David Wilcock's False Predictions

[Khaleesi]

I can honestly say I do not follow DW that closely because the things he says just do not resonate with me. What struck me as odd was this post http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post493404 DW claimed to be the reincarnation of Rasputin, a man that died in 1916. DW also claims to be the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce (born in 1877 - died in 1945). How can he possibly be the reincarnation of both men? Edgar Cayce was born before Rasputin died and died 29 years after. If I didn't have a problem with DW before knowing this, I certainly would have a problem now.

[tenacity1]

well I really don't have time to read all this.. If one looks for peace anywhere but insides themselves, you are looking in the wrong place. True peace comes from within.. bashing folks doesn't get it

[NancyV]

Posted by Unified Serenity (here)

Posted by NancyV (here)
I had to take several cold showers a day just to cool off.

Are you sure your not just a scorpio or entered menopause?

Thanks for sharing what you did about your journey. I too experienced a change in 1995. I had astral traveled and gone into other dimensions for years prior, but this experience was an extreme one that lasted for several years. When it first happened it lasted for hours and would happen every day for about two weeks, then only when I opened to the experience. My best explanation is it was divine unity and I shared it with several very close friends. Until someone experiences such they cannot fathom it's intensity or understand how the things of this earth are but a foreshadowing of the things beyond this dimension. Did you find any more developed skills after your experience?

I definitely grew in my energetic working ability in discernment, healing, and reading others.

LOL, I'm a taurus but I do love scorpios! Menopause was tough but nothing like kundalini burning.

Divine Unity sounds nicely descriptive, and the unity is felt more or less depending on the vibrational frequency of the dimension you're in. There's no experience on earth that can compare with merging with other beings then finally rejoining the Source. Plus timelessness/no-time means that even if you're only out of your body for maybe an hour, it's like more than a million years. Timelessness is also very hard to describe. It's so so awesome. I'm glad you've had that experience and thanks for sharing!

The main abilities I retained were seeing energy, seeing into other dimensions and occasional telepathy. While in the awakened kundalini state I had a huge amount of telepathic experiences with people online. This was in 1994-95. Some of us on AOL in chat rooms were finding that real-time computer chats helped us to develop telepathy and raise our vibrational frequency. The focus was a kind of meditation, at least it worked like meditation in raising our frequency. It enabled me to meet my twin flame/husband. We had an instant connection and the energy was so strong he came to visit and we were married 3 weeks later and have been together ever since.

As far as David Wilcock....I listened to him and read his writings on and off for several years. What I didn't do was accept anything he says as true. Of course a lot of his research and research he collates from others is quite interesting to me, but I always assume that none of us has the absolute "truth" for anyone else. When he makes predictions that apply to the planet, all humans, or even his recent statements about the mass arrests and his support for Drake, I just continue to enjoy the show and figure that he's enjoying the fantasy and conspiracy games more than I do and taking them more seriously than I do. He must believe in what he's doing or the alternatives would be he's either a liar or a fool.

Whatever he is doing he is playing a role that he's created for himself. Anyone has the freedom to believe him or not. If they believe him and are disappointed...it's their responsibility for accepting his prognostications as truth. they may learn a good lesson about trust from that. If they believe him and are not disappointed when his predictions don't come to pass, that's good. They are then more detached from results and apparently enjoy the fantasy game they're playing along with David. We each have our roles we've come here to play. David's game is not overly appealing to me but anyone is welcome to play his game with him. I've played some VERY strange and wild games in my life so I'm not really able to say that someone else doesn't have a right to their games.

When I tell my experiences I can't really categorically state "this is the way it is for everyone". Yeah, sometimes I SAY it's this way or that way...but I know that it may not be felt the same by everyone. I enjoy it when I find someone else whose experiences are similar to mine. I refuse to think that I know what's best for anyone else. That's where we humans get caught so easily....thinking we know the way to be, think, act, what and how to say something, and how to feel for everyone else.

Sometimes I am quite critical of others and have been critical of David, Drake and Fulford at times. But truthfully I don't care. I am happy to let them enjoy their dramas and let their audiences (including me) enjoy the dramas in any way we choose to enjoy them, whether it's as a dewy eyed worshiper, a mild appreciator, or one who enjoys dissecting and critiquing things either positively or negatively, forcefully or mildly. We each have our own styles. I only need to please myself.

ps: even if you have "ascension" experiences you can still be here in a human body and be a total A-hole (lucky for me!) LOL..

[Arrowwind]

Well it seems to me that regardless of warning some people will continue to fund and follow false prophets. Regardless of how many times these prophets are wrong in their prophecy and how many times they promote the sales of their books to educate one on their false prophecy, luring them in with either fear or a hope, they will, I guess, continue to do what they do because they like the guy and the are wrapped up in a hope from someone who really does not produce one of the main product he proclaims...that being prophecy.

So be it. Its a choice they have the right to. But I will call it everytime I see it.

[Arrowwind]

Posted by tenacity1 (here)
well I really don't have time to read all this.. If one looks for peace anywhere but insides themselves, you are looking in the wrong place. True peace comes from within.. bashing folks doesn't get it

he he he...

Bashing folks is not the point. The point is exposing false teachers. We would not be working on this here on this thread if it were not relevant to someone who is trying to sort things out. After all, we do learn from each other.
This thread has a very important purpose revolving around developing discernment.

[Arrowwind]

Posted by Khaleesi (here)
I can honestly say I do not follow DW that closely because the things he says just do not resonate with me. What struck me as odd was this post http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post493404 DW claimed to be the reincarnation of Rasputin, a man that died in 1916. DW also claims to be the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce (born in 1877 - died in 1945). How can he possibly be the reincarnation of both men? Edgar Cayce was born before Rasputin died and died 29 years after. If I didn't have a problem with DW before knowing this, I certainly would have a problem now.

There are those who believe that parallel lifetimes are possible and you or I or anyone really can be having an alternate life in a different body somewhere on this planet at this very moment. I dont have a firm opinon on this but I suspect it as a possibility a componet of the souls presence within the realm of infinity and infinite possibilities

[Craig]

To remove another layer of the onion, didn't that crazy former whitehat fella say that David was cloned? Aren't we all cloned according to him? So when things change or become different - well they abducted him and cloned him, hell apparently I am cloned cause I mentioned something different to the line of current thought.

Floodgates opened.........

[SKIBADABOMSKI]

Edit:

Wrong info..

EEEeeewwww !! what am I doing on a Wilcock thread?

[gripreaper]

If David Wilcock is the reincarnation of RA and actually wrote the Law of One, then wouldn't he know what he's talking about since it is imbedded in his very DNA?

[tenacity1]

Posted by Arrowwind (here)
Well it seems to me that regardless of warning some people will continue to fund and follow false prophets. Regardless of how many times these prophets are wrong in their prophecy and how many times they promote the sales of their books to educate one on their false prophecy, luring them in with either fear or a hope, they will, I guess, continue to do what they do because they like the guy and the are wrapped up in a hope from someone who really does not produce one of the main product he proclaims...that being prophecy.
.
So be it. Its a choice they have the right to. But I will call it everytime I see it.

BINGO could not have said it better..

¤=[Post Update]=¤

that's all well and good discernment etc.. but I stand by my statement ..look for happiness anywhere but within and you are losing all perspective

[Anchor]

Posted by gripreaper (here)
If David Wilcock is the reincarnation of RA and actually wrote the Law of One, then wouldn't he know what he's talking about since it is imbedded in his very DNA?

If that sentence made any sense at all then perhaps - more importantly where is it claimed that DW is the reincarnation of RA?

Really this is beyond a joke.

Why is it acceptable to accuse other people of lying and making stuff up, when the same techniques are used to make or support those accusations?

[RedeZra]

Posted by Khaleesi (here)
DW claimed to be the reincarnation of Rasputin, a man that died in 1916. DW also claims to be the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce (born in 1877 - died in 1945). How can he possibly be the reincarnation of both men? Edgar Cayce was born before Rasputin died and died 29 years after.

DW has probably found a way to circumvent this little logical problem

after all he managed to reincarnate a century before time as prophesied by Cayce himself


he must be the impossibile man ; )

[Arrowwind]

Posted by SKIBADABOMSKI (here)
. Ridiculing this guy will get you nowhere because he's flying high and running with it. I dare say unstoppable.

Anyway thats my 2 yens.

Ski-

The point is not to ridicule DW. The point is to actually look at what is going on here and develop some personal discernement. If ridicule was what it was all about I suspect some would be sending him nasty letters... but what is that worth? Nothing. The only point is to get conscious about what you are dealing with and to clearly look at the writing on the wall. Yes he is running with it into his fame and glory. The higher they fly the further they fall, and the harder too. I would not want to be attached to him.

[Khaleesi]

Great interview with John Lash and Thomas Sheridan:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/grok-th...nd-john-lash-1

[SKIBADABOMSKI]

Posted by RedeZra (here)


he must be the impossibile man ; )

What like Jesus?

[SKIBADABOMSKI]

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
*********************
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
deleted post********

[9eagle9]

It's sort of how the world works. If one makes idiotic claims and wants to behave like the new age version of Richard Simmons, bounding over every subject imaginable and piddling on it like an excited puppy....people are ....what?

Not supposed to notice?

Have their eyes poked out because the same entity opportunes onto every subject in the alternative media. You can avoid him, plastered himself with desperate relentless frequency onto the coat tails of every subject in alternative media. 2012, angels, energy, ufos, aliens, extraterrestrials, astrology, the Bible, former prophets, Clairol hair products--David is there. I'm not sure there is a topic he hasn't attempted to exploit yet.

Granted a lot of that is because of his fans who have to insert him into every topic.

The interviews with Dr. Pete Peterson that David managed to insinuate himself in. He would have been annoying intrusive save the for the looks the good doctor directed his way that plainly said "you're an annoying idiot". I was rather embarrassed for him then but not so much now.

When the good doctor exhibited restraint against David's prattling elementary school questions in a strained attempt to get Peterson to align his science with David's hastily put together fantasies this was declaimed as Peterson somehow being an evil force that couldn't look holy David in the eye.

Another symptom of "Everyone is out to get David"

¤=[Post Update]=¤

YOU just better hush or David Wilcock's fans will be urging him to pose nude on the cover's of his books ala David Icke.

DI was a hottie back in the day though.(If you like blondes that is)

Posted by SKIBADABOMSKI (here)

Posted by Arrowwind (here)

Posted by SKIBADABOMSKI (here)
. Ridiculing this guy will get you nowhere because he's flying high and running with it. I dare say unstoppable.

Anyway thats my 2 yens.

Ski-

The point is not to ridicule DW. The point is to actually look at what is going on here and develop some personal discernement. If ridicule was what it was all about I suspect some would be sending him nasty letters... but what is that worth? Nothing. The only point is to get conscious about what you are dealing with and to clearly look at the writing on the wall. Yes he is running with it into his fame and glory. The higher they fly the further they fall, and the harder too. I would not want to be attached to him.

I thought this thread was about David Icke..... oh dear, >_<

David Wilcock .. Damit how stupid of me, anyway I know nothing about Wilcock other than he's got an ugly cheesy mug and he's got a smile that makes me want to punch a donkey.

That was enough alone to put me off !! I mean come on, if your going to bull***t the masses then at least have some stage manners. Try and look a little convincing. At least David Icke has a rock star look.

RIDICULE .... o_0 ))))

Ski-

[gripreaper]

Posted by Anchor (here)
more importantly where is it claimed that DW is the reincarnation of RA?

Why would the notion of DW being of the soul stream of RA be so ludicrous? I mean, David himself claims that he is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce, who did about 14,000 readings over his lifetime which were fairly accurate, and so is the Law of One.

Posted by Anchor (here)
Why is it acceptable to accuse other people of lying and making stuff up, when the same techniques are used to make or support those accusations?

What? I have no idea what you are talking about here or how this applied to what I said. I said "IF" David Wilcock is the reincarnation of RA, then what he writes about, which would include the Law of One, is imbedded in his very DNA, and therefore is not a stretch like some have claimed.

If you understand that we all come from a soul stream and that we are light fractals of "all that is" then would it be a stretch to say that we are all god? I think not, therefore it is not a stretch for me to say that David Wilcock is RA, as has been inferred by some, regardless of whether or not David himself has made such a claim. What don't you like about the Law of One?

[RMorgan]

Posted by Anchor (here)
Where in your quoted (italicized) text does it mention 2012 ? You imply that he does in your commentary - where is the quote that demonstrates its not just your perception ?
Has Wilcock actually ever given a fixed time for this?
Anchor..

Hey mate,

You should check out his documentary, The 2012 Enigma. It was an essential point in his career.

http://youtu.be/o1Hw8DVLw-A

A huge part of his work is based on the theory that something extraordinary would happen by the end of this year, like his new book is described on Amazon:

"Based on a hugely popular Internet documentary, this exploration of historic signs and symbolism determines what the future holds for humanity come 2012.

"If you believe there is no special significance to the year 2012, then prepare yourself for a guided tour through the most incredible scientific mysteries in the modern world, which may be the rediscovery of an ancient system of physics and spirituality that was once widely used and understood, but has since crumbled almost completely into ruin." -The Source Field Investigations

In his documentary The 2012 Enigma-viewed more than two million times- David Wilcock exposed many great secrets: DNA, consciousness science, wormholes, stargate travel, sacred geometry, three-dimensional time, the Mayan calendar, and much more. And in this book, his seminal work, he'll expose even more.

Calling upon fascinating areas of alternative science, Wilcock's unique philosophy connects the human species and the rest of the cosmos, proposing that it is in our power to usher in the Golden Age prophesied in so many ancient cultures and spiritual traditions. Unlike the doom- and-gloom viewpoints depicted in big-budget disaster films, Wilcock believes that 2012 may be a watermark for when a widespread acceptance of a greater reality will begin to occur-and in his book, he lays out many of the blueprints for such a Golden Age."

source: http://www.amazon.com/The-Source-Fie.../dp/0525952047

You should also check out what is written on the first page of his ascension2000.com website.

http://web.archive.org/web/199905081...nsion2000.com/

"Dedicated to the Single Greatest Moment of All Time,

Now Within One Year of Arrival - Getting Excited?"

And this was in 1999, relating to the year 2000...Does it look like a deadline for you?

By the way, I think the purpose of this thread is not to ridicule anyone; Is to verify the facts in order to know if David Wilcock is a reliable source of information or not. I´m not emotionally involved with this subject and I advice everyone to do the same. One can not develop a clear line of though if blinded by uncontrolled emotions.

About vegetarianism, I really don´t care if he´s a vegetarian or not. It´s not relevant to the main subject of this thread. However, I´ve been a vegetarian for more than 10 years, just like many of my closest friends, and none of us have developed any sort of nutritional problems.

Cheers,

Raf.

[gripreaper]

Posted by RedeZra (here)

Posted by Khaleesi (here)
DW claimed to be the reincarnation of Rasputin, a man that died in 1916. DW also claims to be the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce (born in 1877 - died in 1945). How can he possibly be the reincarnation of both men? Edgar Cayce was born before Rasputin died and died 29 years after.

DW has probably found a way to circumvent this little logical problem

after all he managed to reincarnate a century before time as prophesied by Cayce himself

he must be the impossibile man ; )

Only we look at time as lineal, and time is actually spherical. All that is, exists in the present and always has been and always will be. The only animation is form and transform, which is done with a collective intention and held together like a hologram.

So, as long as people view time as linear and see reality from the perspective of the bible, their view will be very limited and primitive. All timelines and all lifetimes are happening right now in this present moment.