Freeman / Strawman, legal fiction and Admiralty law...

[danceblackcatdance]

Greets, this is a fascinating video to do with the UK strawman / statutes / fiat money & bank of england being a private company (same as the FED)... and probably applies to the US and elsewhere too..

WE ARE ALL LEGALLY DEAD! and 'in custody' / state property... our currency is not backed by gold / silver but by the population's labour represented by your birth (berth) certificate...

"A F Charters Delivers a Information Packed Episode discussing your PERSON and The Worlds Bankruptcy and how it affects each and every one of us.

This Video goes back to 1666, The great Fire of London, where a major piece of legislation was passed through parliament which viced the entire population of the UNITED KINGDOM PLC"

Sounds like the 'Great Fire' of london was the first FLASE FALG?!

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jv2YUMsG5A0

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_feEaLk7vO0

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRQYSnSBRs8

its voluntary! we are born equal under God... if you don't want to fund war with your taxes you don't have to apparently

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EADtWCh30Bg

this sh*t has been going on 2000 years too long...

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1sxPWwEZ2g

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QMQCcyjriE

Some links:
http://www.tpuc.org/ The Peoples United Community
http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/Beat the Banks, Credit Cards and the Debt Collectors totally Lawfully

i know there are posts on this subject but wasn't sure about specific threads? if there are, sorry!

if not please post more info or experiences on this topic please...

all the best

[danceblackcatdance]

the strawman, mechanical (nature mimicking) matrix exposed... really wow..

there is no money / 'we' are all collateral!!

this man has become the 'agent' for the strawman that represents his name! that is why there is a ™ (trademark) after his name... interesting AND confusing

there's nto enough gold in the world to support all the debt... so everyone is bankrupt, all the governments are bankrupt... and its all just a big game to see how bankrupt they can become till the house of cards falls down

"J. Anderson discusses the 'Strawman' that is perceived to exist from the standing of the real man in Common Law.

If you are entering into their jurisdiction by submission or under-standing, then you give up any rights and claims unless specifically reserved.

If you have submitted or under-stood (stood under) their jurisdiction then you have no standing to argue about the existence of the 'Strawman' as you are under the rules of their game.

You cannot enter their game and then argue about their rules once you have already submitted and under-stood them."

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CphbPm8r9jY

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5v-VNErU9c

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-8rXe2ban0

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_n8HUeWROA

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvBbfCJALDM

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyJfTr-PI_0

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cqzns7rhwf0

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbieGrsvKMo

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N37CAw0fBv0

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ONme3HXcmk

[SKAWF]

personally, i dont care how many threads there are on this subject.

i wish i could carpet bomb the entire world with this subject.

there's no conspiracy in it............ on the surface at least,
its about law.
every man women and child has been affected in exactly the same way.
we dont have to go anywhere near the illuminati
or satan
or mass deaths etc....

what it does do though,
is empower everyone to rebel in a way that the system has no way of countering.

there is the potential to put tptb in their place.

they get their permission to exist on OUR land, from us.
they are OUR SERVANTS.
(i get satisfaction out of taking them down a peg or two, and i dont care how many people see it.)

the thing is, when people get to court for non payment of council tax
and a whole raft of other statutory charges...
they say a couple of phrases in court,
and it doesnt take the court long to realise that the accused doesnt really know what he/she is talking about.
and that leaves people open to being made an example of by the court.

so i post this video by dean clifford
(i also wholeheartedly recommend watching a guy called santos bonnaci)

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2pMJyIikCk

cheers

[sigma6]

Great to see people are delving into the occult nature of commerce, that Jordan, Winston Shrout, and now to my utter amazement David Wilcock is looking into, I was amazed by how much he must have absorbed to create the articles he did... I hope he continues to pursue it because I would love to hear his commentaries and summaries given his research abilities and contacts.... many others have been trying to tease out the secrets of Commerce for the last 10-20 years, it has definitely been heating up in the last few years, but be warned this is one very, very, very deep rabbit hole.

The answer lies in understanding how private trusts operate by controlling the title to things, for eg. technically the word property doesn't mean the physical thing, but the 'rights' to 'use of' the physical thing... this is because property is about titles and titles is what is being manipulated in trusts, legal title ('true' ownership, liability) and beneficial titles (beneficial 'use' of) And registration is the hidden system the government (state) gets you to give up legal title. We are brain washed with the concept of registration, in childhood, as exemplified by the nativity (Christmas) story of Mary & Joseph having to go to Bethleham because that is where he was born (registered) or something like that. This Roman system of control of titles is their means of creating contract and jurisdiction. Shrout gets into an analysis of how they have hidden it in biblical text heavily.

And yet with the proper understanding this could be used against them by the same token. It is both fundamental and dizzyingly subtle in all the permutations and variations that trust relationships can take .... (the Rothschilds and other elites like to say... "own nothing, control everything") and when it comes to the study of trust concepts, you will never meet a more squirrelly bunch of paranoid secretive people in your life... there is some kind of dynamic about it, the more they learn the less they want to share it with others... it's just weird (occult)

btw Dean Clifford is one of the most forthcoming and open sharers of this information, but I know he has been in contact with one of the more 'paranoid' researchers (a jerk who likes to charge people for his information and lives in my neck of the woods) so it remains to be seen how he will be affected. This guy has the ability to 'affect' everyone with his 'paranoid' interpretation, secrecy, etc, I have seen whole groups of people who have secret meetings, won't speak about it, etc... all because without knowing it they were influenced by this jerk guy...

Anyhow when it comes the 'Birth Certificate' it is considered by some to be a Cest tu-que vie trust, and through the manipulation of trust interpretation they are taking away our inalienable rights, they give it to you as the Trustees and upholders of the Christian faith (ie. your 'God given' inalienable rights, and our mutual 'stewardship' of the earth) and then take it away through corporate commercial re-manipulation of the same trust interpretation (in a nutshell)

Start Here: What is a "Ces tui Qui Trust" (pronounce set-a-kay) and why should you care?
http://www.relatingtolife.com/index....%22%20Strawman

[danceblackcatdance]

thanks SKAWF, i couldn't agree more... heard about all this a while ago but have only just started delving into it properly... and my how powerful it is, or could be if everyone was clued up.... watching that vid now

and thanks to sigma6.. thats interesting info too, Winston Shrout is doing a semiar in the UK in sept..

i am curious about resistering the birth certificate at all...

[SKAWF]

Posted by danceblackcatdance (here)
thanks SKAWF, i couldn't agree more... heard about all this a while ago but have only just started delving into it properly, watching that vid now

and thanks to sigma6.. thats interesting info too, Winston Shrout is doing a semiar in the UK in sept..

i am curious about resistering the birth certificate at all...

nice one,

i had to watch it a couple of times.
its a new subject, so the chances of getting everything thats said the first time, is very slim,
but for me.... i understand the system now.

any time the system does something, that i consider to be

not in my interests, or for my benefit,

then they are in breach of trust.
i can swear out a statement of the damages they caused me,
and another for the remedy

and then i can take the state to civil court where i have ten times the power that they do.

its about having the balls to go from a state of insecurity in relation to their apparent power
into being in control of them, not being afraid to put pressure on them,
and threatening them, actual loud words, in court, telling them what to do.

regards the birth certificate....

its a good thing. really.

its a document that binds them.
evidence of the trust created when your birth was registered.

basically, we are free.
we have rights given to us by god.
the state (as a non living entity) need's OUR permission to conduct its business on our land.

which begs the question.......

why do i need the permission of my servant for anything?

i'll close by saying.

the state has turned its weapons on those it is entrusted to look after.

so dont be afraid to use your own weapons on them.

they are OUR 'slaves',
and its about time they were put in their place.

[Hip Hipnotist]

I am ( also ) a Notary Public and was working with a gentleman a few years back who was filing 'presentment' after 'presentment' doing his darndest to fend off the 'wolves at his gate'.

This is where I learned just how ( seemingly endless ) this freeman / strawman, fiat money, the legal fiction and Admiralty law rabbit hole actually is.

IMO this subject/topic/reality is the most sinister ( might be putting it mildly ) of all things discussed here on Avalon -- and perhaps anywhere.

The gentlemen I was working with ( as a notary ) won some and lost some but ultimately caved in as the wolves finally crashed through his gate and wore him down to the bone -- his family, too.

I was also cautioned ( threatened ) by the local district attorney's office for lending services to a person engaged in 'felonious activities' and that my commission was in the process of being revoked.

Three years later I'm still a notary.

[danceblackcatdance]

Posted by SKAWF (here)
nice one,

i had to watch it a couple of times.
its a new subject, so the chances of getting everything thats said the first time, is very slim,
but for me.... i understand the system now.

yeah, totally.. i'm going to have to watch it a couple of times too... just found another 2 parts...

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvKu2UNHQpA

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2GaxlGTyAE

cool that you understand the system, i would like to get there too.. if you have any more resources please share, ta!

any time the system does something, that i consider to be

not in my interests, or for my benefit,

then they are in breach of trust.
i can swear out a statement of the damages they caused me,
and another for the remedy

and then i can take the state to civil court where i have ten times the power that they do.

would you give an example when you have a moment please?

its about having the balls to go from a state of insecurity in relation to their apparent power
into being in control of them, not being afraid to put pressure on them,
and threatening them, actual loud words, in court, telling them what to do.

regards the birth certificate....

its a good thing. really.

its a document that binds them.
evidence of the trust created when your birth was registered.

basically, we are free.
we have rights given to us by god.
the state (as a non living entity) need's OUR permission to conduct its business on our land.

which begs the question.......

why do i need the permission of my servant for anything?

i'll close by saying.

the state has turned its weapons on those it is entrusted to look after.

so dont be afraid to use your own weapons on them.

they are OUR 'slaves',
and its about time they were put in their place.

inspirational, many thanks!!

[SKAWF]

'would you give an example when you have a moment please?'

okay, so our 'god given' rights are

dominion over the planet.
free and equal access to the earths resources,
we can go anywhere.
we can do anything we like
as long as we cause no harm or loss to anyone,
and we dont breach the peace.

those are the only 'laws' that exist. (gods law is the only one you MUST abide by)

all the others, are not laws.
they are statutory acts. (the policy of the state, is not law)

they only apply to the title. (the name on your birth certificate)

you can choose at any time, to act through your title,
or you can choose to be in 'common law' jurisdiction,
you can swap whenever you want.

the state only has control over its own creation (your title)
so it tricks people into acting through title,
by asking them what their name is.
99% of people will repeat the name on the birth certificate. (nice eh?)
as soon as people give that name, they have effectively given the state power over them.

currently, i have no driving license.

if i were to be pulled over by the law,
i would not identify myself in any way.
i would say that i'm in common law jurisdiction, so i dont need one.
(only agents of the state, and professional drivers need to have a license)

no doubt the police would disagree.
they would probably arrest me (without title or consent = breach of trust)

so here we have, preventing me from going about my lawful business (1)
kidnapping (2)
holding me against my will (3)
false imprisonment (4)
about ten other 'trespasses' against me (5)
and breach of trust (6)

all they have against me, is not having a driving license, which i'm not lawfully required to have.

so they take me to statutory court, and i make sure that any and all documentation has been signed 'properly'
(which means, being signed by the officeholder, and not just the name of the office!!!) (eg signed.... bailiff manager (which btw is a fraudulent document = breach of trust)

because i would be taking them to civil court, and the documentation, would be my evidence)

there, whoever signed the documents against me, like the magistrate, arresting officer, custody sergeant, the inspector at the station,
would be those who i hold liable for the damages commited against me.

they would then have to go to civil court, and provide evidence that they have a lawful reason for doing what they did.

which, as i was in common law jurisdiction, and not acting through any title,
and,
the alleged offence was statutory in nature......

they would have NO lawful justification for at all.

i win.

the same goes for any....... ANY statutory charge.

hope that helps.

[danceblackcatdance]

Posted by Hip Hipnotist (here)
I am ( also ) a Notary Public and was working with a gentleman a few years back who was filing 'presentment' after 'presentment' doing his darndest to fend off the 'wolves at his gate'.

This is where I learned just how ( seemingly endless ) this freeman / strawman, fiat money, the legal fiction and Admiralty law rabbit hole actually is.

IMO this subject/topic/reality is the most sinister ( might be putting it mildly ) of all things discussed here on Avalon -- and perhaps anywhere.

The gentlemen I was working with ( as a notary ) won some and lost some but ultimately caved in as the wolves finally crashed through his gate and wore him down to the bone -- his family, too.

I was also cautioned ( threatened ) by the local district attorney's office for lending services to a person engaged in 'felonious activities' and that my commission was in the process of being revoked.

Three years later I'm still a notary.

hey Hip Hipnotist, thx.. had to google what notary was because i didn't know.. what you write of your experiences does sound sinister..!

coupled with what SKAWF says, exploitation of this chink in the system is quite a threat.. seems they will take a hard line with anyone testing it if they can get away with it....

[danceblackcatdance]

Posted by SKAWF (here)
'would you give an example when you have a moment please?'

okay, so our 'god given' rights are

dominion over the planet.
free and equal access to the earths resources,
we can go anywhere.
we can do anything we like
as long as we cause no harm or loss to anyone,
and we dont breach the peace.

those are the only 'laws' that exist. (gods law is the only one you MUST abide by)

all the others, are not laws.
they are statutory acts. (the policy of the state, is not law)

they only apply to the title. (the name on your birth certificate)........

.............hope that helps.

cool.. yeh! lots to take in but helps very much... thanks very much

have you ever tested this or anything similar?

[SKAWF]

'have you ever tested this or anything similar? '

yes i have, though i should say that when i first started doing it,
it worked, but i was lucky. there were things i wasnt aware of at the time
looking back, i left myself quite open through my own lack of knowledge.

the title thing, is rock solid.
never give them your name,
but tell them that you KNOW they need a title to act against you
and they aint getting one.

always make sure that they are acting in accordance with the oath they swore (to uphold the common law).

close your front door in the faces of all the others. (tv license etc), they get nothing.

'sorry, no title, no contracts'. end of.

i'm yet to sue the police though.

i'm sure they will provide me the rope to hang them with at some point though.

i should also add, if you ever do get arrested for something, and you havnt identified yourself,

dont start effing and blinding in the police station.
and dont let them know your intentions
get a lawyer as a witness, get what you need and get out safely,
THEN start preparing your case.

we dont want any deaths in custody now do we.

there is a very thin line.
if you stay on it, you're fireproof,
stray off it, and your toast.

they will try all sorts of things to wind you up, but hold your position.
play the long game instead.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Hip Hipnotist (here)
I am ( also ) a Notary Public and was working with a gentleman a few years back who was filing 'presentment' after 'presentment' doing his darndest to fend off the 'wolves at his gate'.

This is where I learned just how ( seemingly endless ) this freeman / strawman, fiat money, the legal fiction and Admiralty law rabbit hole actually is.

IMO this subject/topic/reality is the most sinister ( might be putting it mildly ) of all things discussed here on Avalon -- and perhaps anywhere.

The gentlemen I was working with ( as a notary ) won some and lost some but ultimately caved in as the wolves finally crashed through his gate and wore him down to the bone -- his family, too.

I was also cautioned ( threatened ) by the local district attorney's office for lending services to a person engaged in 'felonious activities' and that my commission was in the process of being revoked.

Three years later I'm still a notary.

Thanks for that personal story. I have a good friend myself who involved himself deeply and actively in this material a few years ago.

He told me recently, totally seriously, that one should not get involved in the sovereignty movement as an activist (i.e. actually trying to amend one's own or someone else's status) -- unless one was prepared to go to jail.

He told stories of good friends of his (who I don't know) who were brilliant minds, and knew the law inside out --- but it didn't make any difference. If the judge rules against you, you're screwed -- whether you are right or wrong.

George Green also has friends who are in jail because of exactly this activism -- and I've heard this from other friends of mine also. It's heavy-duty stuff, and the courts are not amused by it one bit.

I'm not in any way discouraging anyone from getting involved. Just stating the evident risks.

[SKAWF]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
He told me recently, totally seriously, that one should not get involved in the sovereignty movement as an activist (i.e. actually trying to amend one's own or someone else's status) -- unless one was prepared to go to jail.

true.

but most statutory offences dont carry a prison sentence,
also .... usually.... most prison sentences are only handed out if there is no means to give a community based sentence
like a fine, community service, probation, asbo's etc
and also if the gravity and nature of the offence is so serious, that ONLY a custodial sentence is appropriate.

prison.... is the biggest thing they can do to you.
when they see that the threat of it has no effect,
they have nothing else to threaten you with.

i wonder if a magistrate, who has to do his job at the end of the day...
will be so willing to give a harsh sentence, if he thinks he will end up in civil court
having to defend the indefensible.

[MistahMojoRisin]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Hip Hipnotist (here)
I am ( also ) a Notary Public and was working with a gentleman a few years back who was filing 'presentment' after 'presentment' doing his darndest to fend off the 'wolves at his gate'.

This is where I learned just how ( seemingly endless ) this freeman / strawman, fiat money, the legal fiction and Admiralty law rabbit hole actually is.

IMO this subject/topic/reality is the most sinister ( might be putting it mildly ) of all things discussed here on Avalon -- and perhaps anywhere.

The gentlemen I was working with ( as a notary ) won some and lost some but ultimately caved in as the wolves finally crashed through his gate and wore him down to the bone -- his family, too.

I was also cautioned ( threatened ) by the local district attorney's office for lending services to a person engaged in 'felonious activities' and that my commission was in the process of being revoked.

Three years later I'm still a notary.

Thanks for that personal story. I have a good friend myself who involved himself deeply and actively in this material a few years ago.

He told me recently, totally seriously, that one should not get involved in the sovereignty movement as an activist (i.e. actually trying to amend one's own or someone else's status) -- unless one was prepared to go to jail.

He told stories of good friends of his (who I don't know) who were brilliant minds, and knew the law inside out --- but it didn't make any difference. If the judge rules against you, you're screwed -- whether you are right or wrong.

George Green also has friends who are in jail because of exactly this activism -- and I've heard this from other friends of mine also. It's heavy-duty stuff, and the courts are not amused by it one bit.

I'm not in any way discouraging anyone from getting involved. Just stating the evident risks.

Bill, I am sure since you were at ECETI a few months ago you heard about the issues James and the staff are having with the loca goverment there. They are going down this route and have had judge after judge appointed because no one knows how to deal with it. Very interesting stiff here. Thanks for the post.

[Christine]

One man's answer.

You asked about a matter concerning a legal name “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” (Property of the STATE OF BIRTHSTATE, which I do not claim, or own, but do use out of necessity in honor of usufruct)

This is the response to your visit, request, and offer to contract...

1. I do not wish to contract with you, nor do I consent to, or recognize your presumption of having any authority over me.

2. I am not a dead fiction, for I live move, breath, and have blood that flows.

3. I am Spirit who is with a unique Eternal Soul, living in the flesh and blood body of a Man.

4. IamcreatedintheimageandlikenessofmyCreator(Genesis 1:26-28)and given dominion over all the earth; and furthermore, your corporate fictional military industrial complex recognizes this to be true under International Treaty and honors it through the Rules of Usufruct.

5. I am subject ONLY to the Natural Law of my Creator-God and Father and none other, “For no man can serve two masters.” Therefore, I do not recognize any fictional foreign corporation(s) as my Creator, and thereby do not give consent to be administrated by a dead entity corporation(s) selling my God-given Love, Life, and Liberty for a bowl of soup. I am an Act of God; you are an Act of a foreign Legislature, and limited by same. I have no such limitations!

6. I do not have a NAME and I do not consent to be recognized by a name or any legal name of fictional world construction and/or presumption, for I am Spirit with a Soul in the body of Man. I am called by friends and family by the appellation of “FIRST” but even this does not identify me, therefore, this appellation is not me. For purposes of this communication, see definitions below:

a. Appellation is defined as: “word by which a sentient being is called. Not to be confused with a, “NAME” or any LEGAL NAME constructed for identification.”

b. Name is defined as: “Identifying word that was created by a fiction for a fiction. Ex, the NAME on a Birth Certificate.”

7. Since you disturbed the peace of my home uninvited, I feel compelled to respond so that peace is restored honorable. You are hereby put on notice you are NOT WELCOME to visit my property or any of my family, friends and acquaintances properties regarding any issue pertaining to “talking,” “questioning,” “fact finding,” about the legal name “FIRST MIDDLE LAST,” which is property of the STATE OF OHIO. (See them for all of your questions)

8. Henceforth, all future communication must be in writing, signed in wet ink under penalty of perjury. And the three documents I need are:

a. Answer the enclosed questionnaire. I need to identify who you are.
b. Also, include a copy of your license and registration with the Secretary of
State to do business in the STATE NAME Republic/UNITED STATES.
c. Finally, also include a copy of your Oath of Office.

Respectfully,
John Doe the Christ, Child and Son of Nature’s God

In my mind this is a work of genius. I intend to use some of the wording henceforth in my private contracts and for legal purposes.

This is dangerous folks so I don't recommend anyone using such a document unless you are absolutely, resolutely and irrefutably aligned with the message and prepared to stand in your power. This strikes at the heart of the corrupt corporate power structure, so be careful. I am posting this as an example of what it feels like to stand up in the face of Goliath. Power up!

(Obviously the language could be rewritten to invoke whatever image of divinity that best suits your spiritual belief.)

[danceblackcatdance]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Thanks for that personal story. I have a good friend myself who involved himself deeply and actively in this material a few years ago.

He told me recently, totally seriously, that one should not get involved in the sovereignty movement as an activist (i.e. actually trying to amend one's own or someone else's status) -- unless one was prepared to go to jail.

He told stories of good friends of his (who I don't know) who were brilliant minds, and knew the law inside out --- but it didn't make any difference. If the judge rules against you, you're screwed -- whether you are right or wrong.

George Green also has friends who are in jail because of exactly this activism -- and I've heard this from other friends of mine also. It's heavy-duty stuff, and the courts are not amused by it one bit.

I'm not in any way discouraging anyone from getting involved. Just stating the evident risks.

hi Bill, thx for the heads up, seems that there are great risks involved with challenging the system on any front... do you have any more info as to what the case was in any of your friend's scenarios? what were they attempting & how much jail did they do etc?

Dean Clifford in the above videos went to jail for 18 days, sounds like he had a nice time and is now suing the judge / court and whoever else... J. ANDERSON™ has become the agent for his strawman, not quite got to how he's done that yet but seems 'legal'... or what the implications are overall, still digging

-------

Posted by Christine (here)
One man's answer.

You asked about a matter concerning a legal name “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” (Property of the STATE OF BIRTHSTATE, which I do not claim, or own, but do use out of necessity in honor of usufruct)

This is the response to your visit, request, and offer to contract...

1. I do not wish to contract with you, nor do I consent to, or recognize your presumption of having any authority over me.

2. I am not a dead fiction, for I live move, breath, and have blood that flows.

3. I am Spirit who is with a unique Eternal Soul, living in the flesh and blood body of a Man.

4. IamcreatedintheimageandlikenessofmyCreator(Genesis 1:26-28)and given dominion over all the earth; and furthermore, your corporate fictional military industrial complex recognizes this to be true under International Treaty and honors it through the Rules of Usufruct.

5. I am subject ONLY to the Natural Law of my Creator-God and Father and none other, “For no man can serve two masters.” Therefore, I do not recognize any fictional foreign corporation(s) as my Creator, and thereby do not give consent to be administrated by a dead entity corporation(s) selling my God-given Love, Life, and Liberty for a bowl of soup. I am an Act of God; you are an Act of a foreign Legislature, and limited by same. I have no such limitations!

6. I do not have a NAME and I do not consent to be recognized by a name or any legal name of fictional world construction and/or presumption, for I am Spirit with a Soul in the body of Man. I am called by friends and family by the appellation of “FIRST” but even this does not identify me, therefore, this appellation is not me. For purposes of this communication, see definitions below:

a. Appellation is defined as: “word by which a sentient being is called. Not to be confused with a, “NAME” or any LEGAL NAME constructed for identification.”

b. Name is defined as: “Identifying word that was created by a fiction for a fiction. Ex, the NAME on a Birth Certificate.”

7. Since you disturbed the peace of my home uninvited, I feel compelled to respond so that peace is restored honorable. You are hereby put on notice you are NOT WELCOME to visit my property or any of my family, friends and acquaintances properties regarding any issue pertaining to “talking,” “questioning,” “fact finding,” about the legal name “FIRST MIDDLE LAST,” which is property of the STATE OF OHIO. (See them for all of your questions)

8. Henceforth, all future communication must be in writing, signed in wet ink under penalty of perjury. And the three documents I need are:

a. Answer the enclosed questionnaire. I need to identify who you are.
b. Also, include a copy of your license and registration with the Secretary of
State to do business in the STATE NAME Republic/UNITED STATES.
c. Finally, also include a copy of your Oath of Office.

Respectfully,
John Doe the Christ, Child and Son of Nature’s God

In my mind this is a work of genius. I intend to use some of the wording henceforth in my private contracts and for legal purposes.

This is dangerous folks so I don't recommend anyone using such a document unless you are absolutely, resolutely and irrefutably aligned with the message and prepared to stand in your power. This strikes at the heart of the corrupt corporate power structure, so be careful. I am posting this as an example of what it feels like to stand up in the face of Goliath. Power up!

(Obviously the language could be rewritten to invoke whatever image of divinity that best suits your spiritual belief.)

makes two of us that thinks this is genius, thx for the info! actually sent shivers up my spine... more and more this really does appear like this is hacking into the control software that programs the matrix

[Cjay]

Posted by SKAWF (here)
(i also wholeheartedly recommend watching a guy called santos bonnaci)

I had the pleasure of meeting Santos Bonnaci at a meeting of Melbourne Avalonians, earlier this year. Our dear friend, Lord Sidious, was at the same meeting. While I have respect for Santos and his knowledge on a range of topics, Sid-nugget's knowledge on this particular topic is undoubtedly far more in-depth. Rob beat them at their own game and he's not in jail. I wish Rob was still allowed to contribute his wisdom in this forum. We can all (or most of us can) learn so much from Lord Sidious.

[Anchor]

A little while back we had a fun little chat about this subject on Nexus Radio, it kind of dances around the subject a bit but touches on a lot of important points (Lord Sidious, Me, Fred Steeves, Celine) MP3 is here http://nexus.2012info.ca/radio/NeXus...the%20Land.mp3

http://nexus.2012info.ca/forum/showt...an-on-the-Land

[SKAWF]

Posted by Cjay (here)

Posted by SKAWF (here)
(i also wholeheartedly recommend watching a guy called santos bonnaci)

I had the pleasure of meeting Santos Bonnaci at a meeting of Melbourne Avalonians, earlier this year. Our dear friend, Lord Sidious, was at the same meeting. While I have respect for Santos and his knowledge on a range of topics, Sid-nugget's knowledge on this particular topic is undoubtedly far more in-depth. Rob beat them at their own game and he's not in jail. I wish Rob was still allowed to contribute his wisdom in this forum. We can all (or most of us can) learn so much from Lord Sidious.

his wisdom is fine,

but along with it comes other things which do him no favours imo.

in my naivety, when i first heard him call people 'nuggets',
i thought it was a reference to little pieces of gold.

i wish him well though.

and i hope he's doing alright.