+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 21 FirstFirst 1 7 17 21 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 420

Thread: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

  1. Link to Post #121
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    2nd January 2011
    Location
    United States of America
    Posts
    3,244
    Thanks
    1,267
    Thanked 10,494 times in 2,609 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    As for the overpumped up scare of Fukushima radiations being all over the place:


    From http://educate-yourself.org/lte/radi...p08jul12.shtml:

    Fukushima Hoax: Reader Wears Radiation Badge During Vacation Trip from Florida-Seattle-Juneau, Alaska With No Indication of Abnormal Background Radiation Levels


    July 8, 2012


    Subject: Radiation North West
    From: Greg
    Date: Sun, July 8, 2012
    To: Ken Adaci

    : Hi Ken,

    I am a big fan of your site. I've read with interest your articles disputing the radiation scare on the western USA coast from Fukushima. I offer some anecdotal evidence to support your claim that radiation on the western US is exaggerated. I just returned from a 10 day vacation/cruise from Seattle to Juneau Alaska. I carried a small radiation sticker with me the whole time and there was no indication I encountered high levels of radiation. The sticker did not change color from the time I left Florida until my return. The website for the detector I used is


    Thought you might want this background information. Thank you for the information you provide at your site.

    Greg

    ***

    Hi Greg,

    Thanks for your report. The RAD badge you wore is a sensible and inexpensive way to determine if you are being exposed to levels of radiation that could be injurious to your health. The radiation monitors used by the federal, state and local governments, along with universities and nuclear plant facilities can detect much smaller changes than the RAD badge for any type of ionizing radiation source and NONE of them have reported background radiation readings - before, during, and AFTER 3/11- that are in any way worrisome or even HINT at the possibility of an elevated long term health risk. Anyone with a brain can look at the radiation monitoring data, freely available on the internet, to prove to themselves that the Fukushima radiation scare campaign is a contrived hoax from top to bottom.

    I only wish that more people would stop accepting the egregious distortions and wholesale fabrications being promoted by the internet Fukushima Radiation Psyops Team and start checking the FACTS on their own to see that there is NO radiation increase.


    Best Regards, Ken
    The only problem with this is what are individuals to think when after Fukashima happens they shut down radiation monitoring sites in Canada and other parts of the continent? When Japan lies to their people? Who to trust?

    There has been a call out for more radiation monitoring yet it has not happened except by the public and university sector. This does not call out confidence in the public. And on top of it all within days after Fukashima, they choose to raise the bar for radiation exposure. And on top of all of this no US government official even goes over there to look things over for a full year! Everything they do seems to be directied to make fear and instill a lack of confidence from those experts and government agencies that we think are suppose to be watching out for us.
    Last edited by Arrowwind; 11th July 2012 at 15:57.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Arrowwind For This Post:

    GoingOn (15th October 2012), NancyV (11th July 2012), panopticon (12th December 2012), wavydome (11th July 2012)

  3. Link to Post #122
    England Avalon Member SKIBADABOMSKI's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Age
    48
    Posts
    515
    Thanks
    1,898
    Thanked 3,514 times in 458 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Arrowwind (here)
    Quote Posted by Andrew (here)
    Quote Posted by Taurean (here)
    and another thing - What does this say about the Van Allen Belt ?
    Pete Peterson mentions in the camelot video that when your in a plane your getting equivalent of an X-Ray a minute (or something like that) doesn't seem to bother anybody. Also wouldn't any radiation leaked on Earth just make its way up to the radioactive shielding we have around the planet?
    These explainations of receiving equivilent radiation from the environment to some nuclear radiation exposures just doesnt hold water. The real issue is radioactive particles entering your body and lodging there and causing disease. This is not going to happen to radiation exposure on an airplane.

    I live practically next door to one of the worlds largest nuclear research centers. Ive been going to painting sessions with a woman who's husband works there. He is a facility manager at Idaho National Laboratores. We started talking about the nuclear issue and I mentions Galen to her. She was not familiar with him but she started to talk about how excited her husband was to be working at INL. He says that the advances in the nuclear industy is spectacular and they have greatly greatly reduced waste product and the dangers associated with nuclear plants. Although he is not a nuclear physisist he knows them as he has to interface with them daily and needs to understand their work and needs to manage the facility correctly. She made it sound that the changes going on are huge... but how come we dont know about it?

    I realized as she was talking that if what she said was true there is a huge knowlege deficit amonsgst the public sector... including those who live around INL. So I asked her if her husband would be open to me interviewing him for an article on advances in nuclear processing and development. I will likley know next week.

    I thought it interesting that she had no awareness of small nuclear plants for towns or building complexes. She said she had never heard her husband mention it that such devices could be on the drawing table somewhere.

    I'll see what I can find out.


    Now thats more like it.. good luck with the interview.
    Last edited by SKIBADABOMSKI; 11th July 2012 at 17:01.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SKIBADABOMSKI For This Post:

    NancyV (11th July 2012), TargeT (11th July 2012)

  5. Link to Post #123
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,602
    Thanks
    59,170
    Thanked 93,647 times in 15,313 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Arrowwind (here)
    [...]
    I carried a small radiation sticker with me the whole time and there was no indication I encountered high levels of radiation. The sticker did not change color from the time I left Florida until my return. The website for the detector I used is


    Thought you might want this background information. Thank you for the information you provide at your site.

    Greg

    [...]

    NONE of them have reported background radiation readings - before, during, and AFTER 3/11- that are in any way worrisome or even HINT at the possibility of an elevated long term health risk.

    [...]

    Best Regards, Ken

    The only problem with this is what are individuals to think when...

    [...]
    ...or how to dismiss important valuable data.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    NancyV (11th July 2012)

  7. Link to Post #124
    United States Avalon Member ljwheat's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th January 2012
    Location
    Cape Coral, Florida
    Age
    70
    Posts
    949
    Thanks
    5,305
    Thanked 4,468 times in 859 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Kimberley (here)
    ********************

    Ok I recorded the interview with Ben Williams yesterday and it is now posted in the archives for your listening pleasure...

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/beloven...ear-power-scam


    Ben sent me a NUCLEAR RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPARISON CHART that Ben and Galen put together.. I have attached this in a jpg version.



    ok the pdf is attached too so you can see this chart..just click on the pdf attachment link below the graphic..

    Any way Much love!!


    ********** Kimberly **********

    Your interview with Ben Williams, much thanks, Ben has connected many dots, just as all of us have, the comparison of a bombed out city ('NO' -- Two city's) much more devastating than Chernobyl-- but yet has never had a dead zone's declared ? --lives today--- as testimony to Chernobyl’s dead zone lie.--- Just one example in plain sight to anyone with out fear baggage still installed.

    So Fucashima is safer than walking into a local Mc Donald’s and ordering chicken mc nuggets for lunch. Fear of fear “its self” nuclear boggy man is a grown up fear.

    How liberating this has been for me, I feel a great wait has been lifted. Thanks Kimberly for all your work in refining and looking further into this nuclear scam. John xxx
    Last edited by ljwheat; 11th July 2012 at 22:17.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ljwheat For This Post:

    Kimberley (11th July 2012), NancyV (13th July 2012), witchy1 (15th July 2012)

  9. Link to Post #125
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,602
    Thanks
    59,170
    Thanked 93,647 times in 15,313 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Another view on what level of radioactivity is defined as "being safe":


    Quote Posted by Carmody (here)
    [...]

    It is not shouted from the rooftops, it is simply here in this thread, on a 'not at the top interest level' forum. A forum that the odd person of the intellect required, may, perchance.....stumble across.

    My life is about coincidences. timelines. Events, in time.

    Today, I sat in the door of a big chain store, with my new 1000w gas powered generator that I was buying at half price. I wanted a wee one, as in most cases, I have no need to drag out the big one, if the power goes out. Little is fine, perfect in fact. If I need water pressure, hot water and the like, I would bring the big one out. I can surf the net, light the house, use the stereo and watch TV if I have to, on the little one, and have very low gasoline consumption.

    I was sitting in the mentioned exit area( a few chairs where there) with my shopping cart and the generator in it. I was there as a big storm had started up.

    Who came up beside me and I struck up a conversation with? No-one but the person who was connected to the Nuclear regulatory commission at the federal level and was the one who did the direct testing for the area I am in, with regard to radioactivity. They had been doing it for the past 20 years. they were doing it for Chernobyl, as well. I had told him that I understood that the fallout was worst in the leading edge of the given storm, which is why I did not want to go out there. The real deal was That I did not want to get the generator wet, it was a no-box 50% of retail/full price thing.

    I got a full low down on and at a coast to coast federal government testing and monitoring level of the radiation from Fukushima and it's comparison to Chernobyl. We discussed government truth, and the internet truth, and how the two compared.

    I'll speak on that a bit later, but for now I have to go and do a few things. A preview (according to this conversation!) is that it is not as bad as the internet is making it out to be and the government is fibbing, in a mild sense. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
    Quote Posted by Carmody (here)
    Ok. the truth is that his person did not say all that much, and I wasn't going to be probing him. It was a casual conversation and it had to stay that way. Remember, this in casual conversion. It is not my opinion, to the larger extent, but data is difficult to come by. I'm looking at buying one of these and then playing with it. Most of what I say here is extrapolation of what he says.

    http://www.soeks.eu/


    his main point was that the radiation was not all that bad. the deal is that radiation is set to be very very low, regarding exposure levels that are allowable.basically zero tolerance on radiation exposure, on the ground. This is due to the point that radiation is something that governments want to control. so the levels are set low, regarding exposure. In the same way that even a little bit of murder is not considered to be OK, a little bit of exposure to radiation is not OK. Not in the sense of both being ridiculous allowances. What I mean is that no level of murder is OK, according to law and society. If you allowed for a little bit of murder to be OK, then this wold be license for idiots to kill everyone all the time. Excesses would be the norm. Human nature.

    As a psychological comparative, if a bit of radiation was deemed OK, then radiation exposure would likely end up being all over the map. As people, corporations, companies, etc, would all take that to excess, according to their desires. And when radiation is everywhere regarding variation in allowable levels..... you can't control nuclear materials very well, can you? So the allowable exposure levels were set to be exceedingly low.


    Along comes Chernobyl and sets everyone's readings off on these Geiger counters. Then we get this Fukushima thing happening.

    And yes, Fukushima is reading higher than Chernobyl did, and that is not 'new' news. No revelation there.

    Now, granted the exposure levels are high, in the unwanted sense, but not much can be done, regarding the fact that it is out there and cannot be stopped. At least regarding what is already out there.

    Granted they should be doing more than they are in stopping the radiation spreading. Our concern is also the very reason that it has gotten out there - was it accidental, this disaster...or not?

    He said if you took Geiger counters onto aircraft on long fights, you'd likely get some eye opening numbers come up. As an example, on a 10 hour flight as a comparative...you'd have to stand next to the local reactor at the local college (they have one for research) for a minimum of 80 hours, in order to get the same level of radiation exposure. He said that particular reactor room is so clean, it is practically lower than the background level in normal life.

    Regarding spread, he said that when Chernobyl hit, the radiation showed up initially (first readings), in North America, in 48 hours. This means that the radiation was going up VERY high into the atmosphere. If you look at the flow directions, you find the radiation had to circle the globe---- in order to do that.

    I asked where he thought the best honest reporting was coming from, as we could not count on governments to tell the truth (regarding safe exposure, see above) and we could count on the internet to be overly paranoid, so what was, according to his knowledge base and experience, the best place to go for honest and knowledgeable reporting?

    He paused and thought about it..and he said that some website coming out of Australia seemed to have the inside track and inside information. That they were doing a good job.

    Essentially, according to this casual conversation with someone in that position, there is some website in Australia that is doing it best. Perhaps you folks know what that site is.

    Are you worried about the rain? I asked. The rain had slowed quite a bit. He laughed, said no..... and ran out into the rain.....

    Then it moved to being a bit stranger yet.

    A few minutes later....A man and his son sat down. The son was escorting the elderly man around. The man was about 80-85 or so. They weren't about to go out into the rain, he was too old for the chances it would be taking with his health, so they had to wait it out.

    It just happened to be a man who was a military man in is earlier years..and he was in charge of the observation and reporting/control for all nuclear research facilities in the country that I am in, for the 1950's-60's.

    Our conversation centered around the fact that he took a lot of flights in his work, and the idea of accumulated risk in air flight. And parachuting.

    Ie the odds are the same each time you get into the plane or strap on the parachute..but there is a little unrealized factor of 'accumulated risk'. The idea of flipping coins continually and sooner or later, you get heads. The only way to avoid this, is to never get in the plane again. He spoke on how his wife finally relaxed when they sold their small plane, and the accumulated risk was over for them as scenarios go.

    However, this goes back to the idea of radiation exposure, for it is the same in many ways, as the idea of accumulated risk. Higher exposure to radiation brings about the factors of constantly flipping coins until you finally DO hit heads. In the case of radiation, we are all now flipping coins at some rate of some sort. Accumulating risk, is what it is. And this action will be going on for quite some time yet.


    An important and interesting thought:

    By the way, some aspects of aetheric gateway change or over-unity devices DO use radiation in them. T. E. Moray used americium in his over-unity devices. Ionizing radiation, high in the earth's atmosphere, ionizing, working in a charged oscillating polarized atmospheric space. This may degrade humankind's ideas and expectations on ascension (or dimensional opening), this so-called blocking field that surrounds the globe, or it may open it. Like it does for over-unity devices that utilize radiation.

    edit, August 24th,2011: A recent interview of Kerry's with DutchSinse of internet fame has shown some interesting connections with the ideas behind project blue beam's particle dispersion requirements... and radioactive decay.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), Ceedub (12th July 2012), NancyV (13th July 2012), Sir Eltor (22nd July 2012), wavydome (13th July 2012)

  11. Link to Post #126
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    39
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,701 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Arrowwind (here)
    The real issue is radioactive particles entering your body and lodging there and causing disease. This is not going to happen to radiation exposure on an airplane.
    Radiation is really nothing more than the emission of energy waves through space, as well as through physical objects. Usually these energy waves are electromagnetic radiation which are classified into


    Radio waves
    Infrared waves
    Visible light
    Ultraviolet waves
    X-ray
    Gamma rays and
    Cosmic rays


    there are NO "particles entering your body and lodging there" - this just does not happen.
    Nuclear radiation CAN damage cells in concentrated levels, just like anything else really (TOXCICITY IS ALL ABOUT QUANTITY: NOT SUBSTANCE)

    http://www.alternate-energy-sources....radiation.html

    Quote Posted by Arrowwind (here)
    I live practically next door to one of the worlds largest nuclear research centers. Ive been going to painting sessions with a woman who's husband works there. He is a facility manager at Idaho National Laboratores. We started talking about the nuclear issue and I mentions Galen to her. She was not familiar with him but she started to talk about how excited her husband was to be working at INL. He says that the advances in the nuclear industy is spectacular and they have greatly greatly reduced waste product and the dangers associated with nuclear plants. Although he is not a nuclear physisist he knows them as he has to interface with them daily and needs to understand their work and needs to manage the facility correctly. She made it sound that the changes going on are huge... but how come we dont know about it?

    I realized as she was talking that if what she said was true there is a huge knowlege deficit amonsgst the public sector... including those who live around INL. So I asked her if her husband would be open to me interviewing him for an article on advances in nuclear processing and development. I will likley know next week.

    I thought it interesting that she had no awareness of small nuclear plants for towns or building complexes. She said she had never heard her husband mention it that such devices could be on the drawing table somewhere.

    I'll see what I can find out.



    Quote Posted by Arrowwind (here)

    The only problem with this is what are individuals to think when after Fukashima happens they shut down radiation monitoring sites in Canada and other parts of the continent? When Japan lies to their people? Who to trust?

    There has been a call out for more radiation monitoring yet it has not happened except by the public and university sector. This does not call out confidence in the public. And on top of it all within days after Fukashima, they choose to raise the bar for radiation exposure. And on top of all of this no US government official even goes over there to look things over for a full year! Everything they do seems to be directied to make fear and instill a lack of confidence from those experts and government agencies that we think are suppose to be watching out for us.
    I know an IT guy (former co worker) that runs the sensor sites for NOAA, some have radiation detection equipment (along the coast and a few inland) and all of them are still functional with no increased levels of radiation:

    BUT EVEN IF THERE WERE INCREASED LEVELS it's perfectly safe, you can "expose" yourself to radioactive isotopes with no worry given it is not in a concentrated and/or directed form
    (read: doctors offices, directed X-Ray devices, Chemotheropy, or active nuclear reactions (like when a bomb goes off, or inside the reactor chamber of a nuclear reactor) etc..)

    that is the whole point of this thread.
    Last edited by TargeT; 11th July 2012 at 22:32.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  12. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    21CC (11th July 2012), Ceedub (12th July 2012), D-Day (12th July 2012), Hervé (12th July 2012), ljwheat (11th July 2012), NancyV (13th July 2012), wavydome (13th July 2012)

  13. Link to Post #127
    United States Avalon Member wavydome's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    773
    Thanks
    2,060
    Thanked 2,553 times in 674 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    I agree with Aeschylus. How much suffering is needed still needs consideration though. More than linear charts, there are the specific frequencies which have specific effects on specific elements, compounds and biological structures. Besides the specific intensities and wave forms and phased arrays, (as in interference patterns). That is for non-ionizing radiation-- It can still burn in specific concentrations. Body parts can each tolerate a certain amount of exposure. Microwaves in cell phones may or may not cook little parts of the brain. The kitchen radar range could cook a whole brain nicely, i'm sure. In Italy they sold cow brains in the open air markets.I never wanted to taste it though.

    Atom smashing as it was once called, provides another kind of radiation. It breaks down or fuses atoms structures into unstable atom forms which miss a sub atomic part or a few (as byproducts). The nuclear ones are said to have half-lifes implying they are broken for specific lengths of time, according which half-life it is. Radio active in the sense that it can rob and steal sub atomic particles from or foist some surplus radiation on to neighboring atoms... Pray these 'neighboring' atoms are not part of our body, in a sensitive organ....

    No need to suffer that bad on a well run planet.

    Besides we still have the surrounding issues of scorch and burn ravaging of a planet. No need to burn a lovely planet like ours with massive ravaging of forests... Perhaps worse yet coal mining and tar sands.... Yet the condolers of our planet insist on keeping us dumb as a post in the ground. Pounding us down and down. This is the heist. Keep us way down and burn up mother earth, ravage here.... Why? I'm persuaded they fear her like Kavassilas explained in his new book. OUR UNIVERSAL JOURNEY
    Last edited by wavydome; 11th July 2012 at 23:35.

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to wavydome For This Post:

    Ceedub (12th July 2012), D-Day (12th July 2012), ljwheat (11th July 2012), NancyV (13th July 2012), TargeT (11th July 2012)

  15. Link to Post #128
    United States Avalon Member Ceedub's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2012
    Age
    50
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    430
    Thanked 203 times in 47 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Gratitude to all who have posted on this thread, it's been a real eye opener for me. In my search for Truth I have adopted a modus operandi of identifying and breaking down those axiomatic concepts that we all accept as true without question and which form the foundation of all of the other theories we use to understand the reality in which we live. With the programing we are all subjected to it is surprisingly difficult even to identify them. The first clue is usually the source of the information. This nuclear issue at hand is a good example, everything I ever learned about radiation was from government/institutional sources of one sort or another... until I read this thread that is. This subject is a paradigm example of an axiomatic meme accepted with little true knowledge or questioning. I'm kicking myself I didn't spot it earlier but these things are all but invisible, until they are not.

    Much Gratitude, CW
    I Am

  16. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Ceedub For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), Bongo (13th July 2012), fourty-two (14th July 2012), Hervé (13th July 2012), janus (13th July 2012), Jenci (13th July 2012), ljwheat (13th July 2012), NancyV (13th July 2012), Sir Eltor (22nd July 2012), SKIBADABOMSKI (13th July 2012), TargeT (12th July 2012), wavydome (13th July 2012)

  17. Link to Post #129
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,602
    Thanks
    59,170
    Thanked 93,647 times in 15,313 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    [...]
    Took me a while to bite... but there I go: there are three main possibilities or avenues, beside vaccines, for these "other things":
    On that subject, "strange" things are starting to pop-up:


    Chicken vaccines combine to create deadly virus

    Friday, 13 July 2012 Michael Vincent
    ABC

    The vaccines that were meant to protect the chickens instead led to their deaths (Source: nardong/stock.xchng)

    Lethal mix:

    Australian scientists have found that two different vaccines used to control an infectious disease in chickens can recombine to create new lethal virus strains.


    The research, to be published today in the journal Science, has prompted authorities to review vaccine use in animals.

    But the scientists, from the University of Melbourne, say the findings are not only important for vaccines in chickens, but also for any vaccine which might be able to multiply - including those used in humans.

    Chicken respiratory virus ILT can lead to birds dying in a pool of bloody mucus, but vaccines that were meant to protect them have instead led to their deaths.

    Dr Joanne Devlin, a lecturer in Veterinary Public Health-Epidemiology at the Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, says the deaths were caused when two vaccines used to treat the virus combined.

    "These new strains were formed by recombination from the different vaccine strains and that they were actually more virulent than the vaccine strains that gave rise to them," she says.

    "This is something we've never before seen before in the field."

    Full article: http://www.abc.net.au/science/articl...13/3545318.htm


    This is some confirmation of the strategy exposed here:


    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    One of he culprit: PABA

    [...]

    This next piece of text shows that PAB pathway, as opposed to Aro pathway mutants have been made by scientists. They also require PABA to grow. In addition, it is pointed out that it is possible to take two mutants both which look attenuated and thus safe to use for a vaccine, yet when both bacteria are present together they are able to make PABA. That is important to know because two companies making vaccines even for different pathogens could pick different locations in the pathway to target. Then if both live germs met up someplace in the world there could be a sudden outbreak of one or both of the diseases. It might look innocent and each company might claim ignorance that such a thing could happen. But in fact, that possibility is inherent in this piece of text . And any scientist who thought about it for a couple of minutes would immediately see that danger in producing such live vaccines.

    Let me try to explain this problem more clearly. Suppose you have two factories that make the same guns. And suppose that you shut down the first one by not allowing them to make triggers and the second one by not allowing them to make barrels for the guns. If they work together they can share triggers and barrels they can still make guns just fine.

    [...]
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    NancyV (13th July 2012), wavydome (13th July 2012)

  19. Link to Post #130
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Posts
    1,195
    Thanks
    20,032
    Thanked 8,962 times in 1,125 posts

    Talking Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Ceedub (here)
    Gratitude to all who have posted on this thread, it's been a real eye opener for me. In my search for Truth I have adopted a modus operandi of identifying and breaking down those axiomatic concepts that we all accept as true without question and which form the foundation of all of the other theories we use to understand the reality in which we live. With the programing we are all subjected to it is surprisingly difficult even to identify them. The first clue is usually the source of the information. This nuclear issue at hand is a good example, everything I ever learned about radiation was from government/institutional sources of one sort or another... until I read this thread that is. This subject is a paradigm example of an axiomatic meme accepted with little true knowledge or questioning. I'm kicking myself I didn't spot it earlier but these things are all but invisible, until they are not.

    Much Gratitude, CW
    Clicking a thank you was not enough for this post.

    Everything we ever learned about everything was from someone else controlling the information. Who runs the schools, the research, the release of information?

    Yet how many keep perpetuating the information they learned or 'found' without questioning...believing it to be true because it came from some authority figure.

  20. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to janus For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), Bongo (13th July 2012), Ceedub (13th July 2012), D-Day (13th July 2012), ljwheat (13th July 2012), NancyV (14th July 2012), TargeT (13th July 2012), wavydome (13th July 2012)

  21. Link to Post #131
    United States Avalon Member Forevernyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th July 2010
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    498
    Thanks
    235
    Thanked 1,758 times in 421 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    It begins to make you question EVERYTHING. Who's to say the planets are the way we've been told they are? How do we know for sure that there's no life on Mars, Venus, Jupiter or Saturn? How do we know you can't travel faster than light? It just begins to open up a whole Pandora's Box of questions. How much of what we are taught/told is truth? How many lies to keep us under control?
    Last edited by Forevernyt; 14th July 2012 at 02:09.
    There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick.

  22. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Forevernyt For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), Bongo (13th July 2012), Ceedub (13th July 2012), D-Day (13th July 2012), janus (13th July 2012), ljwheat (13th July 2012), NancyV (14th July 2012)

  23. Link to Post #132
    United States Avalon Member ljwheat's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th January 2012
    Location
    Cape Coral, Florida
    Age
    70
    Posts
    949
    Thanks
    5,305
    Thanked 4,468 times in 859 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Forevernyt (here)
    It begins to make you question EVERYTHING. Who's to say the planets are the way we've been told they are? How do we know for sure that there's no life on Mars, Venus, Jupiter or Saturn? How do we know you can't travel faster than light? It just begins to open up a whole Pandora's Box of questions. How much of what we are taught/told is truth? How much lies to keep us under control?
    I agree totally with this, there has been no stone left unturned in our force feed knowledge base it seems. that’s not the problem, the problem is getting the herd out of the pasture or blind canyon they’ve been standing in for so long. As everything in that canyon has been brought in to fit that carrel of existence as we know it. Thinking outside the box, when the box you want to think outside of was brought in to this dead end canyon we’ve been lead into from birth. So how do you think outside the box that’s not your box to begin with? This is all that you were ever shown. The box’s lined up fore you, one by one. This is what we birthed into. Box’s they’ve built.

    Cattle walking up a plank into a truck to market, or up a shiny ramp into ET ships ? I don’t see the difference. We’ve been a commodity since birth, soon they will be coming for there herd. How many will wake up in time or continue to march in a straight line as we’ve been taught since birth?

    Like showing a cave man a shiny new door, if he’s never shown that it opens. 200 years later it will still be shut and never opened. All the planets are inhabited, but the shut door to this was never opened in our schools in fact they were painted over with a thick layer of invisible paint of knowledge, who’s Knowledge? What or who’s box did that gem come out of.

    This thread only exposes one small pebble that we’ve been able to turn back over to see its true color. We have a big task ahead of us at this time, this is a great start if we can keep it going for enough to see, we do need help, but this is a move in the right direction, tell everyone you know about this give them the link to this thread lets move it up a notch or two. John

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ljwheat For This Post:

    Ceedub (13th July 2012), janus (13th July 2012)

  25. Link to Post #133
    United States Avalon Member Ceedub's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2012
    Age
    50
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    430
    Thanked 203 times in 47 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Cattle walking up a plank into a truck to market, or up a shiny ramp into ET ships ? I don’t see the difference. We’ve been a commodity since birth, soon they will be coming for there herd. How many will wake up in time or continue to march in a straight line as we’ve been taught since birth?

    I imagine the rare cow in the herd pleading with the others, "You think this fence is explained by scientists... it's some coincidence the grass just happens to be greener?! 'Walk toward the trucks', that's what the divine biped told you??!! Wake the mooo up!".

    CW
    I Am

  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Ceedub For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), conk (27th July 2012), janus (13th July 2012), NancyV (14th July 2012), TargeT (13th July 2012)

  27. Link to Post #134
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Posts
    1,195
    Thanks
    20,032
    Thanked 8,962 times in 1,125 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Some of us were born mutants...the ones who question everything and just have to find out for ourselves. No one else's box will ever fit...too confining.

    Pretty little boxes all in a row...so tempting...such a trap.
    Last edited by janus; 13th July 2012 at 21:48.

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to janus For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), Ceedub (13th July 2012), ljwheat (13th July 2012), NancyV (14th July 2012)

  29. Link to Post #135
    United States Avalon Member Ceedub's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2012
    Age
    50
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    430
    Thanked 203 times in 47 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Forevernyt (here)
    It begins to make you question EVERYTHING. Who's to say the planets are the way we've been told they are? How do we know for sure that there's no life on Mars, Venus, Jupiter or Saturn? How do we know you can't travel faster than light? It just begins to open up a whole Pandora's Box of questions. How much of what we are taught/told is truth? How much lies to keep us under control?
    Just goes to show, to perceive Truth maintain the Beginer's Mind.

    CW
    I Am

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ceedub For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), GoingOn (15th October 2012), janus (13th July 2012), NancyV (14th July 2012)

  31. Link to Post #136
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    39
    Posts
    7,515
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,701 times in 7,043 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Belle (here)
    Pretty little boxes all in a row...so tempting...such a trap.
    The trap has been shown to us, but being shown something and recognizing something are completely different.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  32. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), Ceedub (13th July 2012), janus (13th July 2012), ljwheat (13th July 2012), NancyV (14th July 2012)

  33. Link to Post #137
    United States Avalon Member Ceedub's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2012
    Age
    50
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    430
    Thanked 203 times in 47 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Belle (here)
    Some of us were born mutants...the ones who question everything and just have to find out for ourselves. No one else's box will ever fit...too confining.

    Pretty little boxes all in a row...so tempting...such a trap.
    I Am

  34. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ceedub For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), gooty64 (30th August 2012), janus (13th July 2012), ljwheat (13th July 2012)

  35. Link to Post #138
    United States Avalon Member Ceedub's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2012
    Age
    50
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    430
    Thanked 203 times in 47 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    Quote Posted by Belle (here)
    Pretty little boxes all in a row...so tempting...such a trap.
    The trap has been shown to us, but being shown something and recognizing something are completely different.
    Jinx, we posted the same song at the same time.
    I Am

  36. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ceedub For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), ljwheat (13th July 2012), NancyV (14th July 2012), TargeT (13th July 2012)

  37. Link to Post #139
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Posts
    1,195
    Thanks
    20,032
    Thanked 8,962 times in 1,125 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Quote Posted by Ceedub (here)
    Quote Cattle walking up a plank into a truck to market, or up a shiny ramp into ET ships ? I don’t see the difference. We’ve been a commodity since birth, soon they will be coming for there herd. How many will wake up in time or continue to march in a straight line as we’ve been taught since birth?

    I imagine the rare cow in the herd pleading with the others, "You think this fence is explained by scientists... it's some coincidence the grass just happens to be greener?! 'Walk toward the trucks', that's what the divine biped told you??!! Wake the mooo up!".

    CW
    Reminds me of something H.R. Tomlinson wrote in the book "The Sea and the Jungle" (it was written as 1 paragraph...I made it more for an easier read)....

    "The day before we left for the Madeira we took aboard sixty head of cattle. They were wild things, which had been collected in the campo with great difficulty, and driven into lighters. A rope was dropped over the horns of each beast: this was attached to a crane hook, the winch was started, and up the poor wretch came, all its weight on its horns, bumping inertly against the ship's side in its passage, like a bale, and was then dumped in a heap on deck. This treatment seemed to subdue it. Each quietly submitted to a halter. Several lost horns, and one hurt its leg, and had to be dragged to its place.

    But, to our great joy--we were watching the scene from the bridge--the Brazilian herdsmen on the lighter shouted an anxious warning to their fellows on our deck as a small black heifer, a pot-bellied lump with a stretched neck, rotated in her unusual efforts to free her horns. She even bellowed. She bumped heavily against the ship's side, and tried desperately to find her feet. She was, and I offered up thanks for this benefit, most plainly an implacable rebel.

    The cattlemen, as punishment for the trouble she had given them ashore, kept her dangling over the deck, and one got level with her face and mocked her, slapping her nose. She actually defied him, though she was quite helpless, with some minatory sounds.

    She was no cow. She was insurrection, she was the hate for tyrants incarnated. They dropped her. She was up and away like a cat, straight for the winchman, and tried to get the winch out of her path, bellowing as she worked. She put everybody on that deck in the shrouds or on the forecastle head as she trotted round, with her tail up, looking for brutes to put them to death.

    None of the cows (of course) helped her. By a trick she was caught, and her horns were lashed down to a ring bolt in a hatch coaming. Then she tried to kick all who passed.

    If the rest of the cattle had been like her none would have suffered. Alas! They were probably all scientific evolutionists, content to wait for men to become kindly apple-lovers by slow and natural uplift; and gravely deprecated the action of the heifer, from which, as peaceful cows, they disassociated themselves."


    Speaking for myself, just try to put this little lady in a box, and expect the same!

  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to janus For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), Ceedub (14th July 2012), ljwheat (13th July 2012), NancyV (14th July 2012)

  39. Link to Post #140
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th December 2010
    Posts
    122
    Thanks
    16,961
    Thanked 512 times in 107 posts

    Default Re: A video they won't want you to see (Galen Winsor: nuclear scare scam)

    Finding out that "You Don't Know Jack" can be quit an epiphany!
    Many thanks for the ride!

  40. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to fourty-two For This Post:

    21CC (14th July 2012), Ceedub (14th July 2012), D-Day (18th July 2012), janus (14th July 2012), ljwheat (14th July 2012), NancyV (14th July 2012)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 21 FirstFirst 1 7 17 21 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts