The Definition of Genocide:
What it Means and Why You Should Care
Before I explain what it does mean, it’s appropriate to display what it does not mean, first. Below is the definition of murder/homicide, with the understanding the two crimes have similar enough definitions that I won’t separate them out here.
Murder/Homicide: the killing of one human being by another; the unlawful killing of another human being without justification or excuse (as in self-defense).
Genocide is another matter entirely, and it behooves the people on this beautiful planet to know what its legal definition is. Genocide: The crime of destroying or conspiring to destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.
I don’t feel particularly satisfied living on a planet where such legal definitions are required, nor am I at all satisfied that although the legal definitions and therefore enforceable laws exist, they are rarely enforced in any meaningful way, if ever. In this respect, the history associated with the legal definition of Genocide and related historical events, should clearly be revisited and therefore well understood by all.
While I will present that here, I recommend you look it up on your own, and print the information out for future reference—before the data-mining internet spiders realize people like yourself are interested in knowing more about it, and they subsequently change the definition because of it. The winners don’t just write/rewrite history, but (y)our dictionaries as well—especially the “on-line” ones.
Once-meaningful experiential/educational tools like books (among other things) are no longer in need of being burned—they are simply deleted. People learned this lesson when George Orwell’s book 1984, was remotely deleted from their Kindles without their permission.
Dimitri has also been kind enough to share how the term “ground zero” has been systematically altered over time in our dictionaries as well, to support the mainstream fiction of a post 9-ll mindset. Jesse Ventura experienced something similar, when one of his shows (regarding FEMA camps) was remotely removed from DVR’s (private property) without the owner’s consent.
The term Genocide was coined in 1944 by the Polish scholar Raphael Lemkin. Genocide comes from the Latin roots genos (race) and cide (killing). What is more essential to understanding the depth of the reality and proper definition of Genocide, is found quoted in a book Lemkin wrote called Axis Rule in Occupied Europe [additional emphasis mine in the following quote]: “a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.”
His writings dealt primarily with Nazi Genocide, and he was instrumental in the development of international conventions against Genocide. After WW2 the United Nations passed a resolution known as the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (78 U.N.T.S. 278 [Dec 9, 1948]). This convention was largely unsuccessful as it took most nations over 50 years to ratify. The United States also chose to wait until 1998 to pass the Genocide Implementation Act of 1987.
This act created a new federal offense that prohibits the commission of acts with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, and to provide adequate penalties for such acts. (S. Rep. No. 333, 100th Cong; 2nd Session  reprinted in 1998 U.S.C.C. A. N. 4156).
That’s all well and good, but we owe it ourselves and our future to really understand what Genocide is, as appropriately described by Lemkin in the phrase: “a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.”
I have again underlined and accentuated the same phrase, because although the definition is/was incredibly all-encompassing (even for its time), it was long, long before the face of Genocide was able to grow more tentacles and morph into a much broader and consequently far deadlier animal—and it was able to transform not just with our permission, apathy, denial, and wishful thinking—but also because the animal/predator has trained us not to see it for what it is.
Very much like the octopus that suddenly fears being discovered for its own safety, an enormous black cloud of ink has been dispersed so we cannot see the truth of our situation. The predator makes its escape while we’re disoriented by the cloud of unexpected black (confusion) suddenly obscuring our sense of direction.
To regain our bearings, even a brief but serious look at things like vaccines, fluoride, weather modification and genetically modified organisms (both food and animal), will show us they all contribute to genocide. There’s certainly no reason to take my word for it in this regard, because endless honest scientific studies, as well as government and military dossiers, have clearly outlined this fact. They generally celebrate it.
Further, the idea that “everyone already knows this” is something I can’t bring myself to believe, because if that is in fact the case, then we’ve already accepted global Genocide as perfectly normal, haven’t we? I’m quite sure you don’t believe that any more than I do. I have never in my life met someone who would happily agree to a slow, painful death of suffering as the victim of Genocide. What I have run into however, are endless people who don’t in fact know that it’s happening—that they and their children are, at this very moment, victims of global Genocide. Also, as legally defined, Genocide is a crime, and every person *and* corporation who participates in it, can be prosecuted for it. Why isn’t this actually happening though?
There are several reasons, and while the problem could easily be summed up by saying the top is as misguided as the bottom, that doesn’t really say much, true as it is regardless. The top (of the pyramid if you like), is killing off nature to kill you, just as the definition of Genocide stated: “a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.”
What the top has yet to realize (or perhaps are simply too broken to understand), is that they are NOT superhuman—their self-proclaimed “special” bloodlines won’t keep them from suffering and dying out of ignorance either. Destroying the foundations of human life might be Genocide for us, but it’s also suicide for them. Moreover, and I don’t say this lightly, the idea that only “they” are detached from reality in this regard, is an absolute fallacy—a fatal one at that.
I have refrained from pointing this out in the past, even as I see more and more people beginning to associate Luciferian principles with the term “light workers”. Nevertheless, I wholly believe in the principle of “sea a need, fill a need” and the need to point this out, is clearly there.
How arrogant, or even ignorant can we be, to belittle our controllers (the top) for having an “insane detachment” to reality, when in fact numerous new age teachings perpetuate the same ideologies, but prefer to call it “healthy or spiritual detachment” instead? As a mother, I can assure I fail to see the difference, and because I can’t see the difference, I’m never quite sure what to tell my son when talking about the future—his future—the very same future all this ‘detachment’ can’t seem to rob him of fast enough.
Tell me, honestly, how many parents of children with leukemia or severe autism, you think are really ‘detached’ from that reality? Parents in Greece and other countries selling their children because they can’t afford to feed them, and all the orphans of parents who died from Aids in other countries, apparently I’m supposed to believe they’re experiencing the healthy detachment of the billions of people who could have prevented all that suffering? In the midst of so much senseless death, I can only hope another new age guru won’t come along and look down their noses at them for not meditating enough to raise their vibration.
The billions of people on this planet suffering needlessly (which will include you and your loved ones soon enough if it doesn’t already), are not waiting for you to raise your consciousness (wake up), they are waiting for you to get out bed, and ACT on what your elevated consciousness (awareness) showed you must be acted on. Action without wisdom is as inappropriate as wisdom without action—the truth of this is all around you—all around me. It chokes the life out of our plants, our animals, our selves, our children, and therefore ALL of our futures. That bothers me a great deal because I am a free-willed being who knows who I really am—who you are as well. I have absolutely no intention of detaching myself from those truths, because I’ve already seen how much suffering that causes.
As a truly sovereign being who understands the responsibility of free will (having really claimed your personal power as such), here’s a list of all the things that realization won’t allow you to accept:
You’re here to suffer—you can’t learn any other way
You’re here to stand idly by and watch others suffer—they can’t learn any other way
You’re here to blame God
You’re here to blame Satan/Lucifer
You’re here to blame aliens
You’re here to blame politicians
You’re here to simply meditate
You’re here to look the other way
You’re here to take action (be really busy) without wisdom
Genocide is a crime of mass proportions, and the idea that you aren’t responsible for the outcome because you never directly took part in the problem, does not detach you from the reality that you never participated in the solution, either. There are only ever two choices—and you can’t love and light your way out of either one. You must act/contribute, and you must do it in ways that are appropriate, based on what is needed at the moment.
Yes, I’m well aware that energy healers do a great deal of good and are expressly needed because they do, but because that’s all spiritual people seem to think is important, those healers will be outran—just like they were in the previous six destruction episodes. I discussed this fact in some depth in my first book, in that the mad scientists, who themselves often don’t take energy healing seriously, will not realize how much interference these healers cause in their experiments as an unknown variable. As a consequence, the mad scientists end up wrongly believing their experiments don’t really harm living things—even when they are supposed to.
These scientists will, because their military grants depend on it, simply keep pushing the envelope; keep turning up the dial until they see living things experiencing the expected disintegration and death they were paid to produce. I can’t tell you how many past live regressions I came across that clearly pointed this out, in great detail I might add. It was as disturbing to read about those past scenarios then, as it is to actually live them out again, now. What happened in the Gulf of Mexico and atFukushima, *are* the escalations I warned about. I can say this with absolute certainty because if all the other methods of Genocide had actually worked up to that point, those escalations wouldn’t have been necessary. This is true to such a degree that if the escalations they’ve moved to now don’t work fast enough to appease their appetite for wide-spread death, there will be others…always others. Yes, it can and will get worse, if the insanely detached from reality fellows, still have access to the buttons.
Think about that for a moment; feel the strain it puts on every decent, kind, and good-natured cell in your body. THAT feeling is your deepest truth, and the only one that matters at the moment. The never-ending “personal truth” nonsense means nothing if it moves you away from this—away from a reality that suffers out of ignorance and wishful thinking. Understand that feeling to the point you can taste it, because as the old saying goes, what we don’t understand we will repeat; clearly, we collectively don’t understand yet.
A truly spiritual humanity will not separate itself from morality with ridiculous notions of detachment. It will do what it knows is right to uphold, create and regenerate life, or it will lose it all and fail because it didn’t—for the seventh, and perhaps final time. I don’t wish that for you—not for any of you.
Having said that, I suppose we’ve come full circle as I recall something my mother used to say to me when I was young and wishing for things to be different: “If wishes were fishes, we would all have a sea full.” That was her less lengthy, but entirely meaningful way of telling me ‘wishing’ never changed anything all by itself.
The skies were such a deep, beautiful blue back then, and the water from the hose was cold, sweet, and safe to drink. It wasn’t a perfect time, but it was good. I was too young to realize that even then subliminal pornographic imagery was in my cartoons but even so, there were no chemtrails in my cartoons, nor animated ogres falling prey to the frequency weapon of a techno-pathic Pied Piper using a different controlling frequency for every different animal.
Needless to say, my oceans weren’t full of millions of dead fish suddenly appearing for no apparent reason back then, nor were they filled with wishes—they were filled fishes—glorious, life-giving fishes.
Blessings to you on your continued journey,