A comparative analysis of the circumstances surrounding John E Mack's 'accident' in the context of other possible masonic 'campaigns'.
"The ridicule of these individuals and the dismissal of their stories has profound moral implications. A society cannot long survive if its truth tellers are rejected. I believe these witnesses are truthful, regardless of the fact that what they are talking about can't be true from the dominant materialist worldview. And their dismissal does make them a kind of suppressed minority. I began to see that the outright dismissal of the testimony of reliable witnessess was because what they reported wasn't consistent with the dominant worldview."
- John Edward Mack, M.D. (Oct 4, 1929 – Sep 27, 2004)
Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer and Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.
(non-Freemason or ex-Freemason?)
Ever since I heard the story about John E Mack getting killed by a 'drunken' driver, the story has never sat well with me. I have a statistical background (not that it makes me special) but it does make me look at things different then the average person. I can't help but create a visual distribution of 'event's in my mind... and other distracting things)
There are some interesting aspects to this story that I never see discussed or talked about. John E Mack was highly intelligent, credentialed, understood scientific methodology, and clearly knew how to diagnose all manner of psychological phenomena. He was also willing to go public and stand by his research. This made him a huge risk to the PTB. He was clearly making inroads, opening up the field, creating awareness, (just watched the Oprah interview - 1994)
Rare Dr John Mack TV Appearance Part: 1
Rare Dr John Mack TV Appearance Part: 2
Rare Dr John Mack TV Appearance Part: 3
and his book was an instant best seller (just before he died). The rate of his movement in the media could be described as fast becoming meteoric, as he began to establish a name for himself.
I would dare say that few could have used the typical standard techniques of ridicule and criticism on him that seem to work so successfully on the majority of people that try to come out. The man was a psychiatrist! The University went to great lengths to threaten him, to take away his tenure, to ruin him by destroying his reputation and character and after a great deal of struggle and legal battle he fought them back, barely surviving.
There was no question at that point he was perceived as an even greater threat. He could have made a difference. He could have brought this into main stream awareness. He could have presented this information in a manner that not even the scientific community could have refuted. He character was honourable, solid, his credentials were impeccable. His life was a testimony of scientific integrity.
What is also interesting is that the man who killed him has never received any [legitimate] attention in the media it seems. I find this strange, usually there is a lot more detailed information, [but in this case, barely a name, no occupation, no history, or context] etc.
[Update: we have his name and age (thanks bmdb) (which is an amazingly similar pattern as Lady Di's butler's assailant; approx 50 yrs old, Eastern European, not responsible for their actions, treated with great 'sensitivity and leniency' and minimal punishment - one has to admit this is yet another 'coincidence') I wonder is it possible, these people fit into some kind of demographic? is there a criminal element? i.e. more easily 'coerced' due to past record? paperwork or citizen status? which in turn affects their financial situation? anyone who is an 'immigrant' understands the subtle but different treatment I speak of. And unbelievably, somehow Mack's family was convinced that it was neither "malicious nor intentional" - again, when is that ever taken into consideration let alone 'highlighted' in a drinking/driving case? since when did the courts reek of such 'goodwill and generosity' ??? These people weren't rich, elites or super celebrities, able to sway the courts, they would have been perceived as 'nobodies' the kind of people the courts salivate at the chance to chew up and spit out. This just isn't how the courts refer to 'drunk drivers', they are demonized, disgraced and ostracized for their debauchery and irresponsibility in order to justify a heavy fine $$$ and a punishing sentence.
One would think the courts were given to some kind of heartfelt sentimentality. If you look closely this just doesn't fit. I also truly didn't know what the charge was at the time of writing (see other's comments), but this is exactly consistent with my theory. Completely out of context and unusual at the least, especially in light of the particular individual they just killed. When you're dealing with Freemasons from top to bottom (more on this below), can you really believe anything that you are seeing? there are good reasons not to underestimate how their system operates...]
In this most infamous case, we barely get the story that he was a 'drunk' driver, and then really nothing more [or very minimal]. Regardless this fact, given all the above information, the likelihood that after surviving and winning a vicious legal battle with the university, several TV interviews, and a best selling book on the horizon, and then just coming out of a UFO convention, that he immediately gets run over by an 'immigrant drunk driver'. This should be considered as a highly improbable event in and of itself and should at the very least be considered suspect under these circumstances.
The University showed that it was willing to expend considerable resources to try to take away his tenure and ruin his life, they weren't satisfied with just trying to ridicule him. There is no question their attack was pointed and vicious. By now we should all know that the upper echelons of Universities as well as Police Depts (and many other 'public' institutions) are controlled by Freemason Secret Society groups, etc. That is why anyone who tries to study paranormal phenomena, Bigfoots (genetic issue as per Lloyd Pye), 'pre-historical' archeology (as per Cremo & Thompson) or anything that would expose the truth about man and the true nature of his origins, is immediately attacked. Even though there are mountains of evidence bursting at the seems to validate all these phenomena. But these things just aren't allowed in their matrix. I don't think people can grasp just how pervasive these secret societies are today, how influential they are, how tied into positions of power, such that they are a form of underground syndicate, and when needs be they can operate as a criminal syndicate if they so please. How is this possible?
Take for example, I have a friend, who lives and works in the suburban part of a large city in Canada, and has worked for the Fire Dept for over 30 years. He is a typical 'white Anglo Saxon' a wonderful person by all accounts, (although I find he has this almost naive quality, but I will get into that a little later...) Anyhow, he knows about my 'conspiratorial leanings' and we have some interesting conversations on occasions. One time on a lark, I jokingly asked him why he wasn't a Freemason. At first he played coy, so I pushed it a little more and said something like "come on, there has to be some Freemason's where you work, hasn't anyone ever approached you?" and finally he admitted that yes! they had approached him, and he had turned down the offer! Even though I trust in my intuition and was simply trying to confirm my speculation, I was still quite impressed by this... So I inquired further... "Well how many of your bosses would you say are Freemasons?" Now this question confused him, and at first I didn't understand why, after all it was a straightforward question (or so I thought)... he was having difficulty and I kept pushing him and he finally said "how many? ALL of them, ALL the higher ups, as well as many below them are Freemasons..." That is when the implications of what he was saying really hit me. This isn't just 'an isolated incident', far from it. This is more like the 'tip of the iceberg'. Here is a guy who has worked in the presence of these 'Secret Society' types for decades, had been offered, and turned them down (much to his credit btw) However that means that although they may not necessarily perceive him as a threat, they still had to regard him as an 'outsider', not privy to their other 'business' for. Yet he works with them everyday, is literally surrounded by Freemasons who are essentially operating an invisible network around him.
There is no doubt in my mind that over the years there may very well have been a number of subtle mind control techniques they 'played' on him. Not so much for any nefarious purpose, but as a matter of procedure, in the sense that in all the time that he was working under those conditions, the information that he was privy to, never seemed unusual to him. He knew they were Freemasons, he knew how they employed questionable tactics in their 'self promotion' for example and knew enough to turn down their offer... but can you imagine what it would be like to have to work under those circumstances? to turn down the easy opportunities for advancement? to be kept outside certain circles? to be surrounded by people who maintained a second level of social organization right in front of your face each day? The more I think about it the more respect I have for my friend, I know he hasn't had it easy. Yet it never seemed to dawn on him to think further about it, or even to share it with us... even when prompted... there was some subtle tendency in him that he 'preferred' NOT to talk about them even though he would engage me on any number of other 'conspiracy' related topics... I have no doubt that they applied some 'systematic approach' on him over the years to create this... there is alot more to this but I hope you get the gist of it... these things go on all around us... and they ARE literally 'hidden in plain sight'
How many people knew that 90 to 100% of all Police Depts, Fire Depts, Governmental Depts, Administrative Depts of Universities and Hospitals, etc are saturated with Freemasons? Who knew that Building 7 was going down and a 'police officer' was heard counting down to zero before the collapse and that they were herding people away from the sight TELLING them the building was coming down!? Or have considered the implications of what this means? Most people will never know, they may have strange experiences or witness unusual events but simply dismiss them, unable to put their finger on what just transpired.
I hope that you are all getting the implications of what I am trying to get at here, these people are sophisticated, the purpose of their groups is maintaining secrets. Which in my opinion by definition is a form of Satanism from get go, because it violates the principle of truth from the start, not so much because they wish to exercise privacy, the most important element in the judgement of any crime is the intention, and we all know what their ultimate intentions are, besides self promoting all their friends into comfy government positions controlling the levers of power. And what lengths they will go through to keep those secrets (ie. in order to keep secrets one must inevitably lie and exercise all manner of deceptions) One is 'compromised' the minute one 'accepts' their existence, let alone joins them. And by embracing such beliefs one can't help becoming very adept at practicing the 'art of deception' while 'hiding things in plain sight'... they are absolute masters in fact, that is 'what they do'.
Now not to go too far off topic, but can you see why these types of organizations would be ideal targets to be infiltrated by 'Satanic' organizations?. And that is assuming they started with good intentions from the beginning which as I study more, I highly question that as well.
Now although this may seem a little off topic, it is actually the context perhaps that is needed to see what is potentially going on here... If my friend can casually relate to me that EVERY SINGLE person of position in his little Fire Dept, in an out of the way suburb in this large Canadian city IS a Freemason without exception, that's 100% ... how about the Police Depts? No question there, goes without saying, And clearly we have seen the Universities and how the attacks on non-abiding scientists who disagreed with the Carbon Tax scheme, (another elite money grab) were ostracized and demoted and marginalized, by whom? Those higher up in the University of course. And on and on it goes. How about the Administration Depts of Hospitals? Yep,again my mind has no problem extending the probabilities, my friend's direct observation is unquestionably the tip of an iceberg. An invisible iceberg, with it's remaining portion equally hidden... out of sight, out of mind, simple formula. I wonder if anyone has ever considered what happens when a secretive societal order reaches a level of saturation on this scale and gets embedded in our public institutions? What are the implications for the rest of us living in the shadow of this mafia network organization? Canada is a strong Freemason stronghold. Image what it is like in England? And where was the good Dr when he was run over? ... the heart of Mordor... London, England itself.
How about another example, take the Oslo Killer. A simple cursory analysis and some good research exposed the following about him. It was found out from his income tax he went from having no income to speak of to becoming fabulously wealthy from one year to the next, just a year or two before his murder orgy. He had recently moved out of some meager apt and purchased and moved onto a sprawling farm in the country. We know he was a Freemason. He has even testified on record that he was part of a Secret Society! Btw he used a technique that was witnessed in the Kennedy Assassination (ie. dressing as a police officer, who then changed into civilian clothing) (search 'Evidence Of Revision') The Main Stream Media was making claims of 'Islamic Terrorists' immediately after it hit the air with obviously NO evidence whatsoever (just like 911)
Our Killer was supposed to kill people and remove his uniform and blend in with the crowd, who would suspect such a clean cut handsome young Norwegian, while the media is blasting to be on the lookout for a Muslim Terrorist!? This has the makings of a staged event, magicians trick, or slight of hand (majik) I have even heard since then there may be indications others were involved. But something went undone, he obviously lost balance somewhere along the line. But no problem, back up plans were already well under way (his behaviour indicated he thought he was going to be 'looked after'...) We also know the MSM removed or greatly downplayed the information about his affiliation by the time it reached the MSM in Canada and the US (and other countries I'm sure) He was now no longer a proud Freemason, but was now relabeled as a 'radical fundamentalist Christian' (more slight of hand) (take note how after the initial 'distraction' of relabeling him as 'fundamentalist Christian' served it's purpose of deflecting attention away from the Freemason connection, it has now ironically faded away as the court case proceeds...) They also manage to avoid making any reference to his unmistakable financial records which would have been ample evidence of an entirely different story. And most recently they have 'dismissed' his claims regarding the 'secret organizations' he specifically admitted to. Do you see a pattern here? Are these 'professionals' dull? dimwitted? lacking insight? (or just following a different script?)
While I'm on it, another interesting bit, he even stated on the record, he "doesn't 'recognize' the court..." something only a Freemason would understand enough to say or 'Commercial Redemption' student might know about. (not that it would make a difference in his case)
Now with this context in mind, I hope to shed some light on what appears to be slightly hidden to my fellow forum members. Why hasn't anyone looked more closely at who the driver was in John Mack's death? or more precisely who might have been his handler? We were being led to believe that there is no reason to look too closely or ponder it too much. But closer examination reveals some evidence to the contrary. All I can find is a 'Police Officer' arrested someone and confirmed he was a 'drunk' driver? [minimal details] almost no context that would focus our attention on this man's past history, legal or financial records, character, etc. This does not sound like a randomly occurring event to me. Does anyone know or have a way to find out more about this driver? I would like to know more about this man, like those very smart people who did the income tax research and property purchases on the "Oslo Killer".
If 'they' identified John Mack as a threat which the record shows 'they' clearly did. And if they did want to plan his death. The highest concentration of 'Freemason operatives' would undoubtedly be in London and if anyone has watched Chris Everard's "Lady Die" - auto accidents are one of their favourite techniques for 'eliminating' victims. How difficult would it be for an 'enlisted' agent to have a drink or two before committing his 'crime'? It would be the perfect diversion, and provide a 'backdoor'... ie. to be essentially treated with 'kid gloves' by the same system that enlisted him? The perfect foil! as it completely misdirects the public away from any suspicion. (unless of course if someone decided to find out more about this 'drunk' driver.) The "alcohol on his breath" was a ruse, a cover, a clever bit of misdirection.
Combine that with the limited media attention on him but instead it is placed on the family, (they must have felt like they were under some kind of philosophical spot light, as if their character was being judged) ...this is how they 'managed' to ease their 'agent' out the 'back door'. Somehow a 'media vacuum' was created around the perpetrator, and the focus became how honourable the Mack family was going to be? Is this subtle or what!? Honestly, how many people suspected the possibility there could be anything more to it? how many already turned off the more critical thinking option at the key word 'drunk driver', as if that couldn't be easily orchestrated, what could be easier? Almost too simple, as all riddles are, after you have been told the answer..
The fact is WE know that this very type of thing IS very possible and there is (for now) absolutely nothing to indicate the above scenario didn't happen, and statistically, it is more likely that that is in fact WHAT DID HAPPEN. Repeat, it is MORE probable that the incredible series of events which occurred were NOT random as opposed to being random. If someone could collect the right data and crunch the numbers I can assure you that is what the math would tell us.
Can anyone find information on the driver? who was he? what did he get charged with?, what was his sentence? what was his past? his occupation? his affiliations? [past record?] where is he now? Technically it should all be a matter of public record right?