Starchild Skull update - 2 new videos with a 3rd on the way

[deadfoot]

Both videos are posted up by Lloyd Pye on the main page:

The 2nd one can't be ignored. This is a must watch for newbies all the up to and including veterans of the Starchild research.

There is no room left for the genetic deformity argument. None. This is the skull of a totally different species of humanoid. The only thing left to do is secure the funds to get it fully sequenced. Unfortunately, it's not cheap so there is no way around this road block, other than a couple of million dollars to get it done properly.

That's it, this is a slam dunk.

Next up will be the coneheads...

¤=[Post Update]=¤

The link is not posting: http://www.starchildproject.com/

[billyji]

Here you go

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzvqZFhQtpU

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_vqT1sN8og

[deadfoot]

Much appreciated.

This research and evidence has consistently gotten underdog status for years. Not only from the main stream, but from the alternative community as well. Many people just write it off as a genetic deformity. Folks, it's impossible. There are way too many differences from a human skull for nature to have created it, and for it to have survived into early adulthood.

Aside from the differences, which are a smoking gun in themselves, is the recent discovery of how different the FOX P2 gene is. This is one of the most highly conserved genes on the planet. As Mr. Pye likes to say, DNA is the math of biology. This is the nail in the coffin! This is nuts and bolts disclosure just waiting for the funding to finish the job and cram it down everyone's throats. That's the way it's gotta go!

[marked]

always thought it wasn't human
but at the end of the second video when they reconstructed how it would look
the first thing that came to my mind was reptilian

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancie...n_Sapiens.html

i havent read throught the DNA part yet but i wonder if the women skull that was found with the starchild skull is related

just a thought =) thx for the post

[deadfoot]

The human skull found with the starchild skull was that of a human woman - likely a Native American belonging to haplogroup A. Originally, before DNA testing, the thought was that she was the mother or caretaker of the "child". But since that time, it's been confirmed that:

1) the woman was not related per DNA with the starchild, and
2) the starchild was not a child, but simply smaller than a normal human.

Since the woman was not genetically related, the speculation is that she was a close friend or possibly more. I don't think there will ever be a definitive answer for that.

The starchild was likely a late adolescent or young adult. That's a fair guess based on the wear of the teeth. The starchild moniker is unfortunate to the extent that it's misleading about its age.

If anyone has any connections to someone with deep pockets, get in touch with Mr. Pye and let's get history made already...

[billyji]

I met Mr. Pye at a conference in Edinburgh two years ago, A lovely man and a wayshower.

He told us the story of the little girl that found the Skull, there was actually a whole body, and the skull was whole also, but she lost all the remains while traveling back home during a storm. she hid all the remains but when she returned all was washed away apart from the skull we now have, She found this a few hundred yards away from where she had hid everything.

peace

[nearing]

Bump!

We need to get the word out on this.

Haven't people been screaming about imminent disclosure? Well, this seems to me to be as disclosing as we can get!

[Mulder]

Wow, I'm impressed. I;'m surprised the Star Child was not part Neanderthal.

[eileenrose]

So is this a grey?

that is my question


----
Update, after reading a few other people's ideas...I am feeling this isn't a grey but another subset of humanity/alien crossbreed that is no longer manifesting in this reality.

my two cents

[Rocky_Shorz]

grays have teeth?

so all those disappearing cattle, wasn't for an experiment?

did this skull age back to the time when the Mayan Calendar was created long before the Mayans?

[Rocky_Shorz]

just found the story of how it was found buried with a human female dated 900 years back...

not 25000