“Coalition of 138 nations”? Anyone have a list?

[Selene]

One of the kingpins of the Wilcock/Drake theory is the “acknowledged” existence of an operating coalition of 138 nations who have united to (presumably) a) defeat the financial tyranny of the central banks, or b) the Bretton Woods system or c) the fiat money system, or some such, to be shortly replaced with a new worldwide financial structure of their devising.

Does anyone have a link to an actual document or list of these nations?

Pardon me, but I cannot, for the life of me locate one. All I can find is requoted quotes of David’s original statement/allegation, but no actual data.

And please, don’t say we can’t because it’s “a secret”. Nothing signed and sealed by 138 nations can possibly be a secret in this world. If this is real, it must be noted somewhere. Possibly this is a working group in some other quasi-governmental structure? Part of the UN? SEATO? BRICS?

Anyone?

Regards,

Selene

[foreverfan]

Everyone but the G7. I think that will cover it.

[Unified Serenity]

Assuming is not proving.

[GoodeTXSG]

Yea, but its a pretty good guess, lol. Just subtract the "G*" anything and the countries left out are probably in it since we have locked them out of the game. But I would like a true list BRICS union and others all together. I will shoot DW and email and see if there is one available.

[sdv]

You cannot find such a list because it does not exist but the myth is being promoted by BF, DW and Drake and the three go round and round incircles verifying each other.
While you wait for BF, DW, Drake, ETs, and so on to save you:

Iceland has gone ahead and had the revolution (no guns involved).
BRICS (representing about half the world's population) has freed itself from the domination of the dollar as a currency of exchange.

Most countries outside of USA have been making a real effort to reduce pollution simply because we just think it is the right thing to do to keep our air and water and land clean.

And so on ...

I don't have a hat to eat, but if this list of so-called 138 countries is real in the way that the revolution in Iceland and BRICS is real, I will eat a bowl full of olives with a side dish of wasabi (I am in awe of people who can actually eat these two items of food).

[sdv]

Could not resist adding some humour ...

[RMorgan]

Posted by sdv (here)
You cannot find such a list because it does not exist but the myth is being promoted by BF, DW and Drake and the three go round and round incircles verifying each other.
While you wait for BF, DW, Drake, ETs, and so on to save you:

Iceland has gone ahead and had the revolution (no guns involved).
BRICS (representing about half the world's population) has freed itself from the domination of the dollar as a currency of exchange.

Most countries outside of USA have been making a real effort to reduce pollution simply because we just think it is the right thing to do to keep our air and water and land clean.

And so on ...

I don't have a hat to eat, but if this list of so-called 138 countries is real in the way that the revolution in Iceland and BRICS is real, I will eat a bowl full of olives with a side dish of wasabi (I am in awe of people who can actually eat these two items of food).

I agree my friend.

Just imagine the necessary logistics for the meeting of these 138 countries. Each country carrying a staff of at lest 20 people (security, secretaries, etc..). Plus the necessary resources to organize such meeting (hotels, security plans, etc...). Plus the press, which is all over even the most "secret" political/economic meetings.

Even the most secret meetings involving very important persons are hard to be kept in secret these days...

So, if there is really such official agreement between 138 nations, it would be so hard, almost impossible to keep it secret.

These are just a few variables of many. Imagine the diplomatic consequences of such an agreement. Small countries that would be part of it would be covered with sanctions from the US and EU just for thinking of signing such document.

Frankly, this mass arrests story is a very old one. People are saying that it´s going to happen and setting dates for it many years before the internet. Just like this ascension thing, which people are waiting for since the beginning of human existence; it will always going to happen tomorrow, tomorrow and suddenly thousands of years have passed.

So, if there really is such an agreement, it would certainly be traceable. That´s for sure.

While people keep waiting for these mass arrests, without making significant efforts to change things beside typing words on internet forums, THEY are preparing to hit us hard and when they do it, it might be too late.

Cheers,

Raf.

[sdv]

I've Googled and found various references to 138 countries:

Skype claims to have users in 138 countries
Organic farming purprtedly extends to 138 countries
Learning to Teach Online claims to help teachers in 138 countries
I foound two studies (one on Internet trends and one on gender inequality) that included 138 countries in each study
Pan Am published a guide of travel facts about visiting 138 countries

And so on.

But maybe the number 138 has been incorrectly reported on this forum and a different figure was given?

PS

[Mad Hatter]

Careful there Selene remember 'many a good argument is ruined by someone who knows what they are talking about' and asking for facts is tantamount to asking a tru believer for proof.... fraught with danger in this politically correct era...

[RMorgan]

Posted by sdv (here)
I've Googled and found various references to 138 countries:

Skype claims to have users in 138 countries
Organic farming purprtedly extends to 138 countries
Learning to Teach Online claims to help teachers in 138 countries
I foound two studies (one on Internet trends and one on gender inequality) that included 138 countries in each study
Pan Am published a guide of travel facts about visiting 138 countries

And so on.

But maybe the number 138 has been incorrectly reported on this forum and a different figure was given?

Hey mate,

Well, google any random number of countries bellow 194 and you´ll find lots of results.

I´ve just googled "132 countries" and many interesting things appeared as result as well.

Frankly, it´s meaningless.

Cheers,

Raf.

[Positive Vibe Merchant]

When all the bread is buttered, I think we need to realise, that these 'nations' are still corporations, just wanting a larger slice of the pie.

if it isn't in their interest it wouldnt be done.

[foreverfan]

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rKKexGdPjI

[Mozart]

Guys ~


Just google this: " Monaco accords " ...


... and see for yourselves the birth of this now-138-nation alliance that has decided to stop the goddamn, evil Cabal. It started with 57 nations and now it's 138 nations.


They are for real, whether you believe it, or not.


http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/...gust-2011.html


http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-he...end-tyranny-ii


Excerpt from Wilcock:

Since I am in direct contact with the organizers of the Monaco Accords -- the 122-nation alliance -- let me say this:

The "old guard" were not even INVITED to these meetings -- and if any of them showed up, they were turned away. Fulford documented all of this at the time.

The number of nations that was chosen -- namely 130 -- is too close to the Monaco Accords figure to be accidental.

That being said, Kerry Cassidy vouched for the legitimacy of the man giving the information. That would imply that whomever told him this is lying to him.

It is also interesting, and may be significant, that less than 24 hours before this story broke on the Internet, one of the chief organizers of the "real" Monaco Accords was hit by a car and narrowly escaped with his life.

He is very lucky to have had fairly minor injuries, and will be fine. Nonetheless he is in a lot of pain and is mostly staying in bed.

To me, all of this is only further proof that the negative elite are on their last legs and are making desperate moves to stave off their inevitable defeat.

So, do you think that this guy, David Wilcock, is lying to all of us? He's in "direct contact with the organizers of the Monaco Accords" ... do you believe him? Do you think that all this hoopla over the "Monaco Accords" is a figment of someone's overactive imagination?


Hey, I know the guy, Wilcock, and I've known him for 13 years. I can personally guarantee that David is not lying about this. So the probabilities of the Monaco Accords to have really happened is extremely high.


Get those bowls of olives and wasabi on standby ...


~Mozart

[OnyxKnight]

If it was indeed 138, we would not be still using colored paper today. I mean literally today. They would have been successful by this time.

[sdv]

Fiction. What is the stuff that David Wilcock is smoking?!

All Google searches lead back to David Wilcock so do I need to explain the absurdity of this as proof?

Here is what the so-called Monaco Accord is:

The Principality of Monaco is a sovereign and independent state, linked closely to France by the Treaty of 1918, the text of which has international recognition because it is confirmed by Article 436 of the Treaty of Versailles of 1919, which instituted a contractual, bilateral, and reciprocal regime between the two states. The foreign policy of Monaco is one illustration of this accord: France has agreed to defend the independence and sovereignty of Monaco, while the Monegasque Government has agreed to exercise its sovereign rights in conformity with French interests. Since then, the relations between the sovereign states of France and Monaco have been further defined in the Treaty of 1945 and the Agreement of 1963.

Now read this piece of common sense and move on!

Just imagine the necessary logistics for the meeting of these 138 countries. Each country carrying a staff of at lest 20 people (security, secretaries, etc..). Plus the necessary resources to organize such meeting (hotels, security plans, etc...). Plus the press, which is all over even the most "secret" political/economic meetings.

Even the most secret meetings involving very important persons are hard to be kept in secret these days...

So, if there is really such official agreement between 138 nations, it would be so hard, almost impossible to keep it secret.

These are just a few variables of many. Imagine the diplomatic consequences of such an agreement. Small countries that would be part of it would be covered with sanctions from the US and EU just for thinking of signing such document.

So, if there really is such an agreement, it would certainly be traceable. That´s for sure.

[RMorgan]

Hey sdv,

Yes. David Wilcock says that everything that comes from his mouth is a proof of something, without ever showing evidence. He´s also pointing to other dubious alternative characters as proof and relying in other persons vouch as proof, like this:


"Since I am in direct contact with the organizers of the Monaco Accords -- the 122-nation alliance -- let me say this:

The "old guard" were not even INVITED to these meetings -- and if any of them showed up, they were turned away. Fulford documented all of this at the time.

The number of nations that was chosen -- namely 130 -- is too close to the Monaco Accords figure to be accidental.

That being said, Kerry Cassidy vouched for the legitimacy of the man giving the information. That would imply that whomever told him this is lying to him.

It is also interesting, and may be significant, that less than 24 hours before this story broke on the Internet, one of the chief organizers of the "real" Monaco Accords was hit by a car and narrowly escaped with his life.

He is very lucky to have had fairly minor injuries, and will be fine. Nonetheless he is in a lot of pain and is mostly staying in bed.

To me, all of this is only further proof that the negative elite are on their last legs and are making desperate moves to stave off their inevitable defeat."


How come this is proof of anything? A couple of lines written in a computer screen, documented by Fulford, who never showed the documents, with Kerry Cassidy vouching for a man with no name, and another man with no name who supposedly suffered a car accident that can´t be verified???????

Everything that almost all these guys (Wilcock, Fulford, Drake, etc...) offer as evidence and proof can´t be tracked further than their own testimonials, documents that never show up and people with no name.

These things couldn´t be called evidence or proof anywhere in the whole Universe!

They make such a illogical mess, that people end up believing in them, because it twists their brains! One vague evidence relying on another vague evidence, which relies on a nameless person testimony, which relies on another vouch that another person gave about another nameless person, who show documents that never show up...

This is like a poor Hollywood movie script full of loopholes! At the moment you´re on the theater watching the movie, full of special effects and loud sounds, you find it truly amazing. Five minutes after the movie is over and you start examining the script, you can´t believe you were actually enjoying such a poor movie.

This is absurd relying on absurd relying on absurd. Maybe relying is a good word to describe it indeed: Re-Lying, re-lying, re-lying...A lie on top of another pile of lies.

It´s always the same old formula, and people never get tired of buying it. Just like Hollywood movies. Pure superficial entertainment.

Cheers,

Raf.

[Mozart]

Guys~


I did not use the term "proof".


I said this: "probabilities of the Monaco Accords to have really happened is extremely high."


So this does not constitute as proof, I agree, but it is highly evidential -- given Wilcock's reliability of information -- that the Monaco Accords are for real.


So then it boils down to Wilcock's character -- you can either believe him, or not. I don't give a flying **** either way you go. I just know what I know and am going with that.


And only 57 nations got together physically, then it grew to 138 nations over time. This alliance is already succeeding in denying the dark bastard cabal the critical lifeblood of their evil empire -- money, their own fiat money.


I am confident that you all will soon be eating hats, shoes, olives, wasabi -- all washed down with raw milk.


~Mozart

[Unified Serenity]

Posted by Mozart (here)
Guys ~


Just google this: " Monaco accords " ...


... and see for yourselves the birth of this now-138-nation alliance that has decided to stop the goddamn, evil Cabal. It started with 57 nations and now it's 138 nations.


They are for real, whether you believe it, or not.


http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/...gust-2011.html


http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-he...end-tyranny-ii


Excerpt from Wilcock:

Since I am in direct contact with the organizers of the Monaco Accords -- the 122-nation alliance -- let me say this:

The "old guard" were not even INVITED to these meetings -- and if any of them showed up, they were turned away. Fulford documented all of this at the time.

The number of nations that was chosen -- namely 130 -- is too close to the Monaco Accords figure to be accidental.

That being said, Kerry Cassidy vouched for the legitimacy of the man giving the information. That would imply that whomever told him this is lying to him.

It is also interesting, and may be significant, that less than 24 hours before this story broke on the Internet, one of the chief organizers of the "real" Monaco Accords was hit by a car and narrowly escaped with his life.

He is very lucky to have had fairly minor injuries, and will be fine. Nonetheless he is in a lot of pain and is mostly staying in bed.

To me, all of this is only further proof that the negative elite are on their last legs and are making desperate moves to stave off their inevitable defeat.

So, do you think that this guy, David Wilcock, is lying to all of us? He's in "direct contact with the organizers of the Monaco Accords" ... do you believe him? Do you think that all this hoopla over the "Monaco Accords" is a figment of someone's overactive imagination?


Hey, I know the guy, Wilcock, and I've known him for 13 years. I can personally guarantee that David is not lying about this. So the probabilities of the Monaco Accords to have really happened is extremely high.


Get those bowls of olives and wasabi on standby ...


~Mozart

Ok, so I went to check out the sources for this story. I went to http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/...gust-2011.html first.

The story is linked to: http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/2011...set-free-soon/

This is site is taking it's information from Fulford's stuff: http://benjaminfulford.net/2011/08/3...ancial-system/

If you trace the sources listed:

More comment on the Monaco Colloquium can be found here (16.09.11), here (14.09.11), here (06.09.11), here (30.08.11), here (30.08.11) and here (30.08.11).

Some big-picture geopolitical background is outlined here (23.04.12), here (16.04.12), here (12.04.12), here (12.04.12), here (10.04.12), here (09.04.12), here (03.04.12),here (31.03.12), here (27.03.12), here (27.03.12), here (27.03.12), here (26.03.12), here (22.03.12), here (21.03.12), here (21.03.12), here (20.03.12), here (17.03.12), here (13.03.12), here (07.03.12), here (05.03.12), here (29.02.12), here (27.02.12), here (27.02.12), here (27.02.12), here (21.02.12), here (20.02.12), here (16.02.12),here (13.02.12), here (12.02.12), here (07.02.12), here (05.02.12), here (04.02.12), here (31.01.12), here (27.01.12), here (26.01.12), here (26.01.12), here (26.01.12), here (23.01.12), here (19.01.12), here (18.01.12), here (17.01.12), here (09.01.12), here (09.01.12), here (08.01.12), here (06.01.12), here (05.01.12 - sourced from a bilingual Japanese/English presentation here on 25.12.11), here (02.01.12), here (31.12.11), here (29.12.11), here (28.12.11), here (28.12.11), here (26.12.11), here (22.12.11), here (22.12.11), here (20.12.11), here (20.12.11), here (12.12.11), here (12.12.11), here (05.12.11), here (30.11.12), here (28.11.11), here (24.11.11), here (21.11.11), here (15.11.11), here (08.11.11), here (05.10.11), here (03.10.11), here (26.09.11), here (25.09.11), here (22.08.11), here (19.08.11), here (15.08.11), here (09.08.11), here (08.08.11), here (01.08.11), here (25.07.11) and here (17.07.11). Continually updated gold price charts can be viewed here and here. And the corresponding silver charts are here and here.

So we yet again have the stooges backing each other up and quoting one another, listing other blogs which cite the same sources. This is very much a scam. How come we don't have any "credible" non fulford,wilcock (divine cosmos), Drake, and other blogs siting Fulford, Wilcock, Drake? It's because they want you to think there is tons of evidence when it's really just a circle jerk.




Contrary to what the most worshipful followers of BF, DW, Drake want us to believe, we are not idiots! Follow the sources and they are always the same players.

[RMorgan]

Exactly, my dear friend Unified Serenity! Spot on!

This is what I´m talking about for years!

Their "proof" is always pointing to their own testimonials and they all back up each other!

Anyone who tries to exam and track down these stories further, will have the same results!

If all of this was a journalism student´s work, he would end up with a very big red D , for not tracking and verifying his sources properly.

Cheers,

Raf.

[Mozart]

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)

Contrary to what the most worshipful followers of BF, DW, Drake want us to believe, we are not idiots! Follow the sources and they are always the same players.

Yes, I've done searches and have noticed that this information tends to circle back to the same sources and that has bothered me to see that other sources are not covering this information in depth.


But Fulford has been vindicated on a large number of key points that he'd been talking about for years -- with no other corroborating information on the net -- yet to be validated eventually, like with the Keenan lawsuit, the Asian caches of gold, etc.


Not all of Fulford's information panned out, of course, so don't misconstrue what I'm saying here.


Skepticism is always useful and I welcome that.


If the mass arrests don't happen and if the ****ing dark bastard cabal are not defeated, once and for all, anytime this ****ing year, I just don't ****ing know how I'm going to respond to those events, quite frankly. <sigh>


Meanwhile I am well-prepared with food, water, etc in a rural area, so I'm ok. It's the big cities that I worry about. But you must keep in mind that the players in this drama on Earth are so big, bigger than you can imagine (the ETs/EDs), so I seriously doubt that they would allow our Earth to descend down into horrible Mad-Max-like scenarios on the whole of our Earth with massive destabilization everywhere.


No, I just don't see that happening.


~Mozart