+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 3
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government"

  1. Link to Post #41
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    13th November 2012
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 172 times in 48 posts

    Default Re: What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government"

    Good point. We'd probably have to ask one of the mods?

  2. Link to Post #42
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    13th November 2012
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 172 times in 48 posts

    Default Re: What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government"

    Now isn't this interesting: The GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, "Also Traded as the OFFICE OF TAX & REVENUE". Now you know what their real purpose is, don't you?

    The IRS

    All the tax collection agencies and offices are corporations that ultimately report to the IMF, and all you have to do is search them on the D&B website to see that.

    UNITED STATES SENATE
    UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    See, it's corporate officers making the "laws" here, we only have to follow them because our birth certificates prove us to be members of their corporation. But if you research well you can get around that and be immune to all of these silly acts and statues. The corporate police can't do anything against a sovereign flesh-and-blood entity, they only have power over those who are members of the corporation. Opt out and you will be FREE.
    Last edited by Living Food; 19th November 2012 at 16:56.

  3. Link to Post #43
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    13th November 2012
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 172 times in 48 posts

    Default Re: What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government"

    Also the US military is a private mercenary army under the corporation USA:

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, UNITED STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, UNITED STATES
    UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
    UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, UNITED STATES

    No doubt this applies to the militaries of the other corporation-countries too.

  4. Link to Post #44
    France Avalon Member OZ.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    9th November 2012
    Age
    35
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 48 times in 13 posts

    Default Re: What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government"

    A lot of work to uncover the whole Web!
    " You are a drop, and there is an Ocean ! Oh yes definitely there is an Ocean & that where you came from."

  5. Link to Post #45
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    13th November 2012
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 172 times in 48 posts

    Default Re: What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government"

    So far in this thread I've used the SEC for foreign corporations posing as governments, and Dun & Bradstreet for domestic corporations posing as the US government. But I'm even more fond of the website manta.com, because it flat-out states that our alleged government is really a corporation. Ladies and gentleman, all the proof you should need:







    *Our current Secretary of State is actually John Kerry, that image is a little old.

    ¤=[Post Update]=¤

    The Organic Act of 1871 was the Act that sold us down the river and replaced our de jure government with a corporation. What nobody ever bothered to tell you was that the "Federal government" ONLY has jurisdiction in DC.

    Some notes I took from the Organic Act:

    "Nor shall the legislative assembly have power to establish any bank of circulation, nor to authorize any company or individual to issue notes for circulation as money and currency" [end of section 17] - *cough cough* Federal Reserve Act, anyone?

    "That the legislative power of the District shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District" [section 18 beginning] - in other words, the government only has jurisdiction within DC.

    "That the said legislative assembly shall not have the power...to tax the property of the United States" [section 20] - implies that DC and the United States are separate entities? Also only gives power to tax property within DC.

    "That the property of that portion of the District not included in the corporations of Washington and Georgetown..." [section 21 beginning] 'Nuff said.

    Section 22 calls both Georgetown and Washington "corporations", multiple times. I'm too lazy to type out the whole section though.

    Section 25 implies DC courts can only enforce DC laws.

    Section 28 is so mindblowing, I'm going to type the whole thing out here: "That the said legislative assembly shall have power to create by general law, modify, repeal, or amend, within said District, corporations aggregate for religious, charitable, educational, industrial, or commercial purposes, and to define their powers and liabilities; Provided, That the powers of corporations so created shall be limited to the District of Columbia." THIS is the evidence proving that our "government" only has jurisdiction in DC.

    Section 40 again calls Washington and Georgetown corporations (in the beginning) .

    "And upon the repeal of the charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown, the District of Columbia be, and is hereby declared, the successor of said corporations" [section 41]

    Sure, some people might argue that by "corporation" they mean "municipal corporation", ie "An incorporated political subdivision of a state that is composed of the citizens of a designated geographic area and which performs certain state functions on a local level and possesses such powers as are conferred upon it by the state." (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...al+Corporation), but I don't buy that. With legal terms being as precise as they are, there's no way they would make such a huge "mistake". Oops, looks like we accidentally made a corporation that rules the nation instead of a capital for the US government...oh well. NO, it was intentional.

    The Organic Act of 1871, for anyone interested in reading it: http://www.dcvote.org/trellis/strugg...ation_1871.pdf

    More on how the Organic Act of 1871 created a corporation called THE UNITED STATES: http://byronwine.com/files/1871.pdf

    ¤=[Post Update]=¤

    Quote JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS

    District of Columbia


    In the revision of the Statutes relating to the District,
    the clause of the Act of 1871, declaring the District of Columbia
    (Rev. Stat. D.C. p. 2, Sec. 2) to be a body corporate for
    municipal purposes, with power to contract, etc. was retained.
    By the Act of June 20, 1874, for the government of the District
    and for other purposes. (18 Stat. 116, Chap. 337), previous
    statutes providing for the District a governor, secretary,
    legislative assembly, board of public works and a delegate to
    Congress were repealed, and all the power and authority then
    vested in the governor and board of public works, except as
    limited by that Act, were vested in a commission, composed of
    three persons, to be appointed by the President, with the consent
    of the Senate. But by the Act of June 11, 1878 (20 Stat. chap.
    180), a permanent form of government for the District was
    established. It provided that "the District of Columbia shall
    remain and continue a municipal corporation, as provided in
    section two of the Revised Statutes relating to said District,"
    and that the commissioners therein provided for should "be deemed
    and taken as officers of such corporation.


    [The District of Columbia v. Henry E. Woodbury, 136 U.S. 472]
    [(1890)]
    http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dccases/woodbury.htm

  6. Link to Post #46
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    13th November 2012
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 172 times in 48 posts

    Default Re: What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government"

    Nobody ever notices when they go to court that the flag in the corner is NOT the US flag. C'mon, people, it's right there in front of you. See:

    ACTUAL US FLAG





    THE FLAG FOUND IN COURTROOMS







    See the difference? Even the CEO of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA always stands in front of the second (fake) flag:

    Last edited by Living Food; 14th February 2013 at 18:38.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Living Food For This Post:

    Akasha (15th February 2013)

  8. Link to Post #47
    Australia Avalon Member BMJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th May 2010
    Posts
    1,270
    Thanks
    35,924
    Thanked 5,673 times in 1,115 posts

    Default Re: What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government"

    Just a bump for this old thread, a good one for fellow Australians to look at.
    In hoc signo vinces / In this sign thou shalt conquer

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BMJ For This Post:

    Constance (26th June 2019), Valerie Villars (25th June 2019)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts