David Wilcock "DIVINE INTERVENTION: Section I -- Defeating Financial Tyranny"

[felixq78]

It's not Marrs, that's obvious and in any case Drake's told us that he's retired military. Why try to identify him, do we want him killed ? No of course not so let's forget about who he may be and concentrate on bringing this plan to fruition. It's going to happen, 80% to 90% of the military are behind it so who'd be suicidal enough to point a weapon at the US military not to mention the millions of armed US citizens. Hopefully it won't come to a shooting war, it shouldn't they are legally covered by the US constitution to remove the criminal bankers/corporate robbers and send them to jail on behalf of the US population. I'll only start to worry if the arrests don't go to the top of the pyramid and stay concentrated on the pawns.

[Mozart]

Posted by alxz (here)
D.W was going to make an transcript of the interview with drake ASAP he said. Have u seen? cant listen to the interview without it.. :/

alxz ~

I'm the dude who did the editing and coordinating for the transcript that you have referred to that has been produced by the Divine Cosmos Keyboard Commandos.

I have sent the 'script to David and he's working on it right now. It should be posted soonest, in a matter of hours, or tomorrow (Wed, the 4th) at the latest ... that's my best guess.

[charlesfrith]

The very idea of announcing 'arrests' beforehand is absurd... agreed.

Also it makes reasonable sense that the clampdown could be the elites battening down the hatches and using Drake as disinformation so the new agers celebrate their own imprisonment... which is not so fantastic it couldn't' happen.

[sunnyrap]

I agree, Revere, this YouTube out of Russia had 4million+ views:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=KgoapkOo4vg

[Alie]

Posted by sunnyrap (here)
i agree, revere, this youtube out of russia had 4million+ views:

awesome video - i'm a sucker for dance.

[sdv]

Bill, I really do agree with your message. I researched the International Court in the Hague, and what Drake is saying makes no sense, because the Court would have no jurisdiction in the matter of Pennsylvania, etc declaring itself independent. There are just so many holes in his story.
But David Wilcock used to be a meticulous researcher with an encyclopedic memory, and he used to play a significant part in helping people wake up and think for themselves and question ....
I think that the manipulation is perhaps having an audience that craves and even demands more and more sensation, and a couple of manipulative people who are not necessarily part of a wider conspiracy.
But in the long run I wonder if this Divine Intervention saga is not simply going to be used to justify and strengthen the oppression of people by immoral governments (public and secret).

[sdv]

By the way, a lot of the resignations could be because of burnout. I was in the corporate world where increasing profits and being the biggest and the best was the only agenda. I burnt out. I was part of a brilliant and talented management team. Not none of us is left in that company and all my staff (the best I have ever worked with) have gone as well.
A significant number of resignations could be because that is what psychopaths do - they create havoc and destroy and then they leave.
The arrests are a good sign that somewhere in this world there are still people with a conscience and the will to try to put right what went terribly wrong in our world.
I stayed up last night reading John Pilger and Joseph Stiglitz - a sobering reminder of just how unjust the world has become!
And yes, from what I have read about how the United States Empire works, a military plan probably does exist, but are you all forgetting that part of the problem is the military aggression of this same empire? Look at Africa where liberators have now become the very people that are destroying the continent with corruption and oppression and be very wary of liberators who promise miracles and ask the people to simply stay calm and follow orders!

[karelia]

Posted by sdv (here)
<snip> I researched the International Court in the Hague, and what Drake is saying makes no sense, because the Court would have no jurisdiction in the matter of Pennsylvania, etc declaring itself independent.

From my understanding, it is not about the IC having jurisdiction but about informing an "authority" of regained sovereignty. If you, as an individual, reclaim your sovereignty, you would send your declaration to the United Nations, for example, amongst other places, such as the "authority" that issues birth certificates, driving licenses, etc, depending on your nationality. So for Pennsylvania, a state, it makes perfect sense to inform the International Court of its regained sovereignty.

[sdv]

Karelia, that is not the purpose of the IC. The authority to go to is the United Nations. The IC is an instrument of the United Nations but it does not deal with matters such as this. This is the jurisdiction of the court:
The International Court of Justice acts as a world court. The Court has a dual jurisdiction : it decides, in accordance with international law, disputes of a legal nature that are submitted to it by States (jurisdiction in contentious cases); and it gives advisory opinions on legal questions at the request of the organs of the United Nations or specialized agencies authorized to make such a request (advisory jurisdiction).
Since Pennsylvania has not been recognised as a State by the United Nations, the Court has no jurisdiction in this matter as a dispute. Since Pennsylvania is not an organ of the United Nations nor an authorised specialised agency, the Court has no jurisdiction over this matter.
Even if Pennsylvania did unilaterally declare itself independent, was recognised as such by the United Nations and then was in dispute with the United States about this, the United States has not recognised the jusrisdiction of the Court as compulsory.

[karelia]

Like I said, it is NOT about jurisdiction.

[sdv]

Karelia, it is about jurisdiction. What is the purpose of informing an authority that it has regained sovereignty other than the authority to recognise that regained sovereignty, and the International Court cannot do that because it does not have the jurisdiction to do so. What Drake claims has been done is a meaningless gesture.

Have a look at the matter of Palestine: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-17602425

In the case of Kosovo, the United Nations appealed to the ICJ for an advisory opinion, which is why the ICJ did accept the case (however, an advisory opinion is not binding). This was the result:
On July 22, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion on the following question posed to it by Serbia: "Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo in accordance with international law?" By a 10-4 majority, the court ruled that, because "general international law contains no applicable prohibition of declarations of independence", Kosovo’s declaration of independence in February 2008, coordinated with and supported by the American and most EU governments and subsequently recognized by 69 countries, "did not violate general international law." The clear implication is that no declarations of independence violate international law and that all are therefore "legal".
Do you understand why it is meaningless for Pennsylvania to have lodged papers with the IJC?

[Jean-Luc]

You might think this is off topic. In fact, I think it simply goes along with it.
Major changes are in the air.


Basically : Meanwhile, the diffusion of Keshe Foundation's breathrough new understanging of the building blocks of matter and of our Universe is steadily making its way and being disclosed to an ever wider public.

More information on the Keshe Foundation thread where I just posted this.

[Mozart]

Posted by sdv (here)
By the way, a lot of the resignations could be because of burnout.

*sigh*

I was able to make a graph using MS Word, but I was not able to transfer the image into this post.

Anyway, corporate burnout has always happened in the corporate world, so people leaving corporations has always happened at the rate of about 2,000 resignations per quarter, per the EDGAR stats in the SEC, which requires corporations to file paperwork for every single resignation of CEOs and CFOs in corporations.

So, in lieu of an inserted graph, I'm going to have to make-do.

The average CEO/CFO resignations has been 2,000 per quarter for many years, ok?

Each "X" represents 400 resignations, ok?

1st Quarter 2011
XXXXX (2,000

2nd Quarter, 2011
XXXXX (2,000)

3rd Quarter, 2011
XXXXXXXXXX (4,000)

4th Quarter, 2011
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX (7,000)

1st Quarter, 2012
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX (16,000)


So, this is a MASSIVE jump in the corporate resignations. Did corporate burnout suddenly jump EIGHT-FOLD in just a few months? 800%?

No.

This ad-hoc chart shows that there is something ELSE going on. That's a HUGE jump!

What could it be?

Now, I edited/coordinated the Drake transcript, but since it's not yet been published, I cannot take quotes and paste them here, so I'll have to recap without quotes.

Drake got on the radio show and laid out the basic sovereignty information in May/June of 2011 and that was at the end of the second quarter of 2011.

Somebody in Pennsylvania took notes and sent off the paperwork to the Hague sometime in June, 2011. The entire paperwork process (for the majority of the Original Thirteen Colonies) was done by July/Aug, 2011. This was before the end of the third quarter of 2011 ... and notice that the rate of resignations DOUBLED in that quarter, so I think that the whole paperwork process probably was all done by no later than mid-July, 2011.

Then in the final quarter of 2011, the rate nearly DOUBLED again.

Then in the first quarter of 2012, the rate MORE THAN DOUBLED again.

So, in total, the rate has OCTUPLED from the average, normal rate of 2,000 resignations per quarter to 16,000+ in the first quarter of 2012.

SOMETHING ELSE is going on other than corporate burnout.

The vast majority of those corporations are closely tied into the central core set of the 147 corporations that have direct connections to the 2nd-tier of 3,000+ corporations in which the core set of corporations have direct control/directorship over.

Then there's the 3rd tier of many thousands of additional corporations that have profited massively from their connecting to the core tier and 2nd tier of corporations that are closely tied in with the Illoonynaughties.

Those rats are now jumping ship since they have lost their protection, now that the Illoonynaughties now will soon no longer effectively control the US military.

The MAJORITY of those in the US military are the good guys -- even if they don't know it -- and they would immediately align with the good guys who are in the know about The Plan that has been planned by the insider good guys for decades.

As Drake pointed out, there is an enormous amount of tactical positioning going on right now, so once the green light is issued and the initial arrest actions are taken, then the MAJORITY of the huge bunch of good guys in the US military will align with this movement and be available to assist.

Then you must consider that the good guys would have effective control of the Pentagon, so when that happens, there ain't a damn spot on Earth to which the bad guys can run to and hide themselves, or the money that they'd take with them.

Many guys in Special Forces will fully support the good guys, so just about all the goddamn Illoonynaughties will be apprehended, arrested and put into those FEMA camps while they await trial.

[Earth Angel]

Excellent work Mozart, even without the graph!!!

[Mozart]

Ok, about the debate over the jurisdiction of the ICJ.

What the paperwork that Pennsylvania team of American Patriots did was that it forced the ICJ -- that wears the hats of the Common Law and the Admiralty system of "laws" -- to RECOGNIZE that the inhabitants (notice that I used this word, instead of the "residents" word) of the Original Thirteen Colonies have declared themselves sovereign, thus, in effect, REBIRTHED the beloved Declaration of Independence.

The problem with the original Declaration of Independence was that it died when the last signatory who signed the document died, so it was no longer in effect.

So it was critical that the people who live in the Original Thirteen Colonies -- not officials with big-assed titles, not politicians, not corporate guys -- simple people within those states that were once those Original Thirteen Colonies to sign the paperwork that was accepted by the ICJ, per their rules, thus such paperwork now STANDS AS INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT AND AS LAW within the Common Law framework **AND** the Admiralty color-of-law framework.

Through the color-of-law adhesion contracts -- the Social Security numbers, driver licenses, voter registration, etc, etc -- the people had been converted into mere legal-fiction "persons", who are fully subject to the jurisdiction of the unlawful 14th Amendment and fully under the thumb of the color-of-law system that built on a massive base of duped, ignorant persons.

So when the few persons/signatories completed their Notification Process with the ICJ, they then were able to throw off the horrible yoke of corporate personhood and were reborn as We the People, who stand AT THE TOP of the power structure in the Common Law and the Organic Constitution of 1787, as Lawfully amended.

ANYBODY, ANY agent acting within the color-of-law system, or the color-of-law system itself has NO EFFECT, NO JURISDICTION over anyone who is a part of the We the People because the People -- each one -- is sovereign within a sovereign nation-state that exists within the Common Law that encompasses the Organic Constitution of 1787, as Lawfully amended.

Note that Drake said that everything was done to try to stop the process by the many agents of the Illoonynaughties within the ICJ, but the paperwork proceeded and was completed.

It has been a long-accepted tenet in the realm of law that when someone makes a formal, public declaration without any subsequent controverting of such a declaration, such a declaration would stand as fact within the framework of the Common Law. Every single newspaper of record in America has the "Legal Notices" column in the classifieds section that is used for this purpose.

Since the ICJ wears both the Common Law and the color-of-law hats, it HAS TO allow the Common-Law-based paperwork to be completed by the inhabitants of the Original Thirteen Colonies, as long as such paperwork was properly completed, per the protocols of the ICJ paperwork procedures.

By virtue of the completed paperwork, the inhabitants of the Original Thirteen Colonies had, in effect, rebirthed the Declaration of the Independence -- the very document that their own forefathers signed in their respective states/colonies -- and made it FACT AND LAW within the Common Law framework.

And BECAUSE the ICJ wears the hats of both jurisdictions, the color-of-law system is FORCED to recognize the validity of the rebirthed Declaration of Independence via the declaration of sovereignty within the framework of the ICJ system, in which the vast majority of the world's nations are signatories.

It does NOT matter if the USA, Inc does not recognize this new declaration by the inhabitants of the because the new declaration of sovereignty has not been controverted by the USA, Inc, nor by anybody else.

And the USA, Inc **CAN'T** controvert the new declaration, because if they tried to do so, they'd expose themselves very badly, so they are caught in an impossible bind, hence the fleeing of the rats jumping off the corporate ships.

The jig is up. The game is over. The corporate bastards have lost the game.

[Kimberley]

Posted by Mozart (here)

The jig is up. The game is over. The corporate bastards have lost the game.

Mozart bravo!!! Thank you for your great information!! And I am with you, it's a done deal!

Much love!

[karelia]

Thank you, Mozart. That is a most excellent explanation!

[xbusymom]

Posted by charlesfrith (here)
The very idea of announcing 'arrests' beforehand is absurd... agreed.

Also it makes reasonable sense that the clampdown could be the elites battening down the hatches and using Drake as disinformation so the new agers celebrate their own imprisonment... which is not so fantastic it couldn't' happen.

That may very well be true... but I still like my fantasy version better...

and here is another flash mob I liked...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8GfrfDmXDb0

EDIT:

Posted by Mozart (here)
Ok, about the debate over the jurisdiction of the ICJ.

What the paperwork that Pennsylvania team of American Patriots did was that it forced the ICJ -- that wears the hats of the Common Law and the Admiralty system of "laws" -- to RECOGNIZE that the inhabitants (notice that I used this word, instead of the "residents" word) of the Original Thirteen Colonies have declared themselves sovereign, thus, in effect, REBIRTHED the beloved Declaration of Independence.

The problem with the original Declaration of Independence was that it died when the last signatory who signed the document died, so it was no longer in effect.

So it was critical that the people who live in the Original Thirteen Colonies -- not officials with big-assed titles, not politicians, not corporate guys -- simple people within those states that were once those Original Thirteen Colonies to sign the paperwork that was accepted by the ICJ, per their rules, thus such paperwork now STANDS AS INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT AND AS LAW within the Common Law framework **AND** the Admiralty color-of-law framework.

Through the color-of-law adhesion contracts -- the Social Security numbers, driver licenses, voter registration, etc, etc -- the people had been converted into mere legal-fiction "persons", who are fully subject to the jurisdiction of the unlawful 14th Amendment and fully under the thumb of the color-of-law system that built on a massive base of duped, ignorant persons.

So when the few persons/signatories completed their Notification Process with the ICJ, they then were able to throw off the horrible yoke of corporate personhood and were reborn as We the People, who stand AT THE TOP of the power structure in the Common Law and the Organic Constitution of 1787, as Lawfully amended.

ANYBODY, ANY agent acting within the color-of-law system, or the color-of-law system itself has NO EFFECT, NO JURISDICTION over anyone who is a part of the We the People because the People -- each one -- is sovereign within a sovereign nation-state that exists within the Common Law that encompasses the Organic Constitution of 1787, as Lawfully amended.

Note that Drake said that everything was done to try to stop the process by the many agents of the Illoonynaughties within the ICJ, but the paperwork proceeded and was completed.

It has been a long-accepted tenet in the realm of law that when someone makes a formal, public declaration without any subsequent controverting of such a declaration, such a declaration would stand as fact within the framework of the Common Law. Every single newspaper of record in America has the "Legal Notices" column in the classifieds section that is used for this purpose.

Since the ICJ wears both the Common Law and the color-of-law hats, it HAS TO allow the Common-Law-based paperwork to be completed by the inhabitants of the Original Thirteen Colonies, as long as such paperwork was properly completed, per the protocols of the ICJ paperwork procedures.

By virtue of the completed paperwork, the inhabitants of the Original Thirteen Colonies had, in effect, rebirthed the Declaration of the Independence -- the very document that their own forefathers signed in their respective states/colonies -- and made it FACT AND LAW within the Common Law framework.

And BECAUSE the ICJ wears the hats of both jurisdictions, the color-of-law system is FORCED to recognize the validity of the rebirthed Declaration of Independence via the declaration of sovereignty within the framework of the ICJ system, in which the vast majority of the world's nations are signatories.

It does NOT matter if the USA, Inc does not recognize this new declaration by the inhabitants of the because the new declaration of sovereignty has not been controverted by the USA, Inc, nor by anybody else.

And the USA, Inc **CAN'T** controvert the new declaration, because if they tried to do so, they'd expose themselves very badly, so they are caught in an impossible bind, hence the fleeing of the rats jumping off the corporate ships.

The jig is up. The game is over. The corporate bastards have lost the game.

So ... as I understand it... the constitution and DOI is only effective as a PERSONAL/GROUP STATEMENT OF FACT that the courts will never have controversy with because of the evidence of natural people never becoming their fictional corporate entities... and it must be renewed periodically when the covered parties cease to be covered (upon their death) as well as any new people/groups needing to get their own coverage statement(s)??

is that the gist of it???

[YvonneG]

Mozart...you rock! Thank you...People need to understand. Most folks not aware of these aspects are drawing a lot of needless conclusions. Thank you so much.

[Earth Angel]

well all I gotta say is...........

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XgDrJ5Z2rKw

and I love the time on this clip 2:22