Obama's attorney admits birth certificate is fake!

[Maia Gabrial]

This one should make the Birthers feel vindicated. Obama's attorney admits the birth certificate is fake! So, just think of all the executive orders that will be null and void SOON....!
It's already making my day....

This is from Beat Obama PAC https://beatobama.us/birth-certifica...ficate-is-fake

It’s official. The man sitting in the highest public office in America is an outlaw and has no legitimate claim to the White House. Any member of the House of Representatives or the United States Senate who says that Barack Obama is a legitimate office-holder should be held to account for being part of the greatest criminal conspiracy in our history. If Mr. Obama doesn’t resign before the dust settles, or if the Congress doesn’t impeach him, we will officially be living in a nation where all semblances of law and order have broken down. Barack Obama’s own attorney says his birth certificate is a forgery.

New Jersey is one of the many states where citizens have brought legal challenges to Barack Obama’s eligibility status. If Mr. Obama is not a natural-born citizen as the overwhelming majority of Americans believe, then he cannot legitimately appear on the numerous states’ ballots in the presidential race. On April 12, 2012, Alexandra Hill – the attorney for Mr. Obama in New Jersey – told the presiding judge in open court that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery.


Ms. Hill, an associate attorney at Genova, Burns & Giantomasi Attorneys in Newark, told the judge that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is such a poor forgery that it should be thrown out as evidence. In other words, the fake birth certificate can’t be used to prove that Mr. Obama is not a natural-born citizen, because it is a fake birth certificate. The full details of the case are here.

It gets even worse. Ms. Hill then argued that the judge should not look to petty nuisances such as the United States Constitution to determine Barack Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot. She told the judge that Mr. Obama’s political popularity is all that is necessary to determine his validity as a candidate. She also argued that the fact that he was elected once already (fraudulently) automatically places him on the ballot by default. She stated, “No law in New Jersey obligated him to produce any such evidence in order to get on the primary ballot.”

In spite of the bombshell admission, no mainstream news outlet has covered what happened at the trial yet. Judge Jeff Masin blocked the case and basically told the plaintiffs that it’s now up to the New Jersey Secretary of State to decide the issue of Mr. Obama’s eligibility. Talk about judicial courage.

Mario Apuzzo, the attorney for the plaintiffs, had this to say about the incident:

“Upon my request that she so stipulate, Obama’s lawyer agreed during the trial that there was absolutely no evidence before the court as to who Obama is or where he was born, including excluding from evidence the internet image of Obama’s alleged Certificate of Live Birth he released on April 27, 2011. The ALJ confirmed that to be the case. “

This of course creates an unprecedented Constitutional crisis. Every piece of legislation and every executive order that Barack Hussein Obama has signed is now technically invalid and possibly illegal. Since he was elected on fraudulent terms, he has no legal authority to sign bills into law. And don’t get us started on the executive orders.

Obamacare is therefore an illegal order, and cannot be enforced. The National Defense Authorization Act, which allows the executive branch to use the military to arrest conservatives without a warrant and hold them without trial, is invalid. The U.S. troops which he has sent to Pakistan, Libya, Nigeria, Uganda, Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia (we’re losing track of all of them by now) and other countries for combat operations should be pulled out immediately.

He has no legal authority to do anything in the name of the people of the United States of America. Barack Hussein Obama II is an impostor and a usurper, and has no legal right to do anything from the White House. And this is by the admission of his own attorney, stated in open testimony in a court of law. What do his blind supporters have to say now, after his attorney states that the birth certificate is a forgery? Better yet, what will Congress have to say about it?

[GoodETxSG]

Very sad times here in the U.S..... what else can one say. It makes me feel quite blue that all of my family members who served to protect the Constitution and what we as a nation used to stand for... The BIG issue is going to be what to do about all of the Executive Orders and Laws passed under this President if indeed it is ever made PUBLIC that he is not a Natural Born Citizen. There will be quite a battle over whether these laws are legally NULL and VOID because of the Signature of the President. This will cause more racial problems than anything I can think of for the last 30 years. But, who knows... If David W. and all of the sources who are putting out the info about the Mass Arrests that always keep getting pushed back ever happen maybe he will be on the list. I honestly do not see how there will be anyone left in Politics if such arrests happen. Talk about a power vacuum... I digress... just one more thing to make this Native American boy shake his head.

[foreverfan]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-AAGdCHR8T4

[jorr lundstrom]

Wot a divine joke. LOL


All is well


Jorr 2.0

[GlassSteagallfan]

Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Update on the Purpura and Moran New Jersey Obama Ballot Access Objection


By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
April 10, 2012
Updated April 14, 2012

Today, April 10, 2012, Nicholas E. Purpura and Theodore T. Moran had their Barack Obama primary ballot objection heard by Deputy Director and Administrative Law Judge, Jeff S. Masin, at the Office of Administrative Law, 9 Quakerbridge Plaza, Mercerville (Hamilton Twp.), New Jersey 08619. The case started about 9:30 a.m. and lasted to about 1:00 p.m. I represented the Objectors. Mr. Obama was represented by Alexandra Hill of the firm of Genova, Burn & Giantomasi of Newark, New Jersey.

We argued that Mr. Obama has not met his burden of showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by showing that he is a “natural born Citizen.” We argued that he has not presented any evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State showing who he is and that he was born in the United States. We also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.

Obama’s attorney made a motion to dismiss the Objection in its entirety. She argued that it was not relevant to being placed on the ballot whether Mr. Obama is a “natural born Citizen,” where he was born, and whether he was born to U.S. citizen parents. She said that no law in New Jersey obligated him to produce any such evidence in order to get on the primary ballot. We argued that Mr. Obama under the Constitution has to be a “natural born Citizen.” We argued that under New Jersey law (the state constitution, statutes, and case law), Mr. Obama must show that he is qualified for the office he wishes to occupy and that includes showing that he is a “natural born Citizen,” which includes presenting evidence of who he is, where he was born, and that he was born to two U.S. citizen parents. We argued that the Secretary of State has a constitutional obligation not to place any ineligible candidates on the election ballot. Judge Masin denied Obama’s motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.

After calling to the witness stand Mr. Moran and Mr. Purpura, who gave testimony as to why they brought the ballot challenge, and introducing documents showing there is a question as to Mr. Obama’s identity, I called Brian Wilcox to testify as an internet image expert. Mr. Wilcox was going to testify on how the Obama April 27, 2011, long-form birth certificate has been altered and manipulated either by computer software or by a human or both, producing a forged documents, and that since the image is not reliable, we need to see the original paper version. Obama’s lawyer objected to my proffered testimony. I then offered that I would not need to have Mr. Wilcox testify, provided that Obama stipulated that the internet image of his birth certificate could not be used as evidence by either Judge Masin or the New Jersey Secretary of States and that he presented to the court or the Secretary of State no other evidence of his identity or place of birth. Judge Masin also asked Obama’s attorney whether she would so stipulate. She did so stipulate, agreeing that both the court and the Secretary of State cannot rely on the internet birth certificate as evidence of Obama’s place of birth and that Obama has produced no other evidence to the court regarding his place of birth. She also argued that Obama has no legal obligation to produce any such evidence to get on the primary ballot. Judge Masin then took the issue under advisement. Having produced absolutely no evidence of his eligibility for the Office of President, Judge Masin will decide whether as a matter of law Obama has a legal duty to produce such evidence before he may be placed on the New Jersey ballot in light of the pending objection filed against him. If he decides that he does, then the Objection will be successful. If he decides that Obama has no such legal obligation, the Objection would fail on the first issue.

The second issue that Judge Masin addressed was whether the definition of an Article II “natural born Citizen” includes the requirement that the child be born to two U.S. citizen parents. Judge Masin relied heavily upon the fact that no court in the nation has yet ruled that Mr. Obama had to have two U.S. citizen parents at the time of his birth. I explained that most cases regarding Mr. Obama have been ruled in his favor on procedural grounds rather than on the merits of the definition of a “natural born Citizen.” He relied heavily upon U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) and its use of the English common law to define U.S. citizenship. We also discussed the Indiana Ankeny decision and the Georgia ballot access cases. I explained how Wong did not hold that Wong was a “natural born Citizen,” but only a “citizen of the United States” under the Fourteenth Amendment which does not define an Article II “natural born Citizen.” I explained that Wong distinguished between a “citizen” and a “natural born Citizen,” explaining how Justice Gray used Horace Binney’s distinction between both classes of citizens. I argued that it is error to rely upon Wong as though it held Wong to be a “natural born Citizen.”

I argued that the Founders and Framers did not adopt the English common law to define the term, but rather natural law and the law of nations which under Article III became part of the “Laws of the United States.” I explained that the definition of a “natural born Citizen” comes from natural law and the law of nations as commented upon by Emer de Vattel in Section 212 of The Law of Nations (1758), which definition was recognized as American “common-law” in Minor v. Happersett (1875). I also explained that Wong Kim Ark confirmed Minor’s definition (a child born in a country to citizen parents) and did not change it.

I explained that Congress through the Naturalization Acts of 1790, 1795, 1802, and 1855 abrogated the English common law as the law to define U.S. citizenship and that through those acts it told us that a child born in the United States to alien parents was an alien and not a “citizen of the United States.” I went through the historical evidence, including but not limited to Emer de Vattel and St. George Tucker, which shows that the Founders and Framers defined a “natural born Citizen” as a child born in the country to citizen parents and not as the English common law defined a “natural born subject.” I explained how Madison wrote to Washington that at the constitutional convention, the delegates did not adopt the English common law for the new republic. I explained that the English common law continued to have effect in the states, even being included in their constitutions and statutes, but not on the federal level where both the Constitution and Acts of Congress did not do the same as the states did. I explained that there is a constitutional distinction between a “citizen” and a “natural born Citizen,” and that the two terms cannot be conflated and confounded as per Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 and Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, who told us that each clause of the Constitution must be given its own meaning. Judge Masin also reserved decision on the question of whether a “natural born Citizen” must be born to two U.S. citizen parents.

Judge Masin will be contacting counsel today or tomorrow morning either by telephone or email as to his decision, stating “yes” or “no” on both issues. He will then provide his written decision to the Secretary of State no later than Wednesday, April 11, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel will be able to object to Judge Masin’s initial decision. The Secretary of State will make the final decision. After her decision, the parties can then appeal to the New Jersey Appellate Division and then to the New Jersey Supreme Court. After that, the parties can appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Update:

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 states: “No person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office, who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”

New Jersey state statutes (N.J.S.A. 19:23-7 and N.J.S.A. 19:23-15) state that a person must be eligible to run for the office he or she seeks. They make no exception for someone running for the Office of President. N.J.S.A. 19:25-3 provides that a presidential candidate does not have to file his or her consent to be nominated for that office. But the statute does not say that such candidate does not have to show under the previous cited statutes that he or she is eligible for the office sought.

Additionally, the New Jersey Secretary of State instructions on her web site to presidential candidates running in the New Jersey primary tell them they must be “natural born Citizens.”

New Jersey statute N.J.S.A. 19:29-1(b) provides that voters can contest the New Jersey election of any candidate who is not eligible for the office he or she seeks.

Upon my request that she so stipulate, Obama’s lawyer agreed during the trial that there was absoulutely no evidence before the court as to who Obama is or where he was born, including excluding from evidence the internet image of Obama’s alleged Certificate of Live Birth he released on April 27, 2011. The ALJ confirmed that to be the case.

Yet, in his decision, the ALJ said that because he does not have to consent to his nomination it did not matter who Obama is or where he may be born because he has no legal obligation to show that he is constitutionally eligible to run in the New Jersey primary for the Office of President.

Not only did he say that Obama has no legal duty to provide the State of New Jersey with any evidence that he is constitutionally eligible to be placed on the New Jersey primary ballot for election to the Office of President, the ALJ also said: “Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.” Initial Decision, p. 7. Dr. Conspiracy, in light of the fact that there was absolutely no evidence before the ALJ as to where Obama was born, must be so embarrassed by the finding of the court that at his blog he tries to tell us that it is not true that the ALJ found Obama to be born in Hawaii. But on the contrary, from the quoted language, we can conclude that the ALJ found that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore based on that fact alone and with no reference to the citizenship of his parents, found that he is a “natural born Citizen.” But he made the finding that he was born in Hawaii without providing any explanation as to what evidence he relied upon to make such a finding. His Initial Decision is silent as to what evidence he relied upon to find that Obama was born in Hawaii. Also, the ALJ relied strictly upon U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) to rule that Obama, born to an alien father, is a “natural born Citizen.”

On April 12, 2012, Secretary of State, Kimberly M. Guadagno, issued her Final Decision in Nicholas E. Purpura and Theodore T. Moran v. Barack Obama New Jersey Primary Ballot Objection. A copy of her decision may be read here, http://www.scribd.com/puzo1/d/894313...ection-4-12-12 . She concludes without any explanation: “After full consideration of the record and a review of the exceptions filed, I hereby adopt the ALJ’s Initial Decision in its entirety.”

The next step is an appeal directly to the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
April 10, 2011
Update April 9, 2012
Updagted April 12, 2012
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
####

Copyright © 2012
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
All Rights Reserved


Posted by Puzo1 at 3:17 PM 69 comments Links to this post

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Important links concerning this post:

https://beatobama.us/birth-certifica...ficate-is-fake

http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/...amage-control/

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

////////////////////////////////////////////

The videos to be confiscated and supressed:

https://youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=OwmfisorUcc

https://youtube.com/watch?v=AHKJQ...layer_embedded

https://youtube.com/watch?v=JohAu...layer_embedded


Get copies of these videos before YouTube deletes them

[sdv]

No, his attorney did not 'admit' that his birth certificate is fake at all. She said that the arguement is irrelevant. The following paragraph is hearsay and is probably misinterpreted, or needs to be interpreted within the law and the context:

“Upon my request that she so stipulate, Obama’s lawyer agreed during the trial that there was absolutely no evidence before the court as to who Obama is or where he was born, including excluding from evidence the internet image of Obama’s alleged Certificate of Live Birth he released on April 27, 2011. The ALJ confirmed that to be the case. “

I do accept, although I don't understand, that this issue is of primary importance to Americans, but to outsiders it is bemusing and amusing. If this is the great crime that Obama is accused of then it is a bit of a joke! Well, I suppose you tried to impeach a president because of sexual misdeamenour as well!

Don't Americans care that he violated and disrespected the soveriegnity of Pakistan with the whole Osama bin Laden incident? It's outrageous that a country could have done this. To outsiders this is what makes the USA the most dangerous threat to world peace, and this is the great betrayal of Obama. (This is just one example.)

[markpierre]

Geeze...you'd get fired from Wall-Mart for producing a fake ID wouldn't you?

What if you'd already sold a few bras and lawnmowers?'
'
And furthermore; how could they not know it would be an issue?

And furthermore; if you need a fake birth certificate, you don't get the lady who makes the coffee
to go find you one.

[BlueGem]

This should be going viral! What a storm this could create... a great outcome can arise from this change!

Also, I l couldn't help but notice the article writers name is Mario Apuzzo. The author of 'The Godfather' is Mario Puzo.

[Maia Gabrial]

“Upon my request that she so stipulate, Obama’s lawyer agreed during the trial that there was absolutely no evidence before the court as to who Obama is or where he was born, including excluding from evidence the internet image of Obama’s alleged Certificate of Live Birth he released on April 27, 2011. The ALJ confirmed that to be the case. “
I do accept, although I don't understand, that this issue is of primary importance to Americans, but to outsiders it is bemusing and amusing. If this is the great crime that Obama is accused of then it is a bit of a joke! Well, I suppose you tried to impeach a president because of sexual misdeamenour as well!

Don't Americans care that he violated and disrespected the soveriegnity of Pakistan with the whole Osama bin Laden incident? It's outrageous that a country could have done this. To outsiders this is what makes the USA the most dangerous threat to world peace, and this is the great betrayal of Obama. (This is just one example.)

To someone who's not an American, you wouldn't understand how this defiles our Constitution and our country. Think of this as happening in your country and see how you react to it...
This is a serious matter when such deceit can make its way unhindered to the highest office in the land.... What I read is that the lawyer "agreed" that absolutely no evidence of who Obama was or where he was born" was presented in court. And YES he DOES have to provide the information we, the citizens of America demand. He is an ELECTED official, not a law unto himself.
The sooner we rid ourselves of Prez BO the better. It would be wonderful to have him impeached for all of his illegal activities, so we can imprison him. He should not be dismissed like some school girl with a slap on the wrist. Not only has he hurt America, but every other country on the planet. For that he should be held accountable....
I hope the Appellate Court will have better sense than this ALJ....IMO the ALJ is one of the elite buttkissers....And if he has been bought off, he may find himself part of the mass arrests....

For the record, the US has always been a dangerous threat to the world. It's just now that everyone is seeing the depth of the deceptions. Believe me, we Americans DO care about what's being done in our name by this criminal bunch in our govt. WE want it to stop as much as the other countries do....And We ARE doing something about it now....!

[crosby]

well said Maia Gabrial.
regards, corson

[Operator]

Ok, here's another view on this debacle ...

They've been pushing themselves to lift the veil on this ... almost gave it on a silver platter and yet no consequences (yet !).

What if ...
Someone planned Obama to be there obeying the orders from behind the curtain, toeing the line of TPTB for 4 years giving them
the impression that their will be done all that time. Then at the final moment they pull the rug away under all these plans rendering
all the executive orders etc. as null and void. TPTB lost 4 years on their agenda which will make them miss a threshold date for their
final moves. ... Checkmate ?

Just a thought ...

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Operator (here)
Then at the final moment they pull the rug away under all these plans rendering
all the executive orders etc. as null and void. TPTB lost 4 years on their agenda which will make them miss a threshold date for their
final moves. ... Checkmate ?

I don't think we can just erase four years of administration, law and regulation, like it never happened.

I figure that the best we can do is to proceed forward from where we are, hopefully with few more clues and a few less crooks.

[webyourstuff]

This is a crock.

I heard the managing clerk from the town/city hall where Obama was born interviewed about this. She was repeatedly asked variations of the question "why won't you prove Obama was born here (USA). She was flabergasted. She kept saying variations of the statement "I HAVE, haven't I? This document here proves it."

For the nay-sayers, they seem to believe if they say it loud enough, long enough, the can make it true.

Frankly, I like Obama.

[Operator]

Posted by Paul (here)
I don't think we can just erase four years of administration, law and regulation, like it never happened.

You're right of course. It was a wild speculation to allow sketching another view.

But the power is in the selection of the right words. I don't think along the lines of erasing and forgetting etc.
The US involvement in Libya e.g. happened, there is no turning back from that.

Now declaring e.g. the NDAA null and void, rolling back all consequent actions etc. would be feasible I think.
But that's me just logical thinking ... I am no expert on US political structures.

[sdv]

The report is a completely misleading interpretation of what happened in that courtroom and the conclusions reached are false. Read what was actually said yourself, in terms of a legal arguement. The judge dismissed the case because there was no legal merit to it.

Face the facts folks: Obama was born in Hawaii to an American mother and an African father.

PS Thanks for the response Maia Gabrial. I can be quite shrill with my opinions, but this does not mean that others cannot raise their voice and give their opinion as well.

[Maia Gabrial]

The judge dismissed the case because there was no legal merit to it.

The whole point is that Obama WASN'T born in Hawaii, ISN'T a natural citizen; and it's only a matter of time before all the evidence comes out. Just like 911 is right now. This is a big con job as well... The mistake TPTW made is in thinking that we are so stupid and will believe their lies. There are Pit Bull Americans who haven't let go of this and should be thanked for it. While dumba**es still believe that the govt would never do anything against the country.... (yeah, right)....The reason why Birthers took notice in the first place is that the certificate stunk like a skunk and attracted too much attention.... That's why arrogance is it's own enemy...

This IS going to the Appellate Court as it should. Just because one judge had his head up the a** of TPTW, doesn't mean he did the right thing... There IS legal merit here! When these lawyers and judges stop playing this game of "words and definitions" and trying to twist the truth, then the truth will emerge.The fact is that they need to accept the fact that they can't get away with this game any longer.
BTW the justice system is ONLY designed to protect the US govt, not us. It was created by them and for them.... THAT'S one of the misconceptions we're dealing with now, too.... Prez BO is under the mistaken idea that he DOESN'T have to answer to the American people for anything. WRONG! How many times has he ignored our voices? We will not be ignored by this fraud. He and those involved in this fraud WILL answer to us...Our voices will be heard and our actions will be swift now....


WE'RE not letting this go.... But if HE wants to take it to the point where the consequences will be worse for him, then fine.

Who said that I was stopping other opinions, namely yours, sdv? Isn't this us sharing our thoughts? If I made you feel defensive, then I regret that. Speak your mind and I'll speak mine. As long as the Constitution (and the Mods) guarantee it, let's go for it!

[humanalien]

Everyone in high places, knew obama wasn't a natural born citizen.
even before he became president. Almost all of congress knew it,
and so did all the federal judges.

The only reason why this news isn't common knowledge by now,
is because of the ptb. They threaten to kill anyone that reveals
obamas real place of birth.

If you or i were in court, trying to determine where you or i were born
at, and we produced a terribly falsified document of live birth, not only
would we be declare an undocumented alien, we would be thrown in
prison for falsifying a legal document and after that, we would be thrown
out of the country,

Obamas lawyer already said the document of live birth is a bad forgery,
and obama is responsible for any documents he produces to the courts, so
why has he not been tossed in jail for falsifying documents? At the lest,
he should have been thrown out of the white-house and at the most, he should
have been set to prison.

What is good enough for us, is good enough for him.

The fact that obama has all his information sealed means that he has
something to hide......

[Sidney]

when will the united states of america (myself included) ever grow some backbone. Come ON. Where the hell are our voices.

[humanalien]

I ask the same question. What are we waiting for, a writing invitation?

There are suppose to be militias in america that are ready to take back our country
and i have to ask, what is stopping you?

There are Ben Fulfords, white dragons out there, ready to take back our planet from
the evil ones, so what are they waiting for. The world is in a dire situation right now
and we need to be freed from these evil people, now. Where are you? What are you
waiting for?

I'm beginning to think that all of this is nothing but a pack of lies and we have no one
on this planet, that is going to free us from the evil ones...

[Maia Gabrial]

The fact that obama has all his information sealed means that he has
something to hide......

EXACTLY, humanalien! He has alot to hide, but it ain't staying like that no more!