Hello TH,
i like to go back to the topic I had a question about in Post #2732.
For that matter I like to quote some of your words that I found on the current (edit: previous) page of this thread:
As far as I know apparently everyone seems to agree that the physical world is a world that's limited compared to other types of worlds -- that what life is about "down here" is living with and learning to adjust to or overcome or transform our limitations and those of living in this type of world.#2733 But secondly, it seems to me that Source would have insisted on creating a type of world limited enough for that Hypothesis not to apply, because such a thing was quite possible.#2733 Well, firstly the majority of physicists are of the opinion that the evidence suggests it doesn't apply in the physical world.#2733 […] when quantum physics made it clear that if the physical world was made of objects, these are very strange objects indeed. For instance, every electron only has more or less probable locations, and can be literally anywhere in the entire universe, at any time.[…]#2738
How can these statements properly fit together? So if we’re capable of overcoming or transforming limitations, they seem not to be carved in stone (1.). So they’re not so limited instead and maybe a part of the screenplay of a not so little „trickster" (2.)? Are those scientists listening to themselves, because the strange behavior of particles doesn’t stop at "more or less probable locations", it’s becoming even stranger when a particle can be at two locations at the same time (3., 4.)?