society with the means to build such structure would have to be sufficiently advanced to have their basic life's needs meet in order to have the free time to work on such large projects.

[buckminster fuller]

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)
Are you saying this would not work at Stone Henge?

I seriously have doubts, considering slopes and the nature of the terrain, which is not a flat concrete slab as we see in the vid... Nice ideas there, but I agree that it is not enough to explain it all, especially the lifting..

[Bryn ap Gwilym]

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)
Funny, the one's in Egypt still look nice n flat.

Hi,
The ones in Egypt where buried for how ever long. The weather conditions in Egypt are totally different to Britain. A lot of the monument's in Egypt have also been repaired & tarted up since Napoleon times with a vast amount of ££££ being spent on preserving sites.

Stonehenge was a smashed up wrecked until the last century. Repairs are still ongoing.
I look out of my window I can see the Mynydd Y Preseli / Preseli Mountains where the blue stones came from. I am also surrounded by ancient weathered structures which have been & still are abused by the English heritage trust that claims to be protecting them. Ironic seeing that the English heritage trust is in charge of protecting sites in Cymru, which is a different country btw.

Strange how you can claim that "Stonehenge and Coral Castle building solved" but you refuse to acknowledge on how over 4500+ thousand years of bad weather & vandalism may have altered the appearance of these stones & structures.

[ceetee9]

I'm surprised US that you would consider the "case closed" based upon such minimal data. I realize you’re thread addresses only Stonehenge and Coral Castle, but many of the stone blocks used to create some of the ancient sites around the world were 100 to 1000 tons—which would require today’s largest cranes to lift, were made of granite and even diorite—which require diamond cutting tools to cut, were cut and placed together with extreme precision, and were quarried from locations up to several hundred miles away from the ruins site. These are hardly feats that could be accomplished by man using wood levers, rollers and ropes.

Consider Puma Punku for instance, the blocks were quarried 10 miles from the ruins, were made of granite and diorite, weighed up to 800 tons each, and were aligned with precision that would be hard to duplicate with today’s technology:
http://daveearley.hubpages.com/hub/A...-in-Tiahuanaco

[Carmody]

Do a web search for 'Nikolai Kozyrev', and read. At that point mundane explanations around the idea of moving gigantic blocks...... tends to disappear.

[Khaleesi]

I don't think Serenity considers it case closed. Just that this could be one explanation of many.

[mountain_jim]

Posted by Khaleesi (here)
I don't think Serenity considers it case closed. Just that this could be one explanation of many.

The very thread title clearly implies 'case closed'.

[mountain_jim]

Posted by Carmody (here)
Do a web search for 'Nikolai Kozyrev', and read. At that point mundane explanations around the idea of moving gigantic blocks...... tends to disappear.

Whose work I was introduced to and explained by that noted (around some of these parts) value-not-added compiler of other people's research, David Wilcock.

[Khaleesi]

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)

Also maybe a question mark would be appropriate for the end of the title, for the sake of healthy debate.

You know, i actually thought I put a ? mark when I wrote it, but there are members here who take great delight in trying to find fault with anything I say, so let them have their fun!

Thanks for the comments btw,

Serenity

Guess you missed that post.

[mountain_jim]

Posted by Khaleesi (here)

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)

Also maybe a question mark would be appropriate for the end of the title, for the sake of healthy debate.

You know, i actually thought I put a ? mark when I wrote it, but there are members here who take great delight in trying to find fault with anything I say, so let them have their fun!

Thanks for the comments btw,

Serenity

Guess you missed that post.

And several more, all discussing validity or intent of thread title.

I scanned too quickly. If thread titles can be changed, this one should be, to convey author's real intent - well unless stirring the pot and being provocative was the intent.

And I admit I should not have commented if/when I don't have the whole thread content well in hand.

[goinghome2012]

if you don't know it yet, the pyramids, coral castle and even the huge rocks on Easter Island were moved my magnetics, sound vibration and/or alien technology ant-gravity. come on people I thought that information was a given, especially at today's date and year.

peace out

[TargeT]

Posted by 13th Warrior (here)

Posted by freebird111777 (here)
Back in the day the people did not have any entertainment like TVs to occupy their minds (which is why they were smarter)....so yeah it is very plausible that with help from fellow man, they could build such elaborate structures.

On this same line of thinking...

If these peoples were as primitive as history would have us believe and this thought is what carries forward the idea that these structures were built on basic lever, fulcrum and ramp principles? A truly primitive society spends a great deal of time just in subsisting; they wouldn't have the luxury or the resources to carry on such tasks.

A blacksmith certainly would have the ability to make steel girders and rivets to hold them together but, you don't see any ancient skyscrapers now do you?

A society with the means to build such structure would have to be sufficiently advanced to have their basic life's needs meet in order to have the free time to work on such large projects.

From my current understanding of the methods POSSIBILY (probably) used, this really wasn't that big of an under taking (the construction) the bigger undertaking was the initial design and the VAST amounts of universal understanding that it entailed..... the work is, well interesting, but the REAL jewl are the ideas (as always).

Posted by Carmody (here)
Do a web search for 'Nikolai Kozyrev', and read. At that point mundane explanations around the idea of moving gigantic blocks...... tends to disappear.

^^ this is kinda what I was getting at

Nikolai Kozyrev:
http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.ph...d=95&Itemid=36

[mountain_jim]

Posted by TargeT (here)

Posted by 13th Warrior (here)

Posted by freebird111777 (here)
Back in the day the people did not have any entertainment like TVs to occupy their minds (which is why they were smarter)....so yeah it is very plausible that with help from fellow man, they could build such elaborate structures.

On this same line of thinking...

If these peoples were as primitive as history would have us believe and this thought is what carries forward the idea that these structures were built on basic lever, fulcrum and ramp principles? A truly primitive society spends a great deal of time just in subsisting; they wouldn't have the luxury or the resources to carry on such tasks.

A blacksmith certainly would have the ability to make steel girders and rivets to hold them together but, you don't see any ancient skyscrapers now do you?

A society with the means to build such structure would have to be sufficiently advanced to have their basic life's needs meet in order to have the free time to work on such large projects.

From my current understanding of the methods POSSIBILY (probably) used, this really wasn't that big of an under taking (the construction) the bigger undertaking was the initial design and the VAST amounts of universal understanding that it entailed..... the work is, well interesting, but the REAL jewl are the ideas (as always).

Posted by Carmody (here)
Do a web search for 'Nikolai Kozyrev', and read. At that point mundane explanations around the idea of moving gigantic blocks...... tends to disappear.

^^ this is kinda what I was getting at

Nikolai Kozyrev:
http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.ph...d=95&Itemid=36

Great link. I did not realize he had this much detail available online. Here are the references to this synthesis of ideas/research:

REFERENCES:

1.Akimov, A.E. and Shipov, G.I. Torsion Fields and their Experimental Manifestations. Proceedings of International Conference: New Ideas in Natural Science, 1996.
2.Anonymous. (Amount of vaccuum space in light bulb) {Link no longer in operation 6/02}:
3.Fox, Hal. Now Come Torsion Fields. NEN, Vol. 5, No. 11, Mar. 1998, p.1. URL:
4.Gamow, George. Gravity. Anchor Books, NY, 1962; p. 138.Keely, John. Sympathetic Vibratory Physics.
5.Kozyrev, N.A. On the Potential for Experimental Investigation of the Properties of Time. 1971.
6.Levich, A.P. A Substantial Interpretation of N.A. Kozyrev’s Conception of Time. Singapore, New Jersey, London, Hong Kong: World Scientific, 1996, p. 1-42.
7.Lyne, William. Occult Ether Physics. Creatopia Productions, NM, 1997. ISBN: 0-9637467-2-3
8.Nachalov, Yu.V. Theoretical Basics of Experimental Phenomena.
9.Nachalov, Yu.V. and Parkhomov, E.A. Experimental Detection of the Torsion Field.
10.Nachalov, Yu.V. and Sokolov, A.N. Experimental Investigation of New Long-Range Actions. 1993.
11.Ostrander, S. and Schroeder, L. Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970.
12.Pasichnyk, Richard. The Vital Vastness: Volume One. Writer’s Showcase, 2002.
13.Russell, Walter. The Divine Iliad. University of Science and Philosophy
14.Taubes, Gary. Relativists in Orbit. Discover Magazine, March 1997.
15.Tesla, Nikola. Lecture Before the Institute of Immigrant Welfare. May 12, 1938.
16.Wilcock, David. Science of OnenessI. April, 2001. URL:
17.Wright, Walter. Push Gravity

I have a paperback copy of this one I bought 39 years ago: Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970.

[Unified Serenity]

Ok, my one obscure comment for the day, why does anyone care if I think a case is closed? What's it matter? If it's not to you then it's not to you. I really have not made up my mind completely, but I am just tired of the pissant attacks I get, so I took that stand to basically end that side of the banter. Have fun all, I am pretty much done with posting any relevent thoughts or questioning anything or posting anything on PA.

There are two sets of rules here, that's obvious, and I don't have to play ball. For some that will be great news, for others that will not. So be it. I will go where I am allowed to at least think, ask, and seek without being attacked by ad hominem posts whenever someone doesn't like my viewpoint, which is nearly everytime I type something.

The end.

Serenity