+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Indiana legalizes shooting cops - rt.com

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member GlassSteagallfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    21st January 2011
    Location
    The Berkshires
    Posts
    986
    Thanks
    2,086
    Thanked 3,203 times in 769 posts

    Default Indiana legalizes shooting cops - rt.com

    Indiana legalizes shooting cops
    Published: 11 June, 2012, 21:31


    Hold onto your holsters, folks: shooting a cop dead is now legal in the state of Indiana.
    Governor Mitch Daniels, a Republican, has authorized changes to a 2006 legislation that legalizes the use of deadly force on a public servant — including an officer of the law — in cases of “unlawful intrusion.” Proponents of both the Second and Fourth Amendments — those that allow for the ownership of firearms and the security against unlawful searches, respectively — are celebrating the update by saying it ensures that residents are protected from authorities that abuse the powers of the badge.

    Others, however, fear that the alleged threat of a police state emergence will be replaced by an all-out warzone in Indiana.

    Under the latest changes of the so-called Castle Doctrine, state lawmakers agree “people have a right to defend themselves and third parties from physical harm and crime.” Rather than excluding officers of the law, however, any public servant is now subject to be met with deadly force if they unlawfully enter private property without clear justification.

    “In enacting this section, the general assembly finds and declares that it is the policy of this state to recognize the unique character of a citizen's home and to ensure that a citizen feels secure in his or her own home against unlawful intrusion by another individual or a public servant,” reads the legislation.

    Although critics have been quick to condemn the law for opening the door for assaults on police officers, supporters say that it is necessary to implement the ideals brought by America’s forefathers. Especially, argue some, since the Indiana Supreme Court almost eliminated the Fourth Amendment entirely last year. During the 2011 case of Barnes v. State of Indiana, the court ruled that a man who assaulted an officer dispatched to his house had broken the law before there was “no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers.” In turn, the National Rifle Association lobbied for an amendment to the Castle Doctrine to ensure that residents were protected from officers that abuse the law to grant themselves entry into private space.

    “There are bad legislators,” the law’s author, State Senator R. Michael Young (R) tells Bloomberg News. “There are bad clergy, bad doctors, bad teachers, and it’s these officers that we’re concerned about that when they act outside their scope and duty that the individual ought to have a right to protect themselves.”

    Governor Daniels agrees with the senator in a statement offered through his office, and notes that the law is only being established to cover rare incidents of police abuse that can escape the system without reprimand for officers or other persons that break the law to gain entry.

    “In the real world, there will almost never be a situation in which these extremely narrow conditions are met,” Daniels says. “This law is not an invitation to use violence or force against law enforcement officers.”

    Officers in Indiana aren’t necessarily on the same page, though. “If I pull over a car and I walk up to it and the guy shoots me, he’s going to say, ‘Well, he was trying to illegally enter my property,’” Sergeant Joseph Hubbard tells Bloomberg. “Somebody is going get away with killing a cop because of this law.”

    “It’s just a recipe for disaster,” Indiana State Fraternal Order of Police President Tim Downs adds. “It just puts a bounty on our heads.”


    Source: http://rt.com/usa/news/indiana-shooting-law-state-591/

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to GlassSteagallfan For This Post:

    eileenrose (12th June 2012), jjjones (12th June 2012), seko (11th June 2012), sigma6 (12th June 2012), SKAWF (11th June 2012), sumkat (11th June 2012)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Moderator-in-training Sidney's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th April 2010
    Location
    Big Blue Marble
    Posts
    2,830
    Thanks
    6,061
    Thanked 10,856 times in 2,376 posts

    Default Re: Indiana legalizes shooting cops - rt.com

    Thats a start!!!!

  4. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member humanalien's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,161
    Thanks
    2,733
    Thanked 3,153 times in 834 posts

    Default Re: Indiana legalizes shooting cops - rt.com

    It's funny that the law even thinks it has the right to outlaw firearms
    to begin with. It's written in the constitution that all americans have
    the right to own and bare arms.

    It's the law, that has been telling you that it isn't legal to own
    and carry a firearm but the constitution trumps the law.
    Military men are "dumb, stupid animals to be used" as pawns for
    foreign policy. - Henry Kissinger

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to humanalien For This Post:

    jjjones (12th June 2012)

  6. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member sigma6's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th July 2011
    Location
    Tattooine
    Posts
    1,026
    Thanks
    1,910
    Thanked 3,399 times in 843 posts

    Default Re: Indiana legalizes shooting cops - rt.com

    It's about time ... I guess being a cop isn't the ticket to immunity from the law after all... maybe they will start doing their job being 'peace officers' and drop the gestapo bullsh**...
    "We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time"
    - TS Eliot
    "By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the 'word of God' ... so that the things which are seen were not made of the things which are visible"
    - a quantum interpretation, understanding 'spirit' (or consciousness) as the "things not visible" (or non-material) yet quintessentially fundamental to the "things which are seen"

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts