Disclosure is happening (drip drip), but this report seems a pretty feeble effort in that regard. And your belittling of those of us here that can discern that has not gone unnoticed.Posted by eileenrose (here)
Now that disclosure is happening, I notice some people even here on PA are refusing to see it.
Isn't that always the case?
Things never turn out the way we expect them to. But that is the mind for you.
I saw these posts (just 3 so far) as confirmations of exposure of aliens on our planet. I confirmed them (myself) through my own intuitive side. I posted my findings days before each of his three reports.
But since I don't feel like negative ET attacks, I am not going to expose myself more than need be.
Believe what you want to.
But disclosure is just happening all around you, if you (anyone) cares to watch it happen.
And who said it would happen in a way your mind can accept?
...just saying. You are the natives that didn't see the Spaniard ships (old story)...because they didn't exist in their version of reality. It took a shaman to show them (part of that story) they existed, at all.
So I am saying, this is real. Sorry to dissappoint the naysayers. And I have no regrets about putting this out there (in public). Like I said in my previous post. This is for real. Take it or leave it. Doesn't matter (it's happening anyway).
And yes, it is the greys. But you (deep down) already knew this. ...I can go into this if requested (from a nicer place then the previous 'hate kettler' postings).
There might be a real interesting event behind the radiation and reported troop movements and such, but using this post of Kettler's to confirm your remote views and to describe the rational evidence gatherers in this thread as 'naysayers' is 'weak sauce', for Kettler's claims in this article are not backed up by any evidence of value, in my view.
If there really was a captured ET ship at the airport, why does he post such an obvious BS drone picture (edit- ok he explains they created this fake-drone to hide what it really is), claim events at a location that hundreds would have observed, yet no others have reported, and then he links (green-glowing UFO) to a picture that has been spread around the internet for years and implies it is from this event?
That is either tremendously sloppy or just plain disingenuous. I don't 'hate Kettler', I hate sloppy reporting and/or disingenuous attempts to mislead people.
The previous, well-documented event at this airport (Nov 7, 2006) was reported by flight crews, pilots, workers on the ground, tower employees, was visible on radar, and produced enough evidence that it has been the subject of several TV shows.
The only aspect of Disclosure that Kettler's article supports is that the field is overrun with disinfo and/or unsupported claims. It is beginning to look like Kettler is trying to see how far he can stretch his absurdities and still find believers, as if he is really Tavistock Institute - US division.
And no your remote views or visions prior to this report don't give his report (in its current form) any more validity, in my rational and intuitively-supported opinion.
Edit: I am certainly ready and able and waiting for additional witness reports or other evidence to these airport events, but until then I would hope that if Kettler is disclosing real info he would do a better job of credible reporting, making it clear where stock photos are used, providing supplementary evidence, etc.
Some discussion from GLP that might be closer to the real situation:
Even later edit: I have read all the comments at Kettler's site, including Eileen's. I could believe something happened, and even that this picture could be of something else disguised to appear to be a US drone.
My thought is that it is diversion/disinfo to get people to think that this thing is what caused the radiation ---- while they are covering what really did cause it.
Anybody got a geiger counter to try to check the area around this drone out?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17690801
This was meant to be seen...thus they wanted the shape to be known.
If this was to do with the radiation from a few days back, this would be the decoy. While everybody was looking at this heading in that direction, then we should have looked what was going the other direction, because that what would have been important.
if this was really important, they would have disguised the shape much better. This was intentional.
1. Moved in daylight
2. Shape clearly visible
3. Put on "display" at rest area (even brought construction cones)
4. Stopping makes it a target (and a great photo op). They even brought a spare truck and trailer, but cant put two drivers in each rig to keep it moving?
No doubt, it was intentional. What is more important is why?
What I can't rationally go along with, is that a 'green glowing UFO ... sat there motionless on the ground for hours' at O'Hare without someone external to Kettler's sources noticing and reporting on this incident - including tying it to an O'Hare location, during it's time on the ground, treatments and examination by various government persons, it's wrapping, and loading on this truck for transport.
I would expect if all this happened, it was either somewhere other than O'Hare, or maybe the MIB flashed their device and all witnesses lost their memories.
I would love to be proved wrong, and await any updates to add credence to this account.