A Question for Bill Ryan re: Kerry Cassidy/ FWHO/Randy Maugans and Duncan O ' Finioan

[Rupertmoon]

Bill

I am putting this to you and would appreciate hearing your perspective and where you stand on this matter. There has been no public statement from Kerry in regard to what Randy and Duncan have suggested about her. This has created a further divide within the alternative media and in the attached post Duncan has asked for all his testimony and videos to be removed from the Camelot site.

http://duncanofinioan.wordpress.com/...n-up/#comments

I am not sure how aware you are of events that have transpired in recent months, but if you follow Randy Maugans blog and latest entry, he has summarised the situation here.

http://exotica-radio.squarespace.com...needed-cr.html

Bottom line. There are some strange anomalies between the Former White Hat's blog and the fact that Kerry has repeatedly posted links to his blog, including the day after it was initially set up. This individual is clearly reading from a script, prepared by a 'higher' authority, and has made defamatory and slanderous remarks about huge numbers in the alternative community, including yourself and many that have come out of mind control projects. However Kerry initially called him 'harmless' and was the FIRST person to link to his site, the day after she returned from 'Belize', thus conveniently giving him great traffic numbers. Coincidence? Coupled with this is the recent tendency of Kerry to throw the 'mind control' card at anyone who she happens to disagree with and also the fact that she has not made a public statement refuting what Randy and Duncan have said about her, which initially began with a question over her defence of Richard Hoagland.

As a result her integrity is being questioned and the possibility that she herself may be under the influence of another's agenda, unknowingly?

I would appreciate your perspective on this as I feel you could provide the balance between Kerry and Duncan and Randy and help to unify as opposed divide. I strongly feel that this is a deliberate fracturing of certain alternative communities, by parties that have been called names like alphabets and tptb, to prevent us from coming together and presenting a more united, solution based front.

Sincerely

Richard

[Rupertmoon]

There is one correction to the above post.

She linked to the blog the day after the first posting on March 7th. She linked a 2nd time upon her return from Belize towards the end of March and linked again in her post re Bill Brockbrader of May 27th.

[eileenrose]

Not meaning to be the first one to post. But as I go to bed soon and will forget my few thoughts on this thread...here they are.

I feel for Duncan, myself. I always have. He makes a good whistleblower (sticks to his story, doesn't get sidelined, etc.). So I listen when he gets involved in a story/mess like this.
Secondly, thanks to everyone who figured out who 'former white hat' really is....or close enough, for me.
Thirdly, Kerry has gone off this time. Up to her to put it all back together (her decision).... But since I don't know details, as the ones mentioned in the links above (still digesting)...that is all I will say on it (for the moment).

Let the fixation (on this topic) begin.

carry on

[spiritguide]

It is hard to be objective in a subjective world. As of late her biggest detractor is her own EGO. IMHO

[seeingterra]

I posted this yesterday, it is the only thing I care to say on this topic for now, it represents a part of my general view, but it also reflects on this.

I do not care to feed into this drama. He keeps talking about a dog and pony show, well, go figure..

I welcome Bill's thoughts on this, but I also understand perfectly if he don't wish to feed the drama.

How I see the many shades of humanity

As has been foretold in numerous prophecies, literature, poems, songs, last words....
The ages of darkness would always be initiated by the ultimate deceit.
Deceit as in your brother stabbing you in the back, your friends turning into enemies..
And almost without exception, somehow, always for their own personal gratitude, reasons of jealousy or simple greed.

We talk big words about "standing in the light", yet no one seems to even know the difference between what is "light" and what is "dark" anymore. Hell, I am not saying I do either at times.
It seems that people in general simply see what they want to see, so in a sense we are all color blind, and thus all the shades are hidden from view, leaving most of us walking in the dark.

We talk about programming and how society is a mindless tool for the powers that stand, yet we still do not dare to look in the mirror and realize the ultimate truth, the truth of s-el-f..
To know the truth in others you must know the truth in yourself. This is no truth any person, or any thing can tell you, this is your truth, in a mirror darkly or otherwise, truth regardless.

We judge others more than we judge our self's, that is certainly no secret for most of us on this rock.. If that can not be admitted there is little hope for redemption in this writers view.

Some talk about these tall beings stepping down from the shadowy space, leaning down giving us their hands. Some even pray for this. I pray we will be wise enough to think otherwise.
There are less diamonds in the night sky than there is darkness.

This whole charade started with people questioning other people, and then letting other "people" decide weather they were right in their questioning or accusation, resting comfortably thinking
"justice was served". But what is justice? Whom defined justice? Did you define it?
Or was it an excuse to sleep better at night?
Do we wan't other beings, human or not to continue to define our faults and our victories?

My message is simple, mirror your thoughts, and thus be clear in your actions.

This is not meant to be clear speech, this is not meant to be preaching.. This is the only way I know how to share my truth as of late, and it is not particular for this venue, it is for the rocky venue called Earth, Terra, Avani...

Salute friends. Stay strong, stay vigilant, always.

EDIT TO ADD: His claims about "The former white hat" is simply untrue, that goes for Randy Maugans as well. It is just as fiction as everything the "FWH" writes. (Personal statement, not reflecting Kerry)

FWH has clear mental issues, Kerry and myself have always referenced it as being false.
We chose to take it as a laugh, especially considering how certain people have reacted.
They have been feeding him every step of the way with their reactions, I am dumbfounded by the fact that they don't see that. I mean seriously, have you read FWH's crap? I mean it is so far out there, so if you can't discern that what hope is there to discern anything? Especially in this arena.

And "ego"? I mean come on, look around..

For reference, look at what "Charles" said in his first interview, see any parallels?

Take care all

Edit 2: In regards to Duncan's statement regarding anonymous on the phone (the Wilcock incident):
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...594#post383594

Edit 3:

Duncan's post:

Mr. Anonymous Caller, during the David Wilcock dog and pony show. Seriously, and you two call me deluded? Allowing people to think that this guy was light years away on a spacecraft? Horse****.

Kerry's response after the radio show in question:

At great personal risk Anonymous came forward. He is not from 'off world' as some surmised. He is very much one of us. By that I mean, he is a highly gifted human with ET roots as we all are.

http://projectcamelotportal.com/inde...log&Itemid=218

Edit 4:

Reg. Duncan's statement about me at Awake and Aware 2011 after Richard Hoagland's presentation:

It is true that I talked to Duncan about my feelings regarding portraying Obama as a good guy\ savior. However, I never asked him to to anything. He was the one wanting to "take care" of it, I was simply expressing some anger of it being presented in the way it did at the venue it did.
I got over it. Duncan did not actually do anything at all to reflect on this, so he is taking credit for absolutely nothing at all. The only thing I can say is that he pretended to be "a friend", he even called me "Brother of\from Valhalla" in a blog post after the event.. Yeah, this is how you treat a "brother" right..

This is the last update on this from me, I don't care to partake any longer in this.. you said it Duncan, "Dog and Pony show". I got my input on the record, that is all I needed. It is here now, do what you will with it.

Updating for your consideration

[mountain_jim]

Related to:

created a further divide within the alternative media

Not that long ago, Randy said this about Avalon (incorrectly lumping it and Bill in with Kerry/Camelot):

http://exotica-radio.com/articles/20...#entry15041639

I get a steady flow of emails form listeners and readers who voice concerns over the goings on at Camelot/Avalon, usually of the type that indicates they feel captive to the millieu of such turmoil. YOU HAVE A CHOICE: Dump them and begin to dig out the truth for yourselves! Camelot may be the "big dog" (for now) of truther-type media, but they are certainly not the only one.

In fact, be suspicious of "big dogs"---they are usually "well fed", if you catch the drift. Certainly, the tone of arrogance indicates that Kerry & Co. feel justified in deploying the mind control meme to their advantage whenever it suits them. That arrogance worries me...how about you?

to which I responded (in a previous thread)

to which I would suggest, don't lump Camelot and Avalon's forums together, Bill separated sites with Kerry for good reasons I suspect, and as I posted in a previous thread:

Yes Randy, I have a choice. I like Avalon as a community just fine, and continue to dig out the truth for myself. I don't need to be told by anyone who to Dump, and who not to Dump.

And yes, there are other forums available, some who appear to exist mainly to trash this one.

[Wantsthetruth74]

I am so confused its not EVEN funny. Can somebody put into laymans terms what just happened, without it being a half hours worth of reading??

[andrewgreen]

Posted by starchild111 (here)
I am so confused its not EVEN funny. Can somebody put into laymans terms what just happened, without it being a half hours worth of reading??

More drama to get web hits and sell advertising, nothing to raise an eyebrow about really.

[Wantsthetruth74]

Posted by andrewgreen (here)

Posted by starchild111 (here)
I am so confused its not EVEN funny. Can somebody put into laymans terms what just happened, without it being a half hours worth of reading??

More drama to get web hits and sell advertising, nothing to raise an eyebrow about really.

Good answer!!!!! I will simply forget I even read it. LOL

[alamojo]

I lost all respect for Duncan when he mocked David Wilcock for crying after he got a death threat. What kind of person does this?

[gripreaper]

it's like walking through a carnival and there are so many booths to grab your attention, that the one freak side show with the guy who has six arms and ten legs gets most of the attention, just because it is so outrageous and so out of the norm. Pay your two bucks to see the show and move on to the next booth.

[RMorgan]

Posted by gripreaper (here)
it's like walking through a carnival and there are so many booths to grab your attention, that the one freak side show with the guy who has six arms and ten legs gets most of the attention, just because it is so outrageous and so out of the norm. Pay your two bucks to see the show and move on to the next booth.

Hey mate,

The way I currently see the alternative media, is just like I see an asylum.

You know, there´s a group of about five persons, each one claiming to be Jesus, and then they fight to find out which one of them is the real one.

Then, during the fight, one of them change his mind and, instead of Jesus, start believing he´s Saint German.

Then, the new Saint German makes an alliance if with one the the Jesus guys, vetting him, giving him support.

Than, another folk comes in claiming to be Buddha, and then supports and vetoes another Jesus.

In the meantime, the other crazies of the asylum watch the show and also fight with each other, because they support different Jesus guys; Each one of them claims to have proof that he´s right and the other is wrong...

To sum up, none of them is the real Jesus; none of them is Saint German or Buddha, and the folks who were fighting for them, actually, were just fighting for different versions of, essentially, the same lie.

Cheers,

Raf.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by seeingterra (here)
I posted this yesterday, it is the only thing I care to say on this topic for now, it represents a part of my general view, but it also reflects on this.

I do not care to feed into this drama. He keeps talking about a dog and pony show, well, go figure..

I welcome Bill's thoughts on this, but I also understand perfectly if he don't wish to feed the drama.

How I see the many shades of humanity

As has been foretold in numerous prophecies, literature, poems, songs, last words....
The ages of darkness would always be initiated by the ultimate deceit.
Deceit as in your brother stabbing you in the back, your friends turning into enemies..
And almost without exception, somehow, always for their own personal gratitude, reasons of jealousy or simple greed.

We talk big words about "standing in the light", yet no one seems to even know the difference between what is "light" and what is "dark" anymore. Hell, I am not saying I do either at times.
It seems that people in general simply see what they want to see, so in a sense we are all color blind, and thus all the shades are hidden from view, leaving most of us walking in the dark.

We talk about programming and how society is a mindless tool for the powers that stand, yet we still do not dare to look in the mirror and realize the ultimate truth, the truth of s-el-f..
To know the truth in others you must know the truth in yourself. This is no truth any person, or any thing can tell you, this is your truth, in a mirror darkly or otherwise, truth regardless.

We judge others more than we judge our self's, that is certainly no secret for most of us on this rock.. If that can not be admitted there is little hope for redemption in this writers view.

Some talk about these tall beings stepping down from the shadowy space, leaning down giving us their hands. Some even pray for this. I pray we will be wise enough to think otherwise.
There are less diamonds in the night sky than there is darkness.

This whole charade started with people questioning other people, and then letting other "people" decide weather they were right in their questioning or accusation, resting comfortably thinking
"justice was served". But what is justice? Whom defined justice? Did you define it?
Or was it an excuse to sleep better at night?
Do we wan't other beings, human or not to continue to define our faults and our victories?

My message is simple, mirror your thoughts, and thus be clear in your actions.

This is not meant to be clear speech, this is not meant to be preaching.. This is the only way I know how to share my truth as of late, and it is not particular for this venue, it is for the rocky venue called Earth, Terra, Avani...

Salute friends. Stay strong, stay vigilant, always.

EDIT TO ADD: His claims about "The former white hat" is simply untrue, that goes for Randy Maugans as well. It is just as fiction as everything the "FWH" writes. (Personal statement, not reflecting Kerry)

FWH has clear mental issues, Kerry and myself have always referenced it as being false.
We chose to take it as a laugh, especially considering how certain people have reacted.
They have been feeding him every step of the way with their reactions, I am dumbfounded by the fact that they don't see that. I mean seriously, have you read FWH's crap? I mean it is so far out there, so if you can't discern that what hope is there to discern anything? Especially in this arena.

And "ego"? I mean come on, look around..

For reference, look at what "Charles" said in his first interview, see any parallels?

Take care all

Edit 2: In regards to Duncan's statement regarding anonymous on the phone (the Wilcock incident):
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...594#post383594

Edit 3:

Duncan's post:

Mr. Anonymous Caller, during the David Wilcock dog and pony show. Seriously, and you two call me deluded? Allowing people to think that this guy was light years away on a spacecraft? Horse****.

Kerry's response after the radio show in question:

At great personal risk Anonymous came forward. He is not from 'off world' as some surmised. He is very much one of us. By that I mean, he is a highly gifted human with ET roots as we all are.

http://projectcamelotportal.com/inde...log&Itemid=218

Edit 4:

Reg. Duncan's statement about me at Awake and Aware 2011 after Richard Hoagland's presentation:

It is true that I talked to Duncan about my feelings regarding portraying Obama as a good guy\ savior. However, I never asked him to to anything. He was the one wanting to "take care" of it, I was simply expressing some anger of it being presented in the way it did at the venue it did.
I got over it. Duncan did not actually do anything at all to reflect on this, so he is taking credit for absolutely nothing at all. The only thing I can say is that he pretended to be "a friend", he even called me "Brother of\from Valhalla" in a blog post after the event.. Yeah, this is how you treat a "brother" right..

This is the last update on this from me, I don't care to partake any longer in this.. you said it Duncan, "Dog and Pony show". I got my input on the record, that is all I needed. It is here now, do what you will with it.

Updating for your consideration

Here's an exact copy of what I replied to Tommy (seeingterra) just now:

Hi, Tommy --

I quickly scanned your e-mails: many thanks. Not ignoring you. Traveling at the moment, with very limited net access. I agree that there's a bit of a posse out for Kerry.... I don't think it's a heavy-duty conspiracy. She's just pissed off a lot of people -- as far as I can see.

From a very quick read, they should all know better.

Drake and Brockbrader are not worth dealing with at all.

The only one of your list I have any time for is Duncan O'Finioan. He's a good guy. His frustration (rightly) was with Wilcock. He was pissed that Kerry SEEMED to be supporting Wilcock. That fence can be mended, I believe.

Apologies for the short message -- genuinely very rushed here. All best wishes, Bill

[humanalien]

It is my belief that out of all the Wilcocks, Fulfords, Kettlers, White Hats,
Cassidy's and all the rest, the only people speaking the truth is Duncan
O'finion and Alex Jones.

Everyone else is out to make a profit from stories they make up.

I believe kerry started out with the best of intentions. She was truly
out there, searching for truth but somewhere along the way, she became
lost in a sea of lies. As kerry got more and more popular, her ego, grew
and grew and now her ego runs her life.. Kerry needs help getting back
on the right track.

[mab777]

..and don´t forget about david icke !

Posted by humanalien (here)
It is my belief that out of all the Wilcocks, Fulfords, Kettlers, White Hats,
Cassidy's and all the rest, the only people speaking the truth is Duncan
O'finion and Alex Jones.....

[Wantsthetruth74]

I just think that if I were to put myself in Kerrys shoes, being on the receiving end of the huge amount of information that has come her way, I can see how it would become over-whelming, and difficult to operate with discernment every second of every interview she does. We all have been lost at one time or another, some are lost for the majority of their lives. Kerry has done so much good, that far outweighs her imperfections IMO.

As for the rest of them, I would rather just pay more attention to the things they do right, that we agree with, and spend less time picking apart their shortcomings. Take in what we can relate to, lat the rest go.

[Rupertmoon]

The reason I posed this to Bill was in the hope that he could become a go between of sorts between what has effectively become a Kerry camp and an O'Finioan/Maugans camp. I agree with Bill when he says that this 'issue' could be resolved fairly quickly, but I believe it would take a public statement from Kerry to do that. Primarily regarding her relationship with Jack Burns and why she has frequently linked to FWH and not publicly condemned him. I think that would go along way towards calming the water. Randy Maugans has only ever tried to provide honest and open questioning of Kerry and her recent behaviour, without resorting to unwarranted criticism and name calling. In fact I believe that he would rather not have gone down this road but felt that Kerry had to be called out on this. And as for Duncan, he is seldom incorrect in his judgment.

Richard

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Rupertmoon (here)
Bill

I am putting this to you and would appreciate hearing your perspective and where you stand on this matter. There has been no public statement from Kerry in regard to what Randy and Duncan have suggested about her. This has created a further divide within the alternative media and in the attached post Duncan has asked for all his testimony and videos to be removed from the Camelot site.

http://duncanofinioan.wordpress.com/...n-up/#comments

I am not sure how aware you are of events that have transpired in recent months, but if you follow Randy Maugans blog and latest entry, he has summarised the situation here.

http://exotica-radio.squarespace.com...needed-cr.html

Bottom line. There are some strange anomalies between the Former White Hat's blog and the fact that Kerry has repeatedly posted links to his blog, including the day after it was initially set up. This individual is clearly reading from a script, prepared by a 'higher' authority, and has made defamatory and slanderous remarks about huge numbers in the alternative community, including yourself and many that have come out of mind control projects. However Kerry initially called him 'harmless' and was the FIRST person to link to his site, the day after she returned from 'Belize', thus conveniently giving him great traffic numbers. Coincidence? Coupled with this is the recent tendency of Kerry to throw the 'mind control' card at anyone who she happens to disagree with and also the fact that she has not made a public statement refuting what Randy and Duncan have said about her, which initially began with a question over her defence of Richard Hoagland.

As a result her integrity is being questioned and the possibility that she herself may be under the influence of another's agenda, unknowingly?

I would appreciate your perspective on this as I feel you could provide the balance between Kerry and Duncan and Randy and help to unify as opposed divide. I strongly feel that this is a deliberate fracturing of certain alternative communities, by parties that have been called names like alphabets and tptb, to prevent us from coming together and presenting a more united, solution based front.

Sincerely

Richard

A little more: my previous post was not a full reply.

• A lot of people -- Randy Maugans included, apparently! -- do not realize that the "Former White Hat's blog" is a comedy site. (It really is.) The funniest part of it is that quite a few people take it seriously. Kerry knows this is comedy. (Come on, Randy, wake up!)

• I read Duncan's blog post. He's right about Jack Burns.

[seeingterra]

Bill, would you do me a favor and answer this: Do you really blame Jack Burns, as in what Duncan writes? Please specify what part about it if you don't mind, bear in mind what I also quoted above.

I mean absolutely no offence, but kinda important

Thank you

As for the rest (meaning everyone, not Bill), I advise you to look very hard at the track record of all these people. I have no desire to throw more fuel on this dying fire, but I urge you for your own discernment's sake to look harder at the actual facts and don't take anyone's word for anything.

[Rupertmoon]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Rupertmoon (here)
Bill

I am putting this to you and would appreciate hearing your perspective and where you stand on this matter. There has been no public statement from Kerry in regard to what Randy and Duncan have suggested about her. This has created a further divide within the alternative media and in the attached post Duncan has asked for all his testimony and videos to be removed from the Camelot site.

http://duncanofinioan.wordpress.com/...n-up/#comments

I am not sure how aware you are of events that have transpired in recent months, but if you follow Randy Maugans blog and latest entry, he has summarised the situation here.

http://exotica-radio.squarespace.com...needed-cr.html

Bottom line. There are some strange anomalies between the Former White Hat's blog and the fact that Kerry has repeatedly posted links to his blog, including the day after it was initially set up. This individual is clearly reading from a script, prepared by a 'higher' authority, and has made defamatory and slanderous remarks about huge numbers in the alternative community, including yourself and many that have come out of mind control projects. However Kerry initially called him 'harmless' and was the FIRST person to link to his site, the day after she returned from 'Belize', thus conveniently giving him great traffic numbers. Coincidence? Coupled with this is the recent tendency of Kerry to throw the 'mind control' card at anyone who she happens to disagree with and also the fact that she has not made a public statement refuting what Randy and Duncan have said about her, which initially began with a question over her defence of Richard Hoagland.

As a result her integrity is being questioned and the possibility that she herself may be under the influence of another's agenda, unknowingly?

I would appreciate your perspective on this as I feel you could provide the balance between Kerry and Duncan and Randy and help to unify as opposed divide. I strongly feel that this is a deliberate fracturing of certain alternative communities, by parties that have been called names like alphabets and tptb, to prevent us from coming together and presenting a more united, solution based front.

Sincerely

Richard

A little more: my previous post was not a full reply.

• A lot of people -- Randy Maugans included, apparently! -- do not realize that the "Former White Hat's blog" is a comedy site. (It really is.) The funniest part of it is that quite a few people take it seriously. Kerry knows this is comedy. (Come on, Randy, wake up!)

• I read Duncan's blog post. He's right about Jack Burns.

Bill,

From what Randy has written and said he is aware that FWH is a 'comedy' site. That is not the issue. However he does not put it into that bracket. I don't think he believes it should even be called that. According to him those comments have hurt many people that have come out of the projects and it has not just been comments on a blog, i think the attacks have been more than verbal. In the words of Duncan and Randy it hasn't been 'harmless' at all. It is obviously a distraction. There question is the anomalies regarding the timing of that distraction and Kerry's relationship to those anomalies. Rightly or wrongly. She has not publicly refuted them.