9/11 TV Fakery No Planes!(3:10 is of particular importance)

[danceblackcatdance]

in my utterly humble opinion... you are doing yourselves a gross disservice if you don't watch the 'september clues' video.....

then again i can totally understand the tendency of an ostrich to put its head in the sand...

i'm out... cya on the other side!

[Oouthere]

I think most people post what they truly believe, I also believe "they" love it when far fetched ideas are thrown into the mix in order to make us weaker as a group. Education and honesty to ones self is what will allow us to survive. IMO, any other path will allow us to be manipulated very easily into whatever agenda is desired.

Rich

[Spartacus]

This looks like an aircraft to me.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

[Whiskey_Mystic]

I'm impressed by this footage. I maintain that no amount of evidence at this point will convince those who buy the terrorist story, but it is good analysis.

[Oouthere]

Susan Lindauer worked for the CIA and was the second non-Muslem to be imprisoned under the patriot act. She tells of prior knowledge of using aircraft as weapons and states that at least some of the people named worked with the CIA. This is really worth listening to……

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=EavsvUn7QT8

Rich

[truth4me]

Posted by Spartacus (here)
This looks like an aircraft to me.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

that is a good video......

[jimmer]

in honor of all those massacred lives, truthers should take their thumbs out of their a**es
and put it in their mouths, were it belongs.

and while you're at it, go out and do something constructive.

[Prodigal Son]

Posted by Spartacus (here)
This looks like an aircraft to me.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

Maybe you already know this because it has been widely discussed in 911 theory, that this aircraft had a missile pod mounted on the right side of the underbelly of the fuselage, and it clearly fired something into the building just before making impact. This excellent video you have posted shows it quite nicely. The Naudet Brothers video of the north tower hit shows an identical flash just before impact.

Both of these aircraft hit perfectly at brand new data centers that had raised floors filled with "battery back up units" that were never turned on. It's plausible that whatever these aircraft fired from these missile pods ignited whatever was in those pseudo-batteries and blew the cartoon-cutout in the perimeter walls to allow these planes to enter with no resistance.

We all know that in the real world, hollow aluminum aircraft bodies cannot penetrate the outer perimeter steel columns of a building like this as if they were cardboard. Something is amiss. If this is what happened, it could explain how we could have seen the nose come out the other side unscathed. Everything was cleared out of its way before impact.

I think the "no-planes" theory including holograms shrouding missiles was invented by people who knew that what they saw didn't make sense and were wildly postulating. I did this myself. But it just doesn't make sense. Remote controlled retrofitted 757's with some type of steel-cutting technology would make a lot more sense imo.

[Prodigal Son]

Posted by jimmer (here)
in honor of all those massacred lives, truthers should take their thumbs out of their a**es
and put it in their mouths, were it belongs.

and while you're at it, go out and do something constructive.

It does a far greater disservice to those massacred lives to let the real murderers go unpunished while we blindly accept tales of CIA operatives running the operation with cell phones from their caves.

What does it tell you that we never saw Bin Laden's (I mean Tim Osman's) body, but the entire special forces team that allegedly killed him were themselves all killed?

Who benefits from 911? The military-industrial complex, run by the banksters. Who loses? Anyone who was formerly protected by the Constitution, so respectfully referred to as that "goddammed piece of paper" by the Commander-in-Thief.

There's nothing more entertaining than a good Co-Incidence Theory, but it would be far more constructive to either stop being a lemming and doing something to expose the cabal responsible, or to leave those who have the courage to question the official story alone to try and save the planet. I can't think of anything more constructive than that.

[Fred Steeves]

Posted by Lifebringer (here)
They're already talking about public hangings of bankers in EUK.

I sure hope not Lifebringer. Even if we could somehow separate the good, bad, and in between bankers, that could turn real messy, real fast. Is that how we want to introduce our kids to this new era of peace, by going to the big public hanging every Saturday afternoon? Bring a blanket to spread out, a picnic lunch, and maybe even win the raffle to get junior's picture taken while pulling the lever on the gallows.

I know you're not saying all that, and I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, but it's human nature. Isn't that what we're trying to change?

Cheers,
Fred

[Oouthere]

I once believed in the pod theory as well. I do not have time to find the documentary but it explained about how the paint scheme made it appear like a pod. The flash could be static electricity discharging, who knows how many volts would be carried in airframe and one would never know. Remember these aircraft can taking a lightening strike (man thousands of volts and not be damaged). Even as good of an insulator as rubber is, the touching of the wheels at landing discharges voltage. This stored voltage is also why a ground is required while refueling the aircraft.

But anyway, two metal objects with thousands of volts difference coming in contact could make for interesting viewing....

Rich

[noxon medem]

..
-

It might be (again)
Wise to separate the first and second "impact" on wtc 2 and 1 .

The first came unprepared (on the general public) and anything could have happened ...
The second was watched by many, since a tower was burning from an explotion ..

Note that the second plane hits more off-centre of its designated tower, than the first.
( Some debris is necessary in there, to make it credible ..).

There are credible reports on heavy "things" being moved into, and around in the
upper flores of the wtc buildings in days (and nights) prior to 11th of septemper 2001.
( - so what was it ? A beacon, weapon, enginge, o.a.)

This topic, like most, have been discussed at this forum before. Look in archives (search).
( or some veterans may do the job for you ..)

Thank you for this new information.
Let us make the 11th aniversary of this tragic event
a grand reply, and a kick upwards, since there is
no obvious force from above judging these crimes.

Be well

..
-

[ghostrider]

I noticed something in the 9-11 video, can't believe I didn't think of this while watching it. The bomb went off, and smoke came out of the tower, notice the smoke doesn't behave like normal smoke. IT is supposed to go up , heat rises cold air falls. This smoke seemed to have some kind of force pushing it down , keeping it from going up. I think it may have been the space based weapon ( star wars - molecular dissassociation ) . Much like the wave of a magnet pushing down , take a look and see for yourself pay attention where and how the smoke reacts.

[Cjay]

Posted by Spartacus (here)
This looks like an aircraft to me.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

Watch the right wing-tip carefully as it crosses the left edge of the smoke (at 0:15 to 0:16) - the wing-tip disappears. Then as the wing-tip crosses the left edge of the building (at 0:23), the wing-tip disappears again, as if one-third of the wing went "behind" the building.

Aside from that, the plane looks to me like a static image super-imposed on the background. It just doesn't look natural.

[the_flyingboy]

My opinion is that they used not only holographs but energy weapons as well , it made the concrete to dust...

[danceblackcatdance]

Posted by Cjay (here)

Posted by Spartacus (here)
This looks like an aircraft to me.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

Watch the right wing-tip carefully as it crosses the left edge of the smoke (at 0:15 to 0:16) - the wing-tip disappears. Then as the wing-tip crosses the left edge of the building (at 0:23), the wing-tip disappears again, as if one-third of the wing went "behind" the building.

Aside from that, the plane looks to me like a static image super-imposed on the background. It just doesn't look natural.

Quite.

You'd also expect some wreckage too from a real plane hitting a concrete and steel building.. Maybe even the fragile wings shearing off.. But nada, the building swallows the 'plane' like it was a ghost...

[Prodigal Son]

The lack of wake vortices at both tower impacts and also the Pentagon speaks volumes.

Personally, I find the "no planes" theory at the WTC kind of hard to swallow and I'm on the fence about it, but except for the lack of debris, this vortex thing seems to be a real smoking gun to support it.

Make of this what you will....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zw8ZvGEsc8c

As for the Pentagon, I've come to the conclusion that the downed light poles were staged to conceal a different approach angle that seems to have ended in a FLYOVER...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xo1udtPUR1Q

[conk]

Posted by Cjay (here)

Posted by Spartacus (here)
This looks like an aircraft to me.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

Watch the right wing-tip carefully as it crosses the left edge of the smoke (at 0:15 to 0:16) - the wing-tip disappears. Then as the wing-tip crosses the left edge of the building (at 0:23), the wing-tip disappears again, as if one-third of the wing went "behind" the building.

Aside from that, the plane looks to me like a static image super-imposed on the background. It just doesn't look natural.

Can aluminum wings slice through a mega strong steel structure? The plane seems to just melt into the building, like a good magic illusion.

[bluestflame]

would a hand held laser pointer reveal a hologram by shining straight through it ? ( would you need binoculars to see it clearly enough to tell?

[Conchis]

Posted by Spartacus (here)
This looks like an aircraft to me.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

If you look carefully at 0:24 you an still see the corner of the building through the right wing of the plane. And as was also pointed out...the right wing sort of disappears into the smoke before the plane makes it to where the smoke is. This footage just has an odd look to it.