(Classified) NORAD satellite Video of Missile Hitting the Pentagon..!

[seeingterra]

A site with some useful information and graphics:
http://www.newsfollowup.com/flight77_24.htm

I am wondering, does anyone here actually believe a plane hit the pentagon (even remote controlled) ?

Cause even when I was 13 in 2001 I asked "where the hell did the plane go?" .. lol

[seeingterra]

High res images of immediate aftermath:
http://publicintelligence.net/911-pe...lution-photos/



No parts, no plane, that is what I see.. Especially judging from the state of the lawn outside which is the most apparent to me. Though on birds-eye pics (seen in the first link among other places) you can see what looks like the effect a rocket booster has on a lawn.. If you know your stuff you can even calculate approx speed of the object using that for analyses. Naturally this is too late now, but it only adds to the unanswered questions in this very open case.

[ponda]

Posted by jaybee (here)

Posted by Selene (here)
Jaybee ~

Posted by Jaybee
If he [Duff] is basing it on the 'missile hit' video, that I have proved to be a hoax, then yes, it must be false....

You have done nothing of the sort here. Not at all.

Instead, you’ve done the old “bait and switch” disinfo tactic: set up a second straw man (i.e. the video you posted), knock it down as a “hoax” and hope that somehow the reader will mistakenly infer that the original video under discussion here is false as well. And, oh by the way, so is Gordon Duff.

The video that I posted from 2007 is clearly the same video that is used in Duff's video. Although when they go in for the close up it gets blurred.


This is a screen shot taken from the video in the Gordon Duff article...




hear is the screen shot I posted from the 2007 video...showing that the point of impact is in the WRONG place.





note that there are the same numbers on it...0205...maybe the date of the original? Feb 05?....and there's that little white arrow.


I don't know how much clearer I can make the point that I am making.


Gordon Duff said what he said and used the video to back up his claim...but the video is a hoax and shows the wrong 'impact' position.


this is what he said....."The following video shows a cruise type missile hitting the Pentagon. It was taken from a NORAD satellite at great distance. How do we know? We just do."


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04...t-be-silenced/






.

And here's the "Stock" footage that was used to make the fake missile video.After watching the 'stock' footage it appears that it must of have been filmed several years prior to 911.When compared to the image posted in post 7 one can see that a white overhead walkway that is located on the right hand edge of the Pentagon is not in the 'stock' footage and the nearby trees seem to be smaller.


35mm Stock Footage of Washington DC aerials (if the video won't play then it can be watched from the link below)



http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...+footage&hl=en




Aftermath image from Pentagon on 911

[jaybee]

.


Excellent find and observations Ponda......many thanks for that!....





IMO, Gordon Duff has been caught red-handed trying to manipulate and deceive.

So why would he do that?

I, personally, think it is to keep the 9/11 Inside Job Conspiracy meme going . And to mess with our heads. But on this occasion he has failed and has exposed himself.



@Selene...(re post 39)....apology accepted and appreciated.....thanks.


.

[RMorgan]

Thank you ponda!! This is what I call a fiasco!!!

Cheers,

Raf.

[Forevernyt]

Could it be that the video shown (I haven't watched it yet) was inverted? Just asking.