Who is Daniele Dal Bosco?
The only thing that we've heard about him is that he was introduced to Fulford and Keenan by Leo Zagami - and he (Dal Bosco) claimed to be a Vatican Banker.
Then, after a vetting of sorts, trust was established between Mr. Dal Bosco and Mr. Keenan. So, Neil Keenan handed over One Trillion Dollar's worth of bonds to Dal Bosco and Dal Bosco stole them.
This is what we are told, but there are two sides (or more) to every story.
Daniele Dal Bosco hasn't had a say in all of this other than the notoriety given to him by the very people he has made beef with.
Daniele Dal Bosco's e-mail address (may now be expired) is registered as the Administrator for the website below, and he posted there under the name "Dani" (short for Daniele).
This thread in no way speaks directly to his motives or speaks for him, but I believe there is something to be taken about the man's perogatives based on what he has written in the past (i.e. his personal philosophies).
This is his website:
It is in Italian so you will need to plug it in to a translator (i.e. Google or Babelfish).
Within that site are Dal Bosco's personal views on banking/finance/economics, government, and sovereignty along with ascension science, reptilians, etheric entities, archetypes and de-programming. He could have very well been a member here on PA (he is/was not).
I am still going through all of the material, but I will share some of the general excerpts of interest that I have come across so far (I have merely taken the first and last two paragraphs to conserve space).
Dal Bosco on Economics and Social Structure:
We are accustomed to think to a social structure to classes or, in other words, pyramidal. But is truly this purer the social structure that exists?
Although in the modern democracies real social classes do not exist, there is however a clear pyramidal hierarchy that is based on the money. It is the money in fact that, in the modern societies, it determines the pyramidal structure. The same concept of power today is meant like infuence on people, and this always depends in last analysis from the amount of possessed money. Even loaded in theory not associated directly to the amount with money possessed as that politics and that religious one enjoy only being able based on the ability that they have to influence that is on people and, in last analysis, on the ability to move the money own piacimento.
The creation of the money from private ago yes that the amount of money in circulation insufficient and is limited to desires of the private bankers. And such sparsity of money regarding that one of which the society it would have need creates a fight for the existing money, not sufficient for all. A competitive society is created that is and not more pure competitive. Such problem easy would be resolved if he were the Government to create the currency from the nothing. Only in such a way in fact the money necessary could be created in order to give the possibility to all of having a dignitosa life (sees also article n.18 the True Origin of the Prices).
The competitive mechanism is therefore fundamental and necessary in order to continue to stimulate the increase it characterizes them of everyone of we and consequently collective. It is right that everyone of we is a little egoist and tasks in the first place to if same, for being able better to then help other from a more favorable position. The egoismo is a pure attitude and necessary in order to grow truly, at least fintantoché the others in ours are not damaged to act. Fintantoché that is we are competitive and not competitive we are useful to same we and the society. In other words, we support our personal ascension and the total ascension.
Read full article here: http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate...rUrl=Translate
Dal Bosco on True Currency:
Read full article here: http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate...rUrl=TranslateIn order to comprise the concept of Currency it is necessary to analyze the logical origin of the same one, an origin that not by force corresponds always with that historical one: not always in fact the humans have lived and created a True Logic second (see art.86).
We better see therefore the development logical of the concept of Currency.
In case of defect of currency in the system regarding the production costs, instead, it means that or a cost has been conteggiato like production cost that has not been paid in currency, or that production costs with a various currency from that emitting from the local community have been paid. In the first case there is an obvious punibile irregolarità from the respective public judicial organ, in the second is instead solo to verify with the issuing monetary organs the other foreign coins in issue if the payments carried out in such coins turning out from the budgets correspond to their calculations.
The issuing public organ a True Currency has therefore the task to only take part when there is an excess of currency regarding the real goods and services (measured like saying from the production costs); in the event of defect of currency regarding the real goods and services, in fact, it certainly does not depend from the issuing organ currency since the same organ controls all directly the monetary mass it on credit emits and it alone and exclusively like production cost and: what that guarantees the logical impossibility of a sparsity of currency in the system regarding the goods and services.
Dal Bosco on the Yield of Citizenship:
Read full article here: http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate...rUrl=TranslateRecently a concept of yield of citizenship has become of public debate in economic within, or institutional that Many are not the proposals that have been made with regard to but up to now they have had little happened to political level. However, this that I would want to discuss now is not as well as the effectiveness of the single proposals, that it would be oltretutto much expensive one, how much the ammissibilità of the same idea of yield of citizenship.
The proposal of a yield of citizenship is based generally on the idea that every human being has straight, only for the fact to exist, to having a dignitosa life and therefore a house, of the food, the garments and other things considered () subjective fundamental for a worthy life of a human being. In short, the right to the life is asserted here. And dignitosa life.
Rather, it is moral duty of every member of the community to give own contribution to the community and to share own acquaintances and own experience with the others. Beyond this limit, it is interfered with in the other people's freedom to make own choices and to create a sure life. Paradoxicalally, the better way in order to help the others is to leave them free to make what they want and not to interfere in their choices, because the life is always theirs.
To share acquaintance, experience and love, but never to interfere if not demanded. This is to my judgment the true one must to moral of every member of the community and the principle base on which a community would have to be based.
Dal Bosco on True Government:
Read full article here: http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate...rUrl=Translate3 possible forms of Government exist: the government of a solo, the government of a part of the collectivity and the government of all the collectivity. We now try to understand which between these 3 government is the better form than. Or perhaps it is possible that the better form than government it is a detail combination of they? We see a little.
We think that every member of the community must have the same possibility to enter to make part of the government of the same community. It must be that is respected the principle of Fairness, second which every member has the same power (executive, legislative and judicial) in the choices of the community. Such principle practically means that every member of the thought community able to mean and of wanting (greater age, no insufficiency lies them) must have the possibility eleggere the politicians (to be able executive and legislative) and the judges (judicial power) which representatives of the community in the administration of the respective powers; and it same elect for such charges also must have the possibility to be, provided that able to mean and of wish.
Now, since a complex society needs of persons who take care themselves of many governmental but equally important ones various issues from those, is natural that the better solution is that only some persons dedicate themselves to the government issues. Therefore the system of ideal government is a system constituted from a sure number of representatives of the community that carries out the governmental functions. This is the True Government.
The power in the hands of a single person could be favorable for all solos if such person was perfect, what that only God Is. Therefore, less than God do not make yourself alive between we, the perfect form of Government is the government of a part of the members of the community. In short the system puts into effect adopted them also in Italy, with the single difference that the system of ideal voting and that rispecchia the 3 principles of Fairness, Merit and Will is that one proporziona pure them.
Dal Bosco on Social Solidarity:
These are just a fraction of what he has written regarding government, economics, society and the like.The term Solidarity is a term a lot used nowadays. With it the aid is usually indicated that it comes offered regarding the needy persons, a kind of redistribuzione of the well-being, not only monetary, between the persons who form a determined community.
What means to make of the good for own community and to help own similar ones? To my judgment, the true social aid is given, in the within of the redistribuzione of the well-being, allowing to all the active members of the community to take to part to the social activities and those not active (children, old, disabili of miscellaneous type) of having a worthy life of such name. In short, the concept of true social aid consists in favoring integration of every member of the community based on those which they are its possibilities of contribuzione to the social well-being, except the case of the not active ones.
It is thought from we also just who the quota Social Security supplied to a not active member or an active member but not more contributor in way directed with own job to the well-being of the community for the reasons of which over or ALWAYS the same one, independently from the fact that the member of the active or not active community or and independently from the type of social job that or be carried out.
It is thought from we corrected, in fact, than every member of the community that does not contribute with own job to the community it must have the same value for the community, anyone is such subject. This is the true Social Solidarity, based on the principles of Fairness, Respect and Justice.
Here is a list of articles to search through:
The translations aren't that great but you can see what he's trying to get across. Some of the words didn't translate at all, so you may have to plug them into a translator individually.
I believe he had a hand in founding the Global School of Ascension, and is connected to a couple of other website's as well.
The next couple of posts will deal with other topics of interest that he has written about as well. Such as reptilians and manipulative etheric entities. Very interesting, in my opinion. Some of the stuff of his I could copy and paste right on Houman's thread (linked to in my signature).
There is also channeled material on the site (I can't confirm whether or not it was indeed Dal Bosco that channeled the material). *EDIT* I have now confirmed this.
A bulk of the channeled material deals with ascension science, de-programming, spiritual cosmology, etc.
The names of the "channeled entities" are Mother Earth, Metatron, Lucifer, Sananda, the Great Central Sun, and Archangel Michael. (I think there are others too).
Remember, this is the man that absconded with the bonds. I think there is much more to be said.