One of the biggest debates that has reared it's ugly head for what seems like forever is the lack of Proof, Evidence, Etc in the MSM regarding UFO's, ET's, The PTW are loosing or have lost this fight, etc, etc. Even things like the 40 Iranian Kamikaze Boats that were snatched in broad daylight infront of Hundreds of Witnesses, or Venezuelan Missile Crisis are couple more good examples.
I lived in Los Angeles area for seven years, and worked among other things as an photojournalist in the LA Music Scene, but also covering other events, topics etc. And it never stopped amazing me the things that weren't covered or talked about that went on. Even, the scandalous actions of the LA Unified School district surrounding the Historic Ambassador Hotel Site, that drowned in so much history, and sits above one of the biggest methane deposits in the LA Basin.
I can understand the desire for crying for proof in MSM but, it seems some? don't realize the depth of the control the PTW have still over MSM outlets and why while things continue to happen again, and again and again, that the only sources for what is REALLY going on out in the REAL world are mostly if not all Alternative Media Sites, Fringe Media Sites, and from the Blogs of those either directly or indirectly involved. And, how noxiously unreliable MSM sources really are in comparison to Alternative Sites that aren't under the thumbs of the cabal/nwo/ptw/global elite.
Another good example, in my own desire to investigate on some of the current happenings going on, being reported etc by various sites. I called my two close friends that I know from Associated Press, spoke with them both for well upwards of an hour and half at length and questioned them on things. The response I got back was that they knew about the majority of what I was inquiring about but were ordered not to publish anything regarding them as they would detract from the Iran is evil and has nukes campaign and the political crap going on, also that they would loose their jobs if not their press permits and lives to go with them. The rest I was told they were looking into with their field journalist and would "get back to me" well that hasn't happened yet. And I'm not surprised in the least.
I've known about this kind of stuff and the behavoir and control, the belt strapping that has been for decades around the media, and yet some don't seem to get it and only respect MSM sources. When they should ultimately be looking anywhere but...granted that paradigm is starting to shift and more real truths are starting to come out into the MSM...but they're still a mighty unreliable source.
While reading the current White Hats Report I came across this piece, it really sums this up. And, inspired me to make this thread as the topic I think can provide with respectful and civil conversation an educational element for those open to learning and expanding their perspectives and horizons.
Please share your insights and experiences etc where you guys have found the Grand Canyon in differences between the Truth/Reality and what MSM has been reporting. It's a lot I'm sure, but the educational merits of such a thread will be limitless.
The main stream media is yet another perfect example of this. We have met with most of the major print media in America and have dealt with senior editors, owners and their attorneys while laying out everything that we have regarding the demise of our Country. They refuse to even consider printing the story due to “what will be done to them”. We understand. When Obama roared in the Oval office while beating his chest, he loudly announced for all to hear, “I OWN THE MEDIA … SCREW THE WHITE HATS.” The media knows it and has hung its respective heads in shame, as they have given up the fight for freedom of the press, a right of all free people.
The Internet does not reach a large enough audience and is mainly reserved for people understanding the problems … people who see what is happening … people who are becoming aware of the problems we face. Yet, the Main Stream Media does not recognize the actual sophistication of the folks online and tends to treat online information as invalid. Hard core investigative reporting is largely a thing of the past. There was a time when Editors would place a team of reporters on a story that meant something big … like Watergate. The world swirled in anticipation of the next report from print and broadcast reporters. Not anymore… News Executives are controlled from the top down and are highly unlikely to allow controversial topics to be reported, unless it is approved by Karl Rove and his echo chamber in his weekly meetings telling his minions this week's methods of control. If print and broadcast owners would open their eyes … wake up …and smell the roses from a different direction, they would see the information we bring forward is 1,000 times more explosive than Watergate, and not just here but from all points in the world. And they might just find the courage to allow it to be reported. This story, our story, is an international story that is so significant the other countries cannot contain themselves, as they know the real truth.