-
27th February 2012 15:32
Link to Post #1
Request to Review Process on Channeled Message Threads
Yeah . . . . I’m gonna be really negative and hateful with this post . . . . or some will say.
A few questions and comments to Bill and the Mods regarding channeled messages:
Day after day, these long posts and threads are started with only the “message” from the channelers or channeled. There is little to no commentary or reason why the Avalon member posted the thread. There is little to no following or supporting posts other than to say how wonderful it (the message) is . . . unless . . .we negative, mean members chime in and challenge.
To me, this is as if Greg Giles, Mike Quinsy, Sheldon Nidle, Steve Beckow, GFL, Ashtar and all the others are some type of “honorary members” . . . . are they? We, the members of Avalon, went through an application process and were therefore invited and accepted into the forum.
These long threads and posts with basically only dialogue from a non-member, with little to no critical thinking or discussion from legitimate members, I feel should not be allowed. These individuals (channelers and channeled) have not gone through the application process.
If these channeled threads were started with ensuing critical thinking and discussion and supporting documentation with the members reasoning then that would be different. But rarely is this done in these type threads . . . .and usually from us “negative hateful” members.
What if a Avalon member, day after day, posted threads with only material from say Clif High and Half Past Human or the Atticus forum or material from a member that had been unsubscribed? This I have a feeling would not be allowed and removed immediately and the member chastised. How are these threads with basically only material from the channeled non-members any different?
Bare minimum, I feel, the channeled messages should all be on only one thread instead of several threads being started almost everyday. On that thread only the link to the message be posted so that if a member wants to read that message he or she will need to follow the link to that website and that the member posting the link to the message be required to state compelling dialogue on why they suggest Avalon members go to the website to read the ‘message’.
I do not feel I am being unreasonable with this request or suggestions. I would like to respectfully ask that the mods review how the channeled messages are posted and that, if they deem, changes be made.
Thank You and I sincerely and deeply apologize for what I’m sure will be a massive mess for a few days.
-
27th February 2012 15:36
Link to Post #2