A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scam)

[ljwheat]

Thank you Kimberly i stand corrected. sorry -T- the date didnt ring any bell in my memery sorry. John xoxo

[TargeT]

Posted by Kimberley (here)
the precursor to adding fear to TMI incident was the release of the movie "The China Syndrome". Galen talked about his involvement with the movie in several of the interviews posted here in this thread...

I thought the movie came out months before the TMI incident I just now see it was only 12 days before... I saw the movie when It came out... so when TMI happened and my whole family except me was 80 miles away from TMI and I was in Miami I was very very afraid..one of the most fearful moments in my life...

I only saw the movie once...so now seeing the trailer is funny as I forgot Jane Fonda's news reporter roles name was Kimberly...interesting.

MOVIE TRAILER -- "THE CHINA SYNDROME" Release date March 16, 1979

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MvOqyIt_Ug

once you know what to look for it becomes a bit obvious doesn’t it? at least the formula seems easier to spot for me now anyway (problem, reaction, solution etc...)

the media involvement before / after false flags is very telling & probably a bit more "sloppy" in the late 70's compared to now but at the same time finding that material is difficult at best.

I'll have to give "the china syndrome" a watch, I'm not very current on movies pre 1990 (with a few exceptions of course).

I'm mostly interested in information on the TMI incident itself, from what I've read so far it was colossal human error (which makes me look for my tinfoil hat....) and especially any regulatory changes that happened shortly afterwards.. perhaps not enough was done so 7 years later Chernobyl (which was also colossal human error... interesting.....?) perhaps was needed? Maybe I'm stretching a bit to connect those two dots but I think further investigation is warranted.

[Kimberley]

*********

Yes targett further investigation is what we are doing... and yes in the late 70's the propaganda was there and not as slick as it is today... because so many have been waking up all these years... how fun is that???


Much love!!!

[Kimberley]

**************

This relates to this thread... Interesting...

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60Z3AdaT5a8

[gooty64]

Well how was it Grip? Scam or no scam...

Also, I am wondering if Bill Ryan has given this matter any attention. With his contacts and being in the whistleblower business and being an intuitive, I am eagerly anticipating his take on Galen Windsors validity too.

This is either blockbuster revelation or govt. dis-info campaign. I am leaning to the latter but don't know honestly.

Much is at stake for me as I live under 10 miles from a Nuke power plant and am considering moving soon- largely because of the close proximity of the nuke plant.

Another question: Has this Galen Windsor info/videos just popped up this year or has it been available all along?

Posted by gripreaper (here)
I decided to read this entire thread before watching the video. There are several things I’ve surmised and I’ll post them here:

1. Nuclear fission is the ultimate discovery of a process of free energy, and the ability to extract a few materials (depleted uranium) which were very important for the shadow black ops and many life affirming applications.

2. Electrical generation of power is just a cover for what nuclear reactors are really used for.

3. There might be an added ingredient in the process of nuclear fission which was inserted to create a chemical reaction to cause a false sense of radiation, when no actual radiation occurs from the pure process.

4. This is one of the biggest cover-ups of this century

5. Galen Windsor’s discoveries were released prior to Chernobyl or Three Mile Island, and those two events could have been staged false flags to keep the cover up alive, generate fear around nuclear plants, and to discredit the truth.

Needless to say, I have more questions than answers now as my head is spinning with 50 years of programming. When I was 8 years old, we used to have nuclear bomb drills in school where the sirens would go off and we had to crawl under our desks, put our heads in our lap, fold our hands over our heads, and pray to Mother Mary and Jesus, and ask for forgiveness and prepare for death.

This was all a scam? I put nothing past those evil bastards who run this planet, who understand human nature and just how to manipulate it better than anyone. This will, like others have suggested, require much corroborating evidence though in order to bust the trail wide open and purge that programming from my system, but here goes. Going to listen to the video.

We’ll see how I feel after watching it.

[4evrneo]

Wow ! Interesting stuff. My father retired from Los Alamos and I would make a HUGE bet that even my father wouldnt believe this. (he believes the media wouldnt lie) Makes me wonder what else the ptw are doing to inflate taxes, insurance, etc. Im copying this vid right now.

Annette

[Kimberley]

Galen's video was posted on Ben Williams web site over a year ago...someone found it and put in up on youtube a few months ago...

I would love to have Bill Ryan look at this thread also...however if he has he has made no comment on it...

Much love!

[ljwheat]

A lot of commerce and industry has sprang up around this fear of radiation since the cold war, just a little 5th grade science and common sense would go a long way in dispelling the scam that’s been pushed on the populous of the world, trying to keep free energy like nuclear power hidden behind unfounded fear.

Did you know that with out nuclear power that there would not be life on this planet. In school we learned all about how wonderful nuclear radiation from our sun is the life force behind everything that grows on this planet.

Yet setting off a bomb and searing that image into our brains has effectively killed our sense of common sense in this matter. The following video will explain this in detail how the wool has been pulled over the eye’s of the world for a reason, and that’s keeping free energy off the market and out of our hands.

And replaced it with fear. There is more radiation coming from our sun every minute of the day than what is feared coming from Japan. A Million fold per square inch more, and with out it we would die.

People, people please wake up. Remember what the Sun is and bring your brains back on line. You’ve been scammed.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejCQrOTE-XA

[wavydome]

As the OP is based on a man who said he made his own observations...

I would like to see if any additional people or groups of people are making additional observations in support of Galen's observations.

I've already forgotten the the exact observations made with the specific elements or isotopes or which forms of radiation were involved.

Which instruments or apparatus were used and the method also, (the scientific methods, if these merited such a description).

Then there was the other promotions for other nuclear tech, the real impact of which on our troubled planet is still not clear to me.

The science that stays with me here is that we really need a new map of radiation phenomena and effects on biology and matter.

We need to take science back out of the ivory tower and away from weird priesthoods.

Not holding my breath however as the brainwashing and widespread-hijacking on this planet is confusing every issue, (for the time being).

Obviously some forms of radiation are benign and other forms range through broad gradients to shear destruction of life and stable-elements.

There appears to be no clear mapping of this. Instead we have confusion along with amazement.

As to public disclosures of a writer and another first hand experiencer, here is a woman who wrote a book. I just listened to her interview with Helen Caldicott, M.D:

http://ifyoulovethisplanet.org/?p=6122

Quote from this webpage which has many referenced links:

This week’s guest is Kristen Iversen, author of the new book, Full Body Burden: Growing Up in the Nuclear Shadow of Rocky Flats, published this month by Crown Books in the U.S. and Random House in the U.K. Read the press release about the book. Watch the book trailer here. Iversen is Director of the MFA Program in Creative Writing at The University of Memphis, and also Editor-in-Chief of The Pinch, an award-winning literary journal. She grew up in Arvada, Colorado near the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons facility, and currently lives in Memphis. As background, read Iversen’s March 10 New York Times opinion piece, Fallout. Also read Naomi Wolf’s 2012 article From Rocky Flats to Fukushima: This Nuclear Folly and The day Denver was nearly lost. During the interview, the research of Carl John is mentioned. Read the Wikipedia entry Radioactive contamination from the Rocky Flats Plant which states that “An early, focused study by Dr. Carl Johnson, health director for Jefferson County, showed a 45 percent increase in congenital birth defects in Denver suburbs downwind of Rocky Flats compared to the rest of Colorado.” Iversen mentions the book The Plutonium Files by Eileen Welsome. She also refers to this map showing the Rocky Flats contamination zone (note: large file size). A compressed version of the same map can be seen here. For more information, be sure to see the recently re-released 1983 documentary, Dark Circle. The Emmy Award-winning film includes much footage of the Rocky Flats plant and its radioactive pollution of neighborhoods around Denver.

[ljwheat]

Posted by wavydome (here)
As the OP is based on a man who said he made his own observations...

I would like to see if any additional people or groups of people are making additional observations in support of Galen's observations.

I've already forgotten the the exact observations made with the specific elements or isotopes or which forms of radiation were involved.

Which instruments or apparatus were used and the method also, (the scientific methods, if these merited such a description).

Then there was the other promotions for other nuclear tech, the real impact of which on our troubled planet is still not clear to me.

The science that stays with me here is that we really need a new map of radiation phenomena and effects on biology and matter.

We need to take science back out of the ivory tower and away from weird priesthoods.

Not holding my breath however as the brainwashing and widespread-hijacking on this planet is confusing every issue, (for the time being).

Obviously some forms of radiation are benign and other forms range through broad gradients to shear destruction of life and stable-elements.

There appears to be no clear mapping of this. Instead we have confusion along with amazement.

As to public disclosures of a writer and another first hand experiencer, here is a woman who wrote a book. I just listened to her interview with Helen Caldicott, M.D:

http://ifyoulovethisplanet.org/?p=6122

Quote from this webpage which has many referenced links:

This week’s guest is Kristen Iversen, author of the new book, Full Body Burden: Growing Up in the Nuclear Shadow of Rocky Flats, published this month by Crown Books in the U.S. and Random House in the U.K. Read the press release about the book. Watch the book trailer here. Iversen is Director of the MFA Program in Creative Writing at The University of Memphis, and also Editor-in-Chief of The Pinch, an award-winning literary journal. She grew up in Arvada, Colorado near the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons facility, and currently lives in Memphis. As background, read Iversen’s March 10 New York Times opinion piece, Fallout. Also read Naomi Wolf’s 2012 article From Rocky Flats to Fukushima: This Nuclear Folly and The day Denver was nearly lost. During the interview, the research of Carl John is mentioned. Read the Wikipedia entry Radioactive contamination from the Rocky Flats Plant which states that “An early, focused study by Dr. Carl Johnson, health director for Jefferson County, showed a 45 percent increase in congenital birth defects in Denver suburbs downwind of Rocky Flats compared to the rest of Colorado.” Iversen mentions the book The Plutonium Files by Eileen Welsome. She also refers to this map showing the Rocky Flats contamination zone (note: large file size). A compressed version of the same map can be seen here. For more information, be sure to see the recently re-released 1983 documentary, Dark Circle. The Emmy Award-winning film includes much footage of the Rocky Flats plant and its radioactive pollution of neighborhoods around Denver.

There are probably more reports out there to keep the fear alive and well, and most are tied to the all mighty dollar bill, on the other hand common sense is the greatest evidence available in a world of almost total distortion money generator.

Between ww11 bombing of Japan, two “A” bombs dropped releasing radiation, hundreds of above ground BOMB testing releasing a combined unbelievable total amount of radiation and fall out.

Yet the two city’s in Japan and the rest of the world is still thriving, the hydrogen build up and pressure explosion at Japans and Russia’s accident released no fall out, and if there was compared to the release of bombs testing would equal a fart in the wind.

Common sense is the first thing to die in the face of fear. Doing the math what is released in a nuclear blast ?

Verses a release of pressure build up of heat and steam from a melt down ? A bubble pop compared to a bomb release of radiation and fall out?

You don’t need an expert to do the math, and exercise a little gray matter. Just the amount of evidence on this thread alone is not enough to cure stupid, in giving away our power to so called experts that wipe the buts just like we do.

[Andrew]

Which is cleaner Nuclear power or Coal power?

If we had to pick between the two for our energy, which one would you pick?

What are the records for all the pollution for burning coal?

Why did they BAN the burning of coal in towns and cities in England?

Why did they close most of the coal mines?

If we cant handle the Nuclear power properly why the hell are they going to give us a newer more potent energy source to get our electric?

If we had this so called free energy could we do more damage with it then Nuclear?

Is the more cleaner energy solutions more dangerous without better experience?

Are we ready for better technologies?

[TargeT]

Posted by Andrew (here)
Which is cleaner Nuclear power or Coal power?

You are going to have to carefully define "clean" as that is currently a politicized word that means almost nothing anymore...

Posted by Andrew (here)
If we had to pick between the two for our energy, which one would you pick?

Nuclear HANDS DOWN (LFTR to be specific)

Posted by Andrew (here)
What are the records for all the pollution for burning coal?

we are going to have to carefully define "pollution", same reasons as "clean"

Posted by Andrew (here)
Why did they BAN the burning of coal in towns and cities in England?

I'd guess for air quality issues mostly?

Posted by Andrew (here)
Why did they close most of the coal mines?

do you know something I don't ? I'd guess due to lack of demand??

Posted by Andrew (here)
If we cant handle the Nuclear power properly why the hell are they going to give us a newer more potent energy source to get our electric?

"we" have never had nuclear power, we have had Yellow cake refineries that make power as a secondary function, but that is NOT nuclear power.

Posted by Andrew (here)
If we had this so called free energy could we do more damage with it then Nuclear?

We are going to have to define "damage" here also....

Posted by Andrew (here)
Is the more cleaner energy solutions more dangerous without better experience?

"Clean" again eh?

Posted by Andrew (here)
Are we ready for better technologies?

Are we ready for what we have now?

[scanner]

Posted by TargeT (here)

Posted by Andrew (here)
Which is cleaner Nuclear power or Coal power?

You are going to have to carefully define "clean" as that is currently a politicized word that means almost nothing anymore...

Posted by Andrew (here)
If we had to pick between the two for our energy, which one would you pick?

Nuclear HANDS DOWN (LFTR to be specific)

Posted by Andrew (here)
What are the records for all the pollution for burning coal?

we are going to have to carefully define "pollution", same reasons as "clean"

Posted by Andrew (here)
Why did they BAN the burning of coal in towns and cities in England?

I'd guess for air quality issues mostly?

Posted by Andrew (here)
Why did they close most of the coal mines?

do you know something I don't ? I'd guess due to lack of demand??

Posted by Andrew (here)
If we cant handle the Nuclear power properly why the hell are they going to give us a newer more potent energy source to get our electric?

"we" have never had nuclear power, we have had Yellow cake refineries that make power as a secondary function, but that is NOT nuclear power.

Posted by Andrew (here)
If we had this so called free energy could we do more damage with it then Nuclear?

We are going to have to define "damage" here also....

Posted by Andrew (here)
Is the more cleaner energy solutions more dangerous without better experience?

"Clean" again eh?

Posted by Andrew (here)
Are we ready for better technologies?

Are we ready for what we have now?

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/me...lenr/lenr.html

[TargeT]

LENR (E-cat comes to mind) could work. LENR is "cold fusion" and at least with the E-cat it doesn't even involve nuclear isotopes.

seems like we are on the cusp of a few tech's that will drastically change the world (and what is CURIOSITY running on??)

LENR (low energy nuclear reaction... much more PC than "cold fusion" haha..) is working and functional (though no power production units are made that I know of other than possibly the "e-cat" if it turns out to be real)

LFTR (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor) was a power production method that ran for over 10 years in the 40's & seems like the most obvious choice (to me)

who knows which will come out on top, China is perusing LFTR so maybe that will.

[TargeT]

Latest E-cat test:

LEONARDO CORPORATION

REPORT ON THE INTERNAL TEST PERFORMED ON THE “HOT CAT”



Report date: October 9th 2012

NOTICE : THIS REPORT IS ISSUED BY LEONARDO CORPORATION, NOT BY A THIRD PARTY. TESTS PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY WILL BE RELEASED UPON COMPLETION OF THE SAME.

IN THE PRESENT REPORT, WE ARE PRESENTING DATA OBTAINED BY US THROUGH A PARALLEL TEST PERFORMED WITH THE SAME INSTRUMENTATION USED BY SAID THIRD PARTY, ON THE SAME REACTOR, THE SO-CALLED “HOT CAT”.

PLEASE CONSIDER THESE FIGURES AS THOSE WE REASONABLY EXPECT TO SEE CONFIRMED IN THE FORTHCOMING INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY TEST.

THE REACTOR WAS MANUFACTURED IN THE USA.

MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION WAS CHOSEN SUBSEQUENTLY TO THE SWEDISH TEST PERFORMED ON SEPT. 6TH.

MEASUREMENTS WERE THEREFORE PERFORMED WITH THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE PRECISION, AVOIDING THE USE OF AMP CLAMPS AND VOLTMETERS, IN PLACE OF WHICH THE INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT # 2 (MODULATED BY A VARIAC INSTEAD OF A TRIAC POWER SOURCE) WAS USED.

DATA

Please take note of the data format: a period “.” is used to indicate the decimals and a comma “,” to indicate the thousands, not vice versa as in many countries; for instance, 2,000.00 means “two thousand point zero hundredths”.

REACTOR DESCRIPTION

The reactor is a cylinder having the following dimensions:

Length: 33 cm

Diameter: 8.6 cm

(See photos in the Penon Report attached)

Surface: 891 cm2

The internal cylinder has been eliminated; energy measurements were performed on the external surface only, through the Stephan-Boltzmann equation.

Weight without charge: 4331 g

Weight before test: 4351 g

Weight after test: 4350 g

Charge weight: 20 g

Test started: Sept 25th at 08.00 AM

Test completed: Oct 9th at 08.00 AM

Total duration of the test: 336 hours

OPERATION

Time from reactor startup to full power: 4 hours

Reactor shutdown time: 4 hours

Net operation time for stabilized reactor: 328 hours

TEMPERATURES

Average room temperature: 25 °C

Temperature reached after 4 hours: 1050 °C

Average temperature for the following 328 hours: 1050 °C

POWER CONSUMPTION

Self-sustaining mode operation, total time: 118 hours

Peak power consumption: about 5 kW

Average power consumption: about 2.4 kW (two point four kW)

TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMED

kWh 278.4

ENERGY PRODUCED

T(°K)4 = 2.838 * 1012

Wh = 2.838 * 1012 * 5.67 * 10-8 * 8.91 * 102 * 10-4 = 14.337 Wh * h-1 (fourteen point three hundred and thirty-seven kWh per hour)

TOTAL ENERGY IRRADIATED

kWh 3.268

COP

3.268/278.4 = 11.7 (eleven point seven)

POWER DENSITY

163.4 MW * kg-1 (one hundred and sixty-three point four MWh per kg)

(see the Ragone Plot at p. 15 of the Penon Report attached)

INSTRUMENT USED FOR MEASURING

TEMPERATURE ON THE EXTERNAL SURFACE:

Optris PI 160 Camera (see Attachment 1)



INSTRUMENT USED FOR MEASURING POWER

CONSUMPTION DURING THE TEST

Tursdale Technical Services, PCE-830 (See Attachment 2)



EXTERNAL REACTOR SURFACE COATING

Black paint, proprietary formulation, resistant up to 1200° C, made specifically for Leonardo Corp. by Universokrema, Treviso, Italy.

This test is under scrutiny by an independent third party.

DIRECTOR OF THE TEST:

DR. ANDREA ROSSI

CEO

LEONARDO CORPORATION

http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/10/up...ot-cat-report/


Go LENR GO!

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Happy to see this post appear again, it was recently unstickied and the motivation for doing so was it was not posted on for about a month or so, i thought this was and still is very strange, there are thousands of threads on Avalon that are not posted on for two years, i wish this was a sticky thread again.

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Posted by ljwheat (here)
A lot of commerce and industry has sprang up around this fear of radiation since the cold war, just a little 5th grade science and common sense would go a long way in dispelling the scam that’s been pushed on the populous of the world, trying to keep free energy like nuclear power hidden behind unfounded fear.

Did you know that with out nuclear power that there would not be life on this planet. In school we learned all about how wonderful nuclear radiation from our sun is the life force behind everything that grows on this planet.

Yet setting off a bomb and searing that image into our brains has effectively killed our sense of common sense in this matter. The following video will explain this in detail how the wool has been pulled over the eye’s of the world for a reason, and that’s keeping free energy off the market and out of our hands.

And replaced it with fear. There is more radiation coming from our sun every minute of the day than what is feared coming from Japan. A Million fold per square inch more, and with out it we would die.

People, people please wake up. Remember what the Sun is and bring your brains back on line. You’ve been scammed.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejCQrOTE-XA

Bump for the video, and i dont know what the sun is, nuclear or electromagnetic, i have never been to the sun so i am just guessing here all i know its hot and provides light for seeing sh!t during daytime and its needed for photosynthesis that grows my salad( i like that in the suns i know and i respect them for that, as a matter of fact, some of my best friends are suns, i worship my friends too) , thats good enough for me, i need sun regardsless of what its made of or what it radiates, i also think its really funny that a CME is only problematic when there are electronics and such to the best of my knowledge, a few hundred years ago you would not even notice if one occured (CME) oyeag right, its a funny day and the sun is burning a bit today, my tomatoes leaves look a bit curly, that would be about it.

[Rocky_Shorz]

bumped for 665 plumber...

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Posted by Rocky_Shorz (here)
bumped for 665 plumber...

Thanks Rocky, should be up here all the time, i am still thinking everybody should see this.

[Rocky_Shorz]

Maybe a new category should be set up for hidden truths like this under general discussion so they are never buried...

Tesla Secrets... Sabbath of Electronics...
recycling Nuke Material...

beyond Newton...