Thorium would sensibly be the way to go

[steve_a]

Hi Everybody,

Now the cat is out of the bag I'm sure there will be a lot of pressure put on world governments from both sides of the energy business, from oil producers wanting to keep this stuff hidden to green earthers who would probably want this stuff to be exploited. The 'stuff' is called Thorium and apparently it's much safer than uranium - it cleans its' own waste, is cheaper - it's almost free, in abundance and two hundred times more powerful than uranium.

Check out the article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/c...r-thorium.html

Best regards,

Steve

[Anchor]

I have my doubts as to the energy solution being nuclear based, but man that was a good article. Ignoring the technology - just the idea of essentially free energy in a thorough mainstream media article is a pretty good development!

I love the comments on it as well - some are superbly cynical :D - demonstrateing a real awareness of the wider issues.

John..

[Ixopoborn]

Thanks Steve - I would have missed that completely except for your post. Hopefully, we will be able to jump over the need for Thorium development and move directly to so called "free energy". The existence of Thorium as a viable alternative to uranium nuclear underscores the general subterfuge which exists in media coverage of this and other topics of central importance to our energy future.

This information underscores the need to keep pushing for more and more people to wake up to our reality and push for full disclosure in 2010.

[Fredkc]

Dr Rubbia says a tonne of the silvery metal – named after the Norse god of thunder, who also gave us Thor’s day or Thursday - produces as much energy as 200 tonnes of uranium, or 3,500,000 tonnes of coal. A mere fistful would light London for a week.

Thorium eats its own hazardous waste. It can even scavenge the plutonium left by uranium reactors, acting as an eco-cleaner. "It’s the Big One," said Kirk Sorensen, a former NASA rocket engineer and now chief nuclear technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering.

"Once you start looking more closely, it blows your mind away. You can run civilisation on thorium for hundreds of thousands of years, and it’s essentially free. You don’t have to deal with uranium cartels," he said.

Thorium is so common that miners treat it as a nuisance, a radioactive by-product if they try to dig up rare earth metals. The US and Australia are full of the stuff. So are the granite rocks of Cornwall. You do not need much: all is potentially usable as fuel, compared to just 0.7pc for uranium.
[...]
Nuclear power could become routine and unthreatening. But first there is the barrier of establishment prejudice.

The global energy crunch needs equal "action". If it works, Manhattan II could restore American optimism and strategic leadership at a stroke: if not, it is a boost for US science and surely a more fruitful way to pull the US out of perma-slump than scattershot stimulus.

So... until someone figures out how to make money with "Free", perhaps we can settle for "dirt cheap". I'd say the US economy is about ready for it.
Fred

[Luke]

Dirt cheap is helluva way to go.

But you all know ramifications. No govt/system funds would ever go into research that supports easily obtainable/personal solutions.
Every solution that threatens centrally controlled power is direct threat to all powerful men on this planet and will be treated accordingly.
Even pursuing theoretical ways for such tech is forbidden, and will be unlit system lasts.
Remember: manhattan project was govt one, and war one to that. Designed to create weapons. normal reactors were created before that, By Fremi at Chicago University in 1942. Call for new "project manhattan" is then a mental trap. Never, ever such project would work towards personal freedom.
Only solution is to create needed technology ourselves, outside limitations of the system. Quite tough, but doable ... but wait , isn't thorium "controlled substance", due it's radioactivity? .. then kiss your free/cheap energy goodbye, at least any official way to it.

Earth is "Occupied territory". Time to act keeping this crucial fact in mind.

Btw: look carefully at "rare earth elements" that thorium is byproduct of. 97% current annual world production comes from China, and these are crucial for any electronic technology. Control this and you control electronics. Funny, Isn't it?

[Carmody]

You are making me think of the Ex-US general who started the world's first artificial diamond factory.

Double walls, double fences, and 10,000% military hard-armed protection/security forces at the site. Just to prevent direct interference and/or malfeasance by the DeBeers/Rhodes/etc crew.

You would have to come into it.....at least that hard and that forcefully, for the people and forces you'd be messing with would make the DeBeers crew look like a bunch of pikers.

[Carmody]

Posted by SaiCO (here)
Dirt cheap is helluva way to go.

But you all know ramifications. No govt/system funds would ever go into research that supports easily obtainable/personal solutions.
Every solution that threatens centrally controlled power is direct threat to all powerful men on this planet and will be treated accordingly.
Even pursuing theoretical ways for such tech is forbidden, and will be unlit system lasts.
Remember: manhattan project was govt one, and war one to that. Designed to create weapons. normal reactors were created before that, By Fremi at Chicago University in 1942. Call for new "project manhattan" is then a mental trap. Never, ever such project would work towards personal freedom.
Only solution is to create needed technology ourselves, outside limitations of the system. Quite tough, but doable ... but wait , isn't thorium "controlled substance", due it's radioactivity? .. then kiss your free/cheap energy goodbye, at least any official way to it.

Earth is "Occupied territory". Time to act keeping this crucial fact in mind.

Btw: look carefully at "rare earth elements" that thorium is byproduct of. 97% current annual world production comes from China, and these are crucial for any electronic technology. Control this and you control electronics. Funny, Isn't it?

Much of it is available in the ground in other countries, it is just not being harvested as the costs are too low due to Chinese production standards and costs being what they are. The Chinese, for example, are buying up similar resources in other countries in order to control those facilities as well.

Lots of thorium in Canada and the US. See the wiki on Thorium:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium


China isn't even on the list.

the top four are Brazil, Turkey, India, and the US.

[steve_a]

Hi Carmody,

The Chinese are buying up (and have been doing for many years now) a load of rutilated quartz from Brazil taking it out as iron ore. Why? because iron ore is a fraction of the cost of quartz so the taxes are none existent. Of course back handers help at the critical points of the journey.

That's big business for you....

Best regards,

Steve

[Luke]

First let me clarify: China produces 97% of rare earth elements, not thorium.

I've dug out some data, and fact is, sadly, the Thorium is hyped up. Every technology involving it is using U233 element too, with very advanced chemical preprocessing needed. Known fuel cycles do involve materials with weapon potential. And the most promising technology, Molten-salt reactor, is not something you could fit in your backyard:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...lt_Reactor.svg
Another cul-the-sack if you ask me. Sure system could use that card to delude some do-gooders, but that is not a gamechanger at all.

OT
Brazil/quartz situation is not only one. Currently there are raw material deposits pillaged from Africa in similar manner, due "governments" being owned by Chinese companies, with exception of Nigeria and some other countries which is owned by western companies. And all of them are only interested in pillaging. Neo-colonialism at it's worst. And now Chinese cash is flowing into Iraq and Afghanistan buying what Americans were unable to obtain by force. And do not forget Iran. From what I see it's quite similar resource grab Japan tried to do on the verge of WWII.
/OT

[GlassSteagallfan]

While we in the west 'go green' with propellers and solar panels, the pacific region is embracing the latest technology in energy. (click the map for larger view)


The Importance of the Development of Thorium as Nuclear Fuel
www.larouchepac.com/node/15639

Japan Developing Its Own Thorium Reactor
www.larouchepac.com/node/16025

China Launching Thorium-fueled Nuclear System
www.larouchepac.com/node/17409

[sigma6]

A library of links on Thorium:

Kirk Sorensen - TEDxYYC - Thorium
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2vzotsvvkw

Kirk Sorenson - Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor (TMSR): Why Didn't This Happen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbyr7jZOllI

Kirk Sorenson - LFTR in 5 Minutes - THORIUM REMIX 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbucAwOT2Sc

Kirk Sorenson - Energy From Thorium:
A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZR0UKxNPh8

Joe Bonometti - Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR): What Fusion Wanted To Be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHs2U...feature=relmfu

David LeBlanc - Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Idea
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F0tUDJ35So

Robert Hargrave - Aim High: Using Thorium Energy to Address Environmental Problems
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgKfS...eature=related

The Thorium Dream
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbGZ_Y-xkPM

[Wantsthetruth74]

Hey, heres a thought.. How about lets stop making bombs, and stop having wars, and give our kids, (ok grand kids, probably too late for our kids) a planet that will provide them with clean air water and food.

[GlassSteagallfan]

Thorium Will Increase Energy Resources By 155,000 Years, Says India's Banerjee

March 11, 2010 • 11:32AM

The Paris International Conference on Access to Civil Nuclear Energy focussed on examining future energy needs and the different kinds of nuclear technologies to deal with those needs, both now and in the future. Indeed, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) expects energy demand to increase by 40% by 2030. Dr. Khaled Toukan, the chairman of the Jordan Atomic Energy Commission, stated that global energy demand is in the process of doubling between 1990 and 2030. It is in this context that 43 new countries are considering acquiring nuclear reactors and 25 others have shown interest in doing so.

Unfortunately, however, no doubt due to the financial crisis, the question of extending considerably the line of the present nuclear facilities is high on the agenda and much energy will be wasted in extending the lives of current nuclear reactors rather than building new and more efficient ones. Bernard Bigot, Chairman of the French Atomic Energy and Renewable Energies Commission told the panel on "The Medium- And Long-Term Outlook For Nuclear Power," that "the extension of the operational life of nuclear installations beyond 35-40 years whilst maintaining the highest safety levels is a major economic issue," and studies will be conducted on the aging equipment, as well as R&D on nuclear fuels aimed at optimizing the current pressurized hot water reactors (PHWR). Most indicative of this economic predicament was the statement by Warren Pete Miller, special advisor to U.S. President Obama on nuclear energy, who declared that one of the five strategic imperatives for the U.S., is to extend the life of the 104 American nuclear reactors to 60, even 80 years, if that can be done safely!

While some speakers, including Nobuo Tanaka, executive director of the OECD's International Energy Agency, which co-hosted the conference, insisted on the fact that the next 20 years will be reserved entirely for third-generation reactors, Bigot clearly stated that beyond extending the life of the present reactors, the priority is to "prepare nuclear technology by coming up with the means to develop Generation IV systems which can produce 100 times more energy" by drawing the maximum potential from uranium and using the plutonium produced by the reaction. Note that most of the countries involved in this conference are coordinating this effort in the Generation IV international forum, even though for most of these countries it has not been until now a kind of life or death issue.

In terms of the future, however, it was Srikumar Banerjee, chairman of India's Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) who stole the show in his remarks to the panel on "Nuclear and Energy Mix in a Perspective of Durable Development." Taking off from previous speeches stating that there are currently 56 new nuclear power plants under construction, Dr. Banerjee noted polemically that this only represents a 1%-2% growth annually, while India and other developing sector nations need at minimum 10% annual growth to provide electricity to millions of poor. Dr. Banerjee presented India's ambitious three-stage nuclear program. The country is moving rapidly from Phase 1 — 17 reactors (15 PHWR and 2 boiling water) in use, plus 5 under construction (3 PHWR and 2 LWR) at three different sites — to Phase 2, where it will shift to liquid sodium-cooled fast breeder reactors. The use of fast breeders, which produce more fuel than they consume, will enlarge the scope of fission resources for humanity until the end of this century, said Dr. Banerjee, but not enough to go beyond. This is why India's third phase of nuclear development is the development of advanced heavy water reactors using thorium as fuel. Since thorium is three times more abundant than uranium, this process will extend the life of that resource to 155,000 years, said M. Banerjee.

That resources are scarce is something that we know for 40 years, said Dr. Banerjee polemically, but we have done nothing to solve the problem. We have been waiting for a miracle to happen and that miracle has not happened. He called for international support of India's thorium project to deal with that problem. He was very happy to answer a question from Nouvelle Solidarité Editor Christine Bierre, on the need to move aggressively towards such more efficient technologies, in the particular the pebble bed reactor (PBMR), to give humanity an adequate energy base, rather than extending the life of much less efficient power stations and sticking to the third generation EPR.

[sigma6]

Same old story, fat greedy bastards, making billions off of bilking the govt, if they move to LFTR, they cut manufacturing and production costs, the fuel will be 100s of times cheaper, 1% efficiency vs 95% efficiency? Come on, they missed that? and it totally eliminates the super complicated fuel processing step. and what happened to human safety being the most important factor? This is on top of all the cost savings and greater efficiency. If ever there was proof a bunch of scum bags are running the show, what more do you need? What a joke, otherwise Thorium LFTR would win hands down.

BS, on BS, on BS as usual while they scrape the last nickels and dimes out of bankrupt governments. Also Thorium 232 is 500 times more abundant then the rarer Uranium 235 which is the actual isotope required for their reactors. It's so many pluses, there isn't really a comparison. We can thank that scum bag Nixon, as he certainly made a dirty deal out of this. Another example of Government special interests (Military) Government kickbacks (Trillions have been spent on plutonium research) Classic example of orchestrated scarcity and "CONTROL OF DISTRIBUTION". In this case govt funding on the one hand and energy on the other.

These parasites that are running the government and this planet have to go.

[TargeT]

Posted by sigma6 (here)
Same old story, fat greedy bastards, making billions off of bilking the govt, if they move to LFTR, they cut manufacturing and production costs, the fuel will be 100s of times cheaper, 1% efficiency vs 95% efficiency? Come on, they missed that? and it totally eliminates the super complicated fuel processing step. and what happened to human safety being the most important factor? This is on top of all the cost savings and greater efficiency. If ever there was proof a bunch of scum bags are running the show, what more do you need? What a joke, otherwise Thorium LFTR would win hands down.

and you CAN'T make weapons grade material with this type of setup, all other active reactors in the world (so called "breeder" reactors) have a primary purpose, and it's NOT producing power, its producing yellow cake and power is a by product.... this is ultimately the reason one technology was chosen over another (yet again more deception)

[sigma6]

Just like the 'moon mission' was to build intercontinentals, the astronauts were just strapped onto the tip of the rocket as a side show. We live in a fish bowl matrix of pure SH**.