Kerry's public message to Light Workers who serve the dark

[Dennis Leahy]

Posted by NternalArchitect (here)
Has Bill Wood ever spoken about underground bases being blown up? Who has? Romantic sense of self? Just wanting to research? 'see false signs everywhere substantiating their false sense of winning.' Crowds and masses following them? Sounds a lot like David to me. Then referring to bill wood later separately, as though she weren't already speaking about him. It seems very likely to me that it was Wilcock.

Yes, sorry. Please see my edits in my post above.

Dennis

[DreamsInDigital]

To me this just screams FEAR as she is still in that FEAR mind-set, she will move past it some time, like some of us already have and focus instead of spreading fear, on working towards an solution. Yeah sure it's still an UP HILL battle that is being fought, but how about instead of spreading fear and further disempowering people, she should be spreading SOLUTIONS and EMPOWERMENT and encouraging people to step into their power, stop fearing the 'dark side' and come out of the defeatist mindset, and do what they can to make things change. But, they need to know we are all strong enough to shake off the mind control and really make a difference. Yes We Can Change The World, but we have to do it TOGETHER.

[Paul]

Posted by Mozart (here)
I'm sad that she's posted this

I'm glad Kerry posted this .

The shouting UPPER CASE rant was too hard for me read, sitting at my computer.

So I walked around, between computer and kitchen, tending to some dishes, as I read. That gave me enough distance to read the reason for the rage.

Kerry has good reason to be enraged ... reasons relevant to the situation we all find ourselves in at this time.

[gooty64]

Good point NA. Maybe she is fed up with both of them. Remember when David and Bill were giggling in interview #2 saying, "we know something really BIG but can't tell you"?
Sounds like she has mentioned both of these guys in her rant. Sorry i said it was unfair.

Posted by NternalArchitect (here)
Has Bill Wood ever spoken about underground bases being blown up? Who has? Romantic sense of self? Just wanting to research? 'see false signs everywhere substantiating their false sense of winning.' Crowds and masses following them? Sounds a lot like David to me. Then referring to bill wood later separately, as though she weren't already speaking about him. It seems very likely to me that it was Wilcock.

[lslimerick]

I dont mind Kerry venting, its healthy, no opinion either way, what I am over is the believe that most ppl believe everything they read is truth, if thats the case - this type of blog doesnt help anyone or cure the culable....if you take what you want, then no big deal....Kerry is welcome to her path and what information she investigates, they are others who focus on empowerment and solutions and between us all, we still dont have all the information, thats the bottom line here....we could spend the next 40,000 years on cabals, enlightenment, ascension, channeling, up and down, in and out and it will still be a mystery....we are here to remember who we are, not what others are doing....but hey, we would rather focus on anything but ourselves...me thinks anyway!!

[Paul]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
More than a rant, this is a warning from Kerry (and I truly do NOT see it as fear mongering to yell "TRAIN!" when there's a train coming at us.) She's angry that the disinfo is getting through to people, making people believe that the battle is over - before the battle has begun. This is an important wake-up call from Kerry. Don't get lost in the emotion, the sawtooth frequency, or the orange aura of the message or messenger - go to the (skull and) bones.

Well said. Thanks.

(Perhaps my changed title is still inaccurate?)

[Carmody]

It's a big cudgel. There's room for two. (this is Carmody's very dark humour at work)

My only comment on this whole thing, so far, is that in the first interview.... I saw behavioral patterns from Bill toward David that instantly had me considering that, potentially... David was the intended target in an integrity and believability takedown, via connection and implication.

What I was really seeing, I've no idea, but that was my near instant response on internal rumination of the rapport style, connection, and direction.

After all, all it takes is someone dressed as a hooker to walk by respected star (famous person), grab them, fake a kiss, have the photo taken and instant tarnish -which is spread around. Better yet, put a body in their house. It only matters for the newspapers, right?

In cases like this, a more intricate plan is required with longer lead in and longer set-up.

The audience is more aware, so the attempts must be more integrated, deeper, and more blended into the subjects at hand. the cons are more involved so they require a certain amount of ad lib capacity.

My personal desire in such situations is to let them go on for as long as possible and supply nothing in the form of data which can be repackaged and sent back. For if one fills in the blanks for someone, then one can have issues of discernment as to origins and who said what, when.

It can easily slip into being aided programing of the self through neuro-linguistic methodologies.

Thus, NEVER take your eyes off the ball and never allow connection to data that you do not fully invest yourself in.

I'm quite aware of such things as I spend lots of time seeding ideas (thoughts, openings, considerations..NOT conclusions--make your own) in people, regarding er..all kinds of subjects. Thus I'm hyper aware of what I have said, what I have not, and when and if any of it has ever been sent back to me.

When I saw Bill speaking with David in the first interview, all my alarm bells went off.

I do not know who or what Bill is, but that connection and specific integration with David was not coming off as seeming.... correct. The connectivity felt forced and contrived, in a way that was seemingly not, er, behaviorally genuine.

[gooty64]

Maybe change it to "a recent guest and friend"? or someome?

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
More than a rant, this is a warning from Kerry (and I truly do NOT see it as fear mongering to yell "TRAIN!" when there's a train coming at us.) She's angry that the disinfo is getting through to people, making people believe that the battle is over - before the battle has begun. This is an important wake-up call from Kerry. Don't get lost in the emotion, the sawtooth frequency, or the orange aura of the message or messenger - go to the (skull and) bones.

Well said. Thanks.

(Perhaps my changed title is still inaccurate?)

[Paul]

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
... but how about instead of spreading fear and further dis-empowering people, she should be spreading SOLUTIONS and EMPOWERMENT and encouraging people to step into their power, stop fearing the 'dark side' and come out of the defeatist mindset ...

You would dissuade others from seeing what is, if what is has a dark and dangerous side, on the grounds that we "should" just see goodness.

I would suggest that dissuading others from seeing what is ... dis-empowers them .

[CdnSirian]

Sorry, but I'm confused!

[NternalArchitect]

Going away and thinking about it further.. yeah, there are too many connections for her to not realize how others will take it. With his newest update talking about ET/angelic humans helping.. guns jamming on several occasions, and how the rules have changed. No problem, Gooty.

I am all for what Kerry does and know that every piece is important. She's devoted much of her focus to collecting and spreading whistleblower information and gaining contacts, and IMO has done a great service. The only thing that gets me... listening to her interviews, and seeing how she conducts herself, is the energy in which she does it. She's who she is; I understand that. It's the energy she perpetuates that makes me feel the disharmony inside myself that she must be feeling! Why spread that.. why introduce that vibration into other's reality. It's her blog though. I'm just speaking my point of view.

Inside it's like nails on a chalkboard lol. So yes, I see both sides of the issue, but I just wanted to point out the connection that I picked up on, her directing that to David. It's been pretty clear to me how she reacts to DW, especially in the second Bill Wood interview, so I put the dots together. And also express myself by stating how my body rejects her behavior and energy.

[Dennis Leahy]

Posted by Paul (here)
...(Perhaps my changed title is still inaccurate?)

Yes, I think yet another title change is in order.

Hey, NternalArchitect, what do you want the title to be? What do you think of "Kerry's warning: Disinfo to Wilcock and Brockbrader - false security"

Dennis

{edit} hahahahaha I'm a slow typist!

[Paul]

Posted by Paul (here)
(Perhaps my changed title is still inaccurate?)

Aha - should have done this earlier - let Kerry determine the title. She chose not to name names, but to speak to "Light Workers who serve the dark "

I have changed this thread title again (sorry). The thread title is now "Kerry's public message to Light Workers who serve the dark".

[NternalArchitect]

I believe that fits the bill! haha X)

edit: lol Nevermind. It's all good.

[Cilka]

Posted by NternalArchitect (here)
Going away and thinking about it further.. yeah, there are too many connections for her to not realize how others will take it. With his newest update talking about ET/angelic humans helping.. guns jamming on several occasions, and how the rules have changed. No problem, Gooty.

I am all for what Kerry does and know that every piece is important. She's devoted much of her focus to collecting and spreading whistleblower information and gaining contacts, and IMO has done a great service. The only thing that gets me... listening to her interviews, and seeing how she conducts herself, is the energy in which she does it. She's who she is; I understand that. It's the energy she perpetuates that makes me feel the disharmony inside myself that she must be feeling! Why spread that.. why introduce that vibration into other's reality. It's her blog though. I'm just speaking my point of view.

Inside it's like nails on a chalkboard lol. So yes, I see both sides of the issue, but I just wanted to point out the connection that I picked up on, her directing that to David. It's been pretty clear to me how she reacts to DW, especially in the second Bill Wood interview, so I put the dots together. And also express myself by stating how my body rejects her behavior and energy.

Why dont you Nternal Architect start a radio show or something, and you can show us how interviews should be done. Maybe there is a clone somewhere that can show the world how every interview should be conducted in the whole galaxy.

[schneider]

to be quite honest, i am and have been a supporter of project camelot for quite some time now. however, as of late, i find myself highly agitated by her interviewing style. she is very rough and has lots of sharp edges to jab people with. that is her style and lots of people like that method (kind of like being tumbled in a hot dryer.) i don't think that style is appropriate all the time, nor do i think she gets the best information out of her guests that way. in the blog , she is referring to bill wood mostly, but i feel some of the rant is also directed at david wilcock. bill and david are good friends now. i hope all the in fighting can end because the true winners of all this sqabbling are the powers that be.

[DreamsInDigital]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
... but how about instead of spreading fear and further dis-empowering people, she should be spreading SOLUTIONS and EMPOWERMENT and encouraging people to step into their power, stop fearing the 'dark side' and come out of the defeatist mindset ...

You would dissuade others from seeing what is, if what is has a dark and dangerous side, on the grounds that we "should" just see goodness.

I would suggest that dissuading others from seeing what is ... dis-empowers them .

That's not what I said...not in anyway. Am I speaking a different language or something? I seriously am not understanding why people are consistently misinterpreting what I am saying, when as far as I can see it. I'm being very direct and clear on what I say and what I mean.

[Carmody]

David should consider being careful who he hitches his wagon to or allows to hitch to his.

His recent book is far too important to allow for such frivolous behavior.

[DreamsInDigital]

I thought we discovered it wasn't ABOUT David Wilcock.

[Carmody]

I don't think that the quality of Camelot or Avalon has gone down.

I think that the disinfo campaign has stepped up and that whistleblowers are, shall we politely say , heavily discouraged from going this route. (regarding walking toward Camelot or Avalon for disclosure)