+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 46 FirstFirst 1 8 18 46 LastLast
Results 141 to 160 of 919

Thread: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

  1. Link to Post #141
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    39
    Posts
    7,511
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,599 times in 7,038 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    9 members & 82 guests on this thread... Hmm
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    DNA (20th December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), jagman (19th December 2012), Referee (19th December 2012)

  3. Link to Post #142
    United States Administrator Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Age
    71
    Posts
    27,725
    Thanks
    28,847
    Thanked 128,773 times in 20,631 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Here is an interesting take on Clare Kuehn's list of 32 discrepancies with which I opened this thread, from one of my favorite sites, The Daily Bell.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    No More Questions to Ask About Sandy Hook Shooting?
    Tuesday, December 18, 2012 – by Staff Report

    Was the Sandy Hook Massacre a False Flag Operation? Early Eyewitness Reports From Newton, CT Suggest So ... We will continue to follow this story closely because there are just too many unanswered questions, and the "official" version of what happened on Friday at Sandy Hook Elementary continues to shift and change. – SGTReport

    Dominant Social Theme: There are no more questions to ask. Everything is settled.

    Free-Market Analysis: There are questions to ask, just as there were at Columbine where hundreds of witnesses saw more than two young shooters and tried, to no avail, to testify about what they witnessed.

    The Columbine investigation was closed without addressing this point and many others, including the medical condition of the two young men who live on only in bloody Internet pictures. Viewers have pointed out inconsistencies in the death photos that tend to undermine the idea of a mutual suicide – the official story.

    Questions emerged after the recent Aurora cinema shooting in Colorado by suspect James Holmes, as well. Eyewitnesses even questioned whether it was Holmes who actually did the shooting.

    And even more questions are being raised following the Sandy Hook Connecticut shooting, as we can see from the above excerpt. Similar questions have been raised on numerous alternative websites including the alternative conservative site Free Republic (in a thread recently pulled).

    There have been too many of these shootings with too many official inconsistencies. A better way of getting information to the public has to be worked out.

    Otherwise, mistrust will continue to grow within the alternative media community. The more the officials seem to be equivocating, the more this perspective will take hold.

    For instance, a list from one "Clare Kuehn" is circulating around the Internet.

    What is interesting is that we cannot find the initial list from Kuehn and the list itself may certainly be disinformation of a sort. The very first point, regarding skepticism as to whether children are dead would seem to invalidate the larger list. Numerous questions are offered without evidence and this in itself is a disinformation technique.

    Yet the list's large-scale circulation on the 'Net, along with other such lists, provides us with evidence regarding the growing cynicism attached to these events.

    This is the important point. When the body politic begins to show evident and obvious mistrust, the powers-that-be have got to realize they need to do a better job regarding communication of the facts surrounding these horrible shootings.

    [ Here The Daily Bell presents what looks to be about the same list as in Post #1 of this thread. -- Paul. ]

    This is a disturbing list, even if each point raised has a reasonable rebuttal. The authorities, after so many shootings with so many unanswered questions, are simply not doing an adequate job, in our view, to reassure citizens of their safety and law enforcement's general competence.

    Over time, questions from multiple events become corrosive and tend to undermine civil trust. This would seem to be happening. Those in charge ought to be concerned.

    Conclusion: A new methodology of public communication would seem to be called for.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    I would disagree with The Daily Bell's conclusion however. I don't think this is a "communication methadology" problem. I think it is a deeper problem with the substance of what is actually going on.
    *** Avalon Forum Guidelines - Membership Guidelines.
    *** ProjectAvalonStatus.net - Check here for forum status.
    Formerly known as "ThePythonicCow", aka "Cow", "Mooster", ...

  4. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Paul For This Post:

    avid (19th December 2012), bennycog (19th December 2012), Calz (19th December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), jagman (19th December 2012), Referee (19th December 2012), Reinhard (19th December 2012), RMorgan (19th December 2012), ROMANWKT (19th December 2012), seko (20th December 2012), Selene (21st December 2012), SilentFeathers (19th December 2012), TargeT (19th December 2012)

  5. Link to Post #143
    Avalon Member SilentFeathers's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2012
    Location
    Appalachians/Earth
    Age
    56
    Posts
    2,967
    Thanks
    3,783
    Thanked 14,337 times in 2,741 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote Posted by Paul (here)
    We're not the only one's doubting this story. See Connecticut shooting 26 dead, 18 children... (Post #324) .

    The current GOP campaign finance chairman Michael Harris agrees, calling out Israel, and a current three star general chimes in saying: “Harris hit the nail right on the head and it is about time someone spoke up.”
    Harris might get "bonked" on the head for going public like this....Alex Jones speaking like this is one thing, but Harris speaking like this is on a whole 'nother level and playing field.....watch and see!
    SilentFeathers

    "The journey is now, it begins with today. There are many paths, choose wisely."

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SilentFeathers For This Post:

    Curt (21st December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), jagman (19th December 2012), Paul (19th December 2012), TargeT (19th December 2012)

  7. Link to Post #144
    Avalon Member Carmody's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th August 2010
    Location
    Winning The Galactic Lottery
    Posts
    11,308
    Thanks
    17,443
    Thanked 81,346 times in 10,139 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote this link is to a DHS excercise manual of sorts and it does talk about using actors in these excercises. I havent read the entire manual but am combing through it now. It does say a couple times "Recruit actors and manage actor logistics (e.g., waiver forms, applying moulage)"
    If anyone ever asks someone to be an 'actor' in their swat team paramilitary exercise, please be smart enough to turn it down.

    And RUN. Very far away.

    And as for the rest, CONSENSUS reality FORMATION.

    It is NOT a joke.

    It is NOT a conspiracy.

    The ego-body is like that, it makes sure that one insists that all potentials lie outside of the self. That way, it remains in charge of the self. After all it is the input/output data formation and polarization filter ,and it THINKS that it is in charge and it is based upon the emotional body as much as anything else.

    It IS the inner angry and emotional child. It IS the inner frightened and lost child.

    it DOES therefore... direct the formation of reality, weaving in and out of probability and timelines.

    It does indeed champion and drive this aspect of reality, as people refuse to realize it exists. They fail to realize that the conscious mind is confined to a box. a filtered box. And the animal, reptilian, and angry/frightened/scared/lost inner child, those components of the self are an underlying filter that ALL data, both ways, passes through and is altered by. The ego/body.

    So yes, it is 105% possible that the collective ego body created and/or 'pre-ordained', or 'temporally dragged us to that event and shape of event'. 105% possible. 110% possible.

    But, this will be ignored as the controller of the consciousness data input and output does not want to be displaced, so this can't be true and it HAS to be some other factor. Like evil otherness, right???

    This is how 'that which is evil' drives people to do what they want them to do, in the 'astral realms'. They make them FEAR. and when they fear, people retract into reactionary animal response.

    If you grab a kitten by the scruff of the neck, it goes limp. Then you can move it to where you want it to be.

    Simple enough.

    The same applies to you. On all levels. Every stinking tiny and big level you can possibly imagine or ponder, mentally, physically, and emotionally.

    Understand this to the point that you live it, in each moment, 24/7. Until you shine that much light on your own ego-body, you will never resolve or understand the sheer depth of it's existence and control over your every thought formation, and mental projections in mind and what you call existence and life.

    so, your question should not all be about 'did the 'Illuminati' create or be involved in this 'satanic scenario, in order to **** us over', but...'did we, as a collective, drive to this place, and create it, whole cloth?'. And, does our lack of knowledge of this, as a reality, constitute the one thing that they do not want us to know?

    What did the ex head of the US Army Intelligence and Security Command, Major General Bert Stubblebine say? (He was also a chemist, by trade, as in 'alchemy', of a quantum nature, was his specialty) - and I paraphrase): 'If people only knew the power that they individually have at their command.....'

    Yes, things really are as serious as I'm trying to indicate, here. The undercurrent of what I'm trying to say REALLY IS what reality itself most seriously is.

    Stop lying to yourself, in fear and pain, and confusion. You are both the answer and the question. You. it is not external. It never was external and never will be. You.

    But, you see, the vast majority of the people who read this, will find that they somehow 'forget' what I just wrote here. They will forget it and move on, in minutes, in most cases.

    The real question should be, "Now..how did that happen?' How can you possibly manage to forget the way out? How?

    Think.......
    Last edited by Carmody; 19th December 2012 at 16:48.
    Interdimensional Civil Servant

  8. The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Carmody For This Post:

    astrid (20th December 2012), bennycog (19th December 2012), CdnSirian (20th December 2012), Curt (21st December 2012), D-Day (20th December 2012), DNA (20th December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), Flash (19th December 2012), Gardener (20th December 2012), hohoemi (19th December 2012), janus (19th December 2012), Mozart (19th December 2012), Paul (19th December 2012), Reinhard (19th December 2012), Reirrac (19th December 2012), Selene (21st December 2012), sigma6 (19th December 2012), skyflower (20th December 2012), sllim11 (19th December 2012), zebowho (19th December 2012)

  9. Link to Post #145
    Avalon Member SilentFeathers's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2012
    Location
    Appalachians/Earth
    Age
    56
    Posts
    2,967
    Thanks
    3,783
    Thanked 14,337 times in 2,741 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Pertaining to recent posts in this thread concerning "child sacrifice and rituals involving children" being possible in the sickest sense.....well here's some photos of rituals on the lighter side that are in your face and for all the world to see. (From the 2012 Olympic Ceremonies).



    Is this how "they" see children?



    Why portray children in hospital beds?



    Is this morbid portrayal of a child sane?



    What exactly is this suppose to mean?????



    Doesn't this remind you of the crucifixion?

    This is what these sicko's show us with the doors open, imagine what they are doing behind closed doors?????

    ADDED: DO NOT under-estimate what these sicko's are capable of!

    Evil has many layers of darkness and these critters dabble in the lowest and darkest layers of evil that there is.....

    "They" rely on the masses to be somewhat aware, but also rely on the masses to be in a collective state of "denial" to the depths of their actions and behaviors.
    Last edited by SilentFeathers; 19th December 2012 at 16:39.
    SilentFeathers

    "The journey is now, it begins with today. There are many paths, choose wisely."

  10. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to SilentFeathers For This Post:

    Curt (21st December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), Flash (19th December 2012), Gardener (20th December 2012), gooty64 (19th December 2012), Mozart (19th December 2012), Paul (20th December 2012), Reinhard (19th December 2012), seko (20th December 2012), sigma6 (20th December 2012)

  11. Link to Post #146
    Avalon Member sigma6's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th July 2011
    Location
    Tattooine
    Posts
    3,428
    Thanks
    8,903
    Thanked 12,614 times in 2,891 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    They also go for the "lone gunmen" theory for legal reasons, when saying Oswald was the lone gunman, I heard that it prevented higher level Federal Government forces from taking control of the investigations at the time. So it does make it possible to go to some small town in some state, hook up with the local scum bags (look under local government services) or maybe your local freemason lodge, start laying the cash on the table, work the bribes, set up the deal and carry out the hit.

    And keep higher levels of government forces out....
    As usual, criminal syndicates must just love milking this system.
    Last edited by sigma6; 19th December 2012 at 16:50.
    We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time
    By faith we understand things which are seen were not made of the things which are visible

  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sigma6 For This Post:

    bennycog (19th December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), Mozart (19th December 2012), Paul (20th December 2012), Referee (19th December 2012), Reinhard (19th December 2012)

  13. Link to Post #147
    United States Avalon Member EsmaEverheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Okie Land (Oklahoma)
    Posts
    205
    Thanks
    3,058
    Thanked 896 times in 172 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Has anyone seen the film, The Cabin In The Woods? For some reason that film comes to mind.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to EsmaEverheart For This Post:

    eaglespirit (19th December 2012), jagman (19th December 2012), seko (20th December 2012)

  15. Link to Post #148
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,534
    Thanks
    37,776
    Thanked 52,322 times in 8,827 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote Posted by Carmody (here)
    Quote this link is to a DHS excercise manual of sorts and it does talk about using actors in these excercises. I havent read the entire manual but am combing through it now. It does say a couple times "Recruit actors and manage actor logistics (e.g., waiver forms, applying moulage)"
    If anyone ever asks someone to be an 'actor' in their swat team paramilitary exercise, please be smart enough to turn it down.

    And RUN. Very far away.

    And as for the rest, CONSENSUS reality FORMATION.

    It is NOT a joke.

    It is NOT a conspiracy.

    The ego-body is like that, it makes sure that one insists that all potentials lie outside of the self. That way, it remains in charge of the self. After all it is the input/output data formation and polarization filter ,and it THINKS that it is in charge and it is based upon the emotional body as much as anything else.

    It IS the inner angry and emotional child. It IS the inner frightened and lost child.

    it DOES therefore... direct the formation of reality, weaving in and out of probability and timelines.

    It does indeed champion and drive this aspect of reality, as people refuse to realize it exists. They fail to realize that the conscious mind is confined to a box. a filtered box. And the animal, reptilian, and angry/frightened/scared/lost inner child, those components of the self are an underlying filter that ALL data, both ways, passes through and is altered by. The ego/body.

    So yes, it is 105% possible that the collective ego body created and/or 'pre-ordained', or 'temporally dragged us to that event and shape of event'. 105% possible. 110% possible.

    But, this will be ignored as the controller of the consciousness data input and output does not want to be displaced, so this can't be true and it HAS to be some other factor. Like evil otherness, right???

    This is how 'that which is evil' drives people to do what they want them to do, in the 'astral realms'. They make them FEAR. and when they fear, people retract into reactionary animal response.

    If you grab a kitten by the scruff of the neck, it goes limp. Then you can move it to where you want it to be.

    Simple enough.

    The same applies to you. On all levels. Every stinking tiny and big level you can possibly imagine or ponder, mentally, physically, and emotionally.

    Understand this to the point that you live it, in each moment, 24/7. Until you shine that much light on your own ego-body, you will never resolve or understand the sheer depth of it's existence and control over your every thought formation, and mental projections in mind and what you call existence and life.

    so, your question should not all be about 'did the 'Illuminati' create or be involved in this 'satanic scenario, in order to **** us over', but...'did we, as a collective, drive to this place, and create it, whole cloth?'. And, does our lack of knowledge of this, as a reality, constitute the one thing that they do not want us to know?

    What did the ex head of the US Army Intelligence and Security Command, Major General Bert Stubblebine say? (He was also a chemist, by trade, as in 'alchemy', of a quantum nature, was his specialty) - and I paraphrase): 'If people only knew the power that they individually have at their command.....'

    Yes, things really are as serious as I'm trying to indicate, here. The undercurrent of what I'm trying to say REALLY IS what reality itself most seriously is.

    Stop lying to yourself, in fear and pain, and confusion. You are both the answer and the question. You. it is not external. It never was external and never will be. You.

    But, you see, the vast majority of the people who read this, will find that they somehow 'forget' what I just wrote here. They will forget it and move on, in minutes, in most cases.

    The real question should be, "Now..how did that happen?' How can you possibly manage to forget the way out? How?

    Think.......
    This post above is very important

    For us at Avalon

    We may decide to go and pursue the mass thinking that follows in the traps already set aeons ago

    Or we may chose not to

    If we chose the latter, then we may very well decide to:

    see reality as it is now
    denounce what has to be denounce in order to change the reality
    see the other reality as it is now, meaning the collective definition of it and our input into it (the most difficult part imo)
    accept it and denounce it
    change by chosing another individual definition of reality, on individual basis (talking to myself here as well)
    help each other to do it
    change by choosing another collective definition of reality

    It could start at Avalon
    Last edited by Flash; 19th December 2012 at 17:01.

  16. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    astrid (20th December 2012), bennycog (19th December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), EsmaEverheart (19th December 2012), Gardener (20th December 2012), Mozart (19th December 2012), Paul (19th December 2012), Reinhard (19th December 2012), seko (20th December 2012)

  17. Link to Post #149
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,534
    Thanks
    37,776
    Thanked 52,322 times in 8,827 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
    Pertaining to recent posts in this thread concerning "child sacrifice and rituals involving children" being possible in the sickest sense.....well here's some photos of rituals on the lighter side that are in your face and for all the world to see. (From the 2012 Olympic Ceremonies).



    Is this how "they" see children?



    Why portray children in hospital beds?



    Is this morbid portrayal of a child sane?



    What exactly is this suppose to mean?????



    Doesn't this remind you of the crucifixion?

    This is what these sicko's show us with the doors open, imagine what they are doing behind closed doors?????

    ADDED: DO NOT under-estimate what these sicko's are capable of!

    Evil has many layers of darkness and these critters dabble in the lowest and darkest layers of evil that there is.....

    "They" rely on the masses to be somewhat aware, but also rely on the masses to be in a collective state of "denial" to the depths of their actions and behaviors.
    How come this was accepted by the mass of British viewers?
    Is pedophilia so engrained in the mind of British that they won't even have goose bump at seeing this?
    After all the scandals going on, how come nobody has brought this show up yet, publically, I bet the designers are in the pedophile groups.
    Are the British sooo sick that they won't ask questions? And demand responses. And refuse such presentations.
    This is a question the British people should ask themselves.

    IT is definitely litterally a sick show, in all its aspects, at first glance one can see it, why was it accepted - any benefit to hospitals for children (I doubt it).

  18. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    avid (19th December 2012), bennycog (19th December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), EsmaEverheart (19th December 2012), Gardener (20th December 2012), gooty64 (20th December 2012), Kristin (19th December 2012), Paul (19th December 2012), Reinhard (19th December 2012), seko (20th December 2012), sigma6 (19th December 2012), SilentFeathers (19th December 2012)

  19. Link to Post #150
    Avalon Member eaglespirit's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th November 2010
    Posts
    2,720
    Thanks
    50,159
    Thanked 25,160 times in 2,653 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    imho..it really is beyond the time for Us to ask for 'as direct' Higher Help as We can possibly get for all of this..
    yes...we do the work to turn it all around the best each of us may but because of the immense rigging and manipulation for years and years and years we really, really really need the help now...it is time.
    We CAN do this together..ask with ALL Your Heart!!
    We WILL get the help..again in my very humble and strong opinion!

  20. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to eaglespirit For This Post:

    Caren (20th December 2012), Carmody (19th December 2012), Curt (21st December 2012), Eram (20th December 2012), EsmaEverheart (19th December 2012), Gardener (20th December 2012), Heather2017 (19th December 2012), janus (19th December 2012), Marianne (19th December 2012), modwiz (19th December 2012), Reinhard (19th December 2012), RunningDeer (19th December 2012), seko (20th December 2012)

  21. Link to Post #151
    United States Avalon Member Referee's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th May 2011
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,823
    Thanks
    10,096
    Thanked 7,906 times in 1,566 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Facebook is now taking down accounts questioning official story. No big surprise

    Interesting look at possible 2nd shooter

    "A nation which has forgotten the quality of courage which in the past has been brought to public life is not as likely to insist upon or regard that quality in its chosen leaders today - and in fact we have forgotten. "John F. Kennedy


    Peace, Love and Consiousness
    Referee

  22. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Referee For This Post:

    778 neighbour of some guy (19th December 2012), avid (19th December 2012), bennycog (19th December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), EsmaEverheart (19th December 2012), Gardener (20th December 2012), heyokah (21st December 2012), hohoemi (19th December 2012), jagman (19th December 2012), modwiz (19th December 2012), Positive Vibe Merchant (20th December 2012), Reinhard (19th December 2012), seko (20th December 2012), Selene (21st December 2012), sigma6 (19th December 2012)

  23. Link to Post #152
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,534
    Thanks
    37,776
    Thanked 52,322 times in 8,827 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote Posted by eaglespirit (here)
    imho..it really is beyond the time for Us to ask for 'as direct' Higher Help as We can possibly get for all of this..
    yes...we do the work to turn it all around the best each of us may but because of the immense rigging and manipulation for years and years and years we really, really really need the help now...it is time.
    We CAN do this together..ask with ALL Your Heart!!
    We WILL get the help..again in my very humble and strong opinion!
    We have the help, we ARE the help, there is NO BUT.

  24. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Carmody (19th December 2012), Curt (21st December 2012), eaglespirit (19th December 2012), Gardener (20th December 2012), gooty64 (20th December 2012), Marianne (19th December 2012), modwiz (19th December 2012), Reinhard (19th December 2012), seko (20th December 2012)

  25. Link to Post #153
    Moderator Kristin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Age
    49
    Posts
    3,619
    Thanks
    15,960
    Thanked 14,920 times in 2,539 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    OK, I did look at the videos again

    Parker is talking from a prepared script, we can see it in the 8 minutes video. When getting outside to give his speech, after the auntie, he is very serious. He has one of those wide smile for less than a second just before starting (strange imo), however, I had known olympic speed skaters and they told me that when they have those huge smiles it is because they force and are in pain, they are not smiling, but I wil have this checked, because it is strange. However, it seems like a fake smile, because he is polite and not a real smile, we see that with the bottom eyelid that does not get higher as it would with real smiles and the wrinkles at the corner of the eyes. Afterwards, he speaks while reading his sheet at times. Yes, he has a script and it is normal when giving a speech. His eyebrows move when he talks of the talks he had with his daughter, which is fine, showing the communication he had. When there is emotion, his upper left eyelid for a few milliseconds, stays like glued there, it stays slightly down, the left side of the body correspond to emotions, the right to rational, and he shows definit sadness there. This happens a few times. He mentions his daughter at the present tense a few times, and at past tense a few times. For him, she is not gone yet, he has not assimilated the loss yet.

    His voice all along, after he starts, shakes when there is emotions, at the right times, as it would naturally, and small tremolos can be heard as well when there is emotions or change of memories, which is all coherent with what is said and which very few actors can act efficiently. I most often catch lies when listening to the voices.

    At the end of the speech, he says he will be glad to answers questions but when a reporter ask the first question, he pushes his tongue toward the bottom lip from the inside of the mouth, in the direction of the reported, which tells me he is not happy at all to answers the question (this is an internal f ck you), then he stick his tongue out a few times, this is called viper tongues, as well as wetting his lips. I have to check that one, what it means within the context.

    the sad eye: http://blog.synergologie.org/2011/05...-sinclair.html

    Following my teachers, James Holmes is far from crazy, he is very conscious of what he did and aware of what can go wrong for him

    http://blog.synergologie.org/2012/07...equilibre.html

    And for the fun of it, yes Kate loves Williams and it is a good relationship, while it was not the case for Diana and Charles, all in a kiss

    http://blog.synergologie.org/2011/05...s-baisers.html

    By the way, yes Sigma 6, he practiced looking in the camera and at people, and had a script, this does not mean he lies, the proof is in the micro movements

    But he is definitely used to talk in public, no single doubt.
    Thank you for this Flash, and great research! However, I can not assume that the responses are for the same reasons that you are suggesting. There could very well be many other underlying reasons for those same responses. But it is very important to note that the responses are there. Thank you!
    From the Heart,
    Kristin

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kristin For This Post:

    Flash (19th December 2012), Paul (20th December 2012)

  27. Link to Post #154
    Avalon Member sigma6's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th July 2011
    Location
    Tattooine
    Posts
    3,428
    Thanks
    8,903
    Thanked 12,614 times in 2,891 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote Posted by Referee (here)
    Facebook is now taking down accounts questioning official story. No big surprise
    Interesting look at possible 2nd shooter
    the school is in lockdown? (like it's a prison)
    good point by this newsguy, pointing out that they put him in the front seat
    that's a total DEAD GIVEAWAY (the cops are so arrogant, they didn't even pretend to put him in the backseat,
    cause they know how uncomfortable and humiliating it is (hypocritical scumbags imho)

    Wow, this is huge - (f**k)face (book) telling people what to think????????
    That is BIG BROTHER RIGHT IN YOUR FACE!! (book)

    Not allowed to ask questions?
    Not allowed to analyze?
    Not allowed to question the freemason police parasites?
    Not allowed to conjecture?

    F*** YOU Facebook!
    (scuuze my french)

    ...and now back to our sponsors... ( lol )
    We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time
    By faith we understand things which are seen were not made of the things which are visible

  28. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to sigma6 For This Post:

    Flash (20th December 2012), Gardener (20th December 2012), Jean-Luc (20th December 2012), Paul (20th December 2012), Referee (20th December 2012), Selene (21st December 2012), TargeT (19th December 2012)

  29. Link to Post #155
    Australia Avalon Member Positive Vibe Merchant's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th April 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    42
    Posts
    666
    Thanks
    2,351
    Thanked 1,597 times in 539 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Interesting Vid.

    Thanks for the upload
    I am the underdog, I am one of many faces,
    In a room full of people, I wouldn't change any places

  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Positive Vibe Merchant For This Post:

    bennycog (19th December 2012), Referee (20th December 2012)

  31. Link to Post #156
    Virgin Islands Avalon Member TargeT's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    St. Croix
    Age
    39
    Posts
    7,511
    Thanks
    21,385
    Thanked 39,599 times in 7,038 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    Quote Posted by Carmody (here)
    Quote this link is to a DHS excercise manual of sorts and it does talk about using actors in these excercises. I havent read the entire manual but am combing through it now. It does say a couple times "Recruit actors and manage actor logistics (e.g., waiver forms, applying moulage)"
    If anyone ever asks someone to be an 'actor' in their swat team paramilitary exercise, please be smart enough to turn it down.

    And RUN. Very far away.

    And as for the rest, CONSENSUS reality FORMATION.

    It is NOT a joke.

    It is NOT a conspiracy.

    The ego-body is like that, it makes sure that one insists that all potentials lie outside of the self. That way, it remains in charge of the self. After all it is the input/output data formation and polarization filter ,and it THINKS that it is in charge and it is based upon the emotional body as much as anything else.

    It IS the inner angry and emotional child. It IS the inner frightened and lost child.

    it DOES therefore... direct the formation of reality, weaving in and out of probability and timelines.

    It does indeed champion and drive this aspect of reality, as people refuse to realize it exists. They fail to realize that the conscious mind is confined to a box. a filtered box. And the animal, reptilian, and angry/frightened/scared/lost inner child, those components of the self are an underlying filter that ALL data, both ways, passes through and is altered by. The ego/body.

    So yes, it is 105% possible that the collective ego body created and/or 'pre-ordained', or 'temporally dragged us to that event and shape of event'. 105% possible. 110% possible.

    But, this will be ignored as the controller of the consciousness data input and output does not want to be displaced, so this can't be true and it HAS to be some other factor. Like evil otherness, right???

    This is how 'that which is evil' drives people to do what they want them to do, in the 'astral realms'. They make them FEAR. and when they fear, people retract into reactionary animal response.
    If you grab a kitten by the scruff of the neck, it goes limp. Then you can move it to where you want it to be.

    Simple enough.

    The same applies to you. On all levels. Every stinking tiny and big level you can possibly imagine or ponder, mentally, physically, and emotionally.

    Understand this to the point that you live it, in each moment, 24/7. Until you shine that much light on your own ego-body, you will never resolve or understand the sheer depth of it's existence and control over your every thought formation, and mental projections in mind and what you call existence and life.

    so, your question should not all be about 'did the 'Illuminati' create or be involved in this 'satanic scenario, in order to **** us over', but...'did we, as a collective, drive to this place, and create it, whole cloth?'. And, does our lack of knowledge of this, as a reality, constitute the one thing that they do not want us to know?

    What did the ex head of the US Army Intelligence and Security Command, Major General Bert Stubblebine say? (He was also a chemist, by trade, as in 'alchemy', of a quantum nature, was his specialty) - and I paraphrase): 'If people only knew the power that they individually have at their command.....'

    Yes, things really are as serious as I'm trying to indicate, here. The undercurrent of what I'm trying to say REALLY IS what reality itself most seriously is.

    Stop lying to yourself, in fear and pain, and confusion. You are both the answer and the question. You. it is not external. It never was external and never will be. You.

    But, you see, the vast majority of the people who read this, will find that they somehow 'forget' what I just wrote here. They will forget it and move on, in minutes, in most cases.

    The real question should be, "Now..how did that happen?' How can you possibly manage to forget the way out? How?

    Think.......
    This post above is very important

    For us at Avalon

    We may decide to go and pursue the mass thinking that follows in the traps already set aeons ago

    Or we may chose not to

    If we chose the latter, then we may very well decide to:

    see reality as it is now
    denounce what has to be denounce in order to change the reality
    see the other reality as it is now, meaning the collective definition of it and our input into it (the most difficult part imo)
    accept it and denounce it
    change by chosing another individual definition of reality, on individual basis (talking to myself here as well)
    help each other to do it
    change by choosing another collective definition of reality

    It could start at Avalon


    You both put together a very nice collection of words.

    Flash offers a bit more "actionable" suggestions, but even those (at least minorly) vague.

    I'm going to give you a perspective of "the average reader" (which I consider myself to be), and suggest you offer more detailed, actionable items for your "solution" other than statements like (and these are what I saw to be possible suggestions to "fix" the situation):

    Quote If you grab a kitten by the scruff of the neck, it goes limp. Then you can move it to where you want it to be.

    Simple enough.

    The same applies to you. On all levels. Every stinking tiny and big level you can possibly imagine or ponder, mentally, physically, and emotionally.

    Understand this to the point that you live it, in each moment, 24/7. Until you shine that much light on your own ego-body, you will never resolve or understand the sheer depth of it's existence and control over your every thought formation, and mental projections in mind and what you call existence and life.
    Here we have a hint that manipulation of "reactionary" programs is happening consistently "24/7" and simply being aware of this is the answer. I feel this is not specific enough, there are not examples to work with and this statement is sufficiently vague that nothing will come of posting something like this (unless I am missing something here? hopefully that is the case...)


    This statement almost contradicts the above statement, but not quite:
    Quote Stop lying to yourself, in fear and pain, and confusion. You are both the answer and the question. You. it is not external. It never was external and never will be. You.
    Ok, to me this is indicating that we have some sort of responsibility, or ability that we need to be aware of. I do not see anything that I can do with this statement other than feel sorry about my apparent lack of knowledge and possible cooperation (?) in the events that are happening daily; even though previously it seems it was hinted that some external force WAS acting to provoke a reactionary program (one that if I was just "aware of" it would no longer work, or perhaps be less effective).

    Quote If we chose the latter, then we may very well decide to:

    see reality as it is now
    ok, so how exactly? is this trying to build on the "filtering" concept that was mentioned by Cam. ? are you suggesting we realize our perspective is not necessarily correct, nor even the same as those around us?

    Quote denounce what has to be denounce in order to change the reality
    well what has to be denounced?

    Quote see the other reality as it is now, meaning the collective definition of it and our input into it (the most difficult part imo)
    accept it and denounce it
    well at least you said it's difficult, I'm finding that to be true, "denounce the collective definition" this seems pretty vague, can you offer a few examples, like "government is there to help people" or something similar; are you getting at the fact that we need to be reminded of the vast quantity of deceptions that occur every day or something else?

    Quote change by chosing another individual definition of reality, on individual basis (talking to myself here as well)
    help each other to do it
    change by choosing another collective definition of reality
    what do you mean by choosing, I don't choose to have to work because of forced scarcity in a universe of abundance, but it seems my "choosing" doesn't alter that fact much. I don't fully understand this "choice" you are speaking of, I decided long ago that "all is not as it seems" but I "seem" to have to continue to function within the parameters of the "game".

    Are yo suggesting something more a long the lines of the "free man" movement, should I shred my license, disassociate with banks, grow my own food & refuse to participate in the system (all things that I can see as "good" though in practical reality the few that try to do this usually end up even further entrenched in the "system"... usually a "system" that involves bars & cages).




    I try not to criticize without offering succinct solutions, if what you have to say is so important please spent a bit more time on what the reader "should do" with the information you present, these messages seem almost more like a shotgun full of blame with a hint at how to fix an issue, this website is entertaining and fun to participate in but ultimately I am here to learn, please help me do so.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  32. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Akasha (21st December 2012), Curt (21st December 2012), Paul (20th December 2012)

  33. Link to Post #157
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,534
    Thanks
    37,776
    Thanked 52,322 times in 8,827 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Target, I take this "criticism" of yours as an indication that I have to express myself better in the future. You are right in something, my own idea was not completely clear when I started. But to tell the truth, sometimes it is and yet I do not find the right words or ways to say it.

    Second, writing sometimes allows my thinking to go further. Sometimes this happens while I am writing, in which case I come back and add or delete, sometimes later in the day or the week. Sometimes I also see incomplete writings in others but it helps me to think further, so why not.

    Third, I may allow myself not to be the brightest at all times or the best writer. Sometimes because I am tired, other times because I am in a rush, other times because I am a clearly a bad writer in English and sometimes because my brain is plain stupider. If I should stop posting for this, I may ask the same from all other members and I have the weird feeling we would end up with less than half what is being posted at the present.

    Others times, I like to be plain stupid, the real blonde syndrome, call it what you want, it is relaxing to be it. Or I will like a good tease or laugh, which is not always appropriate in terms of place/form where i tease or joke.

    Finally, my own target here on Avalon is not only to learn, but also to have fun, rest from other chores or activities, exchange views and ideas and feelings, and then learn again, and finally may be find some solutions. And maybe nothing, so what.. Our objectives may just be different.

    NOW, since you asked, I will make an effort to be more descriptive. Reading your questions, I see that you, and most probably others, did not catch my drift. The blame is on the one communicating, therefore me.

    Let me do it in another post, because i have to sit, think, try to put feeling and visions (in terms of values and what I could foresee), often translate, all in written form and it takes time.

    Quote I try not to criticize without offering succinct solutions, if what you have to say is so important please spent a bit more time on what the reader "should do" with the information you present, these messages seem almost more like a shotgun full of blame with a hint at how to fix an issue, this website is entertaining and fun to participate in but ultimately I am here to learn, please help me do so.
    Last edited by Flash; 20th December 2012 at 00:53.

  34. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Gardener (20th December 2012), Paul (20th December 2012), TargeT (20th December 2012)

  35. Link to Post #158
    France Administrator Hervé's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    15,999
    Thanks
    56,254
    Thanked 88,656 times in 14,697 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    About those discrepancies... another way to look at 'em:

    From http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/20...evision-event/:


    How the Newtown Massacre Became a Mind-Control Television Event

    by Jon Rappoport
    www.nomorefakenews.com

    Mind control. Mass hypnosis. Operant conditioning. Brain entrainment. That’s what we’re talking about here. We’re so conditioned to how television covers life that we rarely step back and take notice. In the case of massive disasters and crimes, network news rules the roost. First, the premiere anchors, who are managing editors of their own broadcasts, give themselves the go signal. They will leave their comfortable chairs and travel to the scene of crime. “It’s that big.” The anchors lend gravitas. Their mere presence lets the audience know this story trumps all other news of the moment. That’s the first hypnotic cue and suggestion. Of course, the anchors were not in Newtown, Connecticut, as reporters. They weren’t there to dig up facts. Their physical presence at the Sandy Hook School and in the town was utterly irrelevant. They could have been doing their newscasts from their studios in New York. Or from a broom closet.

    But much better to be standing somewhere in Newtown. It imparts the sense of crisis to the viewing millions. At the same time, the anchors are also there to give assurance. The subliminal message they transmit is: whatever has happened here is controllable. The audience knows the anchors will provide the meaning and the official voice of the tragedy. The anchors are, in a way, priests, intoning their benediction to the suffering and their elegies to the dead. This is what the audience expects, and this is what they get.

    This expectation, in fact, is so deep that anything else would be considered an insult, a moral crime. For example, suppose a network suddenly shifted gears and began interviewing police and residents and asking tough questions about contradictions in the official scenario. Suppose that became the primary focus. Suppose the tone became argumentative, in the interest of, God forbid, the truth.

    In other words, in a jarring shift of perspective, the anchors began asking questions to seek answers. What a concept. No, a priest doesn’t browbeat a parishioner. He takes confession and then offers a route to redemption. But if, by some miracle, these anchors launched a quest for truth, the whole scene would devolve into uncertainty and even chaos. “First, there was a man in the woods. You people chased him. You pinned him down and brought him back into town. Who is he? What’s his name? Where is he? Is he under questioning? What are you asking him? What gave you a clue that he might be a second shooter? Come on. Talk to us. People want to know. We aren’t going anywhere. We want some answers.” This is called reporting, a foreign enterprise to these blown-dried kings and queens of media news “Sir, I know ABC definitively reported there was a second shooter. They said you gave them that information. Where did you get it?…No, I’m sorry, that’s not an answer, that’s a non-sequitur.” Those of us reporting online declare there is something amiss when the second-shooter story is dropped like a hot potato…and we are called conspiracy theorists.Get it? Trying to ask relevant questions becomes conspiracy only because the major media didn’t do their job in the first place. “Sir, was it one gun found in trunk of the car or three? Show me the car. Yes. Let’s see it. I want to get the license plate. Excuse me? The car is what, some kind of state secret? I don’t think so. There are twenty dead children in that school over there, and we want to get to the bottom of this. Take me to the car.” It’s called an investigation. Reporters do that.

    “Sir, your newspaper ran a story about a man’s body being found in Adam’s brother’s apartment. Then that became Adam’s mother found dead in her own house here in Newtown. What exactly happened there? A mistake? Wouldn’t you say that was a pretty big mistake? How did it happen? What’s that? Typical confusion in the early reporting of a crime? I don’t think so. Thinking a woman was a man and thinking he or she was found in New Jersey instead of Connecticut, that’s not typical at all. Did police find a man’s body. Speak up.”

    Your typical American television viewer would cringe at such demanding questions. You know why? Because he has been entrained and conditioned by news anchors to refrain from digging below the surface. In other words, that viewer is hypnotized. “Dr. Smith and Officer Jones, we understand that this boy, who was autistic, extremely shy, who had some sort of personality disorder, went into that school and methodically carried out the slaughter of twenty-seven people. In order for him to do that, he had to reload clips at least twice after the first clip ran out. Does that make sense? We’re not just talking about a violent outburst here, we’re talking about a methodical massacre. How do you explain that?” If these anchors kept on asking questions like this, do you know what would happen? The viewing audience would begin to stir, would begin to break through their hypnotic programming and wake up. “You know, he’s right. That doesn’t make sense. Maybe there really was a second shooter.”

    Or “that Lanza kid…maybe he didn’t kill anybody at all.” “What? You mean he was…set up?” “Maybe he was a patsy.” Yes. Instead of this kind of talk being consigned to “conspiracy nuts,” it actually becomes part of the evening news experience. Because reporters suddenly ask tough questions. But no. We have to go with grief and shock. We have to lead with it and stay with it. But that is an artificial construct. Yes, of course people in Newtown feel great shock and pain and loss and grief and horror, but the news producers are consciously moving minutes and hours of it through the tube and filtering out everything else. They do this every time one of these events occurs, and so the audience expects it and soaks it in and, in that state of entrainment and hypnosis, the audience doesn’t want anything else…because anything else would BREAK THE FLOW and the spell, and the grief would no longer have the same impact. Newtown is presented as a television event. From the outset, the mood is funereal. It has that tinge and coloration. The audience absorbs it and wants no intrusion on it. This is Matrix programming.

    The anchor is not only the priest, but also the teacher. He/she shows the audience how to experience the event and what to feel and what to think and how to act. One of the great skills of an anchor is the ability to present the news seamlessly. This is what those big paychecks are for: the blends and segueways and the underlying tone of sincerity that bleeds into every detail of what is being reported.

    That is also hypnotic. It sets up a frequency that moves into the brains of the audience. In those brains, it’s an Acceptance-frequency. It’s the mark of a great news anchor, to be able to transmit that and achieve it. Scott Pelley (CBS) has only some of that. Diane Sawyer (ABC) is decidedly inconsistent in her ability to deploy it. Brian Williams (NBC) is the contemporary master. That’s why he’s been called the Walter Cronkite of the 21st century. “Sir, we have a report that police pinned a second man on the ground just outside the school. What is his name? What did you do with him? Where is he now.” No, no, no, no, no. That would crack the Acceptance-frequency like an egg and send the evening news to hell in a handbasket. “Sir, I’m glad we finally located you. We understand you were getting ready to go to Bermuda. Now, you were Adam Lanza’s doctor. What drugs did you prescribe him? Not just recently, but going all the way back to the beginning. You see, we’ve compiled a list of possible drugs for Asperger’s and autism and depression, and of course we see that they do, in fact, induce violent behavior. Suicide, homicide. Speak up, Doctor.” The egg not only cracks in that case, the news anchor is suspended the next day, and the network releases a statement that his “breakdown” on camera was brought on by stress. Pharmaceutical companies put him on their “to-do” list. Yet, the questions about the drugs are exactly what a real reporter would ask. Not a “conspiracy theorist.” A reporter, on the scene in Newtown. Anyone who thinks that is absurd and out of bounds is hypnotized, programmed. That’s all there is to it.Traditional media are dying in this country. Their money is drying up. They could revitalize themselves in a New York minute if they really started COVERING stories and waking up their audience, but that’s not on their agenda. They would rather die. They are the hired hands of the elites that own this country. They are the whores sent out every day by their pimps, and they know what their job is and what it isn’t.

    The direction of elite television news is squeezed down the path of consciously constructing artificial events, for mass consumption experienced in a state of emotional, mental, physical, and spiritual mind-control. Those reporters who venture outside that framework are labeled fringe figures on the margins “Lieutenant, excuse me. Hello. Brian Williams, NBC News. I was wondering: if there had been armed employees inside the school, what are the chances the killer could have been stopped before he shot all those children? You know, people who have been trained to shoot and have concealed carry permits. Strong people who could confront a murderer.” Oh, people say, that is not a reasonable question. That’s a nutcase question. That question shouldn’t be asked. Why not? You want the real answer? Because it destroys the hypnotic frequency that is being delivered by the television networks. That’s the real answer. The viewer: “Don’t bother me, I’m hypnotized. Don’t interrupt the frequency my brain is absorbing while I’m watching the news.”

    And of course, under those conditions, the very last person who should interrupt the hypnotic flow is the anchor himself. He’s the one who’s inducing the hypnosis in the first place.That tells you the anchor is quite definitely NOT there to dig up new facts or perspectives himself. Entrainment means: the brain is being bathed in rhythms and frequencies that literally train it to accept the information that is being transmitted at the same time. In the same way, a song can succeed because the melody (carrier frequency) makes the trite lyrics seem important. Entrainment also makes the recipient feel he is part of something larger. This is a key component. The recipient senses he is a member of a collective that is sharing a moment, an experience. “I feel this way, and everybody else does too.”

    This is what substitutes, in our society, for individual experience and self-sufficiency. But this collective is not real community. It only appears and feels that way. It is mass hypnosis. You can find that in Gregorian chants and in sermons. You can find it in political speeches. The brain is bathed in certain harmonies and responds by Accepting. The Globalists’ language is replete with entrainment. “We are all in this together.” “We are healing the planet.” “All of us must strive to make a better world for our children.” It sounds right, it seems right, but it is delivered to create a collective instead of a real community. Take a few minutes and read Monsanto’s literature. Read it out loud. Listen to yourself. Try to impart convincing rhythms to the phrases. All of a sudden, you’re in the flow. You’re practicing entrainment. This is what network television news does. And we aren’t even talking about the hypnotic effects of the physical signals that deliver the picture to the audience.

    In a previous article, I pointed out that, if we are to believe the network coverage of the Newtown massacre, there wasn’t one angry outraged man or woman in the town. Because we didn’t see them onscreen. The networks made sure of that. This was a conscious choice on their part. “My son died in that school and I want to know why. I want to know exactly how the killer got in there. Who let him in? How did he get in? I WANT TO KNOW.” Sorry, that isn’t part of the coverage. It would interrupt the entrainment. “Sorry, sir, you’ll have to back away. We’re doing mass hypnosis and mind control here. You’re breaking the rhythm.”

    Instead, that angry man will be funneled to a grief counselor, who will try to soothe his outrage. “Sir, we all have to find a way to begin the healing.” Events like Newtown are extraordinary teaching moments for television. Network newscasts display a constellation of emotions that are deemed “acceptable and appropriate” for the audience to experience. And the audience is thereby trained to mirror those emotions, to feel them, to express them, to soak in them.

    It’s a closed system.

    This is how, incidentally, gun control works so well. It’s part of the overall message. The audience, existing inside that closed system, in that state of mass hypnosis, can be pointed to exactly the wrong remedy for the tragedy. All the network anchor has to do is frown and shake his head a little, when the subject of guns arises. That’s all it takes, and the brains of the audience suck it in: “Yes, of course. Take away the guns. If no one had guns, no one could shoot guns. No one would die. No crimes would be committed. How obvious.” The capstone that makes this puerile grand solution seem reasonable is: the police are always the good guys; we can trust them; they can have all the guns and then everything will be all right. That message is also imparted by the big-time network new anchors. These kings and queens don’t ask police the tough questions. They refrain from doing that.In fact, the anchors ARE surrogate police chiefs. They express what the police chiefs would, if they had the anchors’ skills. The anchors do stand-ups in Newtown and give us the absolute best of what the police would if they could. And in the process, they transmit: Entrainment. Mass hypnosis. Mind control. Operant conditioning. It’s perfect, if you want to be an android.

    Jon Rappoport
    Last edited by Hervé; 20th December 2012 at 02:10.
    "La réalité est un rêve que l'on fait atterrir" San Antonio AKA F. Dard

    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede.

  36. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    Akasha (21st December 2012), Antagenet (21st December 2012), Bill Ryan (15th January 2013), Curt (21st December 2012), DNA (20th December 2012), Gardener (20th December 2012), Paul (20th December 2012), Referee (20th December 2012), seko (20th December 2012), Selene (21st December 2012), Sir Eltor (22nd December 2012), Spacyman (20th December 2012), TargeT (20th December 2012)

  37. Link to Post #159
    Avalon Member T Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th January 2011
    Posts
    967
    Thanks
    4,619
    Thanked 3,667 times in 860 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote Posted by Hermite (here)
    As much as I agree that there are things about this that don't add up, I find this totally disrespectful of the grieving parents. A simple Google will show hundreds of links for the funerals held yesterday. Here's one, for instance. http://www.vosizneias.com/119625/201...ewish-victims/

    Plus, Investigators are searching smashed computers for clues to a motive behind the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.
    http://www.waff.com/story/20361117/f...ooting-victims

    Most interesting is that there are 2 people recovering from their wounds, eye-witnesses, and it will be quite revealing to hear what they have to say, if we are ever privy to that information.
    While I understand your point, this list and these questions pale in comparison to the media circus and political exploitation of this tragedy, to mention utter disrespect for the grieving families.

    In my view, the best way to honor the victims is to seek the truth to what happened.

  38. The Following User Says Thank You to T Smith For This Post:

    Referee (20th December 2012)

  39. Link to Post #160
    Avalon Member sigma6's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th July 2011
    Location
    Tattooine
    Posts
    3,428
    Thanks
    8,903
    Thanked 12,614 times in 2,891 posts

    Default Re: What Really Happened at Sandy Hook??

    Quote What did the ex head of the US Army Intelligence and Security Command, Major General Bert Stubblebine say? (He was also a chemist, by trade, as in 'alchemy', of a quantum nature, was his specialty) - and I paraphrase): 'If people only knew the power that they individually have at their command.....'
    Yes, things really are as serious as I'm trying to indicate, here. The undercurrent of what I'm trying to say REALLY IS what reality itself most seriously is.
    Stop lying to yourself, in fear and pain, and confusion. You are both the answer and the question. You. it is not external. It never was external and never will be. You.
    I agree with a lot of what you are saying Carmody, I know someone studying the I AM discourses and meeting up with a student of the Ascended Masters, he said they told hime there was a meeting in 1887 with the world elite at the time how they were supposed to set up 'commerce' (or some system for managing all the wealth) and he said they also mentioned to him that everything today is set up to "tempt souls"... have to admit, I didn't find that too hard to believe...

    I just made a recent post on the potential of mind, funny you mentioned it... Mind Science Kept Hidden
    Last edited by sigma6; 23rd December 2012 at 11:54.
    We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time
    By faith we understand things which are seen were not made of the things which are visible

  40. The Following User Says Thank You to sigma6 For This Post:

    Curt (21st December 2012)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 46 FirstFirst 1 8 18 46 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts