"Where Did The Towers Go?" - Dr Judy Wood in the UK....Sky 200 TV with Theo Chalmers.

[Carmen]

Fantastic interview. She presents the evidence so well. I intend to buy her book.

[Deega]

Posted by PookztA (here)
Those who cannot refute the evidence tend to call it a “theory” so they can attempt to dismiss it. Dr. Wood only presents evidence. Those who insist on referring to evidence as a “theory” have actually admitted that they cannot refute what Dr. Wood has presented.

Thanks PookztA, I was delighted to have another point of view on the matter, and all my appreciation to Dr Wood!

And, as you said, she did a great job presenting facts but also presenting a theory on Static Energy getting hit by Radio Frequency, and for me, I learned a new thing and it's all to her honour.

I'm not sure if the Scientific World divulges much information on this particular interaction of Static Energy and Radio Frequency?

You seem to feel that in saying <theory>, I was denigrating her presentation, hmm!, not at all, on the contrary!

All the best to you.

Deega

[Aurelius]

What worries me about Judy's work is two fold:

1. In my opinion what she says it the truth. However, will this bring the "bastards" to book ?

2. By exposing the "oversights" on the "bastard's" behalf, they learn from this and the next false flag is improved, better implementation on the back of the lessons learned. By us picked apart the "event" looking for evidence and then publicly exposing our findings, we are beta testing their approach and their clean-up efforts. They (the "bastards") read these findings and learn from it. Then it just makes it harder for us to figure out the next "event" becuase they improve their approach or use a different platform. Bit of a chicken egg situation to be honest. ie. Communicate the truth but try not feed them with intel that allows them to fine tune their game.

As a separate note .. on the zero point / free energy / anti-gravitic craft front .. if the tech gets out now .. great!!! however a point in time will arrive where they have slapped us with so many "draconian" laws or have mastered the "technology" to an extent, that if the tech comes out then .. it will be too late. ie. they will slap us with a "law" or easily pick up "energetic signatures" generated by experimenters working in their garages (thereby crushing the efforts of the people).

[Cidersomerset]

What is encouraging about Judys work is she said her research has been reviewed positively by some of her peers, who for
obvious reasons are not ready to put there head over the parrapit as i presume they have family and fear for their jobs
and security etc.....TPTB are still several steps ahead of us as they own the mainstream media and are closing in on
our freedoms in the name of security etc and our targetting the web....

I just listened to the latetest James Martinez show and he and others are trying to expose the finacial corruption of the
elites, which is all part of this, They have always had access to insider trading thru the old boys net works and
various societies and funded and collapsed regimes and governments.There have been many revolutions and
democratic governments in the last 300 years yet the corrupt elite always get back to the top and own everything
you just have to look at the oligarchs in russia and all the assets still owned by 1% of the world population
its pathetic....and very frustrating when you know !!

http://www.achieveradio.com/archplay...-Cash_Flow.mp3

[Vitalux]

Just wished to express my sincere gratitude to the original poster of this thread, as well as those that contributed to it.

It is the first time that I was able to sit and study in some detail of exactly what facts and theories Judy Wood had been advocating.
The thread have provided me with perhaps the most clear understanding of the events of 911 and the demise of the buildings.
It certainly helps to shed more light onto the introduction of more facts and evidence.

I just wish to state also that I have decided not to participate in debates anymore on these forum boards, however I will state that this is one of the best forum boards I have yet to discover.
Many great interesting topics surface on these boards and I have a admiration and respect for all the key components that are responsible for this sites functioning.

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

Really wish I had known Judy was doing a talk here in Brighton in the UK as I walk past the venue everyday and its about 5 mins from where I work.
As I dont think her theory is a good one, I would have loved to have expressed my concerns to her. Oh well. Maybe next time.

Posted by PookztA (here)
Those who cannot refute the evidence tend to call it a “theory” so they can attempt to dismiss it.

Where as those of us that CAN refute the evidence CAN dismiss it legitimately.

Also, until practical experiments have been done, it remains a theory. Thats science for you.

Perhaps this can go in the 9/11 forum?

[jackovesk]

I'm so Proud of how Unwavering & Proud Judy is of her own Discoveries & Hard Work whilst putting her own life at risk at the same time...

One Hell-of-a-Gutsy Woman...

[iceni tribe]

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez Questions Richard Gage at AE911Truth Presentation on 4/12/2011 (Part 1/2)

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir0vukXoWGU

part 2

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9VvSBwVT_A

[unicorny]

Thanks for posting this I have checked out her site a few times but it was great to see her in action joining all the bits of info together, for me, it has made her research much more compelling.

Posted by Cidersomerset (here)
One Step Beyond TV show with Theo Chalmers on SKY 200 in the U.K..25 /10/2011

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmmQ6OWMHTI

I have just found this interview Judy Wood gave to Theo Chalmers I have not seen
it before should be interresting....Cheers Steve

[Cidersomerset]

I've seen most of Richards presentations on line and his debates with 9/11 'Bush believers' on radio shows
as he said in the brief exchange above he is not a scientist and is pushing the truth out as best he can
without being seen by mainstream as more of a conspiricist than nessaccery....
He does know about Judy Woods work and others as I heard him talk about them in various interviews
But he explains up front he does not wish to speak about them as he feels they hinder his disclosure
agenda on 9/11 and he would probably be first to acknowledge and use new data if it could be
validated by more experts comming forward and privately as he intimated there is much not known
about the destruction of everything on that day..He points out hes presenting what information he
feels comfortable putting before the public and I admire him for that.

The work presented here by Judy is suggesting a more exotic and plausible possiblity for the
disintergration of the towers,but she also does not want to get drawn in to deeply with
advanced weoponry in her presentations but in these more casual interviews, this is where
she seems to admit the evidence is going.

Stewart Webb in his interview with Kerry said it was mob boss 'Daddy Bush' and Mossad
responcible for 9/11 he did not go into operational details but named the ex Nazi bank used by the
Bushs to fund the operation, and says Clinton,Obama and 'Boy Bush' are all part of the 'Family' !!!
Running and defrauding the American people and the whole world for that matter..

[king anthony]

Posted by Fundy Gemini (here)
...AND ITS IMPORTANT...

Regarding the video in post #16 - at 1:11:11 minutes (include prior and after) of the video; Dr. Judy Wood does disclose something.

[Cidersomerset]

Yes I see what you mean about being a patriot and free energy also the possible takeover of the US political system..
Which has happened since 1990 from George Bush senior untill today....Her point about being single and not having
a family to be used to blackmail her gives her more freedom than most other scientists and would be whistleblowers,,

[TigaHawk]

Just a theory after watchin her video's.

Chemtrails.

The reflective particles in it - if someone were to use the 9-11 weapon elsewhere, if the target location was chemtrailed i have a feeling their weapon wont work.

It would also explain why the US, Australia, NZ, and alot of other countries have started spraying. Nothing to do with the weather or space - but a "defence blanket" that protects them from the very weapon they created, as they know Russia and China have similar technologies.

Wouldent all the reflective particles dispurse the radio frequencies enough so they cant get a concerntrated effect? As by the look on 9-11 those would have to have been very concerntratred beams of radio waves to hit those targets while leaving everything else ok. The static field on 9-11 would not have been something small, it would have probably covered the entire city, so for them to hit precise targets it would have been the concerntration of radio frequencies.


Anyone able to pull up chemtrail data? Would be interesting to see if they stopped spraying for a few days around there, then started up again straight after.


Also, with "Global warming" (the earth does seem to be getting warmer im sorry, winters just arnt as cold as they used to be, dont even need to wear winter clothes here anymore in Aus!) could be a biproduct of all the chemtrail spraying. Reflecting around all the suns rays. So the carbon tax in effect, is a way for a country to get its citizens to pay for "the defence" of their country, it'd cover the costs to keep all the planes up and spraying, i mean look wherer all the money goes anyway, mostly back to the US and very little of said carbon tax would actualy stay in australia.

[unicorny]

Posted by TigaHawk (here)
Just a theory after watchin her video's.

Chemtrails.

The reflective particles in it - if someone were to use the 9-11 weapon elsewhere, if the target location was chemtrailed i have a feeling their weapon wont work.

It would also explain why the US, Australia, NZ, and alot of other countries have started spraying. Nothing to do with the weather or space - but a "defence blanket" that protects them from the very weapon they created, as they know Russia and China have similar technologies.

Wouldent all the reflective particles dispurse the radio frequencies enough so they cant get a concerntrated effect? As by the look on 9-11 those would have to have been very concerntratred beams of radio waves to hit those targets while leaving everything else ok. The static field on 9-11 would not have been something small, it would have probably covered the entire city, so for them to hit precise targets it would have been the concerntration of radio frequencies.


Anyone able to pull up chemtrail data? Would be interesting to see if they stopped spraying for a few days around there, then started up again straight after.


Also, with "Global warming" (the earth does seem to be getting warmer im sorry, winters just arnt as cold as they used to be, dont even need to wear winter clothes here anymore in Aus!) could be a biproduct of all the chemtrail spraying. Reflecting around all the suns rays. So the carbon tax in effect, is a way for a country to get its citizens to pay for "the defence" of their country, it'd cover the costs to keep all the planes up and spraying, i mean look wherer all the money goes anyway, mostly back to the US and very little of said carbon tax would actualy stay in australia.

Interesting idea TigaHawk -Thanks for sharing ....... not sure if i buy it but it doesn't seem inconceivable either, definately one to ponder

[Cidersomerset]

This interview with Andre Johnson 9/11 for scholers activist ties in very well with this thread.....

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhMPlJ9C__Q

[Cidersomerset]

I first heard about Dr.Judy Wood from the John Lear interviews
at the time some of Johns ideas seemed a bit OTT, but now they
are quite plausible, below is the affidavit that John put forward in
Judys law suit.....I was looking for a clip of him talking about Judy
but found this one about hologrammes.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CudLxM04l6A

John Lear's Affidavit in the Judy Wood lawsuit against NIST and its contractors

http://911scholars.ning.com/profiles...fidavit-in-the

[Paul]

Posted by EYES WIDE OPEN (here)
Also, until practical experiments have been done, it remains a theory. Thats science for you.

Perhaps this can go in the 9/11 forum?

There's evidence, theory and experiments.

We keep asking you to look at the evidence that Dr. Judy Wood presents.

You keep saying you don't see the experiments, perhaps trying to distract us from the evidence by trying to change the subject.

There are such experiments explaining the evidence Dr. Wood presents - see further John Hutchinson. Granted, most of the experiments involving such directed energy have been kept from us. The 9/11 cover-up is in part a cover-up of just such capabilities.

There are no experiments showing how to recreate the evidence she presents, that involve dustifying a 110 story office building in under 10 seconds using office or petro fires on the 80-th (or thereabouts) floor.

I moved this thread under the 9/11 sub-forum.

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

Posted by Paul (here)

There are no experiments showing how to recreate the evidence she presents

The situation is way worse than that. She has no experiments so to belive her, you have to rely on faith alone and whats even worse is that the evidence can ALL be explained easily without space weapons.
Indeed I have explained much of the evidence in this thread and the other one too I was asked to explain 5 points of Judy's evidence. I explained them all. I notice nobody had a rebuttle to my responses. The silence was deafening. I wonder why?

[Paul]

Posted by EYES WIDE OPEN (here)

Posted by Paul (here)
There are no experiments showing how to recreate the evidence she presents

You quoted me out of context. The full sentence was:

Posted by Paul (here)
There are no experiments showing how to recreate the evidence she presents, that involve dustifying a 110 story office building in under 10 seconds using office or petro fires on the 80-th (or thereabouts) floor.

===

Posted by EYES WIDE OPEN (here)
the evidence can ALL be explained easily without space weapons

She's not saying necessarily space weapons. She's saying directed energy. She makes no claim to know from where such energy was directed.

Thermite, dynamite, petro fires, office fires, terrorists, box cutters, ... all combined ... do not even begin to explain the evidence that Judy Wood has amassed.

Advanced (the kind they don't usually teach in "below top secret" physics classes) energy mechanisms do, as demonstrated by the experiments of John Hutchinson.

[Paul]

As announced here, EYES WIDE OPEN is no longer a member of this forum.