# Thread: Edward Leedskalnin's secret of the Pyramid Builders, Perpetual Power

1. ## Re: Edward Leedskalnin's secret of the Pyramid Builders, Perpetual Power

a 3000 watt generator would surely have raised some eyebrows if it were functional... I hate to be a skeptic, but I just don't think something like this is possible... not that easily done nor that easily "shown" to be done..

2. ## The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

Mad Hatter (5th April 2013), Oouthere (29th July 2012), RMorgan (30th July 2012)

3. ## Re: Edward Leedskalnin's secret of the Pyramid Builders, Perpetual Power

- This is an Amateur peice by myself, on the discussion of Electricity, Energy, Gravity & Conveyance of Energy, and provides basic abstracts of the Atomic Force, the derived energy of atomic force and the part that magnetism and it 90 degre right hand twist seems to play in the perpetual orbits of atom's, planets, and their conveyance of power by electrical means,

This piece is about the two sides of planetary action. The first side is the scientific opinions, theories and facts, and the other side is the alternative theory that works the same as the science and gets the same results.

The planets gravity, and their rotations around eachother, it is fair to say that the right hand rule law applies to the 90 degree lineal speed of 100% causing an orbiting speed of the gravity well of perpetual kind. But it is also truer to say that it is the timing of the orbits themselves that is responsible for keeping the lineal velocity. If a large object were to sit in between the gravity of a planet and obstruct the gravity from reaching it's satellite then the force that once attracted the satellite now is using it's force to attract the obstruction, and so the satellite orbit is liberated from the planets "gravitation". Here we see that the perpetual motion of an orbiting satellite is not purely caused by gravitation or it's lineal velocity, but the path that was of the least obstruction between so-called strong gravitational objects and their satellites was the cause of the force.

So whilst it is true to say the lineal velocity of the satellite in a straight line fashion, and the pull of gravity at a right angle to that motion will give rise to an orbit provided that the lineal velocity is great enough to account for the right angle "gravity" pull. It is important to note that it is equally true to say that an obstruction between the planet and it's satellite causes a push on the orbit of the planets satellite, and a lack of obstruction (a free path) causes a pull of orbit. This is proof for sure that whilst it was true to say scientifically the satellite's perpetual orbit was maintained by a constant lineal velocity at right angle to plane of gravity, it is also truer and fairer to say that the timing of the rotation of each planets north and south pole planes and the obstruction of one of the poles by things in between planets cause an inversion of the active pole. And so it is fair to say that it is the South pole that is keeping the moon satellite in it's orbit, and, that any obstruction between the two causes an extra pole, which causes the moon satellite to receive the opposite magnetic pole (field) of what it would have otherwise without the obstruction. This is proof for sure that whilst it was true to describe the constant lineal motion of the satellite relative to the gravity plane, what was truer was that the poles push and pull, and that the formation of new currents of polarity between an obstruction of the satellite causes an inversion of the active pole. This is why it must be true that if the moon was to be turned 180 degrees or one half rotation, then it's south pole will be pushing on the north pole of the earth, and so there will be an attraction.

As I have described how gravity can be alternatively described, I should also tell about how the moon satellites gravity has been scientifically found to move the billions of trillions of watts of current in the oceans on the planet earth. This large current is simply obtained by the motion of the moon relative to the flat plane of the earth per time. The ocean is a lineal conductive mass of connected atoms entirely continuously connected via a network of current systems. In the same way that the distance of the planet, or strength of the gravity is determined, the same applies to the local north and south poles. This is why it can be said for sure to say that lineal motion perpendicular to a flat plane of single gravity is equal to missing out that the lineal motion perpendicular to the flat plane is only a perpetually maintainable orbit when there exists no obstruction between the strong gravity of a planet or sun, and it's satellites.

This means that it is not the lineal motion of the satellite alone that is causing the orbit any more than science's non existent single-force gravity pull and that it is the north and south pole that is responsible for gravity, and, that when an obstruction of the earth's north pole forms between it's moon then the obstruction closest to the earth forms an opposite pole to the earth, and the furthest point of the obstruction forms an opposite pole to it's nearest. So if the earth is north pole, the obstruction nearest the earth is south pole, the obstruction furthest the earth is the north pole, and that is why the satellite would move away. Not because gravity cannot get through, but because the obstruction inverted the poles when it sat in between two electrostatic objects. This is the best work of Nikola Tesla and Edward Leedskalnin and Eric Dollard. You can read about it in their books but you will not find information this detailed.

It is important to go away after reading this text - knowing for sure that lineal motion and a single force of gravity cannot explain perpetual stable orbits of planets and suns. The alternative way to properly explain those perpetual stable orbits and gravity is undertaken by the magnetic pole recirculation, and obstructions in that circulation create new poles, which are responsible for the abscence of normal gravity, and not the obstruction itself. This is akin to saying it is the manner in which objects obstruct existing orbits and their poles, and the formations of the poles in between that are responsible for the governing forces that create gravity. This basically means that gravity pull is a secondary force that arises as relative interaction - the gravity and the light itself are secondary - and that the thing that makes them up can be explained like poles akin to the way in which the energy storage system of Nikola Tesla's Tesla Magnifying Transmitter uses a 3 coil system to invert the direction of 2 pole fields to create "true monopolar" electricity. This is done in the same way as Edward Leedskalnin did it in his flywheel, and in the same way that the planets are creating the push and pull of their gravity. The obstruction between determines if there is a push or a pull. There is no such thing as abscence of gravity, because gravity is caused by the poles, and so gravities effect or diminished effect is determined by the presence of one pole or another in the same way the magnification effect of the Tesla MAgnifying Transmitter apparatus is determined by the inter-modal inversion of north and south pole currents, and, the 3 lump set of 2 poles in 3 coils, or 3 planets - e.g. a satellite, a planet, and an obstruction between, represent the same movement of forces of energy as eachother. Meaning gravity and electrical systems can be described purely in polar means.

This should not be readily believed by the expert or the layman. Quickly to be checked by seeing that energy extraction in nuclear power plants is done by a turbine that has north and south pole magnets in should be proof enough. Quickly checking you will find the same thing in the Coal Power Plants - the turbine, that has the magnets in. You will find the same thing in any electrical generation system. You will find the north and south pole magnets in the ford 1908 flywheel system, this is used to fire the petrol ignition of the motor without a battery or a dynamo. The only generator in the ford model T is the engine's spinning magneto. (Magnets next to spinning coils or reverse). You will find the same north and south pole magnets in the electrical motor, these are created by a running electrical current at the right hand twist, or 90 degrees, like the gravity and the lineal motion of the satellite the same relationship exists between the wire and the transformer core for generated polar magnetism. As you can see all of the electricity that is made is being made by the north and south pole in the same way. At the nuclear power plant, at the coal plant, and in the engines of your car, and their dynamo's, all of the electricity is being made the same, with rotating magnets. The planets are like power plants too, and, just like the flywheel, the mass of a planet, and it's speed of rotation store energy. As I have explained about how gravity and electrical energy is stored and conveyed as north and south pole at the right angle twist - I do not need to tell you what or how the earth is storing it's energy.

What I do need to tell you is that the electricity can only be made by the magnets. The magnetism can only be made by electricity. Electricity can only be made with energy, but no energy can be made at all without mass. Before the turbines at the nuclear and coal station get their hot excited steam particles to spin their magnets around next to the coil to generate the electricity from their magnetic poles - an atomic reaction occurs. The coal is burnt, and perpetual orbiting electrons are released at high speed. When the nuclear rods heat the water, it is because they too are releasing their atomic orbits at extreme speeds, and that these atomic orbits have energy. The only way that is scientifically and factually established of processing both of these energies into significant electrical power is with the use of magnets.

Niagra Falls, Hydroelectric - north and south pole magnets. Wind-Turbine's, north and south pole magnets. Now I have proven inductively for sure that electricity and energy is only conveyed by the north and south pole magnetic force. That the production of electricity from any atomic reaction be it coal, or nuclear radiation being discharged at high speed into water to drive a turbine - there is always the turbine, the north and south pole spinning magnet that is deriving the energy - and this is the way in which the planets are working as well. That is my revelation of Alchemy.

There is more proof to that light can only be form by magnets of north and south pole being obstructed. The only way a light bulb will light is if a high pressure voltage current is applied to a wire with a very small radius comparatively - this forms an obstruction to the running current and the north and south pole magnets are released from the wire at high speed. This causes heat at first (infra red), and after a very short time (in modern light bulbs fractions of miliseconds) the light becomes higher frequency visible light. If the width and assymetry of the filament is altered further and the pressure (voltage) increased further an entire manner of harmful radiations ensue. Dangerous work to say the least. Like it is dangerous to be too near to a nuclear radioactive source, and like it is dangerous to be too near the sun. So you can see that light is only created by obstruction's in the same way that the lack of gravity is caused by a presence of obstruction between any single planetary body of 2 poles or more. The only way to generate the electricity is to use the north and south pole magnetism in the turbines, while the only way to generate light with the electricity is to reduce the mass of the filament, and create an obstruction to the ampere current, causing the wire to leak it's magnet's and create light in the same way that the earth creates the aurora borealis from it's north and south pole recirculating magnets interact with the north and south poles of the running sun. (so, the earth has perpetual motion magnetic orbits and other north and south pole forces from the sun is interacting with them to create light, and all sorts of forces like mountains.)

This is how it works. This work is dedicated to E.D.L, E.D, C.P.S, T.T.Brown, N.T, W.R & Wheatstone.

Best,
A

4. ## The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to 7redorbs For This Post:

Kindred (29th July 2012), Mad Hatter (5th April 2013), phillipbbg (10th January 2013), Tane Mahuta (29th July 2012), TargeT (28th July 2012)

5. ## Re: Edward Leedskalnin's secret of the Pyramid Builders, Perpetual Power

13th Warrior,

Very interesting video. I've ran across these guys before and not a single replication to be found. I just looked for about two hours again and still found no replication. They will gladly send you plans (that you are instructed not to build) if you donate \$200 though.

I've spent \$40 per piece on magnets that are rated to hold 300lbs, about 12 of them I still have.

Rich

7. ## Re: Edward Leedskalnin's secret of the Pyramid Builders, Perpetual Power

Posted by Oouthere (here)
13th Warrior,

Very interesting video. I've ran across these guys before and not a single replication to be found. I just looked for about two hours again and still found no replication. They will gladly send you plans (that you are instructed not to build) if you donate \$200 though.

I've spent \$40 per piece on magnets that are rated to hold 300lbs, about 12 of them I still have.

Rich
Hi Rich,

I don't doubt that what they are doing is legitimate...the guy doing the demo says that the generator makes just barely enough power to run the motor that's driving the generator. The end result being that the unit is only capable of running one piece of equipment at a time (without a load).

I wouldn't waste my money on their plans; since i don't think they have a useful machine at this time but, it does demonstrate some potential...the fact that the motor/generator combination continue to run without a continuous power supplied would indicate that extra energy is being drawn from somewhere else.

The guy with the simple coil and magnet is doing the same thing. The first motor is driving the second as a generator which in turn is feed back into the coil...

9. ## Re: Edward Leedskalnin's secret of the Pyramid Builders, Perpetual Power

I can state he's wrong about the generator not having enough power to run the motor. Also, the drill and grinder were not loaded so power usuage is much less (probably less than 1/2 hp motor anyway/500 watts or so).

I'm still going through their site as it could be the real deal, just not convinced at this point. The overunity water heater may be real but is probably beyond my understanding (not all rednecks are created equal...lol).

Rich

10. ## The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oouthere For This Post:

Mad Hatter (5th April 2013), TargeT (31st July 2012)

11. ## Re: Edward Leedskalnin's secret of the Pyramid Builders, Perpetual Power

Advertisement: I am building a flywheel generator system as built by Edward Leedskalnin did at Coral Castle, Rock Gate. I need your help and advice for parts. I need the following parts. Ford 1908 Model T differential and gearbox (90 degree transverse type transmission). Buzz Coil Ignition Systems from the ford 1908 model T. I also require some engineering or mechanical engineering advice or assistance in terms of mounting the magneto onto the differential properly (balanced) and especially securely (for high speed rotation).

I have designed, and re-developed a magneto system (North and South Pole magnets on a wheel spinning) that supplies power to an coil winding, which provides power and polarity inversion timing for to the ignition model T (which has tunable spark gap). This in turn will invert the polarity (and thus the poles) on an electromagnet that sits inline with the flywheel, is powering the flywheel, and is powered by the flywheel. This should result in a "bulk" transport in excess of 100% unity akin to the way in which reverse resistance and mutual inductance is passed from the secondary to the primary in the T.M.T by reverse resistance, or the manifestation of -i in between A.C cycles from a magneto or an A.C power supply in the Tesla MAgnifier. Amplifications of output, or recirculating currents that exceed the input by over 100% are possible according to Steinmetz when leakages are proportionately and quantatively smaller than the power provided added to the power recirculated by reverse resistance per second. Hence the magnification factor. I Intend to determine if a magnetic pole arrangement system may be viable for this design in the same way that supposed lineal vectors of a planet, and it's gravitic 90 degree pull can be expressed by the poles of planets alone, to account for both the gravity, and the 90 degree expression of supposed lineal motion. This would suggest that perpetual orbits of planets, is not from a balanced lineal motion at 90 degrees to a gravity plane, and are in fact a result of the alignment of north pole of moon, to south pole of earth. This suggests where I to rotate the moon 1/2 of a radial, then it would fall, and that my magneto flywheel north and south pole spinning, with the right ignition timer, could create the self-referencing polar system seen in both the energy configuration's of planets, and in the Tesla Magnifier itself. This is a bold step in my career and I have invested all of my time and efforts into the pursuit of truth. Nikola Tesla's truth. Wilhelm Reich's truth. C. P Steinmetz truth. How atom's and their electrons apparently maintain an indefinite and perpetual spin, as according to the nobel prize winner Richard Feynman, and how academic theories such as "entanglement" relate strongly to the initial discoveries in radio frequency and transmission by Nikola Tesla and Heinreich Hertz. I have discovered that individuals such as Lord Kelvin and Wheatstone had experiments which conceived the speed of electrostatic induction to be 291,000 miles per second, a full 105,000 miles per second faster than the speed of light 186,000 miles per second. MY friend from NASA, has a working T.M.T at 137%, and I am using his design, and test data, and Eric Dollards mathematical equations to apply this to my flywheel. I have found a "co-efficient" or a "constant" relationship between the total surface area of a working T.M.T 137% amplification primary:secondary SA ratio and a secondary:extra SA Ratio. I have found that the ratio is a constant of about 1.56, roughly expressed by the theoretical ratio of difference between the theoretical speed of a longitudinal wave, or electrostatic induction of 291,000 miles per second, divided by the speed of light 186,000 miles per second.

I have a belief that the electron is non existent. The electron is a reaction between the measuring instrument and the north and south poles causing the perpetual orbits inside the atom like the planets do. I have ways to prove this now and I invite anyone who wishes to help me with stiff engineering requirements and precise alignments that would be necessary to create a magneto, pickup, flywheel, ignition, magneto recirculating system as I have described earlier to test the arrangement's and timing of the redistribution of poles of my flyhweel system to create a perpetual motion akin to the atom's or the poles.

I accept that many will not be willing. Neither was I. I was forced to do this work, by the motivation of astonishment alone. Confirmations have flooded my way, I have the basic perpetual motion holder that proves magnetism is a substance that is inside the metal. Not how science believes (What Tesla called "delusive theory [and] works of fiction"). Now it is time for me to build a system that can convert the permanent perpetual movement of the magnetic currents into perpetual power. The proof in it is that if the magnetic current (or magneitc fields) is not static like the experts say, and it is moving, then surely there is a perpetual movement occuring, and, in the right channels, these should have the capacity for perpetual flow considering that polar arrangement alone could be an alternatively and perfectly working expression for gravity (and it's motivational movement). This was what Nikola Tesla called the wheelwork of nature.

I bid you this is my advertisment on my research into electrical theory, and the foundations of my beliefs, experiments , observations and philosophies. I did not get this far over night. I did study much harder than even the experts have, and, I had to used the inductive scientific method when the inventive method provided more inventive fictions that were too contradictory. This is similar condition in scientific theory that was suffered by the long-lived epicycle movement, until the inventive theories became so ridiculous that a non-epicycle movement of planets might usher a revolution into a truer, more representative science. If one is to look back at the history of Radio Corporation America in 1917. It will become obvious that the Tesla MArconi system used a two wave propogation, a complex magneto dielectric antennae systems that had transverse waves propogating sinusoidally at 186,000 miles per second, or at right angles in space and time, as well as the longitudinal waves of 291,000 miles per second that our scientists say cannot exist and do not exist or have ever been proven. I have discovered the old Marconi Wireless plant in Bolinas, California, it was using them, they did exist, and a man called Wheatstone, the inventor of the Wheatstone bridge actually put longitudinal waves of electrostatic induction to be 291,000 miles per second. Given Wheatstone is the father of electronics and computing in the way that faraday was the father of transformer theory - a clear divide occurs here. The R.C.A complex was taken over by a government military rule in 1917, Marconi was removed, and the whole thing became a government and military patent monopoly. IT was even ran by a general.

That is why you think the longitudinal wave is only theoretical. It isn't. The longitudinal wave existed. IT worked here. If you are a scientist you know that you have been lied to or taught wrong, or that I "Must be a fraud". You must listen to me carefully. I have not lied. You can check it all. The claims of Nikola Tesla were to transmit energy absolutely regardless of distance. You experts tell us that planets do this with their gravity all the time, but you never put it together.

The ocean delivers, from it's magnetic or gravitic force alone enough electrical potential and kinetic in the ocean to deliver power in the billions of trillions of watts, or, in a day of total ocean movement, we could power the earth for a year. The scientists and the experts though, they think they know, and they build their windmills and their hydro-dams, Tesla built Niagra falls - surely the greatest and first of them all. But tesla, like I and the aforementioned great men, we realised that if the ocean was being motivated by the Sea, and the limited devices of application such as hydroelectric or windpower were like toys in comparitive analysis of a device that could harness the field from the moon before it ever reached the ocean. He would not only be the richest man, but the man that discovered that power from the sea is a magnetic current. The power from the atom itself is of course ultimately more powerful, and the perpetual movement of the atoms as promised by Nobel Prize Winner Richard Feynman is certainly a truth. The denial and continuing beliefs preserved by current science of today ignores the working instruments of the brilliance of Tesla yesterday. The conception by experts that making use of the SECONDARY wind and SECONDARY Ocean currents being the only and most efficient way of leveraging energy, is the clear and delusive lie that prevents mankind from liberating itself from energy scarcity. Essentially, if I am correct, and their movements are secondary motivations, it is akin to an electrical engineer taking a single power cable and trying to gain power from it indirectly with a pickup coil next to the single wire. This is madness! This is inefficient! This is indirect. This is what the experts do though. They build their windmills, they build their wind-power, they build their dam's with sea-power, but the sea power comes from the moon, and the air power from the sun and the stars of space. And so, you can see, that if the ocean turned the moons gravity into energy, and the wind turned the airs potential current temperature difference into energy, then there are more direct ways to create power. Tesla claimed he had done this with his Wardenclyffe Tower. The company was sold, and the tower destroyed. Tesla claimed there were entirely more efficient systems that existed. If you were selling and creating devices that used this, would you want your car to spin around like an atom indefinitely, or would you prefer to sell more of them, and the fuels.

Electricity is not electricity it should be called magnetricity, and then it would be alright. An Alternating Current Transmission line, for instance, you are probably wondering why it can keep it's magnets, or amperes, without too much loss, like in D.C. Because in A.C the pressure between each stop and start of the line is zero, and so magnets from the surrounding air currents flow in. This is why the A.C transmission line is able to keep it's volts, because it is working like a generator. Try using high voltage D.C, you will find it is useless. This is proof enough that A.C has a characteristic of energy gains akin to the Tesla MAgnifying Transmitter.

Given that Tesla invvented the A.C system this should hardly be surprising. What i put to you that is surprising, is that A.C or north and south pole (clockwise and anticlockwise rotations) appear to be the same thing that motivates the rotation of the moons, planets, suns and stars, - and as much as the electrons. This was Tesla's discovery - also was his claim to have transmitted energy regardless of distance - or, transmit power at the speed that physicists theorise gravity may travel. Or rougly translated, the inventor of the A.C system discovered the electrogravitic connection, and then claimed to have harnessed it to use the planet for gravitic energy transmission (INSTANT POWER TRANSFER). Tesla went further claiming to have contacted aliens, using this system of transmission - he was ridiculed. However, the science of the experts suggests that if the gravity wave was harnessable some how as a transmission medium like morsecode, and an advanced civilisation anywhere in the entire universe was listening to their planets seismic vibrations, it may be possible for Tesla's system to work in this way.

Let gravity be known as invisible ropes that extend accross all points in space. Get a rope of indefinite length and lay space with it, ignore that it would rip apart by the expansion of space, and assume an aether. Now when you push or pull with a longitudinal wave the speed of transmission is instant, not 291,000 miles/per second. Pull the rope, it's instant. Try a transverse propogation or sinusoidal up and down transmission of the rope accross the uiniverse. It is not instant. It is slow. And so, the fabric of space is really the thing that determines whether Leedskalnin, Reich, Dollard, Tesla, Steinmetz and I have really anything to the claim. One I intend to thoroughly put to the test.

Thank you for reading my advertisement about electricity and magnetism. You and I, we are not educated if we cannot fully test our theories, inductively, and if necessarily inventively.

12. ## The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 7redorbs For This Post:

Mad Hatter (5th April 2013), TargeT (9th August 2012)

13. ## Re: Edward Leedskalnin's secret of the Pyramid Builders, Perpetual Power

Leedskalnin crude example:

15. ## Re: Edward Leedskalnin's secret of the Pyramid Builders, Perpetual Power

another example

16. ## The Following User Says Thank You to psykopanther For This Post:

Page 3 of 3 First 1 3