Short UFO video linked from Veterans Today - Duff on 7/11/12

[mountain_jim]

I read every article Duff publishes now.

(edit: not to say this is not a fake, I learned my lesson about that here already

and the comments below video seem to be outing it as fake also. I guess Duff needs to be read with a plenty of discernment as well.)

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07...nt-false-flag/

.....

A bit ago, I had learned what we call “hyper-spatial analysis” and of late have worked with a top expert at an “agency” that does analysis of imagery.

For fun, they look at things and take them apart, seeing what is real and how clever some can be in fooling others.

Think about it, do governments have a major national security interest in being able to determine what is real video and what has been faked? How long would you image we have had this capacity for? How about decades?

This, in the imagery below, actually “illegal as hell” highly classified stuff that can never be legally on the internet is real proof of a UFO or, more correctly, a vehicle capable of something one might minimally call “interplanetary travel.”



The rest of the images, that when turned over to a university to examine, which none can legally touch, prove things we don’t even want to talk about. They are here, in good resolution with full resolution available to qualified institutions.

If you haven’t read the piece attached, you should.

OK, here’s the kicker, when I submitted a video of a plane hitting one of the 9/11 towers even I got “Men in Blacked” as we call it. This is what I was told:


Let’s say we were to spend the $250,000 dollars you ask. What if we were to tell you that iconic film images can be proven to be “something else.” What if we were to say the images, under “national security level analysis” prove, categorically that certain planes had
1.No mass
2.Were not made of metal
3.Had no surface temperature
4.Did not exist ‘contemperaneously’ with their surroundings
5.Had no speed, more simply put, appeared to move but, in fact showed no evidence of movement, something we are capable of detecting down to the level of a walk.

I tried. Take the answer, be it “double-talk” as you will. I cannot and will not expand on it nor answer questions.

Then my friend and associate sent me to Youtube. ”Something has caught our eye. We found a video that could not be “created” using any technology we forsee having available at the xxx for the next ten years.”

I asked the plans.


“Oh, that! UFOs are like a game in some ways, we can take a look at this and let you know but, all I can tell you is that, initially, we are accepting this as a genuine UFO. However, let me add, we are also accepting it as a vehicle of American manufacture.”

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5l5QZiaAU4

I will wait for more evidence but enjoy the video, you are paying considerable taxes to others who are doing the same.

[Forevernyt]

How about some footage created with Vue Infinite, probably version 10.

Note how similar the trees are to the ones in this video, which has already been identified as coming from Vue, version 6.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ogv3NToA5A