Nuked! (New free e-book, on 9/11, by Jeff Prager)

[Dennis Leahy]

These are the first 23 pages of a new 9/11 book written by my friend, Jeff Prager.

http://www.datafilehost.com/download-0b54ce25.html

Jeff knew nanothermite was not the right tool to pulverize the World Trade Center buildings. He never saw the evidence from Judy Wood to support the "directed energy weapon" idea. But he knew some tremendous, powerful forces were used to disintegrate those buildings.

This is the culmination of his research. This 23 page teaser will be followed later today or tomorrow, by the rest of the book.

Dig in, friends.

Dennis

[aranuk]

That link Dennis was a livid download site not excerps from the book

Stan

[aranuk]

Sorry Den I got it now reading.

Stan

[Leon]

When can we expect the rest, most of this I know already but it's a good presentation keep it coming... thank you.

[Debra]

Thank you Dennis. Really looking forward to this.
Zebra

[Cilka]

Dr Judy Wood's research is the best so far, your friend should look into it. The same weapon can be, and was probably, used to induce earthquakes. The human Gods in power now control every one of our lives. This is the most exciting time to be alive.

[Dennis Leahy]

Sorry, I don't have the rest of the book yet. It is nearly 500 pages long. Jeff has been proofreading and fixing typos for quite a while.

Whatever you think of Gordon Duff (good, bad, or indifferent) he knows a good researcher when he sees one. (I personally think that Jeff is the best 9/11 researcher of them all.)

Gordon Duff has the same 23 pages of the story that you and I do, and he is set to go into full disclosure mode as soon as he gets the rest:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03...march-21-2012/

11 years after 9/11, scientists from America’s weapons labs will be releasing conclusive data on the types of weapons used to destroy the World Trade Center.
The outlet will be through Jeff Prager, we will carry as much of the material, it is volumes, as possible, but the original source is both official, highly classified and less “unauthorized” than believed.

As soon as I get the link, I'll publish it here.

I recommend that you do not even try to read it online, but rather download it. If he re-releases it again later, (for example, from fixing more typos), I'll post a newer link. If it disappears off of the server Jeff is using, don't worry, it will pop up from several other places in the world. :~)

Dennis

[iceni tribe]

Intel Disclosure, March 21, 2012

11 years after 9/11, scientists from America’s weapons labs will be releasing conclusive data on the types of weapons used to destroy the World Trade Center.

The outlet will be through Jeff Prager, we will carry as much of the material, it is volumes, as possible, but the original source is both official, highly classified and less “unauthorized” than believed.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03...march-21-2012/

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
These are the first 23 pages of a new 9/11 book written by my friend, Jeff Prager.

On first read of these initial pages ... this looks like it will be stunning.

Thanks!

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Cilka (here)
Dr Judy Wood's research is the best so far, your friend should look into it.

If you read other works of Prager, you will see that he is well aware of Judy Wood's research. Prager gives Wood credit for coining the word "dustification", but finds the vague notion of a "directed energy weapon" to be a distraction.

Judy Wood has accumulated and presented evidence that is important to understanding the World Trade Center events of 9/11.

But Prager, in my view, has gone further in other aspects of that day, and with this work, appears to be making further progress in understanding the actually technology used on the towers.

[Dennis Leahy]

Here it is:

Is's about a 500 page book, so it is broken into 2 downloads. (Jeff just noticed a "significant error on page 8, and will repair and provide a new link soon.)

Part 1: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-79644cfa.html

Part2: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-51eec327.html

Dennis


{edit} added Jeff's comments:

I don't know how to introduce a book like this one. First, it's very large.

It contains dozens of images Never Before Published of Ground Zero on 911, 9-12 and 9-13, BEFORE excavation, when just the rescue workers and their dogs were there searching for anyone that might be alive as well as bodies of those that didn't survive. This means the box beams and I-beams were as yet untouched and the im ages are extremely revealing.

These images are about 30-40 inches wide and 20-25 inches top to bottom. They're high quality, high resolution images and I had a choice.

I could reduce them, or I could PDF them such that YOU can repeatedly zoom the images and examine them in detail at full size as you've never before been able to do. I took that choice and thus, the book is divided into two large files by necessity.

But now you can examine 911 images, zooming them repeatedly, like you've never been able to do before.

The problem I've experience in the past is that lot's of people download part 1 and fewer download part 2 when I divide my books like this.

For that reason:

1. Half of the critical images are in part 1 and the other half are in part two. You'll need and want both parts.

2. The text is divided such that you'll need to read both parts to fully understand the nuclear event that 911 surely was.

To that end, using real science, real chemistry and real physics I successfully challenge the theories presented by Dr's Stephen Jones and Neils Harrit that energetic compounds, specifally the compound Dr. Jones has with a velocity of 300mps could demolish the towers. Further, this book is an open request by virtue of the text and the numerous citations, links and references, to debate Dr. Jones publicly. I'm prepared to debate Dr. Jones on the issues of nano-energetic compounds, tritium, uranium, sodium, potassium, zinc, thorium, vanadium and the other elements in the dust. Dr. Jones, thus far, has only covered tritium and very briefly, uranium. My opinion, based on the evidence in this book, is that his science is deeply flawed and I can prove this.

In that debate I can and will prove 911 was a nuclear event. Please, download both parts of this book. One part isn't sufficient without the other. You'll be glad you did. And PLEASE share these links if you feel the book is worthy.

I'm a former magazine publisher. My books are eMagazines with time consuming graphics and text referenced and cited with working links to support all of my assertions with the best science available. But they are magazines, with awesome graphics and high resolution images. Don't confuse them with books. I also make them fun to read, I hope!

[Dennis Leahy]

I see a lot of views, and it is a lot to take in so, hey, not many comments at this point makes sense.

However, I'm going to bump this a few times over the next few days - in the hope that MANY of you will not only download a copy into you own home computer, where you can read at your leisure, but that you will also post the two links on other forums and your Facebook profiles, and 'tweet' the links, ... hell, print a copy and nail it onto the door of the Vatican. (Why not?)

Dennis

[Bo Atkinson]

Thanks Dennis and all the good people who will help document this *************** event.

I couldn't stop scanning through all the photos for starters. The 'pit' photos were the "most new and captivating" to me. I liked the Russian researcher's pdf on bedrock-buried-nukes, of last year, except photo evidence was sparse back then.... That said, the alledged 50-70 meter deep pit does seem possible in these photos. Nevertheless, whatever terms are to be given, the forces involved are highly directional-- Buried under bedrock, the dustification starts atop the buildings. No? The other weird effect, burnt cars and hurricane effects point back to remarkable, 'unexplained' energy effects.... The full disclosure of which may yet reveal more about available energies for human kind. Or who knows some sort of disclosures, as yet unexpected. Thanks.

[Debra]

Absolutely, glad you give the order here. I was actually going to ask. I will have more to say when I finish Dennis, however I am so impressed by how the work is presented. The magazine format is visually compelling as well, and hopefully will attract a much wider audience because of this.

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
I see a lot of views, and it is a lot to take in so, hey, not many comments at this point makes sense.

However, I'm going to bump this a few times over the next few days - in the hope that MANY of you will not only download a copy into you own home computer, where you can read at your leisure, but that you will also post the two links on other forums and your Facebook profiles, and 'tweet' the links, ... hell, print a copy and nail it onto the door of the Vatican. (Why not?)

Dennis

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
Here it is:

Is's about a 500 page book, so it is broken into 2 downloads. (Jeff just noticed a "significant error on page 8, and will repair and provide a new link soon.)

Part 1: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-79644cfa.html

Part2: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-51eec327.html

Dennis

Thank-you, Jeff Prager, if you read this.

Thank-you, thank-you, Dennis for posting this.

(Dang - stack of reading material keeps growing .)

[ThePythonicCow]

I put copies of this on my web server, at:

• http://avalonlibrary.net/Paul/Jeff_P...rica_Nuked.pdf
• http://avalonlibrary.net/Paul/Jeff_P...rica_Nuked.pdf

[Selene]

I've only just started reading this, but Prager's book is a bombshell must-read for sure.

I do hope that Prager will also format and distribute Nuked! inexpensively via Kindle Fire, so that it can be widely downloaded from Amazon.com with color graphics intact. This present PDF format is a bit difficult to read on my PC - but I'll keep reading, that's for sure. Kindle books can be published for free on Amazon. This book deserves the widest possible circulation.

Cheers,

Selene

[Selene]

Here's the chapter summary of Part One. If this doesn't convince you to keep reading, I don't know what will....

Chapter Summary of Part One: Nuked! by Jeff Prager


Part One Conclusions

1. Leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma, three rare cancers, have increased dramatically and in an unprecedented number [among first responders] ; frequency and rapidity in very young age groups never seen before.

2. All three of these cancers, increasing together in a select population have previously always indicated radiation exposure. The CDC study (K25 Workers), Chernobyl, Nagasaki and Hiroshima data are all conclusive and in agreement on this issue as well.

[See: Robert W. Miller, M.D., and William J. Blot, Ph.D., and others, US National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Japanese National Institute Of Health Of The Ministry Of Health And Welfare, Atomic Radiation, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Also see Ionizing Radiation 911, parts 1, 2 and 3 linked on a previous page. Also see: CDC study of K25 workers linked previously]

3. Increases in these cancers using September 11th as the ‘start date,’ specifically and most importantly; Leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma along with increases in esophageal, prostate & thyroid cancers with all of them very rapid increases often in young and otherwise healthy people indicates clearly, without ambiguity and with certainty that further study into a radioactive component of some type and design is critically required.

4. The government, in all its wisdom, decided not to cover cancer in the Zadroga Bill while cancer deaths in First Responders are exploding like the Twin Towers on 911.

5. The EPA, Congress and the military and other governmental and environmental agencies responsible for the disaster cleanup knew from the very beginning that the dust in New York City was highly toxic, caustic and contained 100s of known human poisons. Very few people knew it was radioactive. My personal opinion is that certain members of government and private organizations knew.

6. I believe it was known early on by the mainstream medical community that radiation was a factor. I emailed over 500 oncologists or people in the Oncology Departments at Sloan Kettering and Mount Sinai Hospitals, Cancer Section, with copies of pages 19-42 of the free e Magazine titled, “Dust” and I also posted it to the CDC and NISOH web sites (link for source to original ‘short’ document below) on March 14th, 2011, in a reformatted style to accommodate CDC and NIOSH web site requirements.

Source:
http://www.datafilehost.com/download-94750b11.html

7. Parts 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 will show that there are and were bombs tested that were ‘salted’ such or designed such that over 97% of their radiation was eliminated from the detonation. There was radiation, but not much, not easily measurable without sophisticated equipment, certainly not with a Geiger Counter, and not long-lasting. And it wasn't alpha, beta or gamma radiation; these are the types we usually measure. But enough to kill people, as we’re seeing now. It was neutron radiation.

8. The following chapters will prove a lot more. The reasoning by Dr. Jones and others used to explain the high levels of tritium are scientific frauds and we prove that here.

After Conclusions - Me and Dr. Jones

9. Although Dr. Jones addressed the following issues partially, loosely, imperfectly in a fragmented manner using poor science that is just good enough to fool most people, he failed to adequately and properly address the increased uranium, thorium (two elements found only in radioactive form) tritium and the high levels of zinc, barium, strontium, vanadium, and especially potassium and sodium (these 2 are crucial) among other elements found in the dust as the levels increase and decrease together across 35 sampled locations by the USGS. Dr. Jones failed to use the Product Momentum Correlation and the ‘t’ test statistic, formulas he’s intimately familiar with, to discuss the various levels of these elements as they are seen in the dust, “together”.

Nanotechnology
10. Forty years of technology has come and gone since 1961 (up until 2001) so we’ll also examine nanotechnology in subsequent chapters because the nuclear industry grabbed hold of miniaturization even more quickly than the Metastable Intermolecular Compound (nanothermite or MIC) industry and well before. Why wouldn't they? Atomic grenades were coming down the pike. It was only a matter of time. The Davy Crockett, as you’ll see in the next chapter, was a watermelon-sized nuclear bomb launched from a 3-man tripod style grenade launcher. 40 years later we have apples. But very, very special apples based on a deuterium-tritium design.

Dr. Stephen Jones himself studied Muon Catalyzed Fusion for the US Department of Energy in critical detail and is intimately knowledgeable in this area.

This report will further show that Dr. Jones’ studies in muon catalyzed fusion involved deuterium, uranium and tritium which produce uranium and tritium as a by-product of fission and fusion and were both found in high amounts in NYC. This report will suggest that Dr. Jones should be fully aware of the nuclear component to the events of 911 based on the reasoning presented herein. Since he’s obviously not and further seeks to hide the nuclear component the only logical explanation is that he’s been tasked with covering it up.

11. Lawrence Livermore has a long history of developing new materials, fabrication techniques, and characterization and diagnostic methods to address the important national problems it is asked to solve. From miniaturizing nuclear weapons in the late 1950s to proving fusion ignition on a laboratory scale five decades later, Livermore’s can-do attitude consistently meets with success. 911 is certainly proof of that.

[Bo Atkinson]

Well, i actually got through it all and with close interest, via text-to-mp3..... I listened while i work at my humble concrete project and weeding the garden before the planting, up here in the northern cold. Actually a good environment to 'ground' out the electronic noise, which intentionally infects our world today.

The nuke aspect interested me the most. Prager powerfully presents available history on nano-technology and it sounded informed and relevant to me. His suggestion of apple sized nuke devices does sound applicable in a generalized sense. I almost felt inspired to graphically model it as my mind enjoys visual complexity. I'm not so sure he nor anyone else has at hand, the complete tech data to prove this nuke version in court. Yet Prager does sound able to win a debate with Dr Jones. Not that i claim precise knowledge here.

I could go on and on, but as an artist really, my expectation is that my words are of less interest. Foremost, though, let me thank Prager for his work efforts and a struggle that we all should share, truth over power.

If we were to compare and meld tech details with visualizations, with leading theories out there, count me in. Yet from my stance, i would rather visualize it all in sort of a chart form, since most people know how to search out key words and this exercise, (in my preference) would be to fast-scroll through the comparisons within categories, of 911 theory.

Thanks to Avalon supporters too!

PS- A long-trusted, scholarly friend of mine has warned me today, that there might be some sort of plagiarism involved or perhaps it was lack of needed citations.... I received several comments and don't want to spend days on this matter, scanning here and studying there. So i will leave it Mr Prager to handle his own public image. I'm not an eagle-eyed proof-reader to scan through and verify scholarly matters. Yet i would respect that long established institution, which handles things with strict protocol. My focus is visualization of physics and creative interpretations. I want to be authentic and can remain honest with artistic license. I'm very limited in publishing skills. The apple-sized nukes appeal like old stories of suitcase nukes, but such a scenario still would require directed-energy, to prevent too much sideways-propulsion... In order to match the evidence of very little adjacent damage).

[gripreaper]

I dunno, you don't think a handful of nomads with box cutters and a couple gallons of jet fuel dropped two steel and concrete buildings at free fall speed, with zero resistance, pulverizing 200 million tons of concrete into dust, stacking all the steel beams in 30 foot lengths within the footprint of the building, without a single trace of any office equipment or anything else, and partially burning automobiles miles away, is the official story?